The Impact of Comprehensive Fetal Care on Mortality of Children With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia when Delivery is Co-located in a Pediatric Hospital.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of delivery at a comprehensive fetal care center co-located in a pediatric hospital on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) exposure and survivorship of children with CDH. METHODS: This retrospective study includes maternal-fetal dyads with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated CDH who received any prenatal care at a single fetal center between February 2006 and March 2021. The principal variables included: (1) delivery setting (children born in the pediatric hospital ["inborn"] vs. children who were delivered elsewhere ["outborn"]), (2) exposure to ECMO (yes vs. no), and (3) survival-at-discharge from birth hospitalization (yes vs. no). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between delivery setting and ECMO cannulation, and whether delivery setting moderates the association between exposure to ECMO and survival-at-discharge. RESULTS: Among 418 maternal-fetal dyads, 77.0% of children were inborn and 32.0% of children were exposed to ECMO during their index hospitalization. Inborn children had more severe prenatal prognostic indicators but had a 57% lower odds of extracorporeal than outborn children. In multivariable logistic regression, delivery setting moderated the association between exposure to ECMO and survival-at-discharge. Although there was no statistically significant difference in mortality between inborn and outborn children who were not exposed to ECMO, inborn children exposed to ECMO had a 6.86 (1.98, 23.74) increased odds of death and outborn children exposed to ECMO had a 17.71 (4.69, 66.87) increased odds of death when both were compared to non-cannulated outborn children. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive fetal care with delivery co-located in a pediatric hospital was associated with decreased exposure to ECMO and a survivorship advantage among children with CDH who required extracorporeal support. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Dignity-Conserving Practice.

The acknowledgment and promotion of dignity is commonly viewed as the cornerstone of person-centered care. Although the preservation of dignity is often highlighted as a key tenet of palliative care provision, the concept of dignity and its implications for practice remain nebulous to many clinicians. Dignity in care encompasses a series of theories describing different forms of dignity, the factors that impact them, and strategies to encourage dignity-conserving care. Different modalities and validated instruments of dignity in care have been shown to lessen existential distress at the end of life and promote patient-clinician understanding. It is essential that palliative care clinicians be aware of the impacts of dignity-related distress, how it manifests, and common solutions that can easily be adapted, applied, and integrated into practice settings. Dignity-based constructs can be learned as a component of postgraduate or continuing education. Implemented as a routine component of palliative care, they can provide a means of enhancing patient-clinician relationships, reducing bias, and reinforcing patient agency across the span of serious illness. Palliative care clinicians-often engaging patients, families, and communities in times of serious illness and end of life-wield significant influence on whether dignity is intentionally integrated into the experience of health care delivery. Thus, dignity can be a tangible, actionable, and measurable palliative care goal and outcome. This article, written by a team of palliative care specialists and dignity researchers, offers 10 tips to facilitate the implementation of dignity-centered care in serious illness.

Addressing health equity in pediatric surgical care in the United States- Progress and challenges.

There are notable inequities in health outcomes for children based on their social determinants of health (SDOH), including where they are born and live, their primary language, their race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and more. These health inequities are not restricted to resource limited settings; here we highlight three broad topics that are relevant to pediatric surgeons in the United States (US): access to care and disparities, and examples of inequities in firearm-related injuries and appendicitis. Most of our patients will at some point require operative interventions, yet there can be significant challenges in accessing this care and navigating our health systems, particularly around complex perioperative care. There are significant opportunities to improve equitable care by helping patients navigate our health systems and connecting them with additional resources, including screening for primary care services. Firearm-related injuries are now the leading cause of death in children in the US, with significant associated morbidity for non-fatal injuries. There are notable inequities in the risk of injury and types of injuries experienced by children based on their SDOH. Appendicitis is one of the most common pathologies managed by pediatric surgeons, with similar inequities in the rates of perforated appendicitis based on a child's SDOH. For both issues, addressing the inequities our patients experience requires moving upstream and working towards prevention. Key opportunities include better research and data to understand the drivers for observed inequities, multidisciplinary collaboration, community engagement, and public health advocacy among others. As a profession, we have a responsibility to work to address the health inequities our patients experience.

Birth Admission Length-of-Stay and Hospital Readmission in Children With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with prolonged birth admission length of stay (LOS) and to evaluate the association between these characteristics and readmission in the year following discharge for children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of children with isolated CDH born in the Special Delivery Unit and admitted to the Newborn/Infant Intensive Care Unit at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from April 2008 to August 2019. Birth admission hospitalization was categorized into 3 groups (≤35, 36-75, and >76 days) based on the data distribution. Participant factors included gestational age (days), side of CDH (right/left), liver position (up/down), CDH repair technique (open/minimally invasive), exposure to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, lung-to-head circumference ratio, and feeding tube at discharge. Chi-squared, t-tests and analysis of variance were used to examine bivariable associations between participant characteristics, birth admission LOS and readmission in the year following initial hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with readmission. RESULTS: Children hospitalized ≥76 days at birth had 4.33 (95% CI: 1.2, 15.2) higher odds of readmission than those admitted for ≤35 days. Children with a non-operative feeding tube at discharge had 4.12 (895% CI: 1.6, 10.5) higher odds of readmission when compared to those with no feeding tube at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Longer birth hospitalization and non-operative feeding tube are associated with increased readmissions in the year after discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Non-English Primary Language: A Growing Population's Access to Cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine access to cholecystectomy and postoperative outcomes among non-English primary-speaking patients. BACKGROUND: The population of U.S. residents with limited English proficiency is growing. Language affects health literacy and is a well-recognized barrier to health care in the United States of America. Historically marginalized communities are at greater risk of requiring emergent gallbladder operations. However, little is known about how primary language affects surgical access and outcomes of common surgical procedures, such as cholecystectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients after receipt of cholecystectomy in Michigan, Maryland, and New Jersey utilizing the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (2016-2018). Patients were classified by primary spoken language: English or non-English. The primary outcome was admission type. Secondary outcomes included operative setting, operative approach, in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and length of stay. Multivariable logistics and Poisson regression were used to examine outcomes. RESULTS: Among 122,013 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 91.6% were primarily English speaking and 8.4% were non-English primary language speaking. Primary non-English speaking patients had a higher likelihood of emergent/urgent admissions (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.04-1.44, P = 0.015) and a lower likelihood of having an outpatient operation (odds ratio: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.91, P = 0.0008). There was no difference in the use of a minimally invasive approach or postoperative outcomes based on the primary language spoken. CONCLUSIONS: Non-English primary language speakers were more likely to access cholecystectomy through the emergency department and less likely to receive outpatient cholecystectomy. Barriers to elective surgical presentation for this growing patient population need to be further studied.

Introducing Surgical Equity into Contemporary Medical Education: Results From Operation Equity, a Pilot Curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: To date, education about health equity for early-stage healthcare trainees is largely situated outside of surgical disciplines. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical equity curriculum offered to a voluntary group of medical and graduate students. DESIGN: Mixed-methods cohort study from January to June 2021. Pre- and post-course surveys measured domains of attitudes, self-reported confidence, and knowledge via 5-point Likert scale and multiple-choice questions. Paired t tests were used to analyze quantitative responses. Qualitative responses were studied via iterative thematic analysis. SETTING: At the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA which provides tertiary level, institutional care, 10, interdisciplinary 1.5-hour sessions were held over 1 semester, teaching surgical equity topics that spanned the peri-operative continuum. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four medical and graduate students from across the University of Pennsylvania enrolled. Twenty completed both surveys. RESULTS: From pre- to post-course, students improved across all domains. Students improved in their self-rated ability to identify strategies to talk about sensitive health topics with patients (pre: 20%, post: 90%) and identify strategies to address healthcare disparities in surgery (pre: 10%, post: 90%). Qualitatively, from pre- to post-course, more students could articulate the role of bias and identify opportunities for surgeons to engage in surgical equity. The course strengthened any pre-existing interest in surgical equity, and for 1 student, created interest in a surgical career where it had not previously existed. Many also expressed greater resolve to provide patient-centric care. CONCLUSIONS: Formal curricula can improve students' ability to advocate for surgical equity. A similar framework may fill a need for medical students interested in health equity and surgical careers at other institutions.

The Patient Dignity Inventory and Dignity-Related Distress among the Critically Ill.

CONTEXT: Critical illness confers a significant risk of psychological distress, both during and after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The Patient Dignity Inventory is a 25-item instrument initially designed to measure psychosocial, existential and symptom-related distress in terminally ill patients. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to validate the inventory as a means of identifying distress in inpatient critical care settings. METHODS: Single-center prospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to one of five ICUs within the University of Pennsylvania Health System for greater than 48 hours from January 2019 to February 2020. Patients completed the inventory in addition to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-seven questionnaires. RESULTS: The tool's internal structure was assessed via principal components analysis. 155 participants consented, completed the surveys and were included for analysis. Scores on the inventory showed evidence of internal consistency when used in critical care settings (Cronbach's α=0.95). Moreover, principal components analysis elucidated four themes prevalent in critically-ill patients: Illness-related Concerns, Interactions with Others, Peace of Mind and Dependency. Construct validity was assessed through correlational analysis with depression and anxiety questionnaires. Scores on the inventory appear to be valid for assessing dignity-related psychological concerns in the critical care setting although there is overlap among components and with anxiety and depression scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the inventory can be used to assess patient distress in critical care settings. Further research may elucidate the role of dignity-based interventions in treating and preventing post-intensive care psychological symptoms.

The Center for Surgical Health: A Compassion-Driven Urban Surgical Mission.

We are the Center for Surgical Health (CSH), an academic community partnership that supports, educates, and advocates for vulnerable Philadelphians with surgical diseases, founded in 2016 by Dr. Jon B. Morris, a leader in surgical education and a general surgeon at the University of Pennsylvania, and Dr. Alan Herbst, a current third-year Penn general surgery resident. At the time, Dr. Morris, raised in a Reform Jewish household, had been participating in an RCIA Program to convert to Catholicism. The mission of providing surgery to uninsured patients, primarily undocumented individuals, by helping them obtain insurance and see Penn providers was seen by Dr. Morris as a form of Catholic charity, which he has continued to remain dedicated to as his faith in Jesus Christ has deepened. Dr. Herbst, now Associate Director of Clinics for the CSH, recalls working with Dr. Morris as a sub-intern during his conversion, beginning with passion and a neon poster board inviting people to "See the Surgeon." Since that time, the CSH has grown from an organization with 10 volunteers, called "personal patient navigators," who provide insurance support and advocacy at every step of the perioperative continuum, to one with over 50, who have now seen 156 patients and assisted in providing 49 needed procedures. Much of this growth has been brought about through the dedication and vision of Dr. Matthew Goldshore, the Deputy Director of the CSH and a fifth-year Penn general surgery resident, as well as Dr. Carrie Z. Morales, Associate Deputy Director of the CSH and a recent Perelman School of Medicine graduate. Through their leadership, and the talent and commitment of other members of the CSH board, overseen by Director Dr. Morris, the CSH now has policy and research divisions, a surgical equity curriculum, and continues to develop new ways of providing better care.

An RCT of Fecal Immunochemical Test Colorectal Cancer Screening in Veterans Without Recent Primary Care.

INTRODUCTION: The use of screening can prevent death from colorectal cancer, yet people without regular healthcare visits may not realize the benefits of this preventive intervention. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a mailed screening invitation or mailed fecal immunochemical test in increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake in veterans without recent primary care encounters. STUDY DESIGN: Three-arm pragmatic randomized trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Participants were screening-eligible veterans aged 50-75 years, without a recent primary care visit who accessed medical services at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veteran Affairs Medical Center between January 1, 2017, and July 31, 2017. All data were analyzed from March 1, 2018, to July 31, 2018. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to (1) usual opportunistic screening during a healthcare visit (n=260), (2) mailed invitation to screen and reminder phone calls (n=261), or (3) mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach plus reminder calls (n=61). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome under investigation was the completion of colorectal cancer screening within 6 months after randomization. RESULTS: Of 782 participants in the trial, 53.9% were aged 60-75 years and 59.7% were African American. The screening rate was higher in the mailed fecal immunochemical test group (26.1%) compared with usual care (5.8%) (rate difference=20.3%, 95% CI=14.3%, 26.3%; RR=4.52, 95% CI=2.7, 7.7) or screening invitation (7.7%) (rate difference=18.4%, 95% CI=12.2%, 24.6%; RR=3.4, 95% CI=2.1, 5.4). Screening completion rates were similar between invitation and usual care (rate difference=1.9%, 95% CI= -2.4%, 6.2%; RR=1.3, 95% CI=0.7, 2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Mailed fecal immunochemical test screening promotes colorectal cancer screening participation among veterans without a recent primary care encounter. Despite the addition of reminder calls, an invitation letter was no more effective in screening participation than screening during outpatient appointments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT02584998.

Pediatric firearm mortality in the United States, 2010 to 2016: A National Trauma Data Bank analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric firearm injury is a leading cause of death for U.S. children. We sought to further characterize children who die from these injuries using a validated national database. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank 2010 to 2016 was queried for patients aged 0 to 19 years old. International Classification of Diseases external cause of injury codes were used to classify patients by intent. Differences between groups were analyzed using χ or Mann-Whitney U tests. Patterns over time were analyzed using nonparametric tests for trend. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate associations between the above factors and mortality. RESULTS: There were a total of 45,288 children with firearm injuries, 12.0% (n = 5,412) of whom died. Those who died were younger and more often white than survivors. Mortality was associated with increased injury severity, shock on presentation, and polytrauma (p < 0.001 for all). There was an increasing trend in the proportion of self-inflicted injuries over the study period (p < 0.001), and mortality from these self-inflicted injuries increased concordantly (35.3% in 2010 to 47.8% in 2016, p = 0.001). Location of severe injuries had significant different mortality rates, ranging from 51.3% of head injuries to 3.9% in the extremities. In the multivariable model, treatment at a pediatric trauma center was protective against mortality, with odds ratios of 2.10 (confidence interval, 1.64-2.68) and 1.80 (confidence interval, 1.39-2.32) for death at adult and dual-designated trauma centers, respectively. This finding was confirmed in age-stratified cohorts. CONCLUSION: Proportions of self-inflicted pediatric firearm injury in the National Trauma Data Bank increased from 2010 to 2016, as did mortality from self-inflicted injury. Because mortality is highest in this subpopulation, prevention and treatment efforts should be prioritized in this group of firearm-injured children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological study, level V.

Defining the role of angioembolization in pediatric isolated blunt solid organ injury.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and outcomes of angiography in pediatric patients with blunt solid organ injury (SOI). METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (2010-2014) was queried for patients ≤19 years who experienced isolated blunt SOI. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate characteristics associated with radiological and surgical intervention. RESULTS: Patients with isolated blunt injuries to the spleen (n = 7542), liver (n = 4549), and kidney (n = 2640) were identified. Use of angiography increased yearly from 1.6% to 3.1% of cases (p = 0.001) and was associated with older age (OR 2.61 [CI: 1.94-3.50], p < 0.001) and grade III or higher injury (OR 4.63 [CI: 3.11-6.90], p < 0.001). Odds of angiography were 4.9 times higher at adult trauma centers (TCs) than pediatric TCs overall, and almost 9 times higher for isolated splenic trauma (p < 0.001 for each). There was no improvement in splenic salvage after angiography for high grade injuries (3.5% vs. 4.8%, p = NS). Only 1.8% of cases began within 30 min of arrival (median time = 3.6 h). CONCLUSION: Variability exists in the utilization of angiography in pediatric blunt SOI between adult and pediatric TCs, with no improvement in splenic salvage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - Treatment study.

Life-saving interventions in pediatric trauma: A National Trauma Data Bank experience.

BACKGROUND: Emergent procedures are infrequent in pediatric trauma. We sought to determine the frequency and efficacy of life-saving interventions (LSI) performed for pediatric trauma patients within the first hour of care at a trauma center. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank (2010-2014) was queried for patients 19 years or younger who underwent LSIs within 1 hour of arrival to the emergency department. Life-saving interventions included emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) and emergent airway procedures (EAP). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of patient and hospital characteristics on mortality. RESULTS: Of 725,284 recorded traumatic encounters, only 1,488 (0.2%) pediatric patients underwent at least one of the defined LSI during the 5-year study period (EDT, 1,323; EAP, 187). Most patients (85.6%) were 15 years or older. Mortality was high but varied by procedure type (EDT, 64.3%; EAP, 28.3%). Mortality for patients younger than 1 year undergoing EDT was 100%, decreasing to 62.6% in patients aged 15 years to 19 years. For EAP, mortality ranged from 66.7% for infants to 27.2% in 15-year-old to 19-year-old patients. Lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, higher Injury Severity Score, presence of shock, and a blunt mechanism of injury were independently associated with mortality in the EDT cohort. On average, trauma centers in this study performed approximately one LSI per year, with only 13.8% of cases occurring at a verified pediatric trauma center. CONCLUSION: Life-saving interventions in the pediatric trauma population are uncommon and outcomes variable. Novel solutions to keep proficient at such interventions should be sought, especially for younger children. Guidelines to improve identification of appropriate candidates for LSI are critical given their rare occurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, III.

Laparoscopic Management of Pediatric Abdominal Trauma: A National Trauma Data Bank Experience.

Purpose: To characterize injury patterns and institutional trends associated with the utilization of laparoscopy in the management of pediatric abdominal trauma. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank (2010-2014) was queried for encounters involving patients ≤14 years who underwent an open or laparoscopic abdominal operation within 48 hours of emergency department arrival. Patient, injury, and hospital characteristics associated with each approach were identified. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of patient and hospital characteristics on operative approach. Results: Laparoscopy comprised 7.8% (n = 355) of all abdominal trauma operations. Patients undergoing laparoscopy had lower injury severity scores and higher Glasgow Coma Scale scores on arrival compared with laparotomy subjects (P < .001). Laparoscopic patients also had a shorter length of hospital stay (5.0 versus 8.6 days, P < .001), but longer time to the operating room (9.2 versus 6.3 hours, P < .001) compared with their open counterparts. The proportion of cases managed laparoscopically increased from 6.2% in 2010 to 10.1% in 2014 (P = .013), with increase in utilization primarily driven by university hospitals (P = .026) and level I pediatric trauma centers (P = .043). Conversion to laparotomy was uncommon (18.6%), and mortality in the laparoscopic cohort was low (0.4%). Conclusions: Use of laparoscopy has increased in the pediatric abdominal trauma population, typically in a less injured cohort of patients. As familiarity with and availability of minimally invasive techniques increase, this trend will likely continue.