[Regenerative effect of comprehensive physiotherapeutic programs in the early postoperative period in patients with chronic paraproctitis]. / Regenerativnyi effekt primeneniya kompleksnykh fizioterapevticheskikh programm v rannem posleoperatsionnom periode u bol'nykh khronicheskim paraproktitom.

The modern lifestyle is often associated with low physical activity and blood stasis in the pelvic organs, which leads to increased incidence of proctological diseases, and increasingly in people of young working age. Chronic paraproctitis is the third most common proctological disorder that requires surgical treatment. The disease occurs commonly in the age group of 30-50 years, predominantly in men, which determines its socio-economic significance. It indicates the urgent need for advanced comprehensive physiotherapeutic programs for early rehabilitation of patients after surgery for chronic paraproctitis, and the application of new diagnostic technologies for assessment of surgery effectiveness and postoperative changes to provide adequate and effective medical rehabilitation. One of the main goals in the early postoperative period is the acceleration of adequate scar formation and reduction of the postoperative wound healing time; therefore, it seems reasonable to assess regeneration processes using transrectal ultrasound examination and sonoelastography of the scar tissue, which have great potential for use in coloproctology. OBJECTIVE: To study the role of the medical rehabilitation program in the early postoperative period on the adequate scar formation and postoperative wound healing processes (by transrectal ultrasound investigation and scar tissue sonoelastography) as well as postoperative complications rate and long-term (up to 12 months) treatment outcomes in patients with chronic paraproctitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 60 patients 20-69 years with chronic pararectal fistulas (ICD-10: K60.4). The patients were assigned into two groups. The control group consisted of 30 patients who received standard of care in the early postoperative period, including analgesics, local antibacterial ointments (Levomekol, etc.), and rectal suppositories (Relief Pro, etc.). The main group also consisted of 30 patients who received standard of care and a 5-day comprehensive physiotherapeutic program starting the second day after the surgery. Effectiveness was assessed by complex transrectal ultrasound investigation with color Doppler mapping, Doppler sonography, and sonoelastography at various post-surgery time points. RESULTS: The higher efficacy of the rehabilitation program, including intravenous ozone therapy, rectal laser therapy, recto-tibial myostimulation, and biofeedback therapy in the early postoperative period, versus the standard of care, was shown. CONCLUSION: The introduction of rehabilitation program including intravenous ozone therapy, rectal laser therapy, recto-tibial myostimulation, and biofeedback therapy in the early postoperative period significantly reduced the average postoperative wound healing time by accelerating the formation of an adequate scar (according to transrectal ultrasound investigation and scar tissue sonoelastography) and the incidence of postoperative complications and improved the long-term treatment outcomes (up to 12 months) in patients with chronic paraproctitis.

[Surgical treatment of mega aorta syndrome: a single-center experience]. / Khirurgicheskoe lechenie sindroma megaaorty: opyt odnogo tsentra.

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience in the treatment of severe patients with mega aorta syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 49 patients with mega aorta syndrome for the period from May 2015 to March 2021. All patients underwent total aortic replacement from sinotubular junction (with staged aortic root repair, if necessary) to abdominal aorta bifurcation. All surgeries were elective. All patients were divided into two groups: group I (n=33; 67.3%) - staged replacement, group II (n=16; 32.7%) - one-staged replacement of the aorta via thoracophrenolumbotomy. The primary endpoints were mortality, perioperative parameters and complications. We also analyzed long-term freedom from aortic redo surgery and survival rate. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable by pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters. The interval between surgeries for staged approach was 7.1±2.3 months. Rehabilitation time considering two stages was longer in group I (13±2 vs. 5.5±1.1 months, p=0.0001). Between-stage mortality rate was 12% (n=4). Intraoperative mortality was absent in both groups. In-hospital mortality was 3% and 12% (p=0.25), overall mortality with between-stage interval - 10.2% and 12% (p=1.000), respectively. The follow-up period was similar (18±22.7 (range 1-71) and 23.3±19.1 (range 1-51) months, respectively (p=0.63)). In group I, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rate considering between-stage mortality was 89% (95% CI 78-100%), 77.1% (95% CI 60.1-98.8%), 77.1% (95% CI 60.1-98.8%), respectively. In group II, 1-year and 3-year survival rate was 86.5% (95% CI 70.5-100%), plog-rank=0.88. Overall freedom from redo surgery was 92.9% (95% CI 80.3-100%) vs. 90.9% (95% CI 75.4-100%), plog-rank=0.072. CONCLUSION: One-stage total aortic replacement via thoracophrenolumbotomy is safe surgical treatment for mega aorta syndrome, especially in young patients with low surgical risk. Favorable outcomes may be expected in specialized centers with extensive experience in aortic surgery. Compared to staged approach, total aortic replacement eliminates the risks of between-stage aortic rupture. Therefore, it is a worthy alternative to other methods.