Impact of total ischaemic time and disease severity class on graft function after bilateral lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Total ischaemic time (IT) is considered a limiting factor in lung transplantation. In this retrospective study, we investigate effects of IT and disease burden on outcomes after bilateral lung transplantation. METHODS: A total of 1298 patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation between January 2010 and May 2022 (follow-up 100%, median 54 months) were included. Pre-transplant diseases' severity (recipient body mass index, recipient age, previous lung transplantation, Tacrolimus immunosuppression, preoperative recipient extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, lung volume reduction) for graft failure was individually calculated and-as IT-categorized. Vice versa adjusted Cox models were calculated. Considering competing risks, we assessed cumulative incidences of airway obstructive complications and chronic lung allograft dysfunction with death as competing risk factors for primary graft dysfunction were assessed by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Higher disease burden significantly accelerated chronic lung allograft dysfunction and death occurrence (P < 0.001); IT did not. IT-adjusted disease burden strata showed 50% graft survival differences at 11 years after transplantation (range 24-74%), disease burden-adjusted IT strata 18% for all and 6% (54-60%) among those above 7 h. All significant primary graft dysfunction risk factors were diagnoses related, IT was not significantly important and odds ratios did not increase with IT. CONCLUSIONS: The eventual graft survival disadvantage that results from an IT between 7 and at least 11 h is negligible in contrast to frequent recipients' disease-based risk levels.

Does donor-recipient age mismatch have an influence on outcome after lung transplantation? A single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: Lack of organ donors demands transplantation of older lung allografts for recipients between 0 and 50 years. So far, it has not yet been investigated whether donor-recipient age mismatch affects long-term outcome. METHODS: Records of patients aged between 0 and 50 years were retrospectively reviewed. Donor-recipient age mismatch was calculated subtracting recipient age from donor age. Multivariable Cox regression analyses was performed to assess donor-recipient age mismatch regarding the end points' overall patient mortality, mortality conditioned to hospital discharge, biopsy-confirmed rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Furthermore, we performed competing risk analysis to analyse if age mismatch affects biopsy-confirmed rejection and CLAD while death being a competing risk. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and September 2021, out of 1363 patients who underwent lung transplantation at our institution, 409 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. Age mismatch ranged between 0 and 56 years. Multivariable analysis revealed that donor-recipient age mismatch does not affect overall patient mortality (P = 0.19), biopsy-confirmed rejection (P = 0.68) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (P = 0.42). There was no difference seen in CLAD (P = 0.166) and biopsy-confirmed rejection (P = 0.944) with the competing risk death (P = 0.765 and P = 0.851; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Age mismatch between recipients and donors of lung allografts does not affect long-term outcomes after lung transplantation.

Volume-Controlled 19 F MR Ventilation Imaging of Fluorinated Gas.

BACKGROUND: 19 F MRI of inhaled gas tracers has developed into a promising tool for pulmonary diagnostics. Prior to clinical use, the intersession repeatability of acquired ventilation parameters must be quantified and maximized. PURPOSE: To evaluate repeatability of static and dynamic 19 F ventilation parameters and correlation with predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 %pred) with and without inspiratory volume control. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: A total of 30 healthy subjects and 26 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Three-dimensional (3D) gradient echo pulse sequence with golden-angle stack-of-stars k-space encoding at 1.5 T. ASSESSMENT: All study participants underwent 19 F ventilation MRI over eight breaths with inspiratory volume control (w VC) and without inspiratory volume control (w/o VC), which was repeated within 1 week. Ventilated volume percentage (VVP), fractional ventilation (FV), and wash-in time (WI) were computed. Lung function testing was conducted on the first visit. STATISTICAL TESTS: Correlation between imaging and FEV1 %pred was measured using Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Differences in imaging parameters between first and second visit were analyzed using paired t-test. Repeatability was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV). Minimum detectable effect size (MDES) was calculated with a power analysis for study size n = 30 and a power of 0.8. All hypotheses were tested with a significance level of 5% two sided. RESULTS: Strong and moderate linear correlations with FEV1 %pred for COPD patients were found in almost all imaging parameters. The ICC w VC exceeds the ICC w/o VC for all imaging parameters. CoV was significantly lower w VC for initial VVP in COPD patients, FV, CoV FV, WI and standard deviation (SD) of WI. MDES of all imaging parameters were smaller w VC. DATA CONCLUSION: 19 F gas wash-in MRI with inspiratory volume control increases the correlation and repeatability of imaging parameters with lung function testing. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Lung transplant and severe coronary artery disease: results from a single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: The management of severe coronary artery disease at the time of a lung transplant remains a challenge. We analysed the short- and long-term outcomes of lung transplant recipients with severe coronary artery disease. METHODS: Records of adult patients who received transplants at our institution between April 2010 and February 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Severe coronary artery disease was defined as coronary stenosis ≥70% (main stem ≥50%) seen on the coronary angiographic scans performed before or at the time of listing. Patient characteristics, perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between patients with and without severe coronary artery disease. RESULTS: Among 896 patients who received lung transplants who had undergone coronary angiography before the transplant, 77 (8.5%) had severe coronary artery disease; the remaining 819 (91.5%) did not. Patients with severe coronary artery disease were older (p < 0.0001), more often male (p < 0.0001) and received transplants more often for pulmonary fibrosis (p = 0.0007). The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 46 (20-76) months. At the Cox multivariable analysis, severe coronary artery disease was not associated with death. Patients with pretransplant percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and patients with coronary artery bypass graft surgery concomitant to a transplant had survival equivalent to that of patients without severe coronary artery disease (p = 0.513; p = 0.556). CONCLUSIONS: Severe coronary artery disease was not associated with decreased survival after a lung transplant. Concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery and pretransplant percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty can be used for revascularization.

Out of sight for the endoscopist? Gastrointestinal bleeding after aortic repair.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Secondary Aortoenteric Fistulas (sAEF) are difficult to diagnose and usually result in fatal gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding following aortic repair. Outcomes are largely dependent on a timely diagnosis, but AEFs remain challenging to identify endoscopically and are usually diagnosed on computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of our study was optimize diagnosis of AEF by identifying patients developing GI bleeding after aortic repair, investigate their clinical course and identify factors specific to different bleeding sources. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study capturing all patients developing upper or lower GI bleeding after aortic surgery between January 2009 and March 2020 was performed. Electronic health records were screened for diagnostic codes of the relevant procedures. Bleeding was classified into three groups: AEF with demonstrable fistula, ischemic - macroscopic ulceration plus histological confirmation or imaging and "other" due to other recognized conventional cause, such as peptic ulcer disease. RESULTS: 47 GI bleeding episodes in 39 patients were identified. Of these, 10 episodes (21%) were caused by AEF, 16 (34%) by ischemic ulceration and 21 (45%) due to other causes. Patients with AEF exhibited more frequent hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors and had higher mortality, while ischemic ulcerations were associated with more recent operation or hypotensive episode. CONCLUSIONS: GI bleeding complications are uncommon following aortic surgery. AEF and ischemic ulceration are however frequent bleeding causes in this cohort. In patients presenting with fulminant bleeding, primary CT-scanning should be considered.

Graphic narrative based informed consent for bronchoscopy improves satisfaction in patients after lung-transplantation: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of supplementing standard informed consent (IC) with a graphic narrative on patient satisfaction, periprocedural anxiety and experience. METHODS: Patients due to undergo first conscious surveillance bronchoscopy following lung transplantation were randomized to receive IC with (intervention group) or without (control group) a graphic narrative illustrating the procedure. The primary endpoint was overall patient satisfaction with the IC. Key secondary endpoints were change in state anxiety level, as measured by State Trait Anxiety Inventory, and a questionnaire assessing satisfaction with IC and adverse experience during bronchoscopy (judged by patient and examiners). RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomized, and 59 patients were included in the analysis (30 intervention-group; 29 control-group). Overall patient satisfaction was higher in the intervention group 9.5 (25Q-75Q: 8.6-9.8) vs. 8.6 (25Q-75Q: 8.1-9.2), p = 0.028). Change in state anxiety level (before vs after informed consent) was similar between the groups. There were no significant differences in adverse experience during bronchoscopy. CONCLUSION: Addition of a graphic narrative illustrating bronchoscopy improved patient satisfaction with IC but did not influence anxiety before and adverse experience during the procedure. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Supplementing the IC process with a procedure-specific graphic narrative may be a simple tool to improve patient satisfaction.

Liver-first strategy for a combined lung and liver transplant in patients with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: A combined lung and liver transplant in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is an uncommon procedure. The goal of this study was to compare long-term outcomes between patients with CF who underwent either a combined lung-liver or a lung-only transplant. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study of patients with CF who underwent a lung transplant between January 2005 and May 2020. Since 2006, our preference for a combined lung-liver transplant was to transplant the liver first and then the lung. Outcomes were compared using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test. Median follow-up was 53 (23-97) months. RESULTS: During the study period, among 357 patients with CF who underwent a lung transplant, 14 (4%) required a lung-liver transplant whereas 343 (96%) had a lung-only transplant. Lung cold ischaemic time was longer in the lung-liver transplant group, but no patient in this group showed primary graft dysfunction at 72 h after the transplant. Prevalence of anti-human leucocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies was 7.1% vs 13.7% in the lung-liver versus the lung-only transplant group (P = 0.42). At 5 years, lung graft survival (78% vs 69%) and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (79% vs 62%) did not differ between the lung-liver versus the lung-only groups (P = 0.45 and P = 0.55, respectively). Freedom from lung biopsy-confirmed rejection was significantly higher in patients undergoing a lung-liver transplant (91% vs 50%; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: A lung-liver transplant did not impair lung graft function. The lower prevalence of donor-specific antibodies and the better freedom from lung biopsy-confirmed rejection suggest tolerogenic effects of the liver graft.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Transplantation.

Lung transplantation (LTx) has been a viable option for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with more than 20,000 procedures performed worldwide. Survival after LTx lags behind most other forms of solid-organ transplantation, with median survival for COPD recipients being a sobering 6.0 years. Given the limited supply of suitable donor organs, not all patients with end-stage COPD are candidates for LTx. We discuss appropriate criteria for accepting patients for LTx, as well as contraindications and exclusionary criteria. In the first year post-LTx, infection and graft failure are the leading causes of death. Beyond this chronic graft rejection-currently referred to as chronic lung allograft dysfunction-represents the leading cause of death at all time points, with infection and over time malignancy also limiting survival. Referral of COPD patients to a lung transplant center should be considered in the presence of progressing disease despite maximal medical therapy. As a rule of thumb, a forced expiratory volume in 1 second < 25% predicted in the absence of exacerbation, hypoxia (PaO2 < 60 mm Hg/8 kPa), and/or hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 50 mm Hg/6.6 kPa) and satisfactory general clinical condition should be considered the basic prerequisites for timely referral. We also discuss salient issues post-LTx and factors that impact posttransplant survival and morbidity such as infections, malignancy, renal insufficiency, and complications associated with long-term immunosuppression.

Long-term outcomes after intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during lung transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has replaced cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for cardiopulmonary support during lung transplantation at our institution. In this study, we present our experience using intraoperative ECMO in isolated lung transplantation and evaluate its impact on long-term graft function and survival. METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated lung transplantation with or without ECMO support between January 2010 and June 2019 were evaluated. Patients transplanted using CPB were excluded. Peri-operative and follow-up results from our database and patient charts were analyzed. Follow-up continued until September 1, 2019 (median, 3.34 years). RESULTS: In total, 311 of 1,161 lung transplant recipients (27%) received intraoperative ECMO, with 24 (2%) patients further requiring CPB. None of the remaining 826 (71%) patients required intraoperative cardiopulmonary support. ECMO patients exhibited higher pre-transplant surgical risk profiles and endured more complicated early post-operative courses than those without ECMO (in-hospital mortality, 10.9% vs 2.3%; p < 0.001). Inevitably, this resulted in poorer overall graft survival among ECMO recipients (p = 0.0025). However, correcting for patients surviving to hospital discharge, no difference in survival between groups was observed (5-year survival, 71% vs 72%; p = 0.56). Similarly, freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction, biopsy-confirmed cellular rejection, or need for pulsed-steroid therapy did not differ between the groups (p = 0.99, p = 0.78, and p = 0.93, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients not requiring cardiopulmonary support, ECMO recipients endured a more complicated peri-operative and early post-operative course. However, among those surviving to hospital discharge, no differences in long-term complications or outcomes were observed.

Equally Interchangeable? How Sex and Gender Affect Transplantation.

Organ transplantation as an option to overcome end-stage diseases is common in countries with advanced healthcare systems and is increasingly provided in emerging and developing countries. A review of the literature points to sex- and gender-based inequity in the field with differences reported at each step of the transplant process, including access to a transplantation waiting list, access to transplantation once waitlisted, as well as outcome after transplantation. In this review, we summarize the data regarding sex- and gender-based disparity in adult and pediatric kidney, liver, lung, heart, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and argue that there are not only biological but also psychological and socioeconomic issues that contribute to disparity in the outcome, as well as an inequitable access to transplantation for women and girls. Because the demand for organs has always exceeded the supply, the transplant community has long recognized the need to ensure equity and efficiency of the organ allocation system. In the spirit of equity and equality, the authors call for recognition of these inequities and the development of policies that have the potential to ensure that girls and women have equitable access to transplantation.

Transplantation of donor lungs with pulmonary embolism - a retrospective study.

Lung transplantation from donors with fulminant pulmonary arterial embolism as a cause of death remains controversial. An analysis was performed comparing preoperative characteristics and outcomes of 25 donors with a primary diagnosis of pulmonary arterial embolism to 1085 recipients of donor lungs without pulmonary arterial embolism. No early functional impairment of donor lungs with pulmonary embolism was detectable as depicted by the incidence of primary graft dysfunction immediately after surgery (P = 0.66), 24 (P = 0.79), 48 (P = 0.99) and 72 h (P = 0.99) after transplantation. Pulmonary function testing at 1 year (P = 0.003) and at last outpatient control (P < 0.05) showed superior results in the cohort receiving lungs from donors with pulmonary embolism. Incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) showed no difference within the first year after lung transplantation, however, 5 year-CLAD free survival was superior in recipients (70.4% vs. 55.1%, P = 0.006) of donor lungs with pulmonary embolism. Overall survival was similar in both groups. Lungs from donors with fulminant pulmonary embolism prior to brain death can safely be used for lung transplantation without impairing postoperative outcomes. Lung function testing shows favorable midterm results in recipients of donor lungs with pulmonary embolism.

Risk factors and outcomes of vocal cord paralysis after lung transplantation - a retrospective cohort study.

Vocal cord paralysis (VCP) may complicate thoracic surgery and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Among lung transplant (LTx) recipients, chronic pulmonary aspiration can contribute to chronic allograft dysfunction (CLAD). We herein assessed the unknown incidence and clinical impact of VCP in a large LTx cohort. All first-time bilateral LTx recipients, transplanted between January 2010 and June 2015 were included in a single-centre retrospective analysis. Bronchoscopy reports were assessed for VCP. Patients exhibiting VCP were compared to propensity score-matched negative controls regarding CLAD onset and graft survival and secondary end-points, including inpatient duration and complications; lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) within 24 months. In total, 583/713 (82%) patients were included in the analysis. A total of 52 (8.9%) exhibited VCP, which was transient in 34/52 patients (65%), recovering after median 6 months (IQR 2-12). Compared to 268 controls, 3-year graft survival and CLAD-free survival were non-inferior in VCP [HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.35-1.57), and HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.39-1.41)] respectively. Duration of hospitalization was similar and no differences in LRTI rates or airway complications were observed. Lower pre-Tx BMI increased risk for VCP [HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.99)]. Overall, VCP did not adversely affect graft and CLAD-free survival and secondary outcomes including LRTIs and hospitalizations.

The burden of sinus disease in cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Sinus disease (SD) in cystic fibrosis (CF) is a known risk factor for disease progression, the upper airways (UAW) being a site of primary colonization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. UAW may function as reservoir for graft colonization after lung transplantation (LuTx), increasing risk of rejection. Aims of this study were to assess the burden of sinus disease in CF LuTx recipients, considering patient-reported symptoms, endoscopically documented signs and microbiological isolates, comparing colonization between upper and lower airways. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed on consecutive CF LuTx recipients, recording history, symptoms, and management of SD. Nasal lavage (NL) was evaluated for UAW colonization, with nasal inspection during bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) used to assess lower airways if clinically indicated. RESULTS: Hundred and fifty-four patients were included. Symptoms of SD were reported in 96 (62%) individuals; 87 (56%) had prior sinus surgery. Only 8 (13%) of 60 individuals undergoing bronchoscopy presented completely normal findings of the nasal cavity. Thirty-six (60%) patients presented the same isolates on both NL and BAL. Polyps and mucosal alterations were significantly less frequently seen endoscopically in patients with normal flora in NL microbiology (respectively, 26% vs 70%, P = .003, and 35% vs 68%, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of SD affected more than 60% of CF LuTx recipients. Nasal endoscopic inspection identified alterations in 55%. The majority of patients presented the same isolates both on NL and BAL performed on the same visit. These results strongly support a role of paranasal sinuses as "reservoir" for descending re-colonization of the lung graft.

Lung transplantation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a pan-European experience.

Late-onset noninfectious pulmonary complications (LONIPCs) affect 6% of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) recipients within 5 years, conferring subsequent 5-year survival of 50%. Lung transplantation is rarely performed in this setting due to concomitant extrapulmonary morbidity, excessive immunosuppression and concerns about recurring malignancy being considered contraindications. This study assesses survival in highly selected patients undergoing lung transplantation for LONIPCs after SCT.SCT patients undergoing lung transplantation at 20 European centres between 1996 and 2014 were included. Clinical data pre- and post-lung transplantation were reviewed. Propensity score-matched controls were generated from the Eurotransplant and Scandiatransplant registries. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models evaluating predictors of graft loss were performed.Graft survival at 1, 3 and 5 years of 84%, 72% and 67%, respectively, among the 105 SCT patients proved comparable to controls (p=0.75). Sepsis accounted for 15 out of 37 deaths (41%), with prior mechanical ventilation (HR 6.9, 95% CI 1.0-46.7; p<0.001) the leading risk factor. No SCT-specific risk factors were identified. Recurring malignancy occurred in four patients (4%). Lung transplantation <2 years post-SCT increased all-cause 1-year mortality (HR 7.5, 95% CI 2.3-23.8; p=0.001).Lung transplantation outcomes following SCT were comparable to other end-stage diseases. Lung transplantation should be considered feasible in selected candidates. No SCT-specific factors influencing outcome were identified within this carefully selected patient cohort.

Technique and Outcomes of Less Invasive Lung Retransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Lung retransplantation is a demanding procedure with outcomes lagging primary transplantation. We implemented less invasive surgical techniques aiming at improving early outcomes. Here, we wish to describe these techniques and analyze the clinical outcomes. METHODS: Since April 2010, a protocol of less invasive techniques was applied to all lung retransplantations. This protocol comprises bilateral lung retransplantation via sternum-sparing anterolateral thoracotomies, off-pump surgery, and empiric administration of 2 g fibrinogen and 2 platelet concentrates. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed starting in April 2010 until May 2016 for this study and compared with a cohort of patients undergoing lung retransplantation between January 2005 and March 2010. RESULTS: From April 2010 through March 2016, 774 total lung transplantations were performed at our center, 49 were retransplantations. In the era January 2005 to March 2010, a total of 480 lung transplantations were performed, 38 of those being retransplantations. Mean operation time in the era April 2010 to May 2016 was significantly longer as compared with the era January 2005 to March 2010, median time until extubation was significantly shorter in the era April 2010 to May 2016 (1 [1-2] days vs 11.5 [1-24] days; P = 0.0009). Similarly, median intensive care unit stay time was shorter in the era April 2010 to May 2016 (4 [2-5.5] days vs 12.5 [3-30.5] days; P = 0.003). Patient survival was significantly better in the era starting in April 2010 at 30 days (98% vs 76.3%, P = 0.002) as well as at 1 year (80.6% vs 63.2%; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Less invasive retransplantation of the lung via sternum-sparing anterolateral thoracotomies and off-pump is a safe procedure with low associated morbidity and favorable midterm survival.

Repeated human leukocyte antigen mismatches in lung re-transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The role of HLA-sensitization in the absence of detectable DSA in lung re-transplantation is unclear. Antigens of the second donor matching the HLA typing of the first donor are considered 'unacceptable', by some tissue typing laboratories, especially in kidney re-transplantation. METHODS: Thus, we performed a retrospective analysis of all lung re-transplantations focussing on the impact of HLA-homologies between the first and the second donor ('unacceptable' antigens; repeated HLA mismatch) on patient and graft survival. RESULTS: A total of 132 lung re-transplantations were performed at our centre between 1985 and 2014, of which 120 with complete HLA data were analysed. 55.8% of the recipients received re-transplants with repeated HLA mismatched antigens whereas 43.2% of the re-transplants were transplanted without repeated HLA mismatched antigens. Postoperative survival showed no difference between re-transplant procedures with or without repeated HLA mismatches (p=0.99). While neither homologies on the HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DR locus, nor the addition of several locus homologies (p=0.72) had an impact on survival, unexpectedly, repeated HLA mismatching on the HLA-DQ locus was correlated with better survival. Re-transplantations with repeated HLA mismatches did not result in more development of CLAD as compared to recipients without repeated HLA mismatches (p=0.99). Neither the number of repeated HLA mismatched antigens (p=0.52) nor the HLA locus (HLA-A(p=0.34), HLA-B(p=0.97), HLA-C (p=0.80), HLA-DR(p=0.49) and HLA-DQ(p=0.07)) had an impact on the development of CLAD after re-transplantation. CONCLUSION: Transplantation with repeated HLA mismatches due to sensitization by a previous transplantation in the absence of detectable HLA-antibodies does not have a negative impact on patient or graft survival.

Topical Nasal Anesthesia in Flexible Bronchoscopy--A Cross-Over Comparison between Two Devices.

INTRODUCTION: Topical airway anesthesia is known to improve tolerance and patient satisfaction during flexible bronchoscopy (FB). Lidocaine is commonly used, delivered as an atomized spray. The current study assesses safety and patient satisfaction for nasal anesthesia of a new atomization device during outpatient bronchoscopy in lung transplant recipients. METHODS: Using a prospective, non-blinded, cross-over design, patients enrolled between 01-10-2014 and 24-11-2014 received 2% lidocaine using the standard reusable nasal atomizer (CRNA). Those enrolled between 25-11-2014 and 30-01-2015, received a disposable intranasal mucosal atomization device (DIMAD). After each procedure, the treating physician, their assistant and the patient independently rated side-effects and satisfaction, basing their responses on visual analogue scales (VAS). At their next scheduled bronchoscopy during the study period, patients then received the alternative atomizer. Written consent was obtained prior to the first bronchoscopy, and the study approved by the institutional ethics committee. RESULTS: Of the 252 patients enrolled between 01-10-2014 and 30-01-2015, 80 (32%) received both atomizers. Physicians reported better efficacy (p = 0.001) and fewer side effects (p< = 0.001) for DIMAD in patients exposed to both procedures. Among patients with one visit, physicians and their assistants reported improved efficacy (p = 0.018, p = 0.002) and fewer side effects (p< = 0.001, p = 0.029) for the disposable atomizer, whereas patients reported no difference in efficacy or side effects (p = 0.72 and p = 0.20). No severe adverse events were noted. The cost of the reusable device was 4.08€ per procedure, compared to 3.70€ for the disposable device. DISCUSSION: Topical nasal anesthesia via a disposable intranasal mucosal atomization device (DIMAD) offers comparable safety and patient comfort, compared to conventional reusable nasal atomizers (CRNA) in lung transplant recipients. Procedural costs were reduced by 0.34€ per procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02237651.