Nab-paclitaxel weekly versus dose-dense solvent-based paclitaxel followed by dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide in high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: results from the neoadjuvant part of the WSG-ADAPT-HR+/HER2- trial.

BACKGROUND: In high-risk hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC), nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel showed promising efficacy versus solvent-based (sb)-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant trials; however, optimal patient and therapy selection remains a topic of ongoing research. Here, we investigate the potential of Oncotype DX® recurrence score (RS) and endocrine therapy (ET) response (low post-endocrine Ki67) for therapy selection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within the WSG-ADAPT trial (NCT01779206), high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC patients were randomized to (neo)adjuvant 4× sb-paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q2w or 8× nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 q1w, followed by 4× epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (90 mg + 600 mg) q2w; inclusion criteria: (i) cN0-1, RS 12-25, and post-ET Ki67 >10%; (ii) cN0-1 with RS >25. Patients with cN2-3 or (G3, baseline Ki67 ≥40%, and tumor size >1 cm) were allowed to be included without RS and/or ET response testing. Associations of key factors with pathological complete response (pCR) (primary) and survival (secondary) endpoints were analyzed using statistical mediation and moderation models. RESULTS: Eight hundred and sixty-four patients received neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (n= 437) or sb-paclitaxel (n = 427); nab-paclitaxel was superior for pCR (20.8% versus 12.9%, P = 0.002). pCR was higher for RS >25 versus RS ≤25 (16.0% versus 8.4%, P = 0.021) and for ET non-response versus ET response (15.1% versus 6.0%, P = 0.027); no factors were predictive for the relative efficacy of nab-paclitaxel versus sb-paclitaxel. Patients with pCR had longer distant disease-free survival [dDFS; hazard ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.91, P = 0.024]. Despite favorable prognostic association of RS >25 versus RS ≤25 with pCR (odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.71-5.63, P ≤ 0.001), higher RS was unfavorably associated with dDFS (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC, neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel q1w appears superior to sb-paclitaxel q2w regarding pCR. Combining RS and ET response assessment appears to select patients with highest pCR rates. The disadvantage of higher RS for dDFS is reduced in patients with pCR. These are the first results from a large neoadjuvant randomized trial supporting the use of RS to help select patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC.

Electrochemotherapy in the treatment of cutaneous malignancy: Outcomes and subgroup analysis from the cumulative results from the pan-European International Network for Sharing Practice in Electrochemotherapy database for 2482 lesions in 987 patients (2008-2019).

BACKGROUND: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a treatment for both primary and secondary cutaneous tumours. The international Network for sharing practices on ECT group investigates treatment outcomes after ECT using a common database with defined parameters. METHODS: Twenty-eight centres across Europe prospectively uploaded data over an 11-year period. Response rates were investigated in relation to primary diagnosis, tumour size, choice of electrode type, route of bleomycin administration, electrical parameters recorded and previous irradiation in the treated field. RESULTS: Nine hundred eighty-seven patients, with 2482 tumour lesions were included in analysis. The overall response (OR) rate was 85% (complete response [CR]: 70%, partial response rate: 15%, stable disease: 11%, and progressive disease: 2%). For different histologies, OR and CR rates for metastases of malignant melanoma were 82% and 64%, basal cell carcinoma were 96% and 85%, breast cancer metastases were 77% and 62%, squamous cell carcinoma were 80% and 63% as well as Kaposi's sarcoma were 98% and 91%, respectively. Variance was demonstrated across histotypes (p < 0.0001) and in accordance with size of lesion treated (dichotomised at diameter of 3 cm (p < 0.0001). Hexagonal electrodes were generally used for larger tumours, but for tumours up to 3 cm, linear array electrodes provided better tumour control than hexagonal electrodes (80%:74%, p < 0.003). For tumours more than 2 cm, intravenous administration was superior to intratumoural (IT) administration (p < 0.05). Current recorded varied across tumour histologies and size but did not influence response rate. In previously irradiated areas, responses were selectively lower for IT administration. CONCLUSIONS: These cumulative data endorse efficiency of ECT across a broad range of histotypes. Analysis of 2482 lesions details subgroup analysis on treatment response informing future treatment choices.

A randomised phase II study investigating durvalumab in addition to an anthracycline taxane-based neoadjuvant therapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: clinical results and biomarker analysis of GeparNuevo study.

BACKGROUND: Combining immune-checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy yielded an increased response rates in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Therefore, we evaluated the addition of durvalumab to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in primary TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: GeparNuevo is a randomised phase II double-blind placebo-controlled study randomising patients with TNBC to durvalumab or placebo given every 4 weeks in addition to nab-paclitaxel followed by standard EC. In the window-phase durvalumab/placebo alone was given 2 weeks before start of nab-paclitaxel. Randomisation was stratified by stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (sTILs). Patients with primary cT1b-cT4a-d disease, centrally confirmed TNBC and sTILs were included. Primary objective was pathological complete response (pCR) (ypT0 ypN0). RESULTS: A total of 174 patients were randomised, 117 participated in the window-phase. Median age was 49.5 years (range 23-76); 47 patients (27%) were younger than 40 years; 113 (65%) had stage ≥IIA disease, 25 (14%) high sTILs, 138 of 158 (87%) were PD-L1-positive. pCR rate with durvalumab was 53.4% (95% CI 42.5% to 61.4%) versus placebo 44.2% (95% CI 33.5% to 55.3%; unadjusted continuity corrected χ2P = 0.287), corresponding to OR = 1.45 (95% CI 0.80-2.63, unadjusted Wald P = 0.224). Durvalumab effect was seen only in the window cohort (pCR 61.0% versus 41.4%, OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.06-4.64, P = 0.035; interaction P = 0.048). In both arms, significantly increased pCR (P < 0.01) were observed with higher sTILs. There was a trend for increased pCR rates in PD-L1-positive tumours, which was significant for PD-L1-tumour cell in durvalumab (P = 0.045) and for PD-L1-immune cell in placebo arm (P = 0.040). The most common immune-related adverse events were thyroid dysfunction any grade in 47%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the addition of durvalumab to anthracycline-/taxane-based NACT increases pCR rate particularly in patients treated with durvalumab alone before start of chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02685059.

Sorafenib in combination with docetaxel as first-line therapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: Final results of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II MADONNA study.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, double-blind phase II study assessed the antitumor activity and toxicity profile of docetaxel with the antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor sorafenib or matching placebo as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic or locally advanced HER2-negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks in combination with sorafenib 400 mg bid or placebo on days 2-18 of each cycle until tumor progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Sorafenib/placebo could be continued at the investigator's discretion if docetaxel was stopped due to toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: From October 2008 to December 2013, 102 patients were randomized; 98 patients were evaluable. The trial was prematurely terminated due to slow accrual. Due to increased toxicity the dose of docetaxel was reduced to 75 mg/m2 and an increasing sorafenib dosing schedule was implemented as part of a protocol amendment. The addition of sorafenib to docetaxel did not improve PFS (8.2 vs. 7.3 months for docetaxel/placebo; HR 0.84, log rank p = 0.43), but led to higher rates of early treatment discontinuation. There were no statistically significant differences between sorafenib dosing schedules. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of sorafenib to taxane-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer failed to improve PFS and resulted in increased toxicity.

Strong impact of MammaPrint and BluePrint on treatment decisions in luminal early breast cancer: results of the WSG-PRIMe study.

PURPOSE: The WSG-PRIMe Study prospectively evaluated the impact of the 70-gene signature MammaPrint® (MP) and the 80-gene molecular subtyping assay BluePrint® on clinical therapy decisions in luminal early breast cancer. METHODS: 452 hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative patients were recruited (N0, N1). Physicians provided initial therapy recommendations based on clinicopathological factors. After prospective risk classification by MammaPrint/BluePrint was revealed, post-test treatment recommendations and actual treatment were recorded. Decisional Conflict and anxiety were measured by questionnaires. RESULTS: Post-test switch (in chemotherapy (CT) recommendation) occurred in 29.1% of cases. Overall, physician adherence to MP risk assessment was 92.3% for low-risk and 94.3% for high-risk MP scores. Adherence was remarkably high in "discordant" groups: 74.7% of physicians initially recommending CT switched to CT omission following low-risk MP scores; conversely, 88.9% of physicians initially recommending CT omission switched to CT recommendations following high-risk MP scores. Most patients (99.2%) recommended to forgo CT post-test and 21.3% of patients with post-test CT recommendations did not undergo CT; among MP low-risk patients with pre-test and post-test CT recommendations, 40% did not actually undergo CT. Luminal subtype assessment by BluePrint was discordant with IHC assessment in 34% of patients. Patients' State Anxiety scores improved significantly overall, particularly in MP low-risk patients. Trait Anxiety scores increased slightly in MP high risk and decreased slightly in MP low-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: MammaPrint and BluePrint test results strongly impacted physicians' therapy decisions in luminal EBC with up to three involved lymph nodes. The high adherence to genetically determined risk assessment represents a key prerequisite for achieving a personalized cost-effective approach to disease management of early breast cancer.

De-escalation strategies in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC): final analysis of the WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- phase II trial: efficacy, safety, and predictive markers for 12 weeks of neoadjuvant dual blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab ± weekly paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Response rates in HER2-overexpressing EBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab (T) have been improved by addition of pertuzumab (P). The prospective, phase II, neoadjuvant WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- trial assessed whether patients with strong early response to dual blockade alone might achieve pathological complete response (pCR) comparable to that of patients receiving dual blockade and chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Female patients with HER2+/HR- EBC (M0) were randomized (5:2) to 12 weeks of T + P ± weekly paclitaxel (pac) at 80 mg/m2. Early response was defined as proliferation decrease ≥30% of Ki-67 (versus baseline) or low cellularity (<500 invasive tumor cells) in the 3-week biopsy. The trial was designed to test non-inferiority for pCR in early responding patients of the T + P arm versus all chemotherapy-treated patients. RESULTS: From February 2014 to December 2015, 160 patients were screened, 92 were randomized to T + P and 42 to T + P+pac. Baseline characteristics were well balanced (median age 54 versus 51.5 years, cT2 51.1 versus 52.4%, cN0 54.3 versus 61.9%); 91.3% of patients completed T + P per protocol and 92.9% T + P+pac. The pCR rate in the T + P+pac arm was 90.5%, compared with 36.3% in the T + P arm as a whole. In the T + P arm, 24/92 were classified as non-responders, and their pCR rate was only 8.3% compared with 44.7% in responders (38/92) and 42.9% in patients with unclassified early response (30/92). No new safety signals were observed in the study population. CONCLUSION: Addition of taxane monotherapy to dual HER2 blockade in a 12-week neoadjuvant setting substantially increases pCR rates in HER2+/HR- EBC compared with dual blockade alone, even within early responders to dual blockade. Early non-response under dual blockade strongly predicts failure to achieve pCR.

Pazopanib (GW786034) and cyclophosphamide in patients with platinum-resistant, recurrent, pre-treated ovarian cancer - Results of the PACOVAR-trial.

PURPOSE: The prognosis is poor for patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Evidence suggests that antiangiogenic treatment modalities could play a major role in EOC. A combined therapy consisting of the investigational oral antiangiogenic agent pazopanib and metronomic oral cyclophosphamide may offer a well-tolerable treatment option to patients with recurrent, previously treated EOC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a multicenter phase I trial evaluating the optimal dose as well as activity and tolerability of pazopanib with metronomic cyclophosphamide in the treatment of patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant, previously treated ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. Here, 50mg cyclophosphamide were combined with 400 to 800mg pazopanib daily. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated; mean age was 66years. At dose levels (DL) I and II, one instance of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in one of 6 patients. At DL III, two of four patients showed a DLT, leading to a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 600mg pazopanib daily. Median number of administered cycles was 6 (2-13), with three patients being treated for at least 13months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.35months and 24.95months, respectively. 155 adverse events (AE) occurred, most frequently elevation of liver enzymes, leukopenia, diarrhea and fatigue. Altogether, five serious adverse events (SAE) developed in four patients. CONCLUSION: Pazopanib 600mg daily p.o. and metronomic cyclophosphamide 50mg daily p.o. is a feasible regimen for patients with recurrent platinum-resistant EOC and showed promising activity in this previously treated patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clin.trial.gov registry no.: NCT01238770.

[Surgical Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy with Respect to Tumour Type, Tumour Stage and Individual Tumour Biology]. / Chirurgische Therapie der peritonealen Metastasierung in Abhängigkeit von Tumorentität, -stadium und -charakteristik(a).

Peritoneal tumour dissemination is still considered as a terminal disease. For the last two decades, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with intraoperative hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been popularised by Paul Sugarbaker almost doubling survival in selected patients compared with systemic chemotherapy alone. Nowadays, this particular treatment protocol is available in comprehensive cancer centres with reasonable mortality and morbidity. However, patient selection is still challenging. In general, CRS and HIPEC is indicated in primary peritoneal tumours such as mesothelioma and pseudomyxoma peritonei as well as in peritoneal metastases derived from gastrointestinal malignancies and ovarian cancers. Since systemic tumour spread is uncommon in patients with peritoneal metastases, peritoneal tumour dissemination was defined as localised disease within the "compartment abdomen". However, CRS and HIPEC are only beneficial as long as complete cytoreduction is achieved (CC-0 or CC-1). Histopathological parameters, the Sugarbaker peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and general condition of the patient have been established as patient selection criteria. In primary peritoneal cancers, individual tumour biology is the predominant criterium for patient selection as opposed to intraabdominal tumour load in peritoneal metastases derived from gastrointestinal cancers. In gastric cancer, CRS and HIPEC should be restricted to synchronous limited disease because of its biological aggressiveness. In patients with free floating cancer cells without macroscopic signs of peritoneal spread, however, CRS and HIPEC following preoperative "neoadjuvant" chemotherapy preserves chances for cure. So far, there is no general recommendation for CRS and HIPEC by clinical practice guidelines. In the recent S3 guideline for treatment of colorectal cancer, however, CRS and HIPEC have been included as possible treatment options.

ICG Fluorescence Technique for the Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: Results of a Prospective Open-label Clinical Trial.

Introduction: Detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is the standard procedure to evaluate axillary lymph node status in breast cancer. In addition to known and established procedures such as the blue dye method and scintigraphy, this study investigated the efficacy of a method based on use of the fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG). Patients and Method: A total of 126 women with breast cancer histologically verified by punch biopsy were studied during surgical removal of SLN. In addition to SLN marking with technetium and scintigraphy, intra-individual comparison was done using indocyanine green (ICG) for marking instead of the standard blue dye. Results: Scintigraphy had a detection rate of 96 %; the detection rate with ICG was just under 89 %. A body mass index (BMI) > 40 was found to be a limiting factor for the fluorescent method. Investigation into potential toxicities associated with the use of the fluorescent dye ICG revealed no systemic or even local side effects. The fluorescent method was found to be significantly less expensive than the scintigraphy method. Conclusion: The ICG fluorescence technique for the detection of SLN was found to be a valid and feasible method in clinical practice when compared directly with the blue dye method and scintigraphy.

Trastuzumab Administration in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer - Experience of a Large University Breast Center.

Background: Administered either alone or in combination with various cytostatic, endocrine or targeted therapies, trastuzumab significantly improves the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. As trastuzumab is effective across multiple lines of therapy in the metastatic setting (treatment beyond progression: TBP), it is often administered over a long period of time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and clinical practice of long-term trastuzumab administration (> 1 year) in metastatic breast cancer patients treated in a large university breast center. Methods: Metastatic breast cancer patients who received at least 18 cycles of trastuzumab administered every three weeks at the University Gynecological Hospital of Tuebingen between 1999 and 2012 were included in this retrospective study. Typical combination drugs, side effects, and the impact of administration on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were investigated. Results: 72 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. The mean number of administrations was 50.14 (SD: 27.51). In 53 patients the principle of TBP was followed across an average of 2.4 therapy lines. Classic cardiac risk factors were present at the beginning of trastuzumab treatment in 34 patients (47 %). Seven patients (10 %) experienced a decrease in LVEF during treatment, 9 patients (13 %) had hypersensitivity reactions. Treatment was discontinued in two patients due to side effects (1â€Š× progressive LVEF decrease, 1â€Š× intolerance). Summary: The administration of trastuzumab across multiple lines of therapy was generally tolerated well. Cardiac risk factors were not a limiting factor. If regular cardiac monitoring is done, trastuzumab appears not only to improve survival but also helps preserve the quality of life of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Risk factors and survival outcome in cerebral metastatic breast cancer.

The development of brain metastases (BM) of primary breast cancer patients leads to limited survival. HER2-positive and triple-negative status are risk factors for the development of BM. Estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)/HER2 are important prognostic markers and are essential for effective treatment decisions. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of known risk factors and the outcome after the development of BM. Eighty consecutive patients, treated between January 1, 2001, and June 30, 2012, on the basis of primary non-metastatic operable breast cancer and who developed BM, were enrolled. Clinical parameters (TNM; ER, PR, HER2) and their impact on the occurrence of BM and additionally their prognostic influence after the occurrence of BM were investigated. A small tumor size, ductal histology, grade 3, hormone receptor-negative, triple-negative and HER2+ tumors were associated with BM. Median time from breast cancer diagnosis to BM was 35 months (range 26.2-43.8). Grade 3 versus 2 has significantly negative prognostic impact with earlier development of BM (median 23 vs. 41 months; p=0.033). HER2-positive patients had significantly longer survival after the occurrence of BM than HER2-negative patients (p=0.009). The risk of BM varies significantly by subtype. In high-risk patients, the occurrence of BM must be considered, and possibly, general screening in these patients is warranted. The survival advantage of HER2-positive breast cancer patients compared with HER2-negative patients after the occurrence of BM is possibly explainable by systemic control of disease. Standard of care for patients with BM is whole-brain radiotherapy, with/without surgery, or stereotactic radiosurgery. Perhaps novel therapies may additionally improve survival in these patients.

Evaluation of Therapy Management and Patient Compliance in Postmenopausal Patients with Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer Receiving Letrozole Treatment: The EvaluateTM Study.

Introduction: The EvaluateTM study (Evaluation of therapy management and patient compliance in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients receiving letrozole treatment) is a prospective, non-interventional study for the assessment of therapy management and compliance in the routine care of postmenopausal women with invasive hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving letrozole. The parameters for inclusion in the study are presented and discussed here. Material and Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2009 a total of 5045 patients in 310 study centers were recruited to the EvaluateTM study. Inclusion criteria were hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and adjuvant treatment or metastasis. 373 patients were excluded from the analysis for various reasons. Results: A total of 4420 patients receiving adjuvant treatment and 252 patients with metastasis receiving palliative treatment were included in the study. For 4181 patients receiving adjuvant treatment, treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole commenced immediately after surgery (upfront). Two hundred patients had initially received tamoxifen and started aromatase inhibitor treatment with letrozole at 1-5 years after diagnosis (switch), und 39 patients only commenced letrozole treatment 5-10 years after diagnosis (extended endocrine therapy). Patient and tumor characteristics were within expected ranges, as were comorbidities and concurrent medication. Conclusion: The data from the EvaluateTM study will offer a good overview of therapy management in the routine care of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Planned analyses will look at therapy compliance and patient satisfaction with how information is conveyed and the contents of the conveyed information.

Receptor change-clinicopathologic analysis of matched pairs of primary and cerebral metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A challenge in the management of breast cancer is development of brain metastases (BM) with limited survival. In primary breast cancer, ER/PR/HER2 are important prognostic markers and are important for making effective treatment decisions. Changes in immunohistochemical markers of metastases are with unclear clinical significance, and mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy are an additional challenge. The aim of this retrospective study is to detect changes in immunohistochemical markers of primary and BM and to recognize if receptor change has prognostic impact. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive primary breast cancer patients who developed BM and got surgical resection of BM were enrolled. Matched pair analyses of primary and BM were done with evaluation by immunostaining (ER/PR/HER2). RESULTS: A small tumor size, ductal histology and HER2+ tumors were associated with BM. Loss of ER/PR receptor positivity was observed in BM compared to primary (ER: 50.0 %/22.7 %; p = 0.004; PR: 45.8 %/9.1 %; p = n.s), respectively, and almost no change in HER2 status (>80 %; p = 0.012). Patients with ER-/PR-negative or HER2-positive primary had shorter time to recurrence than ER-/PR-positive and HER2-negative patients. Receptor change has negative prognostic impact. CONCLUSION: With the observed loss of receptor positivity, therapeutic options are diminished. Identification of patients with a high risk for BM is warranted to evaluate preventive strategies.

CNS metastases of breast cancer show discordant immunohistochemical phenotype compared to primary.

PURPOSE: A challenge in management of breast cancer is the development of brain metastases (BM). Because of improvements in systemic therapy with longer survival of patients with advanced cancer, BM can appear at a time when extra-BM disease is under control. Development of potential preventive strategies are considered, and new developments in systemic approaches to treatment of BM, (cytotoxic/targeted therapy), are explored. In primary breast cancer, ER/PR, HER2 are important biological markers for predicting prognosis and making effective treatment decisions. Known are changes in markers due to metastases, but clinical significance is still unclear. Aim of this retrospective study is to detect changes in immunohistochemical markers of primary and BM, to recognize concordance and impact on prognosis. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive primary breast cancer patients who developed BM and got surgical resection of BM were enrolled in this study. Matched-pair analyses of primary and BM were done with evaluation by immunostaining (ER, PR, HER2). RESULTS: Loss of ER/PR receptor positivity was seen in BM compared to primary (ER: 47.6 %/9.0 %; PR: 42.9 %/0 %), respectively. High concordance exists for HER2 status in primary and BM (>80 %). HER2-positive breast cancer had a shorter median interval until appearance of metastases than HER2-negative patients (32.1/39 months; p = n.s.). CONCLUSION: With loss of receptor positivity (ER/PR) in BM treatment, decisions are very difficult. High concordance of HER2 status was seen in matched-pair analysis. Further studies had to investigate whether HER3/4 is a possible target for further therapy.

Nodal status--its impact on prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Prognostic impact of nodal status or lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer is still unclear. Known best prognostic impact in advanced ovarian cancer has the residual tumor mass. The aim of this retrospective study is to examine the importance of nodal status in correlation with residual tumor mass. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven consecutive patients with primary stage III ovarian cancer underwent surgery between 01/2000 and 06/2007 at the Department of gynecology and obstetrics, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany. All patients got stage-related surgery and platin-based chemotherapy. Median follow-up time was 53.5 months, and all patients were included in the study. RESULTS: Resection status and nodal status are significant prognostic factors in our study (P < 0.001). In FIGO III, patients without residual tumor (R0) had significant best OS and PFS independent to node status (N0/N+; P = 0.002) compared to patients with residual tumor. In contrast, node status had significant positive impact on PFS in patients without residual tumor and node negativity. With the increase in residual tumor, the influence of lymphnode metastases on prognosis is decreasing. CONCLUSION: Main intention of primary surgery is R0 resection with best prognosis in advanced stages. A systematic lymphadenectomy in cases with R0 resection or residual tumor <1 cm seems to be reasonable with positive impact on prognosis. Node status has impact on prognosis in patients with negative node after R0 resection with best PFS in FIGO III. Further prospective studies had to show whether systematic lymphadenectomy in suboptimally tumor-reduced patients can improve prognosis.

Tandem high-dose chemotherapy in high-risk primary breast cancer: a multivariate analysis and a matched-pair comparison with standard-dose chemotherapy.

Stem cell-supported high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) is currently being evaluated in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer (HRPBC), as defined by extensive axillary lymph node involvement. Conclusive results from randomized studies with sufficient patient numbers and follow-up are pending. We retrospectively analyzed 144 HRPBC patients enrolled in a single-arm trial of tandem HDCT at the University of Heidelberg to evaluate the prognostic value of nodal ratio, HER2/neu status, and cytokeratin-positive bone marrow cells and to compare the outcomes of these patients with those of a conventionally treated control group of 91 patients matched by nodal ratio, tumor size, combined hormone-receptor status, and HER2/neu status. The tandem HDCT regimen consisted of 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by 2 cycles of blood stem cell-supported high-dose ifosfamide, 12 g/m2; carboplatin, 900 mg/M2; and epirubicin, 180 mg/m2. Conventionally treated patients received a regimen containing anthracycline without taxanes (52 patients) or CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-flurouracil; 39 patients). With a median follow-up of 3.8 years, disease-free, distant disease-free, and overall survival rates were 62%, 65%, and 84%, respectively. In univariate analysis, besides the hormone receptor status (P = .007), HER2/neu overexpression was the strongest predictor of earlier death (P = .017). In multivariate analysis, a nodal ratio of > or =0.8 was found to be the only independent predictor of relapse (relative risk [RR] = 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-3.60; P = .008) and only the absence of hormone receptors was associated with earlier death (RR = 3.59; 95% CI, 1.45-8.86; P = .006). Despite a trend toward later distant relapse after HDCT compared with standard-dose chemotherapy with a median follow-up of 3 years (P = .059), thus far, matched-pair analysis has not demonstrated significantly better survival rates after HDCT in all matched patients (P = .786) or in the subgroups of anthracycline-treated patients and patients with and without overexpression of HER2/neu. So far, the follow-up time has been too short to draw definite conclusions; however, patients with a nodal ratio of > or =0.8, receptor-negative tumors, or HER2/neu overexpression are at high risk for relapse and death, irrespective of the kind of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Clinical relevance of genomic aberrations in homogeneously treated high-risk stage II/III breast cancer patients.

Little is known about the prognostic impact of chromosome aberrations in breast cancer. The aim of our study was to determine whether genomic aberrations of prognostic relevance can be identified in the context of a clinical study using molecular cytogenetics. Paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 44 patients with high-risk stage II/III breast cancer were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. All patients received identical therapy including dose-escalated chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The most frequent chromosomal aberrations were gains on chromosome arms 17q (24 cases), 1q (21 cases), 8q (17 cases), 20q (13 cases), 6p (9 cases) as well as losses on chromosome arms 13q (25 cases), 11q (20 cases), 5q (11 cases), 6q (11 cases), 9p (10 cases), 18q (10 cases), 8p (9 cases) and 16q (9 cases). In univariate analysis, the correlation with the clinical outcome revealed a higher risk for patients with tumors exhibiting 13q losses and a reduced risk for tumors exhibiting 16q losses (p = 0.020), 6q losses (p = 0.041) and estrogen-receptor positivity (0.051). In multivariate analysis using the Cox model, only the loss of 16q exhibited borderline significance (p = 0.065). These data show that comparative genomic hybridization can be performed in the context of a clinical trial. In our subgroup of high-risk breast cancer patients, chromosomal aberrations were valuable prognostic parameters.

Comparison of double and triple high-dose chemotherapy with autologous blood stem cell transplantation in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

In patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), early dose intensification with multiple cycles of peripheral blood stem cell-supported high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) seems superior to a late dose-intensification strategy. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 20 patients treated with a double (D)-HDCT regimen to 20 patients who received a triple (T)-HDCT, matched by age, estrogen receptor (ER) status, adjuvant chemotherapy, initial disease-free interval, predominant metastatic site, and number of metastatic sites. At a median follow-up of 41.5 months (range, 14-88 months) an intent-to-treat analysis showed no difference in PFS (p = 0.72) and OS (p = 0.93) between the matched patients. For all 76 patients treated within the D- or T-HDCT trial, median PFS and OS was 13 months (range, 2-78 months) and 24.5 months (range, 7-78 months), respectively. In multivariate analysis independent predictors of shorter OS included negative ER (relative risk [RR] = 3.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-5.9]; p = 0.002), more than two metastatic sites (RR = 2.4 [95% CI 1.0-5.7]; p = 0.049) and failure to achieve complete remission/no evidence of disease (CR/NED) after HDCT (RR = 4.5 [95% CI 2.0-10.1]; p < 0.0001). These data show that early dose intensification with T-HDCT is not superior to a D-HDCT regimen in patients with MBC. ER-negative tumors, more than two metastatic sites and no CR/NED after HDCT, are associated with inferior outcome.