Circulating tumor DNA-based stratification strategy for chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Stratification strategies for chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are critically demanded. We performed high-throughput panel-based deep next-generation sequencing and low-pass whole genome sequencing on prospectively collected circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) specimens from 460 patients in the phase 3 CHOICE-01 study at different time points. We identified predictive markers for chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor, including ctDNA status and genomic features such as blood-based tumor mutational burden, intratumor heterogeneity, and chromosomal instability. Furthermore, we established an integrated ctDNA-based stratification strategy, blood-based genomic immune subtypes (bGIS) scheme, to distinguish patients who benefit from the addition of PD-1 inhibitor to first-line chemotherapy. Moreover, we demonstrated potential applications for the dynamic monitoring of ctDNA. Overall, we proposed a potential therapeutic algorithm based on the ctDNA-based stratification strategy, shedding light on the individualized management of immune-chemotherapies for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Plinabulin plus docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based regimen (DUBLIN-3): a phase 3, international, multicentre, single-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet need for second-line and third-line treatments that are effective and tolerable for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with no driver mutations. METHODS: In this phase 3, international, multicentre, single-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients from 58 medical centres in Australia, China, and the USA. Eligible patients were adults with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type NSCLC who had progressed after first-line platinum-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an independent stratified randomisation schedule with a block size of four to receive intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and either plinabulin (30 mg/m2) or placebo on days 1 and 8 in 21-day cycles until progression, unacceptable toxic effects, withdrawal, or death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was analysed in all patients who had received at least one dose of study drug or placebo. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02504489) and is now closed. FINDINGS: Between Nov 30, 2015, and Jan 6, 2021, 919 patients were screened for inclusion. 360 patients were excluded, and 559 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel and plinabulin (n=278) or docetaxel and placebo (n=281). 406 (73%) of 559 patients were male, 153 (27%) were female, and 488 (87%) were Asian. Median OS was 10·5 months (95% CI 9·34-11·87) in the plinabulin group compared with 9·4 months (8·38-10·68) in the control group (stratified HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·68-0·99; p=0·0399). Mean OS was 15·08 months (13·42-16·74) in the plinabulin group compared with 12·77 months (11·45-14·10) in the placebo group using restricted mean survival time analysis (difference 2·31 months, 95% CI 0·18-4·44; p=0·0332). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 273 (>99%) of 274 patients in the plinabulin group and 276 (99%) of 278 patients in the control group. Grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal disorders occurred more frequently in the plinabulin group than in the placebo group, with the most frequent being diarrhoea (24 [9%] of 274 patients vs three [1%] of 278) and vomiting (six [2%] vs one [<1%]), as did transient grade 3 hypertension (50 [18%] vs eight [3%]). Treatment-emergent death was reported in 12 patients (4%) in the plinabulin group and ten patients (4%) in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Plinabulin plus docetaxel significantly improved OS as second-line and third-line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR wild-type NSCLC and could be considered as a new treatment option in this population. FUNDING: BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals.

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options are limited for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after treatment failure with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This multicenter open-label, phase II study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (cohort 1, TIS+chemo) or tislelizumab plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab (cohort 2, TIS+chemo+ beva) in EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC patients who progressed on EGFR TKI therapies. Here, the primary analysis of the TIS+chemo cohort is reported. METHODS: In the TIS+chemo cohort, patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations with prior EGFR TKI failure received tislelizumab plus carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel as induction treatment, followed by maintenance with tislelizumab plus pemetrexed. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The planned sample size was 66 with a historical control of 7%, an expected value of 20%, a one-sided α of 0.05, and a power of 85%. RESULTS: Between July 11, 2020 and December 13, 2021, 69 patients were enrolled. As of June 30, 2022, the median follow-up was 8.2 months. Among the 62 patients in the efficacy analysis set, estimated 1-year PFS rate was 23.8% (90% CI 13.1% to 36.2%), and its lower bound of 90% CI was higher than the historical control of chemotherapy (7%), which met the primary endpoint. The median PFS was 7.6 (95% CI 6.4 to 9.8) months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI 14.0 to not estimable), with a 1-year OS rate of 74.5% (95% CI 56.5% to 86.0%). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 56.5% (95% CI 43.3% to 69.0%) and 87.1% (95% CI 76.1% to 94.3%), respectively. Patients who had progressed on first-generation/second-generation and third-generation EGFR-TKIs at baseline had shorter PFS than those who progressed on first-generation/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (median 7.5 vs 9.8 months, p=0.031). Patients with positive ctDNA had shorter PFS (median 7.4 vs 12.3 months, p=0.031) than those with negative ctDNA. No grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed. Grades 3-4 TEAEs occurred in 40.6% (28/69) of patients. Grades 3-4 immune-related AEs occurred in 5 (7.2%) patients. CONCLUSION: The study met the primary endpoint for the TIS+chemo cohort. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is effective with an acceptable safety profile for EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC after EGFR TKI failure.

Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Patients With Treatment-Naive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial (CHOICE-01).

PURPOSE: The CHOICE-01 study investigated the efficacy and safety of toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 465) with treatment-naive, advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutations were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive toripalimab 240 mg (n = 309) or placebo (n = 156) once every 3 weeks in combination with chemotherapy for 4-6 cycles, followed by the maintenance of toripalimab or placebo once every 3 weeks plus standard care. Stratification factors included programmed death ligand-1 expression status, histology, and smoking status. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator per RECIST v1.1. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: At the final PFS analysis, PFS was significantly longer in the toripalimab arm than in the placebo arm (median PFS, 8.4 v 5.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.61; two-sided P < .0001). At the interim OS analysis, the toripalimab arm had a significantly longer OS than the placebo arm (median OS not reached v 17.1 months, hazard ratio = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.92; two-sided P = .0099). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was similar between the two arms. Treatment effects were similar regardless of programmed death ligand-1 status. Genomic analysis using whole-exome sequencing from 394 available tumor samples revealed that patients with high tumor mutational burden were associated with significantly better PFS in the toripalimab arm (median PFS 13.1 v 5.5 months, interaction P = .026). Notably, patients with mutations in the focal adhesion-PI3K-Akt signaling pathway achieved significantly better PFS and OS in the toripalimab arm (interaction P values ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Toripalimab plus chemotherapy significantly improves PFS and OS in patients with treatment-naive advanced NSCLC while having a manageable safety profile. Subgroup analysis showed the OS benefit was mainly driven by the nonsquamous subpopulation.

Sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment in advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomized controlled phase 3 trial (ORIENT-3).

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) after failure of first-line chemotherapy are limited. This study (ORIENT-3) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC. METHODS: ORIENT-3 was an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled phase 3 trial that recruited patients with stage IIIB/IIIC/IV sqNSCLC after failure with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 200 mg of sintilimab or 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously every 3 weeks, stratified by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the full analysis set (FAS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and safety. RESULTS: Between August 25, 2017, and November 7, 2018, 290 patients were randomized. For FAS, 10 patients from the docetaxel arm were excluded. The median OS was 11.79 (n = 145; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.28-15.57) months with sintilimab versus 8.25 (n = 135; 95% CI, 6.47-9.82) months with docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.025). Sintilimab treatment significantly prolonged PFS (median 4.30 vs. 2.79 months; HR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.68; P < 0.001) and showed higher ORR (25.50% vs. 2.20%, P < 0.001) and DCR (65.50% vs. 37.80%, P < 0.001) than the docetaxel arm. The median DoR was 12.45 (95% CI, 4.86-25.33) months in the sintilimab arm and 4.14 (95% CI, 1.41-7.23) months in the docetaxel arm (P = 0.045). Treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were reported in 26 (18.1%) patients in the sintilimab arm and 47 (36.2%) patients in the docetaxel arm. Exploratory biomarker analysis showed potential predictive values of expression levels of two transcription factors, including OVOL2 (HR: 0.35; P < 0.001) and CTCF (HR: 3.50; P < 0.001)，for sintilimab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with docetaxel, sintilimab significantly improved the OS, PFS, and ORR of Chinese patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC.

Circulating tumour DNA biomarkers in savolitinib-treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer harbouring MET exon 14 skipping alterations: a post hoc analysis of a pivotal phase 2 study.

Background: Savolitinib, a selective MET inhibitor, showed efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC), harbouring MET exon 14 skipping alteration (METex14). Objective: To analyse post hoc, the association between circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) biomarkers and clinical outcomes, including resistance, with savolitinib. Design: A multicentre, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study. Methods: All enrolled patients with baseline plasma samples were included. Outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by baseline METex14 and post-treatment clearance, coexisting gene alterations at baseline and disease progression. Results: Among 66 patients with baseline ctDNA sequencing, 46 (70%) had detectable METex14. Frequent coexisting baseline gene alterations included TP53 and POT1 mutations. Patients with detectable baseline METex14 exhibited worse PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88-3.57; p = 0.108] and OS (HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.35-7.89; p = 0.006) than those without, despite showing a numerically higher ORR. Among 24 patients with baseline detectable METex14 and evaluable postbaseline samples, 13 achieved METex14 clearance post-treatment. Median time to first clearance was 1.3 months (range, 0.7-1.5). METex14 post-treatment clearance was associated with better ORR (92.3%; 95% CI, 64.0-99.8 versus 36.4%; 95% CI, 10.9-69.2; p = 0.0078), PFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.2-1.3; p = 0.1225) and OS (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.1-1.0; p = 0.0397) versus non-clearance. Among 22 patients with disease progression, 10 acquired pathway alterations (e.g. in RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN) alone or with secondary MET mutations (D1228H/N and Y1230C/H/S). Conclusion: ctDNA biomarkers may allow for longitudinal monitoring of clinical outcomes with savolitinib in patients with METex14-positive PSC and other NSCLC subtypes. Specifically, undetectable baseline METex14 or post-treatment clearance may predict favourable clinical outcomes, while secondary MET mutations and other acquired gene alterations may explain resistance to savolitinib. Registration: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02897479) on 13 September 2016.

Long-Term Efficacy, Safety, and Subgroup Analysis of Savolitinib in Chinese Patients With NSCLCs Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Alterations.

Introduction: Savolitinib has been found to have encouraging antitumor activity and a favorable safety profile in Chinese patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma and other NSCLCs with MET exon 14 skipping alterations (MET ex14 positive) at the primary analysis of a phase 2 study. Here, we present the long-term efficacy and safety data of savolitinib, including subgroup analyses. Methods: This multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study in the People's Republic of China enrolled MET inhibitor-naive adults with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-positive NSCLC (NCT02897479). Oral savolitinib at a dose of 400 or 600 mg was administered once daily (body weight dependent). The primary objectives of the final analysis were long-term overall survival (OS) and subgroup analyses by previous systemic treatment, NSCLC subtypes, and brain metastases. Results: At the final analysis cutoff date (June 28, 2021), a total of 70 patients were enrolled and receiving savolitinib, and median follow-up was 28.4 (interquartile range: 26.2-36.3) months. The median OS was 12.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.5-21.4 [18- and 24-mo OS rates, 42.1% and 31.5%, respectively]). Median OS in pretreated or treatment-naive patients was 19.4 (95% CI: 10.5-31.3) and 10.9 (95% CI: 7.5-14.0) months, respectively; it was 10.6 months (95% CI: 4.6-14.0) in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma, 17.3 months (95% CI: 10.6-23.6) in other NSCLC subtypes, and 17.7 months (95% CI: 10.5-not evaluable) in patients with brain metastases. No new safety signals emerged with prolonged follow-up and exposure. Conclusions: The updated results further confirm the favorable benefit and acceptable safety of savolitinib in Chinese patients with METex14-positive NSCLC.

Sarcopenia is associated with prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer after radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of the sarcopenia on the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients who received radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: Data on clinicopathological characteristics and nutritional parameters were analyzed and correlated with PFS and OS, retrospectively. Skeletal muscle, subcutaneous, visceral and total fat tissue cross-sectional areas were evaluated on CT images at the midpoint of the 3rd lumbar vertebrae. A total of 213 patients were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Sarcopenia was significantly associated with subcutaneous fat content. The univariate analysis demonstrated that OS was superior in patients with non-sarcopenia, non-alcohol, NRI ≥ 100, albumin ≥ 40 g/L, TATI > 83.0, SATI > 27.8, VATI > 49, non-anemia, cervical and upper-thoracic ESCC, T stage 1-2, N stage 0-1 and TNM stage I-II. In the multivariate analysis, sarcopenia, albumin, N stage and TNM stage were identified as independent prognostic factors of survival. This study demonstrated that sarcopenia was related to worse PFS and OS in patients with ESCC who received RT or CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is considered to be a useful predictor in patients with ESCC who received RT or CRT. This study also provided a conceptual basis for further prospective research on the application of the sarcopenia for patients receiving RT or CRT for intermediate- and advanced-stage ESCC.

High efficacy of alectinib in a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with 2 rare ALK fusion sites: a case report.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions have been identified in approximately 5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard first-line treatment for patients with ALK-positive (ALK+) advanced NSCLC. Along with widespread use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the molecular diagnosis of lung cancer, an increasing number of ALK fusion partners are being reported, with the majority being effective for ALK-TKIs. Here, we present the case of a 42-year-old female with no smoking history who was diagnosed with stage IVB lung adenocarcinoma. Two rare ALK fusions were detected simultaneously by NGS in this patient: latent transforming growth factor beta-binding protein 1 (LTBP1)-ALK and huntingtin-interacting protein 1 (HIP1)-ALK. HIP1-ALK fusion was also detected by further RNA sequencing, but LTBP1-ALK failed to give a positive signal. The patient received alectinib as first-line therapy and consequently achieved a good response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was more than 19 months, and the treatment with alectinib is ongoing currently. During treatment, clinical symptoms disappeared and no significant adverse events occurred. This is the first case report describing a patient with an NSCLC tumor harboring 2 rare ALK fusions who responded to alectinib. Our report enriches the knowledge of ALK fusion sites and provides an effective clinical basis for the screening of sensitive fusions.

[A Case Report of AFP-producing Primary Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma 
with Significant Therapeutic Effect].

BACKGROUND: Primary lung squamous carcinoma that produces alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is rare and only four related cases have been reported so far. The specific reasons for elevated serum level of AFP and effective treatment regimens for AFP-producing lung squamous carcinoma are not clear. This paper reports the diagnosis and treatment of AFP-producing lung squamous carcinoma so as to provide some references for similar cases in clinical practice. METHODS: The diagnosis and treatment of an AFP-producing lung squamous carcinoma patient admitted to the Shandong Cancer Hospital on October 23, 2020 was retrospectively analyzed, and literatures were reviewed. RESULTS: A 52-year-old male patient was diagnosed as T4N3M0 stage, IIIc right upper lobe lung squamous cell carcinoma with mediastinal lymph node metastasis and multiple metastases in the lung. The main tumor marker was abnormally increased serum AFP. After the rapid progression of two lines chemotherapy, the patient was given anlotinib combined with carrizumab as third-line treatment. The efficacy evaluation reached to partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) after 2 and 4 cycles of treatment, respectively. The treatment regimen was replaced with albumin paclitaxel plus carrizumab due to gastrointestinal bleeding after the fifth cycle. The patient's condition was under continuous control. CONCLUSIONS: The AFP-producing lung squamous carcinoma patient had a good response to anlotinib and immunotherapy in the case report, which may provide some guidances for the clinical practice and the research on AFP-producing lung squamous carcinoma.

Safety and efficacy of ICI plus anlotinib vs. anlotinib alone as third-line treatment in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus anlotinib as third-line treatment in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). METHODS: A total of 120 patients with ES-SCLC who were admitted to Shandong Cancer Hospital between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into the observation group (n = 62) and the control group (n = 58) according to their different treatment plans. The observation group was given ICI plus anlotinib, while the control group was given anlotinib alone. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). An efficacy evaluation was carried out every 6 weeks. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors. The main treatment-related adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS: In the observation group and the control group, the DCRs were 87.1% and 72.4% (p = 0.044), and the ORRs were 19.4% and 6.9% (p = 0.045), respectively. The median PFS was longer in the observation group (7.5 months) than in the control group (4.6 months) (p = 0.0033). In Cox regression analysis, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, brain metastases and metastatic sites were prognostic factors of ICI plus anlotinib. Compared with the control group, grade 1-2 immune-related pneumonia and hypothyroidism of patients in the observation group were significantly increased (p < 0.05), but grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse reactions were not significantly increased (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: ICI plus anlotinib showed promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in third-line treatment of ES-SCLC.

Paclitaxel liposome for injection (Lipusu) plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic lung squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel controlled clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Lipusu is the first commercialized liposomal formulation of paclitaxel and has demonstrated promising efficacy against locally advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) in a small-scale study. Here, we conducted a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of cisplatin plus Lipusu (LP) versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine (GP) as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic LSCC. METHODS: Patients enrolled were aged between 18 to 75 years, had locally advanced (clinical stage IIIB, ineligible for concurrent chemoradiation or surgery) or metastatic (Stage IV) LSCC, had no previous systemic chemotherapy and at least one measurable lesion as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1) before administration of the trial drug. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles. To explore the possible predictive value of plasma cytokines for LP treatment, plasma samples were collected from the LP group at baseline and first efficacy evaluation time and were then subjected to analysis by 45-Plex ProcartaPlex Panel 1 to detect the presence of 45 cytokines using the Luminex xMAP technology. The correlation between treatment outcomes and dynamic changes in the levels of cytokines were evaluated in preliminary analyses. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 15.4 months. 237 patients in the LP group and 253 patients in the GP group were included in the per protocol set (PPS). In the PPS, the median PFS was 5.2 months versus 5.5 months in the LP and GP group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, P = 0.742) respectively. The median OS was 14.6 months versus 12.5 months in the LP and GP group (HR: 0.83, P = 0.215). The ORR (41.8% versus 45.9%, P = 0.412) and DCR (90.3% versus 88.1%, P = 0.443) were also similar between the LP and GP group. A significantly lower proportion of patients in the LP group experienced adverse events (AEs) leading to treatment interruptions (10.9% versus 26.4%, P < 0.001) or treatment termination (14.3% versus 23.1%, P = 0.011). The analysis of cytokine levels in the LP group showed that low baseline levels of 27 cytokines were associated with an increased ORR, and 15 cytokines were associated with improved PFS, with 14 cytokines, including TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-8, demonstrating an overlapping trend. CONCLUSION: The LP regimen demonstrated similar PFS, OS, ORR and DCR as the GP regimen for patients with locally advanced or metastatic LSCC but had more favorable toxicity profiles. The study also identified a spectrum of different cytokines that could be potentially associated with the clinical benefit in patients who received the LP regimen.

Arsenic sulfide reverses cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo through targeting PD-L1.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have found that programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) might be involved in chemotherapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Arsenic sulfide (As4 S4 ) has been recognized to have antitumor activities and enhance the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy drugs. In this study, we aimed to verify the relationship between PD-L1 and cisplatin (DDP) resistance and identify whether As4 S4 could reverse DDP resistance through targeting PD-L1 in NSCLC. METHODS: The effect of As4 S4 and DDP on cell proliferation and apoptosis was investigated in NSCLC cell lines. The expression of p53 and PD-L1 proteins was measured by western blotting analysis. The levels of miR-34a-5p, miR-34a-3p and PD-L1 in cells were measured by real-time qPCR analysis. Mouse xenograft models were established by inoculation with A549/DDP (DDP-resistant) cells. RESULTS: Depletion of PD-L1 inhibited DDP resistance in A549/DDP and H1299/DDP cells. As4 S4 was capable of sensitizing A549/DDP cells to DDP by enhancing apoptosis. As4 S4 upregulated p53 expression and downregulated PD-L1 expression in A549/DDP cells. As4 S4 increased miR-34a-5p level in A549/DDP cells. Inhibition of p53 by PFT-α partially restored the levels of PD-L1 and miR-34a-5p. Pretreatment with PFT-α suppressed the apoptosis rate induced by cotreatment of As4 S4 and DDP in A549/DDP cells. Cotreatment of DDP and As4 S4 notably reduced the tumor size when compared with DDP treatment alone in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Upregulation of PD-L1 was correlated with DDP resistance in NSCLC cells. Mechanistic analyses indicated that As4 S4 might sensitize NSCLC cells to DDP through targeting p53/miR-34a-5p/PD-L1 axis.

[Clinical Analysis of Docetaxel Combined with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor in Second-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor) and docetaxel, as the standard second-line treatments of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, have limited effects. There are few studies on whether docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor can increase the efficacy and make patients better benefit. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor for the second-line treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients. METHODS: Stage IV NSCLC patients (n=118) who received treatment at Shandong Cancer Hospital between October 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into observation group (n=69) and control group (n=49) according to different treatment plan. Observation group was given docetaxel plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, while control group was given PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. The clinical curative effect and the incidence of adverse reactions of grade 3 and above were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The disease control rate (DCR) was higher in the observation group (89.9%) than that in the control group (73.5%) (P=0.019), and the objective response rate (ORR) showed no significant difference between observation group (24.6%) and control group (16.3%) (P=0.276). Till June 22, 2021, the 1-year PFS rate showed no difference between observation group (16.5%) and control group (7.7%) (P=0.205). During the treatment period, the adverse reactions of the two groups were mostly grade 1 to 2, and could be tolerated. The incidence of bone marrow suppression in observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the remaining adverse reactions were not statistically different from control group. Cox regression analysis showed that performance status (PS) (P=0.020) and age (P=0.049) were independent prognostic factors for the effect of docetaxel combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: The second-line treatment with docetaxel plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in patients with stage IV NSCLC can improve the DCR and prolong the PFS, and the adverse reactions are tolerable.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib versus anlotinib alone as third-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus anlotinib versus anlotinib alone to provide guidance for clinical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients & methods: The records of 139 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who received at least one dose of ICIs plus anlotinib (IA group) or single-agent anlotinib (AA group) were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy of the treatments, survival outcomes and adverse events were analyzed. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Result: The IA group had a significantly prolonged median PFS (mPFS: 5.8 vs 4.2 months; p = 0.022) compared with the AA group (hazard ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.68-0.97). In patients with brain metastases, the IA group exhibited improved efficacy (mPFS: 6.0 vs 3.8 months; p = 0.034) compared with the AA group (hazard ratio: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.23-1.05). Conclusion: ICIs plus anlotinib significantly improved efficacy compared with anlotinib alone and showed substantial potential for the control of intracranial lesions.

Once-daily savolitinib in Chinese patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas and other non-small-cell lung cancers harbouring MET exon 14 skipping alterations: a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Savolitinib is a selective MET tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. We investigated the activity and safety of savolitinib in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma and other non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtypes positive for MET exon 14 skipping alterations (METex14-positive). METHODS: We did a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study across 32 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-positive pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma or other NSCLC subtypes, had either presented with disease progression or toxicity intolerance towards one or more standard treatments or were deemed clinically unsuitable for standard treatment, were MET inhibitor-naive, and had measurable disease. Patients received either 600 mg (bodyweight ≥50 kg) or 400 mg (bodyweight <50 kg) of oral savolitinib once daily until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, initiation of other anti-tumour therapy, non-compliance, patient withdrawal, or patient discontinuation. Radiographic tumour evaluation was done at baseline, every 6 weeks within 1 year of the first dose, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was objective response rate, defined as the proportion of patients with confirmed complete or partial responses by independent review committee (IRC) assessment. The primary endpoint was assessed in the tumour response evaluable set, which comprised all treated patients with a measurable lesion at baseline and at least one adequate scheduled post-baseline tumour assessment or the presence of radiological disease progression, with a sensitivity analysis done in the full analysis set, which comprised all patients who received at least one dose of savolitinib. Safety was also evaluated in the full analysis set. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02897479, and recruitment is complete, with treatment and follow-up ongoing. FINDINGS: From Nov 8, 2016, to Aug 3, 2020, 84 patients with METex14 skipping alterations were screened for eligibility, of whom 70 were enrolled, received savolitinib, and comprised the full analysis set. The IRC-assessed tumour response evaluable set comprised 61 patients. At a median follow-up of 17·6 months (IQR 14·2-24·4), the IRC-assessed objective response rate was 49·2% (36·1-62·3; 30 of 61 patients) in the tumour response evaluable set and 42·9% (95% CI 31·1-55·3; 30 of 70 patients) in the full analysis set. All 70 patients reported at least one treatment-related adverse event. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or more occurred in 32 (46%) patients, the most frequent of which were increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=9), increased alanine aminotransferase (n=7), and peripheral oedema (n=6). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 17 (24%) patients, the most common being abnormal hepatic function (n=3) and hypersensitivity (n=2). One death due to tumour lysis syndrome in a patient with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma was assessed to be probably related to savolitinib by the investigator. INTERPRETATION: Savolitinib yielded promising activity and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma and other NSCLC subtypes positive for METex14 skipping alterations. Savolitinib could therefore be a novel treatment option in this population. FUNDING: Hutchison MediPharma and AstraZeneca. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Bevacizumab biosimilar LY01008 compared with bevacizumab (Avastin) as first-line treatment for Chinese patients with unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated the preclinical pharmacological and toxicological consistency, and clinical pharmacokinetic equivalence of bevacizumab biosimilar LY01008 with reference bevacizumab (Avastin). This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of LY01008 with Avastin in first-line treatment of Chinese patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients with evaluable lesions, good physical status, and adequate organ functions from 67 centers across China were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive LY01008 or Avastin 15 mg/kg intravenously in combination with paclitaxel/carboplatin (combined treatment) for 4-6 cycles, followed by maintenance monotherapy with LY01008 until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 confirmed by independent radiological review committees (IRRC). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03533127). RESULTS: Between December 15th , 2017, and May 15th , 2019, a total of 649 patients were randomized to the LY01008 (n = 324) or Avastin (n = 325) group. As of September 25th , 2019 for primary endpoint analysis, 589 patients received ORR evaluation, with a median number of combined treatment cycles of 5 (range 1-6) and median duration of treatment of 3.0 (range 0.0-5.1) months. ORR of response-evaluable patients in the LY01008 and Avastin groups were 48.5% and 53.0%, respectively. The stratified ORR ratio was 0.91 (90% CI 0.80-1.04, within the prespecified equivalence margin of 0.75-1.33). Up to May 15th , 2020, with a median follow-up of 13.6 (range 0.8-28.4) months, no notable differences in DCR, median DoR, median PFS, median OS, and 1-year OS rate were observed between the LY01008 and Avastin groups. There were no clinically meaningful differences in safety and immunogenicity across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: LY01008 demonstrated similarity to Avastin in terms of efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC. LY01008 combined with paclitaxel/carboplatin is expected to become a new treatment option for unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC patients in the first-line setting.

Equivalent efficacy study of QL1101 and bevacizumab on untreated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This phase 3 study aimed to test equivalence in efficacy and safety for QL1101, a bevacizumab analogue in Chinese patients with untreated locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with either QL1101 or bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg every 3-week for 6 cycles. This was followed by maintenance treatment with single agent QL1101 every 3-week. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary end-points being progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 675 patients, 535 eligible patients were randomized to the QL1101 group (n = 269) and bevacizumab group (n = 266). ORRs were 52.8% and 56.8%, respectively, for the QL1101 and bevacizumab groups, with an ORR hazard ratio 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.8-0131.1). The PFS, OS, DCR, and AEs were comparable between the 2 groups, which remained the same after stratification according to epidermal growth factor receptor mutation or smoking history. CONCLUSIONS: QL1101 showed similar efficacy and safety profiles as compared to bevacizumab among Chinese patients with untreated locally advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Utilization of circulating cell-free DNA profiling to guide first-line chemotherapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Rationale: Platinum-based chemotherapy is one of treatment mainstay for patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) but it is still a "one-size fits all" approach. Here, we aimed to investigate the predictive and monitoring role of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profiling for the outcome of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced LUSC. Methods: Peripheral blood samples of 155 patients from a phase IV trial and 42 cases from an external real-world cohort were prospectively collected. We generated a copy number variations-based classifier via machine learning algorithm to integrate molecular profiling of cfDNA, named RESPONSE SCORE (RS) to predict the treatment outcome. To monitor the treatment efficacy, cfDNA samples collected at different time points were subjected to an ultra-deep sequencing platform. Results: The results showed that patients with high RS showed substantially higher objective response rate than those with low RS in training set (P < 0.001), validation set (P < 0.001) and real-world cohort (P = 0.019). Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in both progression-free survival (training set, P < 0.001; validation set: P < 0.001; real-world cohort: P = 0.019) and overall survival (training set, P < 0.001; validation set: P = 0.037) between high and low RS group. Notably, variant allele frequency (VAF) calculated from an ultra-deep sequencing platform significantly reduced in patients experienced a complete or partial response after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (P < 0.001), while it significantly increased in these of non-responder (P < 0.001). Moreover, VAF undetectable after 2 cycles of chemotherapy was correlated with markedly better objective response rate (P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (P < 0.001) than those with detectable VAF. Conclusions: These findings indicated that the RS, a circulating cfDNA sequencing-based stratification index, could help to guide first-line chemotherapy in advanced LUSC. The change of VAF is valuable to monitor the treatment response.

In vitro studies of H520 cell cycle and apoptosis by anlotinib combined with radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To study in vitro the effects of anlotinib combined with radiotherapy on the lung cancer H520 cell cycle and apoptosis. METHODS: The log growth period H520 cells were divided into the control group, anlotinib group (A group), radiotherapy group (RT group) and combined group (A + RT group). Cell cycle and apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry and changes in H520 cell cycle and apoptosis were analyzed in each group. RESULTS: Anlotinib was determined to significantly inhibit cell growth in all groups, both alone, or in combination with radiotherapy. After receiving corresponding treatments, the proportions of G2/M-phase cells in the control group, A group, RT group and A + RT group were different, and statistically significant (F = 32.086, P < 0.001). The apoptotic cell statistics of H520 cells in the control group, A group, RT group and A + RT group were significantly different (F = 44.537, P < 0.01). The relative expression of CDK1 in each group of cells was 0.04 ± 0.02, 0.07 ± 0.12, 0.81 ± 0.11, and 0.56 ± 0.16, respectively. There were differences between the groups by analysis of variance which were statistically significant (F = 58.36, P < 0.0001). The relative expression of cycle B in each group of cells was 0.27 ± 0.05, 0.40 ± 0.16, 0.65 ± 0.14, and 0.57 ± 0.13, respectively. There were differences between the groups by analysis of variance which were statistically significant (F = 10.77, P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib had an inhibitory effect on lung cancer H520 cell proliferation. A higher rate of apoptosis and G2/M phase block was observed in the anlotinib-radiotherapy combined group. Anlotinib combined with radiotherapy was able to synergistically inhibit tumor cell growth. KEY POINTS: Anrotinib combined with radiotherapy can synergistically inhibit tumor cell growth.