Hand2 Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis of Paragangliomas and Other Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Hand2 is a core transcription factor responsible for chromaffin cell differentiation. However, its potential utility in surgical pathology has not been studied. Thus, we aimed to investigate its expression in paragangliomas, other neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), and additional non-neuroendocrine tumors. We calibrated Hand2 immunohistochemistry on adrenal medulla cells and analyzed H-scores in 46 paragangliomas (PGs), 9 metastatic PGs, 21 cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors (CENETs), 48 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), 8 olfactory neuroblastomas (ONBs), 110 well-differentiated NETs (WDNETs), 10 adrenal cortical carcinomas, 29 adrenal cortical adenomas, 8 melanomas, 41 different carcinomas, and 10 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Both tissue microarrays (TMAs) and whole sections (WSs) were studied. In 171 NENs, previously published data on Phox2B and GATA3 were correlated with Hand2. Hand2 was positive in 98.1% (54/55) PGs, but only rarely in WDNETs (9.6%, 10/104), CENETs (9.5%, 2/21), NECs (4.2%, 2/48), or ONBs (12.5%, 1/8). Any Hand2 positivity was 98.1% sensitive and 91.7% specific for the diagnosis of PG. The Hand2 H-score was significantly higher in primary PGs compared to Hand2-positive WDNETs (median 166.3 vs. 7.5; p < 0.0001). Metastatic PGs were positive in 88.9% (8/9). No Hand2 positivity was observed in any adrenal cortical neoplasm or other non-neuroendocrine tumors, with exception of 8/10 GISTs. Parasympathetic PGs showed a higher Hand2 H-score compared to sympathetic PGs (median H-scores 280 vs. 104, p < 0.0001). Hand2 positivity in NENs serves as a reliable marker of primary and metastatic PG, since other NENs only rarely exhibit limited Hand2 positivity.

Phox2B is a sensitive and reliable marker of paraganglioma-Phox2B immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Phox2B is a transcription factor responsible for chromaffin cell phenotype. Although it is used routinely for diagnosis of neuroblastoma, previous reports concerning its utility in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms have been conflicting. We assessed Phox2b immunoreactivity in different neuroendocrine neoplasms. Tissue microarrays or whole sections of 36 paragangliomas (PGs), 91 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours of different organs (WDNETs), 31 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), and 6 olfactory neuroblastomas (ONBs) were stained with Phox2B antibody (EP312) and GATA3. The percentage of positive cells and intensity was analysed using H-score. Phox2B immunoreactivity was seen in 97.2% (35/36) PGs, 11% (10/91) WDNETs, 9.7% (3/31) NECs, and 16.7% (1/6) ONBs. PGs were significantly more often positive (p < 0.001, χ2) than other neuroendocrine tumours, showing highest H-score (mean 144.9, SD ± 75.1) and percentage of positive cells (median 81.3%, IQR 62.5-92.5%). Compared to Phox2B-positive WDNETs, PGs showed significantly higher H-score (median 145 vs 7.5, p < 0.001) and percentage of positive cells (median 82.5% vs 4.5%, p < 0.001). Phox2B positivity was 97.2% sensitive and 89% specific for the diagnosis of PG. GATA3 was 100% sensitive and 88% specific for the diagnosis of PG. When combined, any Phox2B/GATA3 coexpression was 97.1% sensitive and 99.1% specific for the diagnosis of paraganglioma. Widespread Phox2B immunoreactivity is a highly characteristic feature of PGs and it can be used as an additional marker in differential diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours.

Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast: An international multicenter analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) is a rare and serious complication of breast irradiation. Due to the rarity of the condition, clinical experience is limited and publications on this topic include only retrospective studies or case reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with RAAS between January 2000 and December 2017 in twelve centers across the Czech Republic and Slovakia were evaluated. RESULTS: Data of 53 patients were analyzed. The median age at diagnosis was 72 (range 44-89) years. The median latency period between irradiation and diagnosis of RAAS was 78 (range 36-172) months. The median radiation dose was 57.6 (range 34-66) Gy. The whole breast radiation therapy with radiation boost to the tumor bed was the most common radiotherapy regimen. Total mastectomy due to RAAS was performed in 43 patients (81%), radical excision in 8 (15%); 2 patients were not surgically treated due to unresectable disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy followed surgical therapy of RAAS in 18 patients, 3 patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. The local recurrence rate of RAAS was 43% and the median time from surgery to the onset of recurrence was 7.5 months (range 3-66 months). The 3-year survival rate was 56%, the 5-year survival rate was only 33%. 46% of patients died during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The present data demonstrate that RAAS is a rare condition with high local recurrence rate (43%) and mortality (the 5-year survival rate was 33%.). Early diagnosis of RAAS based on biopsy is crucial for treatment with radical intent. Surgery with negative margins constitutes the most important part of the therapy; the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy is still unclear.

Calcifying pseudoneoplasm of neuroaxis (CAPNON): a comprehensive immunohistochemical and morphological characterization of five cases.

Calcifying pseudoneoplasm of neuroaxis (CAPNON) is a rare lesion of the central nervous system with uncertain histogenesis. We further explored phenotypic spectrum of the entity with respect to possible histogenesis. We collected 5 cases of CAPNONs, performed a detailed morphological assessment, and performed an extensive immunohistochemical analysis (EMA, progesterone receptors, MUC4, SSTR2A, cytokeratin AE1/3, cytokeratin 18, GFAP, neurofilaments, desmin, nestin, synaptophysin, S100 protein, SOX10, CD56, Podoplanin, SATB2, ERG, CD45, and CD163) to elucidate the histogenesis. Furthermore, we performed NGS analysis of one case. The clinical course was benign in all cases. All lesions showed extensively calcified matrix in multilobular arrangement, with a palisade of osteoblast-like cells. Characteristic fibrohyaline matrix was notable in 4/5 cases, while one case was myxoid with rod-like calcifications. Metaplastic lamellar bone was present in 4/5 cases and psammoma bodies were present in 2/5 cases. In 4/5 cases, areas of entrapped glial tissue were present. Expression of EMA was focally present in 3/5 cases, SSTR2A and nestin in 2/5 cases, and progesterone receptor in 2/5 cases in rare cells. We did not observe concomitant expression of EMA, SSTR2A, and progesterone receptor in the same cellular subsets. In one case, NGS showed multiple chromosomal alterations and missense mutation in PIK3CA, attributable to the admixed meningothelial population compatible with meningioma. In another case, biphasic proliferation with myoepithelial phenotype was present. The lesions showed no lineage-specific immunoprofile. Additional pathology was identified in two cases, furthermore suggestive of a possible reactive origin of the lesion.

Mammary analog secretory carcinoma of salivary glands: a report of 2 cases with expression of basal/myoepithelial markers (calponin, CD10 and p63 protein).

Mammary analog secretory carcinoma (MASC) of salivary glands is a recently described neoplasm with favorable outcome. We describe 2 cases of MASC occurring in a 34-year-old female and a 58-year-old male, both presenting with a swelling of upper lip and right parotid gland, measuring 15 and 20mm, respectively. Without adjuvant treatment, both patients have been free of disease for 15 months and 12 months since the operation. Microscopically, both tumors were cystic and showed tubular and cystopapillary architecture. The tumor cells had round to oval nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm. Presence of eosinophilic material was evident within cystic spaces. Immunohistochemically, both tumors expressed cytokeratins (CK), CK7, CK8, CK18, epithelial membrane antigen, vimentin, S-100 protein, mammaglobin, and STAT5a (signal transducer and activator of transcription 5a). Interestingly, both tumors showed variable expression of basal/myoepithelial markers. In one case, we observed diffuse expression of calponin and focal expression of p63 whereas expression of CD10 was absent. In the second case, the staining of calponin was negative, but there was focal expression of both p63 and CD10. Both neoplasms harbored the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion transcript as proved by RT-PCR. Although previously reported only rarely, we conclude that MASC may show expression of basal/myoepithelial markers.