Impact of antimetabolite discontinuation following cytomegalovirus or BK polyoma virus infection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK polyoma virus (BKV) infection following kidney transplantation have been associated with allograft dysfunction and allograft loss. Reduction in immunosuppression is a mainstay of management yet has been associated with increased risk of rejection. According to international consensus guidelines, one approach to management of these viral infections is to discontinue the antimetabolite. Little is known surrounding long-term outcomes in these patients, and it remains unclear if consideration should be given to resuming the antimetabolite as variable re-escalation strategies have been reported. The objective was to describe episodes of rejection and identify risk factors for rejection following antimetabolite withdrawal after CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective review evaluated adult kidney transplant recipients with a serum CMV or BKV DNA PCR ≥500 copies/ml who underwent antimetabolite discontinuation. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine patients were included. Overall, 14 patients (8.8%) experienced BPAR at a median of 1.6 years after antimetabolite discontinuation. Compared to CMV, discontinuation after BKV DNAemia was associated with a higher incidence of BPAR. Characteristics observed more frequently in patients with BPAR included younger age, female sex, higher initial viral load, and development of de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that antimetabolite discontinuation after CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients is a reasonable and safe approach. Further prospective studies investigating optimal immunosuppression management following CMV or BKV DNAemia in kidney transplant recipients are warranted.

Tacrolimus Concentration-to-Dose Ratios in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Relationship to Clinical Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: One factor impacting tacrolimus interpatient variability is the presence of CYP3A5 polymorphisms. Low tacrolimus concentration-to-dose ratios (CDRs), or rapid metabolizers (RMs), have been associated with poor graft function outcomes and higher biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rates in a predominantly white population. Pretransplant CYP genotyping is not routinely conducted, and therefore only a small number of studies have assessed the use of tacrolimus CDRs as a surrogate for metabolism. We explored differences in outcomes between patients with low tacrolimus CDRs and high tacrolimus CDRs (i.e., nonrapid metabolizers [NRMs]) in a diverse patient population. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between tacrolimus CDRs and graft and patient outcomes in kidney transplant recipients at a large transplant center between 2006 and 2016. METHODS: Inclusion criteria consisted of adult kidney transplant recipients who received rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction followed by a maintenance regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone. The primary end point was BPAR at 1 year. Secondary end points included graft survival, patient survival, and toxicities. Determination of clusters was conducted using the two-step cluster analysis with a defined two-cluster distribution. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The NRM cluster consisted of 322 patients with a mean CDR of 2.91 ng/ml/mg. The RM cluster consisted of 932 patients with a mean CDR of 1.14 ng/ml/mg. The BPAR at 1 year posttransplant was 3.7% in the NRM cluster and 3.6% in the RM cluster (p=0.95). Death at 5 years was higher in the NRM group compared with the RM group for unknown reasons (p=0.03). Differences in the incidence of posttransplant toxicities were not statistically significant at any time point, except for increased rates of cutaneous cancer at 5 years and cardiovascular disease overall in the NRM group. CONCLUSION: Tailoring tacrolimus therapy early posttransplant based on CDR is not supported by the findings in this study.