Opportunistic autoimmunity secondary to cancer immunotherapy (OASI): An emerging challenge.

With "checkpoint inhibitors" targeting PD1/PD-1-ligands or CTLA-4/CD28 pathways, immunotherapy has profoundly modified therapeutic strategies in oncology. First approved in refractory metastatic neoplasms (melanoma and lung adenocarcinoma), it is now being tested broadly in other cancers and/or as adjuvant treatment. For a significant proportion of patients, immunotherapy is responsible for "immunological" events, identified as Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs). Owing to the increasing number of prescriptions, identification and management of specific immunological side effects is crucial and requires close collaboration between oncologists and internists and/or other organ specialists. Within irAEs, we propose to individualize the induced autoimmunity by the term "Opportunistic Autoimmunity Secondary to Cancer Immunotherapy" (OASI). The aims of this article are (1) to present the different available checkpoint inhibitors and the OASIs reported with these treatments and (2) to propose practical recommendations for diagnosis, pre-therapeutic assessment and management of OASIs. The need for predictive biomarkers of OASIs occurrence will also be discussed.

Impact of common risk factors of fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVE: The natural course of chronic hepatitis C varies widely. To improve the profiling of patients at risk of developing advanced liver disease, we assessed the relative contribution of factors for liver fibrosis progression in hepatitis C. DESIGN: We analysed 1461 patients with chronic hepatitis C with an estimated date of infection and at least one liver biopsy. Risk factors for accelerated fibrosis progression rate (FPR), defined as ≥ 0.13 Metavir fibrosis units per year, were identified by logistic regression. Examined factors included age at infection, sex, route of infection, HCV genotype, body mass index (BMI), significant alcohol drinking (≥ 20 g/day for ≥ 5 years), HIV coinfection and diabetes. In a subgroup of 575 patients, we assessed the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms previously associated with fibrosis progression in genome-wide association studies. Results were expressed as attributable fraction (AF) of risk for accelerated FPR. RESULTS: Age at infection (AF 28.7%), sex (AF 8.2%), route of infection (AF 16.5%) and HCV genotype (AF 7.9%) contributed to accelerated FPR in the Swiss Hepatitis C Cohort Study, whereas significant alcohol drinking, anti-HIV, diabetes and BMI did not. In genotyped patients, variants at rs9380516 (TULP1), rs738409 (PNPLA3), rs4374383 (MERTK) (AF 19.2%) and rs910049 (major histocompatibility complex region) significantly added to the risk of accelerated FPR. Results were replicated in three additional independent cohorts, and a meta-analysis confirmed the role of age at infection, sex, route of infection, HCV genotype, rs738409, rs4374383 and rs910049 in accelerating FPR. CONCLUSIONS: Most factors accelerating liver fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C are unmodifiable.

HPV self-sampling or the Pap-smear: a randomized study among cervical screening nonattenders from lower socioeconomic groups in France.

Today in France, low attendance to cervical screening by Papanicolaou cytology (Pap-smear) is a major contributor to the 3,000 new cervical cancer cases and 1,000 deaths that occur from this disease every year. Nonattenders are mostly from lower socioeconomic groups and testing of self-obtained samples for high-risk Human Papilloma virus (HPV) types has been proposed as a method to increase screening participation in these groups. In 2011, we conducted a randomized study of women aged 35-69 from very low-income populations around Marseille who had not responded to an initial invitation for a free Pap-smear. After randomization, one group received a second invitation for a free Pap-smear and the other group was offered a free self-sampling kit for HPV testing. Participation rates were significantly different between the two groups with only 2.0% of women attending for a Pap-smear while 18.3% of women returned a self-sample for HPV testing (p ≤ 0.001). The detection rate of high-grade lesions (≥CIN2) was 0.2‰ in the Pap-smear group and 1.25‰ in the self-sampling group (p = 0.01). Offering self-sampling increased participation rates while the use of HPV testing increased the detection of cervical lesions (≥CIN2) in comparison to the group of women receiving a second invitation for a Pap-smear. However, low compliance to follow-up in the self-sampling group reduces the effectiveness of this screening approach in nonattenders women and must be carefully managed.

[Prevalence of genotype-specific HPV infection among women in France: implications for screening and vaccination]. / Prévalence des génotypes d'HPV chez les femmes en France : implications pour le dépistage et la vaccination.

OBJECTIVES: To assess human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and genotype distribution by age and cervical cytology/histology status among women undergoing routine gynecological examinations, and to discuss the possible impact on preventive strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples were tested for HPV DNA, mRNA, and HPV genotypes. Women with ASC-US+ and/or at least one positive HPV test were referred to colposcopy. Those with normal colposcopy results had biopsies taken at the 6 and 12 o'clock positions of the normal transformation zone. RESULTS: Of the 5002 women, 515 (10.3 %) were less than 25 and 4487 (89.7 %) were 25 years old or more. Overall HPV prevalence was 10.1 % to 16.1 % depending on the assay. HPV prevalence increased with the cytological and histological severity of cervical lesions. Prevalence of HPV 16/18 was 5.2 % and 2.7 % in women less than 25 and 25 years old or more, respectively. HPV 16 was the type most strongly associated with a diagnosis of CIN3+ (odds ratio=11.64 versus HPV 16 absent, P<0.001). A high proportion of high-grade cervical lesions (60.6 % of genotyping assay-positive CIN2+) were associated with HPV types 31, 33, 45, 52, or 58. DISCUSSION ET CONCLUSION: These data indicate that almost all young women could benefit from HPV prophylactic vaccination, but confirm the need for continued cervical screening and highlight the need for future vaccines to target a wider range of HPV types.

Serum bile acid levels as a predictor for the severity of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Serum bile acids (SBAs) are commonly elevated in cholestatic liver diseases, but it is unclear if SBA levels are also elevated in noncholestatic chronic liver diseases and whether those levels correlate with disease severity. We analysed SBA levels of 135 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and correlated these levels with the degree of liver fibrosis as determined by liver biopsy. In addition, we assessed the accuracy of SBA levels as a noninvasive predictor for liver fibrosis by its comparison to the patients' FibroTest scores. Two-thirds (90/135 patients, 67%) of the study patients had nonsevere liver fibrosis (Metavir F0-F2), and the others (45/135, 33%) had severe fibrosis or cirrhosis (Metavir F3-F4). The SBA levels were significantly higher in patients with severe fibrosis as compared to nonsevere fibrosis (11.46 ± 10.01 vs 6.37 ± 4.69, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, a receiver operator characteristics curve based on a model that included serum bile acids, age, body mass index, serum AST, glucose and cholesterol levels suggested that this combination reliably predicts the degree of liver fibrosis and is not inferior to the current noninvasive FibroTest score (areas under the curve of 0.837 vs 0.83, respectively, P = 0.87). We conclude that measurement of SBA levels may have a clinical role as a simple noninvasive tool to assess the severity of HCV-induced liver disease. Combined with widely available laboratory parameters, SBA levels can predict disease severity with a high degree of accuracy.

Comparison of three algorithms of non-invasive markers of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that performance of non-invasive markers for liver fibrosis in hepatitis C may improve when combined. Three algorithms based on the combination of Fibrotest, Forns' index and AST-to-platelet ratio (APRI) have been proposed: Sequential Algorithm for Fibrosis Evaluation (SAFE biopsy); Fibropaca algorithm; Leroy algorithm. AIM: To compare three algorithms to diagnose significant fibrosis (≥ F2 by METAVIR) and cirrhosis (F4). METHODS: A total of 1013 HCV monoinfected cases undergoing liver biopsy were consecutively enrolled in seven centres. Fibrotest, APRI and Forns' index were measured at the time of liver biopsy, considered the reference standard. RESULTS: Overall, performance of combination algorithms was significantly higher than the single non-invasive methods (P < 0.0001). SAFE biopsy and Fibropaca algorithm saved a significantly higher number of liver biopsies than the single methods (P < 0.0001). For ≥ F2, Fibropaca algorithm saved more biopsies than SAFE biopsy (51.7% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.0003), but with lower accuracy (87.6% vs. 90.3%, P = 0.05). Regarding F4, the number of saved liver biopsies did not differ between SAFE biopsy and Fibropaca algorithm (79.1% vs. 76.2%, P = 0.12). However, SAFE biopsy showed a lower accuracy when compared with Fibropaca algorithm (91.2% vs. 94%, P = 0.02). As to Leroy algorithm, although it showed a good performance for ≥ F2 (93.5% accuracy), it saved less liver biopsies than SAFE biopsy and Fibropaca algorithm (29.2% vs. 43.8% and 51.7% respectively, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: SAFE biopsy and the Fibropaca algorithm have excellent performance for liver fibrosis in hepatitis C, allowing a significant reduction in the need for liver biopsies. They can be useful in clinical practice and for large-scale screening.

The impact of liver disease aetiology and the stages of hepatic fibrosis on the performance of non-invasive fibrosis biomarkers: an international study of 2411 cases.

BACKGROUND: Performance of non-invasive fibrosis biomarkers may be influenced by aetiology of chronic liver disease (CLD) and the stages of hepatic fibrosis, but large-scale studies are pending. AIM: To investigate the effect of aetiogy and stages of hepatic fibrosis on the performance of fibrosis biomarkers. METHODS: A total of 2411 patients with compensated CLD (HCV=75.1%, HBV=10.5%, NASH=7.9%, HIV/HCV=6.5%) were consecutively enrolled in 9 centres. APRI, Forns'index, Lok index, AST-to-ALT ratio, Fib-4, platelets and Fibrotest-Fibrosure were tested against liver biopsy, considered the gold standard. The effect of the stages of hepatic fibrosis to diagnose significant fibrosis and cirrhosis (≥F2 and F4 respectively) was investigated through difference between advanced and non-advanced fibrosis stages (DANA). Performance was expressed as observed area under the ROC curve (ObAUROC) and AUROC adjusted for DANA (AdjAUROC). RESULTS: Performance of APRI and Fibrotest-Fibrosure was higher than other biomarkers. In all aetiologies, AdjAUROC was higher than ObAUROC. APRI showed its best performance in HCV monoinfected cases, with an AdjAUROC of 0.77 and 0.83 for ≥F2 and F4 respectively. In HBV and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients, its performance was poor (AdjAUROC <0.70). Performance of Fibrotest-Fibrosure was good in all aetiologies for both ≥F2 and F4 (AdjAUROC >0.73), except for ≥F2 in NASH (AdjAUROC = 0.64). Performance of all biomarkers was reduced in HCV cases with normal ALT. CONCLUSIONS: Aetiology is a major factor influencing the performance of liver fibrosis biomarkers. Even after correction for DANA, APRI and Fibrotest-Fibrosure exhibit the best performance. However, liver biopsy is not replaceable, especially to diagnose ≥F2 and in HCV carriers with normal ALT.

ActiTest accuracy for the assessment of histological activity grades in patients with chronic hepatitis C, an overview using Obuchowski measure.

BACKGROUND: ActiTest (AT) is a biomarker of liver necro-inflammatory histological activity validated in patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV). AIM: The aim was to assess the accuracy of AT in comparison with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) the standard of care. METHODS: Methods used an integrated database of individual data and the new recommended Obuchowski measures. An updated "classical" meta-analysis of AT validation studies was also performed. The main end points were the area under the ROC curves (AUROCs) for the diagnosis of each histological activity grade defined using METAVIR scoring system. To avoid repeated tests and the spectrum effect of activity grades prevalence, the comparison of AT and ALT accuracies used the Obuchowski method. RESULTS: For the individual analysis, a total of 1250 patients were included and for the meta-analysis six studies (2017 patients) were included. The overall accuracy of AT for the diagnosis of any activity grade (Obuchowski measure=0.850) was significantly higher than the accuracy of ALT (Obuchowski measure=0.837; P=0.009). The updated standard meta-analysis confirmed the accuracy of AT (p<0.0001) both in independent AUROC=0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.85) and in non independent studies AUROC=0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of AT for grading the necro-inflammatory activity of patients with HCV was significantly higher than ALT serum activity alone, the standard biomarker.

Fibrotest or Fibroscan for evaluation of liver fibrosis in haemophilia patients infected with hepatitis C.

Non-invasive modalities to estimate fibrosis stage are desirable in hepatitis C-infected haemophilia patients. Previous studies found a high rate of significant fibrosis both by Fibrotest (FT) and Fibroscan (FS) in these patients. To estimate liver fibrosis and to assess the concordance between FT and FS in hepatitis C-infected haemophilia patients. FT and FS were performed at different laboratories and were unaware of the results of the alternative test. Three successive liver stiffness measurements (LSM) were performed at different sites on the liver. Two-validated algorithms were used to improve evaluation of fibrosis by non-invasive methods. Fifty-seven hepatitis C-infected haemophilia patients were evaluated by FT and FS. Acquisition of LSMs was not feasible in two patients: obesity--one, surgical scars--one. Fibrosis stage > or=F2, > or =F3 or =F4 were estimated in about a half, about a third and in 15-20% of the evaluated patients by FS and FT respectively. The corresponding concordance rates and kappa score for fibrosis stage > or =F2, > or =F3 or =F4 between FT and FS were 62%, 69%, 85% and 0.24, 0.32, 0.44 respectively. Using the two aforementioned algorithms, additional 14 patients could be reliably estimated for fibrosis stage > or =F2. High proportion hepatitis C-infected haemophilia patients were estimated with significant or advanced stages of liver fibrosis using both tests. Nevertheless, the agreement between modalities was only fair and improved with more advanced stages of fibrosis. Practical algorithms for the accuracy of FT and FS may improve reliable evaluation of fibrosis in this population.

[ANRS-fibrovic and homavic: role of non invasive markers of liver fibrosis and insulin resistance during antiviral treatment in HIV-HCV co-infected patients from ANRS HC 02 RIVABIC trial]. / ANRS-Fibrovic et Homavic : rôle des marqueurs de fibrose et de l'insulino-résistance au cours du traitement de l'hépatite C chez les malades co-infectés VHC-VIH de l'essai ANRS HC 02 RIVABIC.

Non invasive liver fibrosis scores have been proposed as alternatives to liver biopsy in hepatitis C virus (HCV) -infected patients. We assessed the impact of antiviral treatment on non invasive serological markers of liver fibrosis in HIV-HCV co-infected patients who received 48-weeks of HCV treatment. In HIV-HCV co-infected patients, HCV clearance was associated with a significant reduction in non invasive fibrosis serological markers, which most likely reflect the histological improvement associated with sustained virologic response. We assessed the association between insulin resistance, liver fibrosis, and liver steatosis in HIV-HCV and HCV-infected patients. Insulin resistance was associated with liver fibrosis and steatosis in HCV mono-infected but not in HIV-HCV co-infected patients. Significant liver fibrosis was associated with insulin resistance independent of liver steatosis only in HCV mono-infected patients. We also assessed the impact of insulin resistance on the response to HCV therapy in HIV-HCV co-infected patients. A high HOMA-IR level was frequently found in HIV-HCV co-infected patients and was associated with a reduced sustained virologic response rate. Improving insulin sensitivity may be a useful adjunct to HCV therapy in HIV-HCV co-infected patients.

Evaluation and improvement of a reliable diagnosis of cirrhosis by blood tests.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rates of reliable diagnosis of cirrhosis by two usual blood tests. METHODS: Reliable diagnosis was mainly evaluated by comparing rates of positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values with FibroTest and FibroMeters, as either standard test or specifically designed for cirrhosis, in 1056 patients with chronic hepatitis C. RESULTS: Using the diagnostic limits provided by fibrosis stage scales, the PPV for cirrhosis was: standard FibroMeters: 68.5% versus FibroTest: 37.1%. Using 95% PPV, the cirrhosis detection rate was: specific FibroMeter: 26.1% versus FibroTest: 2.0% (P<10(-3)). The cirrhosis detection rate increased from 26 to 65% by performing liver biopsy in 8% of patients with indeterminate results on specific FibroMeter between 95% NPV and PPV. On the other hand, specific FibroMeter provided three intervals of 95% reliable diagnosis with no biopsy: less than or equal to 95% NPV: no cirrhosis (threshold: diagnosis); significant fibrosis; and greater than or equal to 95% PPV: cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: The detection rate and PPV for cirrhosis using fibrosis scales were fair for standard FibroMeter and poor for FibroTest. Around one-fourth of cases of cirrhosis are detected by the 95% PPV of specific FibroMeter, and around two-thirds by performing an additional liver biopsy in only 8% of patients. Finally, specific FibroMeter can avoid liver biopsy by classifying patients into three categories: no cirrhosis; significant fibrosis; and cirrhosis.

Optimized stepwise combination algorithms of non-invasive liver fibrosis scores including Hepascore in hepatitis C virus patients.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive liver fibrosis scores such as Hepascore (HS) have been proposed as an alternative to liver biopsy in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. AIM: To validate HS as an alternative to liver biopsy and Fibrotest (FT) and propose five optimized combination algorithms to improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: The cohort included 467 patients with HCV. There were 274/467 (59%) men, and mean age was 47 +/- 12 years. RESULTS: Hepascore area under ROC curves (AUC) for > or =F2, F3F4 and F4 diagnosis were 0.82, 0.84 and 0.90 respectively, in the same range as FT. HS and FT were concordant in 387/467 (82%) for fibrosis staging. Among these patients, 342/387 (88%) were concordant with liver biopsy. AUCs of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to Platelets Ratio Index (APRI) and Forns for > or =F2 were 0.76 and 0.73 (0.65-0.79) respectively. The algorithm combining APRI and HS had the highest rate of avoided liver biopsies (45%) with a high diagnostic accuracy (91%). CONCLUSIONS: Hepascore is an accurate non-invasive marker for > or =F2 and F4 diagnosis in HCV patients. In a pragmatic approach, a stepwise optimized algorithm combining APRI and FT or HS considerably increases diagnostic accuracy and avoided liver biopsies.

Prediction of HIV-1 protease inhibitor resistance by Molecular Modeling Protocols (MMPs) using GenMol software.

This paper investigates the contribution of Molecular Modeling to (i) predict and (ii) understand more fundamentally HIV drug resistance. Based on a new automated GenMol module, these goals are approached by Molecular Modeling Protocols (MMPs), respectively, (i) the Molecular Modeling Phenotype Protocol (MMPP) and (ii) the Molecular Modeling Phenotype-Genotype Protocol (MMGPP). Section 2 recalls clinical practice with a reference case study and Section 3 presents atomistic simulation tools. Section 4 is the heart of the paper. In Section 4.1, MMPP drug resistance prediction is based on correlations between fold resistances versus binding energies on 2959 HIV-1 complexes with 6 protease inhibitors. Based on a drug sensitivity twofold criterion, modeling prediction is able to replace long and costly phenotype tests. In Section 4.2, MMGPP enlightens drug resistance by investigating steric and energetic residues/inhibitor interaction. Section 5 gives a synthesis on modeling contribution to drug resistance prediction. In conclusion, the most promising trend consists of MMP automats that are able to suggest a real time diagnosis taking into account the history of each patient, to enrich databases and to develop therapy strategy and new drugs.

Improving estimation of liver fibrosis using combination and newer noninvasive biomarker scoring systems in hepatitis C-infected haemophilia patients.

Non-invasive biomarkers have gained popularity for estimating fibrosis stage. In our hepatitis C-infected haemophilia patients, Fibrotest (FT) correctly identified clinically advanced or minimal liver disease. More accurate tests, like the FibroMeters, have recently been validated. The aim of the study was to improve the estimation of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C-infected haemophiliacs using a combination of biomarkers and FibroMeters. One hundred and thirty-two hepatitis C-infected haemophilia patients (124 male, mean age: 39+/-14 years) were evaluated. The following biomarkers were used: FT, AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), Forns index, hyaluronic acid and FibroMeter. We applied a published algorithm suggesting that if FT is in concordance with APRI and/or Forns score, then the FT concurs with liver biopsy for estimation of fibrosis. Concordance of three or more biomarkers was present in 43.2% (57/132) of the patients. This high discordance rate was mainly because of indeterminate scores. Significant fibrosis (F2-F4) was estimated at 34.8% (46/132) and 37.9% (50/132) by the FT and FibroMeter respectively. The discordance rate between the FT and FibroMeter was 16.7% (22/132), (P<0.01 vs. other biomarkers). Using the algorithm, liver histology could be confidently estimated in 69.7% (92/132) of the patients. Concordance between the FT and FibroMeter in those patients who met the terms of the algorithm was 90.2% (83/92). Discordance between biomarkers is significant, and is mainly because of biomarkers with indeterminate results. The concordance rate between FT and FibroMeter is higher compared with the other biomarkers. Practical combination of tests may potentially limit the need of liver biopsy in the majority of haemophilia patients.

Variability of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves in the diagnostic evaluation of liver fibrosis markers: impact of biopsy length and fragmentation.

BACKGROUND: The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is widely used as an estimate of the diagnostic value for fibrosis markers. Biopsy length and fragmentation are known as risk factors of false positive or false negative of biopsy but their quantitative impact on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve variability has not been assessed. AIM: To assess these relationships to better compare the fibrosis markers. METHODS: The area under the ROC curves of FibroTest for the diagnosis of fibrosis was estimated in patients with chronic hepatitis C using an integrated database including 1312 patients with FibroTest and biopsy. To take into account the biopsy length, we used two adjustment factors: one in which an observed area under the ROC curve could be adjusted according to the relative area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of a biopsy of a given length vs. the entire liver and one taking into account the prevalence of each fibrosis stage defining advanced and non-advanced fibrosis. RESULTS: The mean biopsy length was smaller for cirrhosis (F4, 16 mm) vs. F3, (18 mm, P=0.01) and F0 (19 mm, P=0.01). The mean number of fragments was higher for cirrhosis (F4=4.1 fragments) vs. all the other stages (F0=1.9, F1=1.9, F2=1.9, F3=2.3; P<0.001 vs. F4). The FibroTest area under the ROC curves for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis, adjusted for stages' prevalence, ranged from 0.80 to 0.98 depending on biopsy length and fragmentation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The comparison of the area under the ROC curves of fibrosis markers should take into account the biopsy length and fragmentation.

Validation and comparison of indexes for fibrosis and cirrhosis prediction in chronic hepatitis C patients: proposal for a pragmatic approach classification without liver biopsies.

Noninvasive indexes have been developed to predict fibrosis staging. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these indexes in comparison with liver histology in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. A total of 235 consecutive patients with HCV infection from the Fibropaca multicentre independent study were included in this paper. FibroTest (FT), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and Forns score were assessed in the cohort and compared with liver histology performed on the same day. The main end point was the area under characteristic curves (AUCs) for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F2-F4) and cirrhosis (F4) by the METAVIR classification. Mean age was 46 (+/-11) years, 55% were males, 42% (n = 99) had significant fibrosis (F2-F4) and 7% (n = 16) had cirrhosis (F4). For the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, respective AUCs of FT, APRI and Forns score were 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.86), 0.71 (0.67-0.79) and 0.76 (0.70-0.82); for cirrhosis prognosis, AUCs of FT and APRI were 0.82 (0.77-0.87) and 0.81 (0.76-0.86) (AUCs not significantly different). Using each index independently, all patients were classified by FT, 214 (91%) patients were classified by APRI and 129 (55%) by Forns score. There were significantly more cases of discordances between APRI and liver biopsy than between FT or Forns score and liver biopsy (P < 0.05). Performing all scores (FT, Forns and APRI) without liver biopsy allowed fibrosis to be well evaluated in 191 patients (81.3%), including patients with FT failure. Liver biopsy remained mandatory to evaluate fibrosis in 44 patients (18.7%). Our study shows that performing all the tests and liver biopsy improves the diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients without patent comorbidities. The combination of all tests with liver biopsy allowed 225/235 (96%) patients to be correctly classified. The combination of all tests without liver biopsy allowed 191/235 (81.3%) patients to be correctly classified; liver biopsy remained mandatory in some patients (18.7%).

Treatment of hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection: from large trials to real life.

To analyse the barriers for anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) treatment in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HCV coinfected patients, we surveyed 71 physicians specializing in infectious disease (39%), internal medicine (27%), HIV/AIDS information and care (17%), haematology (10%) and hepatology (6%). A standard data collection form was used to identify patients observed in 7 days in November 2004. Three hundred and eighty patients with the following characteristics were included: male gender 71%; mean age 41.5 years; HIV diagnosed 12 years ago; routes of transmission via injection drug use (78%); undetectable HIV viral load (235/373, 63%) or <10 000 copies/mL (86/373, 23%). HCV RNA was positive in 325 of 369 (88%) patients; HCV genotype was 1 or 4 in 65% and liver biopsy had been carried out in 56%. There were several explanations for the nontreatment of HCV in 205 of the 380 (54%) patients, with 2.4 reasons per patient: anti-HCV treatment was deemed questionable (n = 109) because of minor hepatic lesions, alcohol consumption, or active drug use; no liver biopsy had been performed (n = 68); treatment was contraindicated (n = 62), mainly for psychiatric reasons; there was physician conviction of poor patient compliance (n = 62) and patient refusal (n = 33). Patients having received anti-HCV treatment (n = 91) compared with those who had never received any (n = 205) were more commonly of European origin, had better control of their HIV infection, were followed by a hepatologist more often, had a liver biopsy more often and had more commonly a high HCV viral load (P < 0.001). In 'real life' in France in 2004, more than half of the HIV-HCV coinfected patients have never received anti-HCV treatment. The main reasons are a treatment that may be deemed questionable (minimal hepatic lesions, alcohol, active drug use), a lack of available liver biopsy, a psychiatric contraindication and physician conviction of poor patient compliance.

[Serum markers of non-invasive fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection]. / Les marqueurs sanguins non invasifs de fibrose hépatique au cours de l'infection chronique par le virus de l'hépatite C.

MATTER: Liver biopsy is recommended for the management of patients infected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) and is currently the gold standard in assessing liver histology. It's an invasive test prone to complications with a morbidity rate of 0.3 to 0.6% and a mortality rate up to 0.05%. Since the last decade, researchers developed non invasifs biomarkers of liver fibrosis as an alternative to liver biopsy. These scores are based on different algorithms with various combinations of biomarkers issued from extra-cellular matrix, serum and cells. CURRENT EVENTS: The diagnostic performance of these scores, estimated by the AUROC for significant fibrosis (>F2), in patients with chronic hepatitis C reach 0.78 to 0.90 for the most accurate. In HIV-HCV co-infected patients and patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis the diagnostic performance of these scores reach 0.74 to 0.88 and 0.73 to 0.97 respectively. PERSPECTIVES: Liver fibrosis biomarkers constitutes an alternative to liver biopsy due to their non invasive approach, their easy reproducibility and accuracy. However, these scores must be used only after a validation in multicentric independent studies. The future is based on the comparison and validation of these scores after laboratory methods standardization.

Non-invasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis in haemophilia patients with hepatitis C: can you avoid liver biopsy?

Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for the evaluation of fibrosis despite its risks and limitations, especially in haemophilia patients. Recently, non-invasive biomarkers have been used to assess histological features. The most thoroughly evaluated biomarker is the FibroTest (FT) (AUROC 0.80 for fibrosis stages F2F3F4 vs. F0F1). To estimate liver fibrosis in haemophilia patients infected with hepatitis C (HCV) using non-invasive biomarkers without liver biopsy. One hundred and thirty-two haemophilia patients (124 male, mean age 38 +/- 14 years) with anti-HCV antibodies were evaluated. These patients were stratified into several groups: patients with features of advanced liver disease - seven, persistently HCV RNA-negative - 21, persistently normal liver function tests (LFTs)- 24, HCV/HIV co-infected - 27. The following biomarkers of fibrosis were used: FT, AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), Forns index, age-platelet index and hyaluronic acid. The obtained scores were correlated with the clinical features of the patients. Estimated by the FT, the distribution of the stage of fibrosis in the 132 patients was F0F1 = 65% (86/132), F2 = 5% (7/132), F3 = 13% (17/132) and F4 = 17% (22/132). Using FT, all patients with clinical suspicion of advanced liver disease were classified as F3F4, whereas patients with persistently HCV RNA-negative were all classified as F0F1. Twenty-one per cent (5/24) of the patients with persistently normal LFTs had fibrosis stage F3F4. The proportion of F3F4 among HCV/HIV co-infected patients was significantly higher than among HCV mono-infected (52% vs. 33%; P = 0.05). Concordance of three or more biomarkers was present in 43% (57/132) of the patients. Liver biopsy could be avoided in 70% (92/132) using a practical assumption that if FT is in concordance with APRI and/or Forns, then we may confidently rely on the biomarker. Concordance rate for patients with presumably advanced or minimal liver disease was excellent (100% and 95% respectively). In our HCV-infected haemophilia patients, FT correctly identified clinically advanced or minimal liver disease. Discordance among the various biomarkers of fibrosis was considerate; nevertheless, practical combination of FT, APRI, and Forns may predict stage of fibrosis with accuracy, potentially avoiding liver biopsy in the majority of the patients.

Multicentre study of hepatitis B virus genotypes in France: correlation with liver fibrosis and hepatitis B e antigen status.

The clinical significance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes is still under debate. The aims of this study were to assess the distribution of HBV genotypes in France and to identify the associations between HBV genotypes and patient demographics, severity of liver disease and HBeAg status in patients referred to tertiary care centres. This was a French, multicentre, retrospective study on 262 patients with chronic HBV infection. HBV genotypes were determined using INNO-LiPA. Liver fibrosis damage was evaluated by histological analysis of biopsy samples. Patients were mainly male (74%), of Caucasian (65%), Asian (17%) or African (18%) ethnicity and 36% were HBeAg positive. All A-G genotypes were found, the most frequent being genotypes D (27%) and A (24%), followed by E (13%) and C (12%), and B (7%). Mixed genotypes were detected in 16% of the cases. Genotype A was associated with sexual contact (P < 0.001) and genotype D with transfusion (P < 0.001) and HBe antibody positivity (P = 0.03).The distribution of HBV genotypes differed with regard to the ethnicity, and may reflect migration patterns. Genotypes A and D were the most frequent in France. Genotype A was associated with HBeAg positivity and genotype D with HBe antibody positivity. In our European patients, we find no clear association between a given HBV genotype and liver disease severity.