RESUMEN
The aim of this study was to compare the virtually planned position to the postoperative position of the maxilla, having performed the maxilla-first sequence or mandible-first sequence orthognathic surgery. An audit of 64 patients who underwent bimaxillary surgery between 2017 and 2020 was performed. Thirty patients had maxilla-first surgery and 34 had mandible-first surgery. The planned and post-surgical positions were analyzed using specific skeletal landmarks. Differences were calculated and the two-sample t-test was used to compare the groups. Measured differences between the planned and postoperative results differed significantly between the mandible-first and maxillary-first surgery groups (P < 0.001). The maxillary central incisors were under-advanced in the anterior-posterior direction in both groups. Most data points showed deviation from the surgical plan ≤ 2 mm and ≤ 4°. Secondarily, maxillary under-advancement in the mandible-first cohort was evaluated; these patients were subdivided into rigid and non-rigid fixation groups. The non-rigid fixation group showed less accuracy compared to the rigid fixation group, which was statistically significant (P = 0.014). The findings of this study demonstrate that virtual surgical planning can be less accurate in predicting the maxillary incisor position when performing mandible-first surgery, but this inaccuracy is within the acceptable range and can be mitigated by rigid fixation of the mandible.
RESUMEN
We treated 34 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIb or IV non-small cell lung cancer with trimetrexate 150-200 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes every two weeks. Six of 31 evaluable patients (19%) achieved a partial response. The major toxic effects from this regimen were myelosuppression, nausea/vomiting, and skin rash. We conclude that this well-tolerated schedule of trimetrexate has significant activity as a single agent against non-small cell lung cancer.