The Risk of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Children: Guidance for Antiresorptive Use in Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Antiresorptive targeted cancer therapies, such as denosumab and bisphosphonates, are used in adults, but their application in pediatric cancer is more recent. Side effects such as osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) observed in adults have curtailed use of these medications in the pediatric population. PURPOSE: This study assesses the frequency of ONJ, other side effects, and the indications for use of denosumab versus bisphosphonates in pediatric subjects. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A retrospective cohort study of pediatric subjects who underwent bisphosphonate or denosumab therapy at our institution from 2007-2023 was conducted. Subjects aged ≥ 18 years at therapy initiation were excluded. INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: The independent variable was antiresorptive therapy divided into 2 groups, treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates or denosumab. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): Primary outcomes were development of bisphosphonate-related and denosumab-related ONJ. Secondary outcomes included additional side effects. COVARIATES: ONJ risk factors, subject demographics, indications for use, timing, duration, and cumulative dose of antiresorptive therapy were abstracted. ANALYSES: Univariate and bivariate statistics were computed to describe the sample and measure associations between antiresorptive therapy and outcomes. P values < .05 conferred statistical significance. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 178 subjects with a mean age of 11.7 ± 6.1 years. There were 14 (7.9%) and 164 (92.1%) subjects treated with denosumab and bisphosphonate therapies, respectively. There were 0 cases of ONJ across all subjects. The most common indication for treatment was adjuvant targeted therapy for aggressive tumors and malignancy (39.3%) followed by osteoporosis (14.6%). Subjects treated with denosumab had higher frequencies of hypercalcemia and severe bone pain than subjects treated with bisphosphonates, 28.6% versus 1.2% (P < .001) and 14.3% versus 0.00% (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: While invasive dental procedures are ideally performed before antiresorptive treatment, our data suggest that bisphosphonates may be used safely in the pediatric population with low concern for ONJ. Our data also demonstrated bisphosphonates may have a more tolerable side effect profile than denosumab. If the perceived benefits are similar, we recommend using bisphosphonates as first-line therapy in children while reserving denosumab for refractory cases. Future studies will help determine long-term side effects and differences in efficacies of these medications.

Custom Endoprosthesis-Assisted Pediatric Microsurgical Jaw Reconstruction.

Surgical treatment of pediatric maxillary and mandibular tumors can cause significant postresection disfigurement, mastication, and speech dysfunction. The need to restore form and function without compromising growth at the recipient and donor sites poses a particular reconstructive dilemma. This study evaluates outcomes of the custom endoprosthesis (CE) compared with noncustom reconstruction (NCR) and introduces an algorithm using CE to optimize available soft tissue reconstructive options. An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review of all patients undergoing maxillary or mandibular reconstruction between 2016 and 2022 was completed. The independent variable of interest was CE utilization. Primary outcomes of interest included hardware failure/removal or exposure, major complications, and revision surgeries. Covariates of interest included patient demographics, medical comorbidities, tumor size, and pathologic diagnosis. Statistical analyses including independent t test, χ2 analyses, and univariate/multivariate logistic regression were performed using RStudio version 4.2.1. Fifty-one patients (37 mandible and 14 maxilla) underwent CE or NCR. Of patients, 37% (n = 19) received CE. Of patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction, there were significantly lower rates of hardware exposure (14.3% versus 47.8%, P = 0.018), failure (7.1% versus 43.5%, P = 0.048), major complications (28.6% versus 78.2%, P = 0.008), and revisions (11.1% versus 50.0%, P = 0.002) in the CE cohort compared with the NCR cohort. The rates of hardware failure, exposure, major complications, and revisions did not significantly differ in maxillary reconstructions, however, CE successfully reconstructed significantly larger defects (179.5 versus 74.6 cm3, P = 0.020) than NCRs. Deviating from NCR, the authors propose an algorithm considering anatomical location, extent of resection, and patient age for soft tissue selection. This algorithm yielded improved mandibular reconstructive outcomes and no increase in complications rate in maxillary reconstruction despite larger resection defects. Furthermore, the authors' initial findings demonstrate that CE is a safe option for pediatric maxillary and mandibular reconstruction that may, in addition, facilitate improved form and function.

A National Analysis of Craniosynostosis Demographic and Surgical Trends Over a 10-Year Period.

The pathogenesis of craniosynostosis, characterized by the premature fusion of calvarial sutures, is multifaceted and often the result of an amalgamation of contributing factors. The current study seeks examine the possible contributors to craniosynostosis development and its surgical trends over time. A multicenter/national retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent surgical repair of craniosynostosis (n=11,279) between 2012 and 2021 identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Data File. Main outcome measures included risk factors and trends relating to surgical repair of craniosynostosis. Nationwide reports of craniosynostosis in the NSQIP-P database have increased between 2012 and 2021 by 195%. The prevalence of craniosynostosis per overall cases has remained between 1.0% and 1.3%. There were predominantly more White male patients in the craniosynostosis cohort (P<0.001). Craniosynostosis patients had significantly greater birth weights, gestational ages, and were less likely to be premature (P<0.05). Linear regression demonstrated that operative time, anesthesia time, and length of stay significantly decreased over the study period (P<0.001). This national data analysis highlights trends in craniosynostosis repair indicating potential improvements in safety and patient outcomes over time. While these findings offer insights for health care professionals, caution is warranted in extrapolating beyond the data's scope. Future research should focus on diverse patient populations, compare outcomes across institutions, and employ prospective study designs to enhance the evidence base for craniosynostosis management. These efforts will help refine diagnostic and treatment strategies, potentially leading to better outcomes for patients.

A Nationwide Analysis of the Impact of Cardiopulmonary Anomalies on Cleft Palate Surgical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To increase awareness and improve perioperative care of patients with cleft palate (CP) and coexisting cardiopulmonary anomalies. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Multi-center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent surgical repair of CP between 2012-2020 identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Data File. Chi-squared analysis and Student's t-test were implemented to make associations between congenital heart disease (CHD) and congenital pulmonary disease (CPD) and postoperative complications. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify associations between CP and CHD/CPD while controlling for age, gender, and ASA class. C2 values were used to assess the logistic regressions, with a significance level of 0.05 indicating statistical significance. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications (readmission, reoperation, reintubation, wound dehiscence, cerebrovascular accidents, and mortality). RESULTS: 9 96 181 patients were identified in the database, 17 786 of whom were determined to have CP, of whom 16.0% had congenital heart defects (CHD) and 13.2% had congenital pulmonary defects (CPD). Patients with CHD and CPD were at a significantly greater risk of increased LOS and all but one operative complication rate (wound dehiscence) relative to patients with CP without a history of CHD and CPD. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that congenital cardiopulmonary disease is associated with increased adverse outcomes in the setting of CP repair. Thus, heightened clinical suspicion for coexisting congenital anomalies in the presence of CP should prompt referring providers to perform a comprehensive and multidisciplinary evaluation to ensure cardiopulmonary optimization prior to surgical intervention.

A Review of Socioeconomic Disparities in Submucous Cleft Diagnosis and Outcomes.

Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is a common congenital anomaly characterized by a diastasis of the levator veli palitini muscle. The subtlety of SMCP on physical examination can contribute to diagnostic delays. This study aims to analyze the factors contributing to delays in care and subsequent postoperative outcomes in patients with SMCP. All patients with surgical indications for SMCP who underwent palatoplasty at an urban academic children's hospital were included. Patient socioeconomic characteristics, medical history, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Patients were compared based on insurance type and government assistance utilization. Statistical analyses including independent t-test, Wilcoxon ranked sum test, χ2 analyses, Fisher's exact test, and stepwise logistic regression were performed. Among the 105 patients with SMCP, 69.5% (n=73) had public insurance and 30.5% (n=32) private. Patients with public insurance were diagnosed later (5.5±4.6 versus 2.6±2.4 years old; p<0.001) and underwent palatoplasty later (7.3±4.1 versus 4.4±3.4 years old; p<0.001) than those with private insurance. Patients receiving government assistance experienced higher rates of post-surgical persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency (74.5% versus 44.8%; p=0.006). The authors' results suggest a disparity in the recognition and treatment of surgical SMCP. Hence, financially vulnerable populations may experience an increased risk of inferior speech outcomes and subsequent therapies and procedures.

Failure Rates Based on Alveolar Cleft Volume: An Analysis of the Critical-Sized Defect for Alveolar Bone Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) using iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) is best practice for children with complete cleft lip and palate. With the advent of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM), excellent results can still be achieved while avoiding donor-site morbidity. This study aims to determine the critical-sized defects by analyzing graft failure rates for ICBG and rhBMP-2/DBM to guide surgeons performing ABG. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted evaluating patients who underwent ABG from 2016-2022. Patients with preoperative and postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging were included. Volumetric defect sizes were calculated using preoperative imaging. Graft success criteria were based on both clinical and radiographic outcomes. Logistic regressions analyzed graft failure rates to identify an optimal cutoff, which defined the critical-sized defect. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were included. Bone graft cohorts included ICBG (n=30) and rhBMP-2/DBM (n=63). The critical-sized defects were calculated to be 810 mm 3 and 885 mm 3 for ICBG and rhBMP-2/DBM, respectively. There were significantly higher graft failure rates beyond the critical size compared to below for both ICBG (71.4% vs. 0.0%; p<0.001) and rhBMP-2/DBM (65.0% vs. 14.0%; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study identified critical-sized defects based on alveolar cleft volume for ICBG or rhBMP-2/DBM with higher graft failure rates beyond the predicted thresholds. Distinct ranges in cleft volume were identified where patients might benefit from each select graft option.

A Single Institution 19 Year Comparison of Furlow and Straight Line Palatoplasty Techniques in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare patients' speech correcting surgery and fistula rates between the Furlow and Straight Line (SLR) palatoplasty techniques when combined with greater palatine flaps for complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) repair. DESIGN: This was a single-center IRB approved retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This study took place at an urban tertiary academic center. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: All patients with BCLP anomalies that underwent repair between January 2003 and August 2022 were included. Patients with index operations at an outside institution or incomplete medical charting were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 1552 patients underwent palatoplasty during the study period. Of these, 192 (12.4%) met inclusion criteria with a diagnosis of BCLP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes of this study included rate of fistula and incidence of speech correcting surgery. Secondary outcomes included rate of surgical fistula repair. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent SLR (52.1%) and 92 Furlow repair (47.9%). There was no significant difference in fistula rates between the SLR and Furlow repair cohorts (20.7% vs. 15.0%; p = 0.403). However, SLR was associated with lower rates of speech correcting surgery when compared to the Furlow repair (12.5% vs. 29.6%; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: This study compares the effect of Furlow and SLR on speech outcomes and fistula rates in patients with BCLP. Our findings suggest that SLR resulted in an almost three times lower rate of velopharyngeal dysfunction requiring surgical intervention in patients with BCLP, while fistula rates remained similar.

Comparing Outcomes of Traditional Lip Repair Versus Early Cleft Lip Repair on a National Scale.

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip (CL) is one of the most common congenital anomalies and has traditionally been repaired surgically when the patient is between 3 and 6 months of age. However, recent single-institutional studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of early CL repairs (ECLRs) during the neonatal period. This study seeks to evaluate the outcomes of ECLR (repair <1 month) versus traditional lip repair (TLR) by comparing outcomes on a national scale. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Date File was used to query patients who underwent CL repairs between 2012 and 2022. The main outcome measures were anesthesia times and perioperative complications. The main predictive variable was operative group (ECLR vs TLR). Patients were considered to be in the ECLR cohort if they were younger than 30 days after birth at the time of cleft repair. Student t test and χ2 analyses were used to evaluate categorical and continuous differences, respectively. Multiple logistic regression was performed to model the association of ECLR versus TLR with death within 30 days, overall complication rates, dehiscence rates, readmission within 30 days, and reoperation rates while controlling for various covariates. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression determined that the ECLR cohort had significantly shorter operative times when controlling for operative complications, sex, cardiac risk factors, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class (coefficient = -34.4; confidence interval, -47.8 to -20.9; P < 0.001). Similarly, multiple linear regression demonstrated ECLR patients to have significantly shorter time of exposure to anesthesia (coefficient = -35.0; 95% confidence interval, -50.3 to -19.7; P < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that ECLR was not significantly associated with an increased likelihood of any postoperative complication when controlling for sex, cardiac risk factors, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide nationwide evidence that ECLR does not lead to an increased risk of adverse outcomes or complications. In addition, ECLR patients have shorter surgeries and shorter exposure to anesthesia compared with TLR. The results provide further evidence that ECLR can be done safely where earlier intervention may result in better feeding/weight gain and subsequently improve cleft care. However, longer-term studies are warranted to further elucidate the effects of this protocol.

A Calvarial Defect Model to Investigate the Osteogenic Potential of Umbilical Cord Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration.

BACKGROUND: The standard graft material for alveolar cleft repair (ACR) is autogenous iliac crest. A promising alternative potential graft adjunct-newborn human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (h-UCMSCs)-has yet to be explored in vivo. Their capacity for self-renewal, multipotent differentiation, and proliferation allows h-UCMSCs to be harnessed for regenerative medicine. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of using tissue-derived h-UCMSCs and their osteogenic capabilities to improve ACR in a murine model. METHODS: Foxn1 mice were separated into three groups with the following calvarial defects: no treatment (empty defect; n = 6), poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) scaffold ( n = 6), or h-UCMSCs with PLGA ( n = 4). Bilateral 2-mm-diameter parietal bone critical-sized defects were created using a dental drill. Microcomputed tomography (microCT) imaging was performed 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks postoperatively. The mice were euthanized 4 weeks postoperatively for RNAScope, immunohistochemical, and histological analysis. RESULTS: No mice experienced complications during the follow-up period. MicroCT imaging and histological analysis demonstrated that the no-treatment and PLGA-only defects remained patent without significant defect size differences across groups. In contrast, the h-UCMSCs with PLGA group had significantly greater bone fill on microCT and histological analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a successful calvarial defect model for the investigation of h-UCMSC-mediated osteogenesis and bone repair. Evidence reveals that PLGA alone has neither short-term effects on bone formation nor any unwanted side effects, making it an attractive scaffold. Further investigation using h-UCMSCs with PLGA in larger animals is warranted to advance future translation to patients requiring ACR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The authors' results demonstrate a successful murine calvarial defect model for the investigation of h-UCMSC-mediated osteogenesis and bone repair, and they provide preliminary evidence for the safe and efficacious use of this graft adjunct in alveolar cleft repair.

Dental Protraction Versus Surgery for Cleft Lip and Palate: A Budget Impact Analysis.

Class III malocclusion for individuals with cleft lip and palate has historically been managed with surgery. Orthodontic protraction is a noninvasive alternative that may be associated with lower costs. This analysis investigated the budget impact of protraction versus surgery from an institutional perspective. Using a decision tree, analysis was conducted using costs derived from Medicaid reimbursement codes and using actual institutional reimbursement. Probabilities of success, failure, and complications were based on a clinical trial comparing the 2 treatment modalities. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of results to model parameters. Based on Medicaid fee schedules and failure rates requiring additional surgery, the total cost of protraction was $79,506 versus $172,807 for surgery, resulting in $93,302 cost-savings per patient. The cost and probability of surgery success, as well as the cost of surgery failure and repeat surgery, had the largest impact on these cost-savings. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed cost-savings of nearly $92,000 or higher in >50% of simulations. This study showed that protraction is associated with lower costs than surgery and may present a cost-effective alternative to surgery in eligible, appropriate patients.

Does Early Referral Lead to Early Repair? Quality Improvement in Cleft Care.

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and palate is the most common congenital defect of the head and neck, occurring in 1 of 700 live births. Diagnosis often occurs in utero by conventional or 3-dimensional ultrasound. Early cleft lip repair (ECLR) (<3 months of life) for unilateral cleft lip (UCL), regardless of cleft width, has been the mainstay of lip reconstruction at Children's Hospital Los Angeles since 2015. Historically, traditional lip repair (TLR) was performed at 3 to 6 months of life ± preoperative nasoalveolar molding (NAM). Previous publications highlight the benefits of ECLR, such as enhanced aesthetic outcomes, decreased revision rate, better weight gain, increased alveolar cleft approximation, cost savings of NAM, and improved parent satisfaction. Occasionally, parents are referred for prenatal consultations to discuss ECLR. This study evaluates timing of cleft diagnosis, preoperative surgical consultation, and referral patterns to validate whether prenatal diagnosis and prenatal consultation lead to ECLR. METHODS: Retrospective review evaluated patients who underwent ECLR versus TLR ± NAM from 2009 to 2020. Timing of repair, cleft diagnosis, and surgical consultation, as well as referral patterns, were abstracted. Inclusion criteria dictated: age < 3 months for ECLR or 3 to 6 months for TLR, no major comorbidities, and diagnosis of UCL without palatal involvement. Patients with bilateral cleft lip or craniofacial syndromes were excluded. RESULTS: Of 107 patients, 51 (47.7%) underwent ECLR whereas 56 underwent TLR (52.3%). Average age at surgery was 31.8 days of life for the ECLR cohort and 112 days of life for the TLR cohort. Furthermore, 70.1% of patients were diagnosed prenatally, yet only 5.6% of families had prenatal consults for lip repair, 100% of which underwent ECLR. Most patients were referred by pediatricians (72.9%). Significance was identified between incidence of prenatal consults and ECLR (P = 0.008). In addition, prenatal diagnosis was significantly correlated with incidence of ECLR (P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate significance between prenatal diagnosis of UCL and prenatal surgical consultation with incidence of ECLR. Accordingly, we advocate for education to referring providers about ECLR and the potential for prenatal surgical consultation in the hopes that families may enjoy the myriad benefits of ECLR.

Rethinking the Rule of 10s: Early Cleft Lip Repair Improves Weight Gain.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares patients undergoing early cleft lip repair (ECLR) (<3-months) and traditional lip repair (TLR) (3-6 months) with/without nasoalveolar molding (NAM) to evaluate the effects of surgical timing on weight gain in hopes of guiding future treatment paradigms. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, California. PATIENT, PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent ECLR or TLR ± NAM from November 2009 through January 2020. INTERVENTIONS: No intervention was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Patient demographics, birth and medical history, perioperative variables, and complications were collected. Infant weights and age-based percentiles were recorded at birth, surgery, 8-weeks, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months postoperatively. The main outcomes were weight change and weight percentile amongst ECLR and TLR ± NAM groups. RESULTS: 107 patients met inclusion criteria: ECLR, n = 51 (47.6%); TLR + NAM, n = 35 (32.7%); and TLR-NAM, n = 21 (19.6%). ECLR patients had significantly greater changes in weight from surgery to 8-weeks and from surgery to 24-months postoperatively compared with both TLR ± NAM (P < .05). Age-matched weights in the ECLR group were significantly greater than TLR ± NAM at multiple time points postoperatively (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: ECLR significantly increased patient weights 24-months postoperatively when compared to TLR ± NAM. Specifically compared to TLR-NAM, ECLR weights were significantly greater at all time points past 6-months postoperatively. The results of this study demonstrate that ECLR can mitigate feeding difficulties and malnutrition traditionally seen in patients with cleft lip.

Fungating Malignancies: Management of a Distinct Wound Entity.

GENERAL PURPOSE: To provide information on the surgical management of fungating malignancies as a distinct wound entity. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Identify characteristics of patients in a study examining the treatment of fungating malignancies.2. Select common symptoms experienced by patients with fungating malignancies.3. Explain issues related to the surgical treatment of fungating malignancies.4. Identify a reason why patients with fungating breast masses may avoid medical care.

To address the literature gap on malignant fungating wound treatment by reporting two institutions' experiences with this disease process and proposing practices to improve care. A multi-institutional retrospective review was conducted of 44 patients with 45 malignant fungating wounds over an 11-year period. Patient characteristics, treatment history, and outcomes were analyzed. Of the 44 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 31 (70.5%) were women and 13 (29.5%) were men. The average age at presentation was 63.0 (SD, 16.1) years. The most common malignancy was breast cancer, accounting for more than half of cases (54.5%). The average surface area of the tumors at presentation was 110.3 (SD, 215.0; range, 2.2­1,140) cm 2 , whereas the average surface area at time of discharge/death was 104.6 (SD, 310.7; range, 0­1,800) cm 2 . Neither surface area at presentation ( P = .504) nor surface area at time of final follow-up ( P = .472) were significantly associated with death during the study time frame. In the era of advancing technologies and medical innovation, the benefits of palliative surgery, which helps mitigate an open wound, should not be overlooked. Improving end-of-life care is beneficial to the patient and families alike. As surgeons, we strive for a tangible cure, but providing palliative resection to enable death with dignity might be the most humane service of all.

Meeting in the middle: pediatric abdominal wall reconstruction for omphalocele.

BACKGROUND: Omphalocele is a congenital abdominal wall defect with an incidence of 1/4,200 births. Repair timing varies from the neonatal period to the first few years of life. Surgical technique has changed over the last two decades. We sought to establish improved surgical/ventilation protocols for patients with omphaloceles requiring abdominal reconstruction. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review was performed on patients with omphalocele requiring abdominal wall reconstruction by Plastics and/or Pediatric Surgery at a pediatric tertiary-care referral center (January 2006-July 2021). Birth history, comorbidities, surgical details, ventilation data, complications/recurrence were extracted. RESULTS: Of 129 patients screened, seven required Plastic Surgery involvement. Defect size was 102.9 cm2 (range: 24-178.5); five patients required component separation; zero patients received mesh; zero complications/recurrences were recorded. Two patients required postoperative ventilation for 2.5 days, based on increased peak inspiratory pressures at surgery stop versus start time. CONCLUSION: Patients with large defects secondary to omphalocele benefit from collaboration between Pediatric and Plastic Surgery for component separation and primary fascial closure without mesh. Future research should follow patients who mature out of pediatric clinics to evaluate the incidence of hernias in adults with Plastic Surgery-repaired omphaloceles.

A Unique Case of Aggressive Central Giant Cell Granuloma in a 10-Year-Old Boy With 16p13.11 Microdeletion Syndrome.

Central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) is a rare disease characterized by sporadic, benign, intraosseous mandibular lesions of unknown etiology. Histologically, these lesions are indistinguishable from brown tumors of hyperparathyroidism and cherubism, and occasionally have been associated with different syndromes raising a question for genetic etiology. The CGCG has varied presentation ranging from nonaggressive and indolent to aggressive, destructive, and recurrent, often posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Herein, we present the first case of a 10-year-old boy with CGCG and 16p13.11 microdeletion syndrome, highlight the diagnostic challenges inherent to this heterogeneous disorder, and discuss the genetics and treatment approaches of these complex lesions.

Early Cleft Lip Repair: Demonstrating Efficacy in the First 100 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and/or palate affects approximately one in 700 live births. Optimal timing for repair of cleft lip has yet to be objectively validated. Earlier repair takes advantage of a high degree of plasticity within the nasal cartilage and maxilla. The authors present patients enrolled in an early cleft lip repair protocol facilitating effective repair of the cleft lip and nostril. METHODS: American Society of Anesthesiologists class I to II patients with unilateral cleft lip and/or palate undergoing repair before 3 months of age were enrolled over 5 years. Perioperative data, surgical and anesthetic complications, preoperative and postoperative nostril breadth, nostril width, nasal angle, lip length, frontal nasal breadth, and commissure length measured as ratios between the cleft and noncleft sides were abstracted. Early cleft lip repair and nasoalveolar molding patients were matched for cleft lip severity using the cleft width ratios and compared. RESULTS: The surgical and anesthetic complication rate for 100 early cleft lip repair patients was 2 percent. Operative and anesthetic times were 123 ± 37 minutes and 177 ± 34 minutes, respectively. Hospital length of stay was 1 ± 0 day. Age at repair between early cleft lip repair and nasoalveolar molding was 33 ± 15 days and 118 ± 33 days, respectively. After early cleft lip repair, preoperative to postoperative distance from symmetry for all anthropomorphic measurements improved ( p < 0.001). Comparing severity-matched early cleft lip repair to nasoalveolar molding patients, similar improvements were observed, suggesting equivalent results ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Early cleft lip repair provides an efficacious method for correcting the cleft lip and nasal deformity that simulates nasoalveolar molding. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Syndromic Synostosis: Frontofacial Surgery.

Frontofacial surgery, encompassing the monobloc with or without facial bipartition and the box osteotomy, can treat the frontal bone and midface simultaneously, providing comprehensive improvement in facial balance. Complex pediatric patients with genetic syndromes and craniosynostosis are most optimized by an interdisciplinary team of surgeons, pediatricians, geneticists, speech pathologists, audiologists, dietitians, pediatric dentists, orthodontists, and psychosocial support staff to manage the myriad of challenges and complications throughout early childhood and beyond. Despite early treatment of the anterior and posterior cranial vault, these patients frequently have resultant frontal and/or midface hypoplasia and orbital abnormalities that are best managed with simultaneous surgical treatment.

Increased Distraction Magnitude Leads to Greater Reduction in the Apnea-Hypopnea Index in Infants With Robin Sequence.

PURPOSE: Upper airway obstruction seen in Robin Sequence (RS) is commonly treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of distraction distance on sleep study outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) secondary to RS. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for patients with isolated RS who underwent MDO at Children's Hospital Los Angeles between January 2006-September 2021. The predictor variable was distraction distance (maximal distraction using a 30 mm device vs sub-maximal distraction), and the primary outcome variable was OSA scores. Relationships between covariates, including demographic characteristics, preoperative sleep variables, and postoperative OSA outcomes using polysomnography, were also analyzed. Descriptive statistics and tests of statistical significance were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 28.0), including Student's t-test, proportions testing, multiple linear regression, and correlation analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients met inclusion criteria (39.4% female, 60.6% male). Average age at MDO was 3.0 ± 10.2 months. Fifty-six patients were distracted maximally with a 30 mm distractor, while the remaining 15 patients experienced shorter distraction due to distractor limitations (25 mm distractor), persistent infection or family request. Looking at absolute values of postoperative sleep study variables, there were no significant differences between patients who were maximally and sub-maximally distracted across apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), highest carbon dioxide, lowest oxygen saturation, and oxygen requirement. However, both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in lowest oxygen saturation, AHI, highest carbon dioxide level, and highest oxygen requirement compared to their pre-distraction levels. Compared with patients distracted <30 mm, maximal distraction had a significantly greater improvement in AHI when controlling for preoperative sleep study variables (P = .047). CONCLUSION: Patients with isolated RS who have more severe OSA experienced greater improvements in AHI, oxygen requirement, and oxygen saturation after MDO. Two-thirds of patients no longer had oxygen requirements after MDO. Our results suggest that MDO is helpful in treating patients with RS regardless of distraction distance. However, our study provides evidence that increasing the distraction distance may further improve AHI, which is particularly beneficial to patients with a significant preoperative AHI.

Orthognathic Surgery Rate in Cleft Care.

PURPOSE: To determine the true need for orthognathic surgery in patients with repaired cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) at a high-volume craniofacial center. METHODS: An institutional retrospective review of patients with CL/P born between 1975 and 2008 was performed. Patients with adequate documentation reflecting cleft care who were ≥ 18 years at the time of last craniofacial/dentistry follow-up were included. Patients with non-paramedian clefts or a comorbid craniofacial syndrome were excluded. Primary outcome variable was the total proportion of patients with CL/P who either underwent or were referred for orthognathic surgery Le Fort I (LF1) to correct midface hypoplasia. Secondary outcome variables were associations between cleft phenotype, midface hypoplasia severity, and number of cleft related surgeries with the eventual LF1 referral/recipiency. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven patients with CL/P met inclusion criteria. A total of 90/177 (51%) patients underwent corrective LF1; however, 110/177 (62%) of patients were referred for surgery. Patients with secondary cleft palate involvement were referred for and underwent LF1 at significantly greater rates than those without secondary palate involvement (referred: 65% versus 13%, P = 0.001; underwent: 55% versus 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with bilateral cleft lip/palate were referred for and underwent LF1 at significantly higher rates than those with unilateral cleft lip/palate (referred: 71.0% versus 50.4%, P= 0.04; underwent: 84% versus 71%, P = 0.02). Number of secondary palate surgeries was positively correlated with increased LF1 referral (P = 0.02) but not LF1 recipiency (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of orthognathic surgery redundant in patients with repaired CL/P was 51% at our institution, marginally above the higher end of previously reported rates. However, this number is an underrepresentation of the true requirement for LF1 as 62% of patients were referred for surgical intervention of midface hypoplasia. This distinction should be considered when counseling families.

Midface Growth Potential in Unoperated Clefts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Competing hypotheses for the development of midface hypoplasia in patients with cleft lip and palate include both theories of an intrinsic restricted growth potential of the midface and extrinsic surgical disruption of maxillary growth centers and scar growth restriction secondary to palatoplasty. The following meta-analysis aims to better understand the intrinsic growth potential of the midface in a patient with cleft lip and palate unaffected by surgical correction. A systematic review of studies reporting cephalometric measurements in patients with unoperated and operated unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), and isolated cleft palate (iCP) abstracted SNA and ANB angles, age at cephalometric analysis, syndromic diagnosis, and patient demographics. Age and Region-matched controls without cleft palate were used for comparison. SNA angle for unoperated UCLP (84.5 ±â€Š4.0°), BCLP (85.3 ±â€Š2.8°), and ICP (79.2 ±â€Š4.2°) were statistically different than controls (82.4 ±â€Š3.5°), (all P ≤ 0.001). SNA angles for operated UCLP (76.2 ±â€Š4.2°), BCLP (79.8 ±â€Š3.6°), and ICP (79.0 ±â€Š4.3°) groups were statistically smaller than controls (all P ≤ 0.001). SNA angle in unoperated ICP (n = 143) was equivalent to operated ICP patients (79.2 ±â€Š4.2° versus 79.0 ±â€Š4.3° P = 0.78). No unoperated group mean SNA met criteria for midface hypoplasia (SNA < 80). Unoperated UCLP/BLCP exhibit a more robust growth potential of the maxilla, whereas operated patients demonstrate stunted growth compared to normal phenotype. Unoperated ICP demonstrates restricted growth in both operated and unoperated patients. As such, patients with UCLP/BCLP differ from patients with ICP and the factors affecting midface growth may differ.Level of Evidence: IV.