Association between underweight status and chylothorax after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Objective: To use a nationwide database of hospitalizations to investigate underweight status as a risk factor for postesophagectomy complications. Methods: We identified all patients who underwent esophagectomy with a diagnosis of esophageal cancer and known body mass index in the 2018-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. All hospital visits for esophagectomy and within 30 days of initial discharge were analyzed for postoperative complications, including chylothorax. Patients who were underweight were propensity score matched with patients who were not. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify complications that were significantly associated with underweight status. Results: There were 1877 patients with esophageal cancer meeting inclusion criteria. Following propensity score matching, 433 patients who were underweight were matched to 433 patients who were not. In the multivariable model of the matched sample, which adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, history of chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and preoperative surgical feeding access, patients who were underweight were estimated to have 2.06 times the odds for chylothorax (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-4.25, P = .035). Underweight status was also significantly associated with acute bleed (odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.05, P = .007), pneumothorax (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.19-4.85; P = .017), pneumonia (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.53-3.50, P < .001), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.31-4.69, P = .006). Conclusions: Underweight status was found to be a risk factor for chylothorax after esophagectomy, which may have implications for perioperative care of esophageal cancer patients. Future studies should assess whether using feeding tubes or total parenteral nutrition preoperatively or thoracic duct ligation intraoperatively decreases risk of chylothorax among patients who were underweight.

Longer hospitalizations, more complications, and greater readmissions for patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders undergoing pulmonary lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of comorbid psychiatric disorders (PSYD) on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2018 was performed. Patients with lung cancer with and without psychiatric comorbidities who underwent pulmonary lobectomy were collated and analyzed (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification Mental, Behavioral and Neurodevelopmental disorders [F01-99]). The association of PSYD with complications, length of stay, and readmissions was assessed using a multivariable regression analysis. Additional subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 41,691 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 27.84% (11,605) of the patients had at least 1 PSYD. PSYD was associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications (relative risk, 1.041; 95% CI, 1.015-1.068; P = .0018), pulmonary complications (relative risk, 1.125; 95% CI, 1.08-1.171; P < .0001), longer length of stay (PSYD mean, 6.79 days and non-PSYD mean, 5.68 days; P < .0001), higher 30-day readmission rate (9.2% vs 7.9%; P < .0001), and 90-day readmission rate (15.4% vs 12.9%; P < .007). Among patients with PSYD, those with cognitive disorders and psychotic disorders (eg, schizophrenia) appear to have the highest rates and risks of postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lung cancer with comorbid psychiatric disorders undergoing lobectomy experience worse postoperative outcomes with longer hospitalization, increased rates of overall and pulmonary complications, and greater readmissions suggesting potential opportunities for improved psychiatric care during the perioperative period.

Delays to surgery and worse outcomes: The compounding effects of social determinants of health in non-small cell lung cancer.

Objective: To quantify the compounding effects of social determinants of health on time to surgery (T2S) and clinical outcomes. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for treatment-naïve patients with cT1-4N0-1M0 non-small cell lung cancer undergoing (bi)lobectomy or pneumonectomy between 2006 and 2016 with 1 to 180 days T2S, the number of days between diagnosis and surgery; surgical delays were defined as statistically significant increased T2S compared with a reference cohort. Social determinants of health factors prognostic for surgical delays were identified using multivariable regression. The 30-/90-day mortality and 5-year survival estimates were calculated using logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Results: In total, 110,005 patients met inclusionary criteria. Multivariable analysis identified race, insurance, and facility type as factors with significant 3-way interaction: T2S of one depended on the others. Income and education also contributed to delays. Privately insured (private) non-Hispanic White patients at academic medical centers (AMCs) were the reference with T2S of 44.1 days. At AMCs, private Black patients had significant delays to surgery (54.7 days; P < .0001), as did Medicaid and uninsured Black patients (58.5 days; P < .0001, 59.4 days; P < .0001, respectively). The 15-day surgical delays were associated with statistically significant 5% increased 30-day mortality odds (confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.08), 6% increased 90-day mortality odds (CI, 1.04-1.08), and 4% decrease in hazard of death at 5 years (CI, 1.04-1.05). Conclusions: In treatment-naïve patients with cT1-4N0-1M0 non-small cell lung cancer, Black race, Medicaid, uninsured status, and AMCs generate compounding surgical delays with increased 30-/90-day mortality and decreased 5-year survival. Thoracic surgeons can leverage these facility and demographic-specific insights to standardize time to surgery and begin mitigating underlying disparities.

Early outcomes of lung transplantation with lung allografts from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-positive donors.

OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be detected for extended periods of time with nucleic acid amplification test even after transmissibility becomes negligible. Lung allografts from COVID-19-positive donors have been used for transplantation in highly selected cases. This study aimed to clarify the early outcomes of lung transplantation with COVID-19-positive donors. METHODS: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database between April 2020 and June 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In the study period, 1297 COVID-19-positive donors were identified and the lungs were transplanted from 47 donors (3.6%). Of 47 donors, 44 donors were positive for COVID-19 NAT with nasopharyngeal swabs and the other 3 were positive with bronchoalveolar lavage. The COVID-19-positive lung donors were younger than the COVID-19-negative donors (28.4 ± 11.6 years vs 35.4 ± 13.6 years, P < .001). Recipients of the COVID-19-positive lungs (n = 47) were more likely have a greater lung allocation score (57.1 ± 22.9 vs 50.5 ± 19.7, P = .057) than recipients of COVID-19-negative lungs (n = 5501). The posttransplant length of hospital stay (39.8 ± 43.6 days vs 30.6 ± 34.5 days, P = .181), need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at 72 hours after transplantation (2.6% [1/38] vs 10.4% [541/5184], P = .18), and 1-year overall survival rate (85.6% vs 87.1%, P = .63) were comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Carefully selected lung allografts from COVID-19-positive donors had comparable early posttransplant outcomes to lung allografts from COVID-19-negative donors.

Adjuvant chemotherapy, not radiotherapy, prolongs survival for node-negative non-small cell lung cancer with positive surgical margins.

Objective: The study objective was to determine differences in survival depending on adjuvant therapy type, timing, and sequence in node-negative disease with positive margins after non-small cell lung cancer resection. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with positive margins after surgical resection of treatment-naïve cT1-4N0M0 pN0 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy from 2010 to 2016. Adjuvant treatment groups were defined as surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, radiotherapy alone, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, sequential chemotherapy then radiotherapy, and sequential radiotherapy then chemotherapy. The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy initiation timing on survival was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare 5-year survival. Results: A total of 1713 patients met inclusion criteria. Five-year survival estimates differed significantly between cohorts: surgery alone, 40.7%; chemotherapy alone, 47.0%; radiotherapy alone, 35.1%; concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 45.7%; sequential chemotherapy then radiotherapy, 36.6%; and sequential radiotherapy then chemotherapy, 32.2% (P = .033). Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant radiotherapy alone had a lower estimated survival at 5 years, although overall survival did not differ significantly (P = .8). Chemotherapy alone improved 5-year survival compared with surgery alone (P = .0016) and provided a statistically significant survival advantage over adjuvant radiotherapy (P = .002). Compared with radiotherapy-inclusive multimodal therapies, chemotherapy alone yielded similar 5-year survival (P = .066). Multivariable Cox regression showed an inverse linear association between time to adjuvant radiotherapy initiation and survival, but with an insignificant trend (10-day hazard ratio, 1.004; P = .90). Conclusions: In treatment-naïve cT1-4N0M0 pN0 non-small cell lung cancer with positive surgical margins, only adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a survival improvement compared with surgery alone, with no radiotherapy-inclusive treatment providing additional survival benefit. Delayed timing of radiotherapy initiation was not associated with a survival reduction.

Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Wound Classification is Prognostic of 30-Day Readmission Following Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to investigate factors associated with 30-day readmission in a multivariate model, including the CDC wound classes "clean," "clean/contaminated," "contaminated," and "dirty/infected." METHODS: The 2017-2020 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for all patients undergoing total hip replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, pneumonectomy, and colectomies. ACS-defined wound classes were concordant with CDC definitions. Multivariate linear mixed regression was used to determine risk factors for readmission while adjusting for type of surgery as a random intercept. RESULTS: 477,964 cases were identified, with 38,734 (8.1%) patients having experienced readmission within 30 days of surgery. There were 181,243 (37.9%) cases classified as wound class "clean", 215,729 (45.1%) cases classified as "clean/contaminated", 40,684 cases (8.5%) classified as "contaminated", and 40,308 (8.4%) cases classified as "dirty/infected". In the multivariate generalized mixed linear model adjusting for type of surgery, sex, body mass index, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, presence of comorbidity, length of stay, urgency of surgery, and discharge destination, "clean/contaminated" (p < .001), "contaminated" (p < .001), and "dirty/infected" (p < .001) wound classes (when compared to "clean") were significantly associated with 30-day readmission. Organ/space surgical site infection and sepsis were among the most common reasons for readmission in all wound classes. CONCLUSIONS: Wound classification was strongly prognostic for readmission in multivariable models, suggesting that it may serve as a marker of readmissions. Surgical procedures that are "non-clean" are at significantly greater risk for 30-day readmission. Readmissions may be due to infectious complications; optimizing antibiotic use or source control to prevent readmission are areas of future study.

Estimating revenue, costs, and operating margin of any hospital-based thoracic surgery practice using a novel financial model.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to develop a generalizable financial model that estimates payor-specific reimbursements associated with anatomic lung resections for any hospital-based thoracic surgery practice. METHODS: Medical records of patients who presented to the thoracic surgery clinic and eventually underwent an anatomic lung resection from January 2019 to December 2020 were reviewed. The volume of preoperative and postoperative studies, clinic visits, and outpatient referrals was measured. Neither subsequent studies nor procedures from outpatient referrals were captured. Diagnosis-related group, cost-to-charge ratios, Current Procedural Terminology Medicare payment data, and Private:Medicare and Medicaid:Medicare payment ratios were used to estimate payor-specific reimbursements and operating margin. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent 113 operations: 102 (90%) lobectomies, 7 (6%) segmentectomies, and 4 (4%) pneumonectomies. These patients underwent 554 total studies, received 60 referrals to other specialties, and had 626 total clinic visits. The total charges and Medicare reimbursement were $12.5 M and $2.7 M, respectively. After adjusting for a 41% Medicare, 2% Medicaid, and 57% Private payor mix, the total reimbursement was $4.7 M. With a 0.252 cost-to-charge ratio, total costs and operating income were $3.2 M and $1.5 M, respectively (ie, 33% operating margin). Average reimbursement per surgery by payor was $51k for Private, $29k for Medicare, and $23k for Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: For any hospital-based thoracic surgery practice, this novel financial model can calculate both overall and payor-specific reimbursements, costs, and operating margin across the full perioperative spectrum. By manipulating hospital name, hospital state, volume, and payor mix, any program can gain insights into their financial contributions and use the outputs to guide investment decisions.

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pathologic N1 non-small cell lung cancer is unrecognized: A subgroup analysis of the JBR10 trial.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is underutilized in clinical practice, in part, because its anticipated survival benefit is limited. We evaluated the impact of AC on overall and recurrence-free survival among completely resected pN1 NSCLC patients enrolled in the North American Intergroup phase III (JBR10) trial. A post-hoc subgroup analysis of pN1 NSCLC patients was performed. Participants were randomized to cisplatin+vinorelbine (AC) (n = 118) or observation (n = 116) following complete resection. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was recurrence free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare OS and RFS between the two treatment groups. Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with OS and RFS endpoints. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. AC patients had improved 5-year OS (AC 61.4% vs observation 41.0%, log-rank p = .008) and 5-year RFS (AC 56.2% vs observation 39.9%, log-rank p = .011) rates compared to observation. Cox regression analyses confirmed the OS (HR 0.583, 95% CI 0.402-0.846, p = .005) and RFS (HR 0.573, 95% CI 0.395-0.830, p = .003) benefit associated with AC. AC was associated with a lower risk (HR 0.648, 95% CI 0.435-0.965, p = .0326) and a lower cumulative incidence (Subdistribution Hazard Ratio [SHR], 0.67, 95% CI 0.449-0.999, p = .0498) of lung cancer deaths. In the JBR10 trial, treatment with AC conferred a significant OS and RFS advantage over observation for pN1 NSCLC patients. These data suggest that pN1 NSCLC patients may experience a disproportionately greater clinical benefit from AC than the 6% survival advantage estimated by the LACE meta-analysis.

Adhering to guideline concordant care improves survival among the different subtypes of T3 N2 non-small cell lung cancer.

Objectives: T3 disease comprises heterogeneous morphologic characteristics, a variation only further complicated when in the context of N2-confirmed involvement. This study aims to examine whether or not specific features of T3 N2 non-small cell lung cancer are associated with improved 5-year overall survival when using a multimodal therapeutic approach consistent with guideline recommendations compared with definitive surgery alone. Methods: Patients with pathologic T3 N2 non-small cell lung cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database. Therapy modality, as defined by surgery alone versus surgery with adjuvant therapy, and T3 disease descriptors were compared for differences in 5-year overall survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine prognostic factors for survival. Results: A total of 1924 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 80.0% (n = 1539) received adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy following surgery and 20.0% (n = 385) underwent definitive surgery alone. Patients in the 2 cohorts differed significantly in age, race, insurance status, and Charlson-Deyo score (P < .05). The overall survival for patients who underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy compared with those who underwent surgery alone was 31.7% and 11.1%, respectively (P < .0001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated a lower risk of death with multimodal therapeutic intervention compared with surgery alone for patients with disease marked by chest wall invasion, additional ipsilateral pulmonary nodules, tumor size, and the presence of multiple T3 features. Conclusions: The utilization of a multimodal approach to treating pathologic T3 N2 NSCLC, compared with surgery alone, is associated with superior overall survival and lower risk of death for many subtypes of T3 disease.

Outcome of Bridge to Lung Transplantation With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pediatric Patients 12 Years and Older.

BACKGROUND: There is a reluctance to using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation in the pediatric population. Pediatric patients between ages 12 and 18 years are eligible for acuity-based lung transplantation using the Lung Allocation Score and may be suitable for adult allografts, increasing the donor pool and thus leading to a successful bridge to lung transplantation. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing dataset was queried for primary lung transplantation in pediatric patients (12-18 years) from 2005 to 2016. Groups were divided into those who were on ECMO (bridged [BG]) and not on ECMO (nonbridged [NBG]) at the time of listing for lung transplant. RESULTS: The groups comprised 16 BG and 375 NBG patients. Fourteen BG patients (88%) survived the first 30 days. One-year (83.3% vs 86.2%, P = .78) and 3-year (66.7% vs 55.1%, P = .57) survivals were similar in the BG and NBG groups, respectively. Donors in the BG group were more likely to be adults. The median wait-list times were shorter (10.5 [interquartile range {IQR}, 11] vs 93 [IQR, 221] days, P < .001), with a higher Lung Allocation Score (89.8 vs 36.6, P < .001) and similar median ischemic times (5.19 [IQR, 2.32] vs 5.34 [IQR, 1.92] hours, P = .85) in the BG group compared with the NBG group. The median post-transplant length of stay was longer in the BG group (33 [IQR, 31] vs 17 [IQR, 12] days, P = .007) and was the only factor predictive of 3-year mortality. Longer wait-list time had a higher mortality in the BG group. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation is a reasonable strategy in pediatric patients aged ≥ 12 years with acceptable operative mortality and similar 1- and 3-year survival compared with nonbridged patients despite higher acuity. Bridged patients were more likely to receive adult donor lungs.

Dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab prior to lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: When the transplant candidates are receiving oral anticoagulation therapy before transplantation, it is crucial to have an urgent reversal strategy to prevent hemorrhagic complications perioperatively. The aim of this study was to present the experience with idarucizumab to reverse the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran prior to lung transplantation. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was performed to analyze the clinical outcomes of idarucizumab use before lung transplantation. RESULTS: Between July 2016 and June 2019, six patients were on dabigatran at the time of transplantation. Out of the six patients, four patients received idarucizumab. These four recipients received a median of 3 units (range 0-4 units) of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) and 450 ml (range 250-1500 ml) of intraoperative salvage of shed blood (cell saver blood) during the lung transplant. The two patients who were not administered idarucizumab received 5 units and 13 units of pRBCs and 900 ml and 3600 ml of cell saver blood, respectively. There was no grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD) at 72 hours after transplantation or in-hospital mortality in idarucizumab group. In the group without idarucizumab, there was one case of grade 3 PGD without any in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab provides reasonable hemostasis during lung transplantation.

National Trends in Extended Criteria Donor Utilization and Outcomes for Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Extended criteria donor (ECD) for lung transplantation (LTx) have been implemented due to the donor organ shortage. The impact on recipient survival is under investigation. We report trends in the use of extended criteria lungs in the modern era and its association with survival outcomes using a large national database. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult LTx from May 2005 to December 2018 using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. ECD were defined by 2 or more variances from standard criteria: age ≥ 55 years, pO2 ≤ 300, pack years ≥ 20, diabetes, purulent bronchoscopy, blood infection, or abnormal chest radiographs. Transplant centers were dichotomized based on volume. Recipient survival was analyzed using lung allocation score as a covariate. RESULTS: Of 24,888 LTx, 80% had extended criteria; 42% had 2 or more extensions and were deemed ECD in this analysis. Both LTx volume (2005: 1352; 2018: 2495) and use of ECD (2005: 27% ECD, 2018: 50% ECD) have increased over the study period. Survival of LTx recipients has steadily increased (2005: 82% 1-year survival in 2005; 2017: 90% 1-year survival). High-volume centers (>47 annual LTx) utilized ECD in 46% of transplants compared with 40% ECD among other centers. Recipients of ECD and standard criteria organs had no difference in 1-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Donor supply limits the number of LTx performed. Extension of donor criteria has occurred alongside increased overall LTx volume. Use of ECD did not compromise 30-day, 90-day, nor 1-year survival. Further studies are warranted to define long-term outcomes.

Oxy-RVAD support for lung transplant in the absence of inferior vena cava.

Cardiopulmonary bypass and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are commonly used adjuncts to lung transplantation. These techniques are not without associated morbidity and mortality, and the surgeon must be aware of the possibility of aberrant anatomy that could lead to vascular injury during cannulation. In this report, we describe a patient with congenital absence of the inferior vena cava undergoing lung transplantation who required perioperative cardiopulmonary support. A percutaneous dual lumen cannula, Protek Duo, was connected in an Oxy-RVAD configuration to provide right ventricular and oxygenation support both intraoperatively and postoperatively to this patient.

Transition of femoral-jugular to dual-stage left subclavian without discontinuation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a technology that has allowed further cardiopulmonary support in the setting of respiratory failure refractory to mechanical ventilation. While it has evolved since its first description, one area of improvement continues to be its implementation. With advancements in cannulation techniques, in recent years, there has been a plethora of new cannulas that has been introduced in the market. For urgent venous-venous cannulation, the right internal jugular vein along with either femoral veins remain the most utilized strategy due to minimal need for imaging support. This allows for safe bedside cannulation. However, as the number of days of ECMO support continue to increase, transitioning to a cannulation strategy that is easier to ambulate with and more comfortable is preferred. Therefore, we describe a method for transitioning from right jugular-femoral cannulation to left subclavian placement of the Crescent Dual-Lumen catheter without interrupting ECMO support.

Cyclosporin A Administration During Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Preserves Lung Grafts in Rat Transplant Model.

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) such as lung reconditioning, preservation, and evaluation before transplantation, deleterious effects, including activation of proinflammatory cascades and alteration of metabolic profiles have been reported. Although patient outcomes have been favorable, further studies addressing optimal conditions are warranted. In this study, we investigated the role of the immunosuppressant drug cyclosporine A (CyA) in preserving mitochondrial function and subsequently preventing proinflammatory changes in lung grafts during EVLP. METHODS: Using rat heart-lung blocks after 1-hour cold preservation, an acellular normothermic EVLP system was established for 4 hours. CyA was added into perfusate at a final concentration of 1 µM. The evaluation included lung graft function, lung compliance, and pulmonary vascular resistance as well as biochemical marker measurement in the perfusate at multiple time points. After EVLP, single orthotopic lung transplantation was performed, and the grafts were assessed 2 hours after reperfusion. RESULTS: Lung grafts on EVLP with CyA exhibited significantly better functional and physiological parameters as compared with those without CyA treatment. CyA administration attenuated proinflammatory changes and prohibited glucose consumption during EVLP through mitigating mitochondrial dysfunction in lung grafts. CyA-preconditioned lungs showed better posttransplant lung early graft function and less inflammatory events compared with control. CONCLUSIONS: During EVLP, CyA administration can have a preconditioning effect through both its anti-inflammatory and mitochondrial protective properties, leading to improved lung graft preservation, which may result in enhanced graft quality after transplantation.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to Overcome Graft-Cavity Disparity of Lung Transplantation.

The waitlist mortality rate is higher in patients with severe restrictive pulmonary disease because of the rapid clinical progression of the disease and the challenges of finding lung allografts that fit their small chest cavities in a timely manner. This report describes a case of urgent lung transplantation in which venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used after open chest management and volume reduction to allow the lung allograft to accommodate to a smaller chest cavity. The use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in this case facilitated early chest closure in a patient with graft-cavity disparity while lowering the risk of infection without hemodynamic or respiratory compromise.

Jejuno-jejunal intussusception in a post-lung transplant patient from a gastrojejunostomy tube: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Gastro-jejunostomy tube is used for post-pyloric feeding for critical-ill patient who cannot tolerate oral alimentation. Jejuno-jejunal intussusception is a rare complication of gastrojejunostomy tube. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 39-year-old male with history of severe combined immunodeficiency, Achalasia and end-stage lung disease underwent double lung transplantation. After lung transplantation, he required gastrojejunostomy(GJ) tube placement due to his esophageal disease. Four days after gastrojejunostomy tube placement, he developed jejuno-jejunal intussusception. A 15 cm segment of thickened and enlarged bowel, which consisted of the intussusception were identified laparoscopically. Surgical reduction was performed without bowel resection. DISCUSSION: Intussusception is uncommon in adults compared to pediatric population. In this rare case, the jejunal limb of the GJ tube placed in jejunum was the cause of jejunojejunal intussusception serving as the lead point. The GJ tube should not be placed farther down from ligaments of Treiz to prevent jejuno-jejunal intussusception. CONCLUSIONS: A heightened index of suspicion for this rare complication should exist with a presenting patient has signs of proximal bowel obstruction and CT evidence of intussusception.

Three-port thoracoscopic middle lobectomy in a patient after left pneumonectomy.

Lung lobectomy after contralateral pneumonectomy is a challenging procedure associated with high morbidity and mortality. To date, only limited evidence has been available, and adequate indication or surgical approach remain unclear. We herein report a successful case of thoracoscopic lobectomy in a single-lung patient. A 63-year-old man, who had a history of left pneumonectomy for lung cancer, was found to have an abnormal opacity in the right middle zone at a health checkup 13 years after the previous operation. This nodule was later diagnosed as squamous cell cancer (cT2N0M0, stage IB) and surgical resection was considered. Thoracoscopic middle lobectomy with D1 lymph node dissection was performed for this patient under selective ventilation of the right upper and lower lobes. Postoperative course was uneventful and he was discharged on postoperative day 7, requiring no oxygen. The patient is doing well with no evidence of recurrence for 5 years. Given the lower invasiveness, thoracoscopic lobectomy under the selective ventilation of residual lobes could be an option after contralateral pneumonectomy in selected patients.