Cryothermal energy demonstrates shorter ablation time and lower complication rates compared with radiofrequency in surgical hybrid ablation for recurrent ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) after prior endocardial catheter ablation(s) presents challenges in the setting of prior cardiac surgery where percutaneous epicardial access may not be feasible. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of cryothermal vs radiofrequency ablation in direct surgical epicardial access procedures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive surgical epicardial VT ablation cases. Surgical cases using cryothermal vs radiofrequency ablation were analyzed and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2022, 43 patients underwent either a cryothermal (n = 17) or a radiofrequency (n = 26) hybrid epicardial ablation procedure with direct surgical access. Both groups were similarly matched for age, sex, etiology of VT, and comorbidities with a high burden of refractory VT despite previous endocardial and/or percutaneous epicardial ablation procedures. The surgical access site was lateral thoracotomy (76.5%) in the cryothermal ablation group compared with lateral thoracotomy (42.3%) and subxiphoid approach (38.5%) in the radiofrequency group, with the remainder in both groups performed via median sternotomy. The ablation time was significantly shorter in those undergoing cryothermal ablation vs radiofrequency ablation (11.54 ± 15.5 minutes vs 48.48 ± 23.6 minutes; P < .001). There were no complications in the cryothermal ablation group compared with 6 patients with complications in the radiofrequency group. Recurrent VT episodes and all-cause mortality were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Hybrid surgical VT ablation with cryothermal or radiofrequency energy demonstrated similar efficacy outcomes. Cryothermal ablation was more efficient and safer than radiofrequency in a surgical setting and should be considered when surgical access is required.

Linear epicardial cryoablation effects in a porcine model: Lesion characteristics and vascular risk.

INTRODUCTION: Cryoablation in open-chest surgical interventions for ventricular arrhythmias has been reported with reasonable procedural outcomes. However, the characteristics of cryoablation lesions on the ventricular myocardium are not well defined. The purpose of the present study was to determine the tissue and vascular effects of a linear epicardial cryoablation probe in a porcine animal model. METHODS: Five adult Yorkshire swine underwent median sternotomy and application of linear cryoablation lesions using a malleable aluminum linear cryoablation probe of varying duration (2, 3, 4, and 5 min), including one lesion placed intentionally over the left anterior descending coronary (LAD) artery. Histological analysis was performed. RESULTS: Maximum lesion depth was approximately 1.0 cm with 3 min freezes, with no significant increase in depth achieved with longer lesions. No transmural lesions were achieved. No large vessel epicardial coronary artery injuries were seen to the LAD; however, surprisingly, remote isolated interventricular septal injury was seen in all animals, suggestive of possible compromise of smaller coronary arterial vessels. CONCLUSION: Single application freezes with an aluminum linear cryoablation probe can create homogeneous ablative lesions over the ventricular myocardium with a maximum depth of approximately 1.0 cm. No large vessel injury occurred with direct lesion application of the LAD; however, small coronary vessels may be at risk.

Non-invasive Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias: Venturing into the Unknown.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising new method for non-invasive management of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Numerous case reports and case series have provided encouraging short-term results suggesting good efficacy and safety, but randomized data and long-term outcomes are not yet available. The primary hypothesis as to the mechanism of action for SBRT relates to the development of cardiac fibrosis in arrhythmogenic myocardial substrate; however, limited animal model data offer conflicting insights into this theory. The use of SBRT for patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias is rapidly increasing, but ongoing translational science work and randomized clinical trials will be critical to address many outstanding questions regarding this novel therapy.

Non-invasive stereotactic body radiation therapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias: an institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: Initial studies have reported excellent safety and efficacy for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of eight consecutive patients who underwent SBRT for refractory, scar-related VT. The anatomic target for radioablation was defined based on surface 12-lead ECG VT morphology, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and electroanatomic mapping data when available. The target volume treated and the prescribed radiation dose (15-25 Gy) was based on the combined clinical assessment of the cardiac electrophysiologist and radiation oncologist. Ventricular arrhythmias, radiation-related outcomes, and adverse events were monitored at follow-up. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent nine SBRT sessions. All patients were male with an average age of 75 ± 7.3 years and mean ejection fraction of 21 ± 7%. SBRT was performed with delivery of an average of 22.2 ± 3.6 Gy in a single session with a procedure time of 18.2 ± 6.0 min. All but one session was performed on an inpatient basis. No acute complications occurred. During a median follow-up of 7.8 months (IQR 4.8, 9.9), ICD therapies decreased from median 69.5 (43.5, 115.8) pre-SBRT to 13.3 (IQR 7.7, 35.8) post-SBRT (p = 0.036). There were three patient deaths in the follow-up period, unrelated to SBRT. Apparent clinical benefit occurred 33% of the time after SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: The patients experienced overall reduction in VT burden following SBRT, though not with the immediate effect seen in other patient series. Further studies (basic, translational, and clinical) are essential to determine the benefit of SBRT and if so, the optimal protocols and patient selection.

Hybrid Surgical Ablation for Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Hybrid surgical ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation combines surgical epicardial access/exposure with contemporary mapping and ablation techniques adapted from percutaneous catheter ablation procedures. Patients considered for a hybrid surgical approach for VT are those who have had prior cardiac surgery or failed percutaneous epicardial access due to pericardial adhesions. They often represent the most challenging end of the spectrum of patients and usually have undergone multiple unsuccessful ablations. In this review, the indications, preprocedure work-up, ablation techniques, and outcomes from hybrid surgical access VT ablations are discussed as well as key technical details that present unique challenges to its success.

Hybrid surgical vs percutaneous access epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation.

BACKGROUND: There is limited experience of surgical epicardial access in the contemporary era of ventricular tachycardia ablation after cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe our institutional experience with surgical epicardial access and the influence of surgical approach and compare outcomes with those of a propensity-matched percutaneous epicardial access control group. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive surgical epicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation cases from a single center. Surgical cases were propensity-matched to percutaneous epicardial ablation controls and short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2016, 38 patients underwent 40 surgical epicardial access procedures (subxiphoid, n = 22; thoracotomy, n = 18). The commonest indication was prior coronary artery bypass grafting (45%), valve surgery (22%), or ventricular assist device (VAD) (10%). The mean procedure time was 444 minutes (standard deviation, 107 minutes). Mapped epicardial geometry area was 149 cm2 (interquartile range 182 cm2), which comprised 36% of the mapped epicardial geometric area of a percutaneous control group. Subxiphoid access gave preferential access to the inferior and inferolateral left ventricular segments and was less frequently able to access the anterior, anterolateral, and apical segments compared with a thoracotomy approach. When compared with results from a propensity-matched percutaneous-access group, short-term outcomes, complication rates, and 1-year survival free from a combined end point of VT recurrence, death, or transplantation were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical epicardial access after cardiac surgery for ablation of VT in patients with careful preprocedure evaluation can be performed with acceptable safety with no statistical difference in long-term outcomes compared with a propensity-matched percutaneous epicardial cohort. The region of left ventricular epicardium that can be mapped is limited compared with that of percutaneous cases and is determined by the surgical approach.

Modifying Ventricular Fibrillation by Targeted Rotor Substrate Ablation: Proof-of-Concept from Experimental Studies to Clinical VF.

INTRODUCTION: Recent work has suggested a role for organized sources in sustaining ventricular fibrillation (VF). We assessed whether ablation of rotor substrate could modulate VF inducibility in canines, and used this proof-of-concept as a foundation to suppress antiarrhythmic drug-refractory clinical VF in a patient with structural heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 9 dogs, we introduced 64-electrode basket catheters into one or both ventricles, used rapid pacing at a recorded induction threshold to initiate VF, and then defibrillated after 18±8 seconds. Endocardial rotor sites were identified from basket recordings using phase mapping, and ablation was performed at nonrotor (sham) locations (7 ± 2 minutes) and then at rotor sites (8 ± 2 minutes, P = 0.10 vs. sham); the induction threshold was remeasured after each. Sham ablation did not alter canine VF induction threshold (preablation 150 ± 16 milliseconds, postablation 144 ± 16 milliseconds, P = 0.54). However, rotor site ablation rendered VF noninducible in 6/9 animals (P = 0.041), and increased VF induction threshold in the remaining 3. Clinical proof-of-concept was performed in a patient with repetitive ICD shocks due to VF refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. Following biventricular basket insertion, VF was induced and then defibrillated. Mapping identified 4 rotors localized at borderzone tissue, and rotor site ablation (6.3 ± 1.5 minutes/site) rendered VF noninducible. The VF burden fell from 7 ICD shocks in 8 months preablation to zero ICD therapies at 1 year, without antiarrhythmic medications. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted rotor substrate ablation suppressed VF in an experimental model and a patient with refractory VF. Further studies are warranted on the efficacy of VF source modulation.