The risk of venous thrombosis in women over 50 years old using oral contraception or postmenopausal hormone therapy.

BACKGROUND: Oral contraception (OC) and postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) can be used to alleviate menopausal symptoms. However, the risk of venous thrombosis (VT) associated with OC use in women over 50 years old has never been assessed and the two preparations have not been directly compared. OBJECTIVES: To determine and compare the risk of VT associated with OC and HT use. METHODS: From a large case-control study, 2550 women aged over 50 years old, 1082 patients with a first VT and 1468 controls, were included. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for VT were calculated for OC-users (164 patients and 54 controls) and HT-users (88 patients and 102 controls) compared with non-hormone users (823 patients and 1304 controls). RESULTS: OC-users had a 6.3-fold (4.6-9.8) increased risk of VT. This ranged from 5.4 (3.3-8.9) for preparations containing levonorgestrel to 10.2 (4.8-21.7) for desogestrel. The VT-risk associated with oral HT use was 4.0 (1.8-8.2) for conjugated equine estrogen combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate and 3.9 (1.5-10.7) for micronized estradiol combined with norethisterone acetate. Non-oral HT did not increase the risk of VT: OR 1.1 (0.6-1.8). Relative risk estimates were further increased in hormone users with factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A or blood group non-O and hormone users with a family history of VT. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, non-oral HT seemed to be the safest hormonal preparation in women over 50 years old. OC use increased the VT risk the most, especially in women with inherited thrombophilia or a family history of VT.

Sex hormone-binding globulin levels are not causally related to venous thrombosis risk in women not using hormonal contraceptives.

BACKGROUND: Oral contraceptive use increases the risk of venous thrombosis as well as sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels. Furthermore, increased SHBG levels are positively associated with activated protein C (APC) resistance and thrombotic risk in oral contraceptive users. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether increased SHBG levels are causally related to venous thrombosis in women not using hormonal contraceptives. METHODS: Premenopausal women were selected from a case-control study on venous thrombosis, the Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment of risk factors for venous thrombosis (MEGA) study (23 patients; 258 controls). Women using hormonal contraceptives were excluded. First, the risk of venous thrombosis with SHBG levels above the normal reference range (70 nm) was determined. Second, because multiple regulatory factors affect SHBG levels and residual confounding may remain, we determined six single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the SHBG gene and assessed the risk of venous thrombosis in a different case-control study, the Leiden Thrombophilia Study (LETS) (20 patients; 74 controls), and in the MEGA study. Finally, the association between SHBG levels and the normalized activated partial thromboplastin time-based APC resistance (an intermediate endpoint for venous thrombosis) was determined. RESULTS: Elevated SHBG levels (> 70.0 nm) were associated with venous thrombosis (odds ratio 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-5.00). However, this finding can be explained by residual confounding. Two SNPs in the SHBG gene affected SHBG levels, but not venous thrombosis risk. Furthermore, SHBG levels in controls were not associated with APC resistance (SHBG level, > 70.0 vs. ≤ 70.0 nm: mean difference in normalized APC sensitivity ratio, 0.03; 95% CI -0.05 to 0.10). Exclusion of women with FV Leiden did not materially change these results. CONCLUSIONS: Increased SHBG levels are not causally related to the risk of venous thrombosis.

Risk of borderline and invasive ovarian tumours after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in a large Dutch cohort.

BACKGROUND: Long-term effects of ovarian stimulation for IVF on the risk of ovarian malignancies are unknown. METHODS: We identified a nationwide historic cohort of 19,146 women who received IVF treatment in the Netherlands between 1983 and 1995, and a comparison group of 6006 subfertile women not treated with IVF. In 1997-1999, data on reproductive risk factors were obtained from 65% of women and data on subfertility (treatment) were obtained from the medical records. The incidence of ovarian malignancies (including borderline ovarian tumours) through 2007 was assessed through linkage with disease registries. The risk of ovarian malignancies in the IVF group was compared with risks in the general population and the subfertile comparison group. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 14.7 years, the risk of borderline ovarian tumours was increased in the IVF group compared with the general population [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 1.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-2.56]. The overall SIR for invasive ovarian cancer was not significantly elevated, but increased with longer follow-up after first IVF (P = 0.02); the SIR was 3.54 (95% CI = 1.62-6.72) after 15 years. The risks of borderline ovarian tumours and of all ovarian malignancies combined in the IVF group were significantly increased compared with risks in the subfertile comparison group (hazard ratios = 4.23; 95% CI = 1.25-14.33 and 2.14; 95% CI = 1.07-4.25, respectively, adjusted for age, parity and subfertility cause). CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian stimulation for IVF may increase the risk of ovarian malignancies, especially borderline ovarian tumours. More large cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings and to examine the effect of IVF treatment characteristics.

PCOS, coronary heart disease, stroke and the influence of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at risk of arterial disease. We examined the risk of (non)fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke in patients with PCOS and ovulatory women without PCOS, and assessed whether obesity might explain a higher risk of CHD or stroke. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled observational studies. Four definitions of PCOS were considered: World Health Organization type II anovulation, National Institutes of Health criteria, Rotterdam consensus and Androgen-excess criteria. Obesity was defined as BMI > 30 kg/m(2) and/or waist circumference >88 cm. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary outcome was fatal/non-fatal CHD or stroke. Definitions of CHD and stroke were based on criteria used by the various authors. The effect measure was the pooled relative risk in a random effects model. Risk ratios and rate ratios were combined here. RESULTS: After identifying 1340 articles, 5 follow-up studies published between 2000 and 2008 were included. The studies showed heterogeneity in design, definitions and quality. In a random effects model the relative risk for CHD or stroke were 2.02 comparing women with PCOS to women without PCOS (95% confidence interval 1.47, 2.76). Pooling the two studies with risk estimates adjusted for BMI showed a relative risk of 1.55 (1.27, 1.89). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed a 2-fold risk of arterial disease for patients with PCOS relative to women without PCOS. BMI adjustment did not affect this finding, suggesting the increased risk for cardiovascular events in PCOS is not completely related to a higher BMI in patients with PCOS.

Sex difference in risk of recurrent venous thrombosis and the risk profile for a second event.

BACKGROUND: The risk of recurrent venous thrombosis is higher in men than in women, and this is so far unexplained. We set out to determine the influence of age, time between first and second event, type of first event, oral contraception, pregnancy and surgery. METHODS: We performed a prospective follow-up study of 474 patients with a first objective diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, aged 18-70 years (Leiden Thrombophilia Study cohort). RESULTS: During 3477 person-years of follow-up, 90 recurrences occurred. The overall incidence rates of recurrence (IRs) were 40.9 per 1000 person-years in men and 15.8 per 1000 person-years in women. Men with an unprovoked first event had the highest risk of recurrence, with almost one-third experiencing a second unprovoked event within 8 years (IR 41.2 per 1000 person-years). This risk was three-fold lower in women [IR 14.2 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.4-5.7)]. Age at diagnosis had little effect on recurrence rate, and nor had time elapsed since the first event. In women, almost half of the recurrences were provoked and were mainly related to oral contraceptive use or pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The higher recurrence rate in men than in women is not the result of differences in the environmental or transient risk factors that we studied. The risk profile for a second thrombotic event is clearly different from that of a first.

The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the thrombotic risk associated with oral contraceptive use with a focus on dose of oestrogen and type of progestogen of oral contraceptives available in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Population based case-control study. SETTING: Six participating anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands (Amersfoort, Amsterdam, The Hague, Leiden, Rotterdam, and Utrecht). PARTICIPANTS: Premenopausal women <50 years old who were not pregnant, not within four weeks postpartum, and not using a hormone excreting intrauterine device or depot contraceptive. Analysis included 1524 patients and 1760 controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First objectively diagnosed episodes of deep venous thrombosis of the leg or pulmonary embolism. Odds ratios calculated by cross-tabulation with a 95% confidence interval according to Woolf's method; adjusted odds ratios estimated by unconditional logistic regression, standard errors derived from the model. RESULTS: Currently available oral contraceptives increased the risk of venous thrombosis fivefold compared with non-use (odds ratio 5.0, 95% CI 4.2 to 5.8). The risk clearly differed by type of progestogen and dose of oestrogen. The use of oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel was associated with an almost fourfold increased risk of venous thrombosis (odds ratio 3.6, 2.9 to 4.6) relative to non-users, whereas the risk of venous thrombosis compared with non-use was increased 5.6-fold for gestodene (5.6, 3.7 to 8.4), 7.3-fold for desogestrel (7.3, 5.3 to 10.0), 6.8-fold for cyproterone acetate (6.8, 4.7 to 10.0), and 6.3-fold for drospirenone (6.3, 2.9 to 13.7). The risk of venous thrombosis was positively associated with oestrogen dose. We confirmed a high risk of venous thrombosis during the first months of oral contraceptive use irrespective of the type of oral contraceptives. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available oral contraceptives still have a major impact on thrombosis occurrence and many women do not use the safest brands with regard to risk of venous thrombosis.

Angiogenic growth factors and their receptors in first-trimester human decidua of pregnancies further complicated by preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction.

Disturbances in decidual and placental vascular development may play a role in the pathogenesis of pregnancy complications. This study focused on the role of angiogenic factors in the first trimester in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia (PE) and/or fetal growth restriction (FGR). First-trimester decidua was obtained during chorionic villous sampling.The expression of the angiogenic factors was determined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and related to the pregnancy outcome. First-trimester decidua expressed all angiogenic factors.The differential expression of angiogenic factors appeared to be more prominent in FGR than in PE. These first-trimester samples provided a unique opportunity to obtain information regarding the onset of PE and FGR. First-trimester changes in angiogenic factor expression may well occur as a compensatory mechanism. This, in turn, may unintentionally set the stage for increased angiogenesis and altered decidual/placental vascular adaptation, which may be part of the pathogenesis of PE and/or FGR.

Routine use of hysterosalpingography prior to laparoscopy in the fertility workup: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A multicentre randomized controlled trial with or without hysterosalpingography (HSG) was conducted to assess the usefulness of HSG as a routine investigation in the fertility workup prior to laparoscopy and dye. METHODS: From 1 April 1997 to 1 April 2002, subfertile women were allocated by a computer-based 1 : 1 ratio randomization procedure, either for an HSG followed by laparoscopy and dye (the intervention group) of for laparoscopy and dye only (the control group) as a part of their fertility workup. Cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) within 18 months after randomization was the primary outcome of interest. RESULTS: 344 women were randomized to the intervention group (n = 169) and the control group (n = 175). There was no significant difference in CPR at 18 months in the intervention group (49.1%) [95% confidence interval (CI) 41.6 to 56.6] and the control group (50.3%) (95% CI 42.8 to 57.8), a difference of -1.2% (95% CI -11.8% to 9.5%). CONCLUSION: The routine use of HSG at an early stage in the fertility workup prior to laparoscopy and dye does not influence CPR, compared with the routine use of laparoscopy and dye without HSG.

Intra-uterine insemination versus timed intercourse for cervical hostility in subfertile couples.

BACKGROUND: The postcoital test has poor diagnostic and prognostic characteristics. Nevertheless, some physicians believe it can identify scanty or abnormal mucus that might impair fertility. One way to avoid 'hostile' cervical mucus is intrauterine insemination. With this technique, the physician injects sperm directly into the uterine cavity through a small catheter passed through the cervix; the theory is to bypass the "hostile" cervical mucus. Although most gynaecological societies do not endorse use of intrauterine insemination for hostile cervical mucus, some physicians consider it an effective treatment for women with infertility thought due to cervical mucus problems. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to determine the effectiveness of intrauterine insemination with or without ovarian stimulation in women with cervical hostility who failed to conceive. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005, MEDLINE (1966 to June 2005), EMBASE (1980 to June 2005), POPLINE (to June 2005) and LILACS (to June 2005). In addition, we contacted experts and searched the reference list of relevant articles and book chapters. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing intrauterine insemination with intercourse timed at the presumed fertile period. Participants were women with cervical hostility who failed to conceive for at least one year. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed the titles and abstracts of 386 publications and two reviewers independently abstracted data on methods and results from five studies identified for inclusion. The main outcome is pregnancy rate per couple. MAIN RESULTS: We did not pool the outcomes of the included five studies in a meta-analysis due to the methodological quality of the trials and variations in the patient characteristics and interventions. Narrative summaries of the outcomes are provided. Each study was too small for a clinically relevant conclusion. None of the studies provided information on important outcomes such as spontaneous abortion, multiple pregnancies, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from the published studies that intrauterine insemination is an effective treatment for cervical hostility. Given the poor diagnostic and prognostic properties of the postcoital test and the observation that the test has no benefit on pregnancy rates, intrauterine insemination (with or without ovarian stimulation) is unlikely to be a useful treatment for putative problems identified by postcoital testing.

Urinary gonadotrophins but not recombinant gonadotrophins reduce expression of VEGF120 and its receptors flt-1 and flk-1 in the mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian stimulation in humans might affect the perinatal outcome and be considered as a stress factor in the implantation process. In this study we compared the effects of recombinant and urinary gonadotrophins during the mouse peri-implantation period. METHODS: Adult female CD1 mice were treated as follows (a) urinary hFSH and urinary hCG, (b) recombinant hFSH and recombinant hLH and (c) saline. The effects of the gonadotrophins on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor120 (VEG120) and its receptors and the corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) system during the peri-implantation period were studied. The specific effects of the different gonadotrophins on the onset of implantation were also studied. RESULTS: Urinary gonadotrophin treatment caused lower levels of VEGF120, flt-1 and flk-1 mRNA levels, reduced the size of the embryo implantation site, delayed implantation and prolonged the gestational period. Both urinary hFSH and urinary hCG contributed to the adverse effects. Levels of CRH and CRHR1 expression were not influenced. Recombinant gonadotrophin treatment did not alter any of the parameters studied. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the VEGF system of the mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period is adversely affected by urinary gonadotrophins but not by recombinant gonadotrophins. The CRH system was not affected by the two types of gonadotrophins.

[Breast cancer and the use of the hormones around the menopause]. / Borstkanker en hormoongebruik rond de menopauze.

Following the publication of the 'Million women study', commotion has broken out in the media about the relationship between hormone use around the menopause and breast cancer. In this study, women were asked about possible risk factors for breast cancer, including hormone replacement therapy, prior to breast cancer screening. After an average follow-up period of 2.6 years, it was found that breast cancer more frequently occurred among women who had recently used an oestrogen-progestagen preparation (relative risk (RR): 2.00; 95%-CI: 1.88-2.12), an oestrogen preparation (RR: 1.30; 1.21-1.40) or tibolone (RR: 1.45; 1.25-1.68) than among women who had not used either of these. Methodologically, the study contains both strengths and weaknesses. However, the findings agree with those from an earlier randomised study. Current users of hormone use were more likely than never users to die from breast cancer (RR: 1.22; 1.00-1.48). For the prescription of hormone replacement therapy, the twice as high relative risk of breast cancer together with the other potentially life-threatening side effects of hormone replacement therapy need to be weighed up against the complaints which form the indication for the prescription. Therefore, the advice for hormone replacement therapy continues to be that it should, if necessary, be made available as a treatment option for a short period (3 months) and only in the case of serious and debilitating complaints. Long-term preventative use, as happens in practice, is not indicated due to the risk of relatively serious side effects.

Estrogens, progestogens and thrombosis.

Hundreds of millions of women worldwide use either oral contraceptives or postmenopausal hormone replacement. The use of oral contraceptives leads to an increased risk of venous thrombosis, of myocardial infarction, of stroke and of peripheral artery disease, the risks of which are highest during the first year of use. Women with coagulation abnormalities have a higher risk of venous thrombosis when they use oral contraceptives (or postmenopausal hormones) than women without these abnormalities. The risk of venous thrombosis is also higher for preparations containing desogestrel or gestodene (third-generation progestogens) than for those containing levonorgestrel (second-generation progestogens). A previous thrombosis as well as obesity also increase the risk of oral contraceptive-related thrombosis. Hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of venous thrombosis, and has no beneficial, and possibly even a detrimental, effect on the risk of arterial disease. The risk of arterial disease in oral contraceptive users and users of hormone replacement therapy is at most weakly affected by the presence of prothrombotic abnormalities.

The RATIO study: oral contraceptives and the risk of peripheral arterial disease in young women.

With regard to oral contraceptives, much research has concentrated on venous thrombosis and on the coronary and cerebral forms of atherosclerotic disease, while peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has received little attention. In this case-control study, we assessed oral contraceptive use and the risk of PAD in young women using a population-based case-control study. The women were 18-49 years of age, and had been admitted to a collaborating hospital between January 1990 and October 1995, and had a diagnosis of PAD. Participants were patients with PAD (n = 152), and control women (n = 925), identified by random digit dialing. The diagnosis of PAD was based almost exclusively on intra-arterial angiography. Patients and control subjects filled out the same structured questionnaire, which included questions on medical history, cardiovascular risk factors, and contraceptive use. The adjusted odds ratio for PAD in women using any type of oral contraceptives vs. no use, was 3.8 (95% CI 2.4-5.8). When first generation oral contraceptive use was compared with no use, the odds ratio was 8.7 (95% CI 3.6-21.3). For second and third generation oral contraceptives, the adjusted odds ratios (compared with non-users) were 2.6 (95% CI 1.4-4.9) and 3.0 (95% CI 1.4-6.6), respectively. This is the first study on oral contraceptive use and PAD in humans. All types of oral contraceptives were associated with an increased risk of PAD.

Estrogen reduces vascular endothelial growth factor(164) expression in the mouse nucleus paraventricularis of the hypothalamus.

The aim of the present study was to establish whether estrogen and corticosteroids exert effects on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)(164) expression in the hippocampus and nucleus paraventricularis of the hypothalamus by in situ hybridization. Female mice were ovariectomized and treated either with estradiol benzoate or vehicle and male mice were either adrenalectomized or sham-operated. Ovariectomy plus estrogen reduced VEGF(164) expression in the nucleus paraventricularis but not in the hippocampus. Adrenalectomy did not influence VEGF(164) mRNA levels in the hippocampus and nucleus paraventricularis. Our results show for the first time an inhibitory effect of estrogen on VEGF(164) expression in the nucleus paraventricularis and suggest a role for estrogen in the regulation of VEGF(164) expression and function in the central nervous system.

Gonadotrophin stimulation reduces VEGF(120) expression in the mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian stimulation by gonadotrophin treatment exerts negative effects on implantation and embryonic development. We investigated whether gonadotrophin treatment affects VEGF(120) mRNA expression during the peri-implantation period. METHODS: Two groups of adult female CD1 mice were used: the hormone-treated group was injected i.p. with urinary human FSH (5 IU in 0.1 ml saline) and urinary HCG (5 IU in 0.1 ml saline). Spontaneously ovulating mice served as controls and received saline injections. The pregnant mice were killed on embryonic development (ED) days 0, 3, 4, 5 and 6 (day of vaginal plug detection is considered as ED0). The uteri with the implanted embryos were processed for in-situ hybridization for VEGF(120). A separate group of control and hormone-treated pregnant mice were allowed to give birth. Litter size, birthweight and length of gestational period were noted. RESULTS: Gonadotrophin treatment decreased VEGF(120) mRNA levels, delayed implantation, reduced the size of the embryo implantation site on ED5 and ED6 and prolonged the gestational period. CONCLUSIONS: Gonadotrophin treatment reduces VEGF(120) expression which may have serious consequences for normal embryonic development. The present data cannot establish whether this effect is a cause or consequence of delayed implantation.

Female hormones and thrombosis.

Exogenous hormones are used by more than a hundred million women worldwide as oral contraceptives or for postmenopausal hormone replacement. Oral contraceptives increase the risk of venous thrombosis, of myocardial infarction, and of stroke. The risk is highest during the first year of use. The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives is high among women with coagulation abnormalities and with so-called third-generation contraceptives (containing desogestrel or gestodene). The risk of myocardial infarction does not appear to depend on coagulation abnormalities or the type of oral contraceptive. Hormone replacement therapy increases the risk of venous thrombosis. This risk is also highest in the first year of use and among women with coagulation abnormalities. The risk becomes very high in women with a previous venous thrombosis. Randomized trials have not confirmed a beneficial effect of postmenopausal hormones on the occurrence of myocardial infarction.

Pro-inflammatory effects of oestrogens during use of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement treatment.

The effects of two third-generation monophasic combined oral contraceptives (COC) and a postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) consisting of 2 mg 17 beta-oestradiol on the plasma level of the acute-phase indicator C-reactive protein (CRP) and other acute-phase reactants were analysed. Two studies were conducted: (1) a randomised, open-label study with two different oral contraceptive preparations with an equal dose of ethinylestradiol (30 micrograms) and a different progestogen, either 75 micrograms gestodene (GSD-EE) or 150 micrograms desogestrel (DSG-EE); blood samples of 39 young women were analysed before and after 3, 6, 12 treatment cycles; (2) a randomised, blinded placebo-controlled study with 2 mg 17 beta-oestradiol in postmenopausal women with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus without signs of cardiac involvement; blood samples of 38 women were analysed before and after 6 weeks of treatment. The plasma concentration of CRP increased strongly during oral contraceptive use for both preparations; the increase persisted over 12 cycles. The already elevated CRP in postmenopausal diabetic women showed a moderate increase after 6 weeks of treatment with 17 beta-oestradiol. CRP increases during oral contraceptive use were associated with changes in some other acute-phase proteins (fibrinogen, ceruloplasmin, von Willebrand factor [vWF]) originating from the liver and vessel wall, but not in others (interleukin-6 [IL-6], serum amyloid A [SAA]). The results demonstrate an increase in a specific set of acute-phase reactants caused by oestrogen-containing preparations. It is proposed that the pro-inflammatory effect of oestrogens should be checked for a relationship with the increased risk of thromboembolism for both oral contraceptive and HRT.

Oral contraceptives and the risk of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: An association between the use of oral contraceptives and the risk of myocardial infarction has been found in some, but not all, studies. We investigated this association, according to the type of progestagen included in third-generation (i.e., desogestrel or gestodene) and second-generation (i.e., levonorgestrel) oral contraceptives, the dose of estrogen, and the presence or absence of prothrombotic mutations METHODS: In a nationwide, population-based, case-control study, we identified and enrolled 248 women 18 through 49 years of age who had had a first myocardial infarction between 1990 and 1995 and 925 control women who had not had a myocardial infarction and who were matched for age, calendar year of the index event, and area of residence. Subjects supplied information on oral-contraceptive use and major cardiovascular risk factors. An analysis for factor V Leiden and the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene was conducted in 217 patients and 763 controls RESULTS: The odds ratio for myocardial infarction among women who used any type of combined oral contraceptive, as compared with nonusers, was 2.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.8). The adjusted odds ratio was 2.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 4.1) among women who used second-generation oral contraceptives and 1.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 2.5) among those who used third-generation oral contraceptives. Among women who used oral contraceptives, the odds ratio was 2.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.0) for those without a prothrombotic mutation and 1.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 5.5) for those with a mutation CONCLUSIONS: The risk of myocardial infarction was increased among women who used second-generation oral contraceptives. The results with respect to the use of third-generation oral contraceptives were inconclusive but suggested that the risk was lower than the risk associated with second-generation oral contraceptives. The risk of myocardial infarction was similar among women who used oral contraceptives whether or not they had a prothrombotic mutation.