Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr ; 165(2): 285-289.e1, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24880888

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcome data in an observational cohort of very low birth weight infants of the German Neonatal Network stratified to prophylactic use of Lactobacillus acidophilus/Bifidobacterium infantis probiotics. STUDY DESIGN: Within the observational period (September 1, 2010, until December 31, 2012, n=5351 infants) study centers were categorized into 3 groups based on their choice of Lactobacillus acidophilus/Bifidobacterium infantis use: (1) no prophylactic use (12 centers); (2 a/b) change of strategy nonuser to user during observational period (13 centers); and (3) use before start of observation (21 centers). Primary outcome data of all eligible infants were determined according to center-specific strategy. RESULTS: The use of probiotics was associated with a reduced risk for necrotizing enterocolitis surgery (group 1 vs group 3: 4.2 vs 2.6%, P=.028; change of strategy: 6.2 vs 4.0%, P<.001), any abdominal surgery, and hospital mortality. Infants treated with probiotics had improved weight gain/day, and probiotics had no effect on the risk of blood-culture confirmed sepsis. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, probiotics were protective for necrotizing enterocolitis surgery (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91; P=.017), any abdominal surgery (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51-0.95; P=.02), and the combined outcome abdominal surgery and/or death (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.33-0.56; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our observational data support the use of Lactobacillus acidophilus/Bifidobacterium infantis probiotics to reduce the risk for gastrointestinal morbidity but not sepsis in very low birth weight infants.


Asunto(s)
Bifidobacterium , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/prevención & control , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Lactobacillus acidophilus , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/epidemiología , Femenino , Alemania , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 212(5): 541-6, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19230762

RESUMEN

In this matched cohort study, clinical data from 43 paediatric cancer patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) were compared with 43 thoroughly matched control patients without BSI. BSI led to a median additional length of inpatient treatment of 12 days (IQR 8.5-16 days; P<0.001), accounting for median additional expenses of euro4400 (IQR, euro3145-5920) per case [6.970 US Dollar (IQR 4.938-9.294)]. Thus, BSI substantially increased financial resources required for inpatient treatment. These data compiled from a paediatric cancer unit may be utilized to estimate the cost-benefit ratio of targeted preventive measures.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Hospitales Pediátricos/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Adolescente , Bacteriemia/complicaciones , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Instituciones Oncológicas/economía , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/complicaciones , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Infección Hospitalaria/complicaciones , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Alemania , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA