Clinical Features, Neuropathology, and Surgical Outcome in Patients With Refractory Epilepsy and Brain Somatic Variants in the SLC35A2 Gene.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The SLC35A2 gene, located at chromosome Xp11.23, encodes for a uridine diphosphate-galactose transporter. We describe clinical, genetic, neuroimaging, EEG, and histopathologic findings and assess possible predictors of postoperative seizure and cognitive outcome in 47 patients with refractory epilepsy and brain somatic SLC35A2 gene variants. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study where we performed a descriptive analysis and classical hypothesis testing. We included the variables of interest significantly associated with the outcomes in the generalized linear models. RESULTS: Two main phenotypes were associated with brain somatic SLC35A2 variants: (1) early epileptic encephalopathy (EE, 39 patients) with epileptic spasms as the predominant seizure type and moderate to severe intellectual disability and (2) drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DR-FE, 8 patients) associated with normal/borderline cognitive function and specific neuropsychological deficits. Brain MRI was abnormal in all patients with EE and in 50% of those with DR-FE. Histopathology review identified mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy in 44/47 patients and was inconclusive in 3. The 47 patients harbored 42 distinct mosaic SLC35A2 variants, including 14 (33.3%) missense, 13 (30.9%) frameshift, 10 (23.8%) nonsense, 4 (9.5%) in-frame deletions/duplications, and 1 (2.4%) splicing variant. Variant allele frequencies (VAFs) ranged from 1.4% to 52.6% (mean VAF: 17.3 ± 13.5). At last follow-up (35.5 ± 21.5 months), 30 patients (63.8%) were in Engel Class I, of which 26 (55.3%) were in Class IA. Cognitive performances remained unchanged in most patients after surgery. Regression analyses showed that the probability of achieving both Engel Class IA and Class I outcomes, adjusted by age at seizure onset, was lower when the duration of epilepsy increased and higher when postoperative EEG was normal or improved. Lower brain VAF was associated with improved postoperative cognitive outcome in the analysis of associations, but this finding was not confirmed in regression analyses. DISCUSSION: Brain somatic SLC35A2 gene variants are associated with 2 main clinical phenotypes, EE and DR-FE, and a histopathologic diagnosis of MOGHE. Additional studies will be needed to delineate any possible correlation between specific genetic variants, mutational load in the epileptogenic tissue, and surgical outcomes.

Genetic Testing for Malformations of Cortical Development: A Clinical Diagnostic Study.

Background and Objectives: Malformations of cortical development (MCD), though individually rare, constitute a significant burden of disease. The diagnostic yield of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in these patients varies across studies and methods, and novel genes and variants continue to emerge. Methods: Patients (n = 123) with a definite radiologic or histopathologic diagnosis of MCD, with or without epilepsy were included in this study. They underwent NGS-based targeted gene panel (TGP) testing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), or WES-based virtual panel testing. Selected patients who underwent epilepsy surgery (n = 69) also had somatic gene testing of brain tissue-derived DNA. We analyzed predictors of positive germline genetic finding and diagnostic yield of respective methods. Results: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline genetic variants were detected in 21% of patients (26/123). In the surgical subgroup (69/123), we performed somatic sequencing in 40% of cases (28/69) and detected causal variants in 18% (5/28). Diagnostic yield did not differ between TGP, WES-based virtual gene panel, and open WES (p = 0.69). Diagnosis of focal cortical dysplasia type 2A, epilepsy, and intellectual disability were associated with positive results of germline testing. We report previously unpublished variants in 16/26 patients and 4 cases of MCD with likely pathogenic variants in non-MCD genes. Discussion: In this study, we are reporting genetic findings of a large cohort of MCD patients with epilepsy or potentially epileptogenic MCD. We determine predictors of successful ascertainment of a genetic diagnosis in real-life setting and report novel, likely pathogenic variants in MCD and non-MCD genes alike.

GATOR1-related focal cortical dysplasia in epilepsy surgery patients and their families: A possible gradient in severity?

BACKGROUND: Variants of GATOR1-genes represent a recognised cause of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD), the most common structural aetiology in paediatric drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Reports on familial cases of GATOR1-associated FCD are limited, especially with respect to epilepsy surgery outcomes. METHODS: We present phenotypical manifestations of four unrelated patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, FCD and a first-degree relative with epilepsy. All patients underwent targeted gene panel sequencing as a part of the presurgical work up. Literature search was performed to compare our findings to previously published cases. RESULTS: The children (probands) had a more severe phenotype than their parents, including drug-resistant epilepsy and developmental delay, and they failed to achieve seizure freedom post-surgically. All patients had histopathologically confirmed FCD (types IIa, IIb, Ia). In Patient 1 and her affected father, we detected a known pathogenic NPRL2 variant. In patients 2 and 3 and their affected parents, we found novel likely pathogenic germline DEPDC5 variants. In family 4, we detected a novel variant in NPRL3. We identified 15 additional cases who underwent epilepsy surgery for GATOR1-associated FCD, with a positive family history of epilepsy in the literature; in 8/13 tested, the variant was inherited from an asymptomatic parent. CONCLUSION: The presented cases displayed a severity gradient in phenotype with children more severely affected than the parents. Although patients with GATOR1-associated FCD are considered good surgical candidates, post-surgical seizure outcome was poor in our familial cases, suggesting that accurate identification of the epileptogenic zone may be more challenging in this subgroup of patients.