The Financial Impact on Reimbursement of Moderately Hypofractionated Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer: An International Consortium Report.

AIMS: Moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation has been evaluated in several prospective studies, resulting in wide acceptance of shorter treatment protocols for postoperative breast irradiation. Reimbursement for radiation therapy varies between private and public systems and between countries, impacting variably financial considerations in the use of hypofractionation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the financial impact of moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation by reimbursement system in different countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed by an international group of radiation oncologists. A web-questionnaire was distributed to representatives from each country. The participants were asked to involve the financial consultant at their institution. RESULTS: Data from 13 countries from all populated continents were collected (Europe: Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, UK; North America: Canada, USA; South America: Brazil; Africa: South Africa; Oceania: Australia; Asia: Israel, Taiwan). Clinicians and/or departments in most of the countries surveyed (77%) receive remuneration based on the number of fractions delivered to the patient. The financial loss per patient estimated resulting from applying moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation instead of conventional fractionation ranged from 5-10% to 30-40%, depending on the healthcare provider. CONCLUSION: Although a generalised adoption of moderately hypofractionated breast irradiation would allow for a considerable reduction in social and economic burden, the financial loss for the healthcare providers induced by fee-for-service remuneration may be a factor in the slow uptake of these regimens. Therefore, fee-for-service reimbursement may not be preferable for radiation oncology. We propose that an alternative system of remuneration, such as bundled payments based on stage and diagnosis, may provide more value for all stakeholders.

Tumour response 3 months after neoadjuvant single-fraction radiotherapy for low-risk breast cancer.

Introduction: Standard treatment for early-stage invasive breast cancer (bca) consists of breast-conserving surgery and several weeks of adjuvant radiotherapy (rt). Neoadjuvant single-fraction rt is a novel approach for early-stage bca. We sought to investigate the effect of delaying surgery after neoadjuvant rt with respect to the rate of pathologic response (pr). Methods: Women 65 years of age or older with a new diagnosis of stage i luminal A bca were eligible for inclusion. A single 20 Gy dose to the primary breast tumour was given, followed by breast-conserving surgery 3 months later. The primary endpoint was the pr rate assessed by microscopic evaluation using the Miller-Payne system. Results: To date, 10 patients have been successfully treated. Median age of the patients was 72 years (range: 65-84 years). In 8 patients, neoadjuvant rt resulted in a tumour pr with median residual cellularity of 3%. No immediate rt complications other than mild dermatitis were noted. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a method for delivering single-fraction rt that can lead to a high level of pr in most patients. Continued accrual to this study and subsequent trials are needed to determine the feasibility, safety, and role of this novel technique in the management of early-stage bca.

[Current status of hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer]. / Radiothérapie externe hypofractionnée du cancer du sein localisé : où en est-on ?

The benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy following lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer are well established. The most widely used method consists of roughly twenty-five fractions of whole-breast irradiation. In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy regimens. Many of these techniques have been shown to be equivalent in terms of tumor control and cosmetic results while minimizing inconvenience and costs both to the patient and health care system. Here, we present the various hypofractionation modalities, patient selection criteria, consensus guideline recommendations and a look at future indications.

Phase II trial of short-course radiotherapy followed by delayed surgery for locoregionally advanced rectal cancer.

AIM: A prospective phase II study to investigate the feasibility and the rate of complete pathological response (ypT0) after short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by surgery at 8 weeks. METHOD: Operable patients with localized rectal cancer staged T3-4N0/+ or T2N+ were eligible and received 25 Gy (in one-third of patients, the gross tumor volume received a simultaneous integrated boost up to a total of 30 Gy) in five consecutive fractions to the posterior pelvis followed by surgery 8 weeks later. Pathological response and surgical toxicity were assessed in all patients. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (median age 68 years) completed the study. The median distance of the tumour from the anal verge was 6.5 cm. The median interval to surgery was 52 days. Three-quarters of patients underwent a low anterior resection. All underwent complete surgical resection and 100% had pathological negative margins. Ten per cent had stage ypT0 after radiotherapy. The median length of hospital stay was 8 days. Toxicity was comparable with the rates reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: In this study, SCRT followed by delayed surgery was feasible and had acceptable toxicity. All patients underwent complete surgical resection and 100% had negative pathological margins. The rate of ypT0 was 10%.

Effect of exercise in reducing breast and chest-wall pain in patients with breast cancer: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Breast or chest-wall pain (BCP) is prevalent in 20%-50% of breast cancer survivors, and it affects quality of life (QOL). To determine the feasibility and potential efficacy of an exercise program to improve patient QOL and BCP, such a program was offered to breast cancer patients suffering from BCP. METHODS: The study enrolled 10 breast cancer patients with moderate-to-severe BCP at 3-6 months after completion of all adjuvant treatments. These patients participated in a 12-week comprehensive health improvement program (CHIP). Intensity was adjusted to reach 65%-85% of the patient's maximal heart rate. Before the CHIP and at 1 and 6 months after completion of the CHIP, QOL and pain were measured using questionnaires [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life core and breast cancer modules (QLQ-C30, -BR23) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire short form] completed by the patients. Results were compared with those from case-matched control subjects from another study at McGill University. RESULTS: After the CHIP, patients reported significant and clinically important improvements in QOL and symptoms. At 1 and 6 months post-CHIP, patients in the study felt, on average, better in overall QOL than did historical control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that patients who experience chronic bcp may benefit from an exercise program. A randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy do not increase radiation-induced dermatitis in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Radiation-induced dermatitis is a common side effect of breast irradiation, with hypofractionation being a well-known risk factor. In the context of the widespread adoption of hypofractionated breast radiotherapy, we evaluated the effect of hypofractionated radiotherapy on the incidence of skin toxicity in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with breast cancer treated from 2004 to 2006 at a single institution. Patients undergoing lumpectomy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy consisting of 42.4 Gy in 16 fractions were included in the study. Using cosmetic and skin toxicity scales, all patients were evaluated weekly during treatment and at scheduled follow-up visits with the radiation oncologist. RESULTS: During the study period, 162 patients underwent radiotherapy, and 30% of those (n = 48) received chemotherapy. Radiotherapy boost to the tumour bed was more common in the chemotherapy group [n = 20 (42%)] than in the radiotherapy-alone group [n = 30 (26%)]. We observed no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to acute skin toxicity of grade 3 or higher (2.1% in the chemotherapy group vs. 4.4% in the radiation-alone group, p = 0.67) or of grades 1-2 toxicity (62.5% vs. 51.7% respectively, p = 0.23). There was also no significant difference in late grade 3 or higher skin toxicity between the groups (2.1% vs. 0% respectively, p = 0.30) or in grades 1-2 toxicity (20.8% vs. 25.5% respectively, p = 0.69). Similarly, excellent or good cosmetic result scores were similar in both groups (p = 0.80) CONCLUSIONS: In our single-institution review, we observed no adverse effects of chemotherapy in combination with hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation. Further investigations are necessary to better elucidate the effects of chemotherapy on skin toxicity in the context of hypofractionated irradiation.