Mortality and need for reoperation in patients with mild-to-moderate asymptomatic aortic valve disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft alone.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery may have concurrent asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic insufficiency (AI). This retrospective study was performed to evaluate outcomes in patients with aortic valve disease undergoing CABG with or without aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: Study groups included 414 patients undergoing combined AVR and CABG (AVR-CABG group) and 62 patients with asymptomatic mild-to-moderate AS, AI, or both undergoing CABG but not AVR (CABG group). End points included 30-day mortality rate, time to cardiac mortality, time to all-cause mortality, and time to aortic valve reoperation. Reoperation refers to surgery for replacement of the native aortic valve in the CABG group or replacement of the prosthetic aortic valve in the AVR-CABG group. Important patient characteristics affecting outcomes were determined by using Cox proportional-hazard analysis. These variables were then included in multivariable analyses by using logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional-hazard modeling to compare outcomes between each patient group. RESULTS: No difference was seen in any of the mortality end points between the CABG group and the AVR-CABG group after controlling for significant differences between the groups. However, the need for reoperation for AVR was significantly higher for the CABG group than the AVR-CABG group. For patients followed for up to 6 years, the estimated need for aortic valve reoperation was 24.3% in the CABG group versus 3% in the AVR-CABG group. CONCLUSION: On the basis of these results, patients with asymptomatic AS or AI should be considered for AVR at the time of CABG.

Percutaneous stenting of superior vena cava syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is a distressing manifestation of benign or malignant disease obstructing return of blood flow through the superior vena cava (SVC). Treatment, often centering around management of the underlying illness, may be slow in relieving symptoms, relying on the recruitment of collateral veins to reestablish blood flow. Percutaneous delivery of metallic stents into the vena cava has been used with success to relieve obstruction to blood flow quickly and completely. We present the case of a patient with complete occlusion of the SVC who underwent successful vena caval revascularization with placement of balloon expandable metallic stents. We also review published reports on the use of stents for SVCS. Results from several series demonstrate that stents can be used with excellent results. Response rates in these series reviewed range from 68% to 100%. Recurrence of symptoms occurred in 4% to 45% of patients but could often be treated with anticoagulation, angioplasty of the stented area, or repeat stenting. Stenting has been used successfully in patients with malignant diseases and in the less common cases of SVCS from a benign etiology. Complications are uncommon and usually of minor consequence. Anticoagulation, thrombolytics, and thrombectomy or atherectomy catheters have also been used during or following stent implantation although their use remains primarily empiric. Percutaneous treatment of SVC obstruction offers patients hope for prompt and dramatic relief from the symptoms of SVCS.