Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Childhood in Late Preterms: Comparison to Early Preterms and Term-Born Controls.

Background: Late preterm (340−366 weeks gestational age [GA]) infants may have abnormal pulmonary development and possible exercise physiology parameters. We aim to assess the effect of late prematurity on exercise capacity in childhood and to compare it to early preterm (EP) (born < 300 GA), and to term healthy control (TC) (>370 week GA). Methods: Late preterm and early preterm (7−10 years) completed a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and spirometry and were compared to EP and to TC. Results: Eighty-four children (age 9.6 ± 1.0 years, 48% girls) participated. Twenty-one former LP were compared to 38 EP (15 with Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) [EP+], 23 without BPD [EP−]) and to 25 TC children. Peak oxygen uptake (peakV̇O2) was statistically lower than in the TC, but within the normal range, and without difference from the EP (LP 90.2 ± 15.1%, TC 112.4 ± 16.9%, p < 0.001; EP+ 97.3 ± 25.5%, EP− 85.4 ± 20.8%, p = 0.016 and p < 0.001, respectively, when compared with TC). Lung function (FEV1) was lower than normal only in the EP+ (75.6 ± 14.9% predicted, compared with 12.5 ± 87.8 in EP−, 87.5 ± 16.9 in LP and 91.0 ± 11.7 in TC). Respiratory and cardiac limitations were similar between all four study groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrated lower exercise capacity (peakV̇O2) in former LP children compared with healthy term children. Exercise capacity in LP was comparable to that of EP, with and without BPD. However, the exercise test parameters, specifically peakV̇O2, were within the normal range, and no significant physiological exercise limitations were found.

Continuous versus Bolus Gastric Tube Feeding in Very Low Birth Weight Infants Supported with Noninvasive Respiratory Support: A Randomized, Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare time to full feeding (TFF) between continuous gastric feeding (CGF) and bolus feeding (BF) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants supported with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and to evaluate feasibility and identify methodological pitfalls for future large-scale studies. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a randomized controlled, prospective, pilot study. VLBW premature infants, supported with NIV, were randomized while still on trophic feeding <20 mL/kg/day to receive feeding over 2 hours of CGF or over 15- to 30-minute BF. The primary outcome was TFF. Analysis was done by intention to treat. RESULTS: Overall, 32 infants were included in this analysis, 17 in the CGF group and 15 in the BF group. Infants in the CGF group were significantly younger than the BF group (mean ± standard deviation [SD] gestational age [GA] 26.9 ± 1.2 vs. 28.9 ± 1.5 weeks, respectively). TFF was comparable with median (interquartile range [IQR]) for the two groups, 10.0 (10.0, 19.0) days in the BF group versus 12.0 (9.0, 13.0) days in the CGF group (p = 0.59). Feeding length was not found to significantly affect TFF in multivariate analysis correcting for GA. Groups were comparable in weight gain, gastrointestinal complications, length of NIV, bronchopulmonary dysplasia incidence, and age at discharge. Most infants from both groups (60% of BF and 70% of CGF) required changes in feeding length. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, among VLBW infants supported with NIV, TFF was comparable between the BF and CGF groups. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and despite the multivariate analysis correcting for the different GA. Interestingly, most infants required changes in feeding length regardless of their allocation. This feasibility study emphasizes the need for careful attention to randomization and strict feeding protocols including criteria for switching allocation in future large-scale studies aimed at determining the preferred feeding length during NIV in VLBW infants. KEY POINTS: · Among infants supported with NIV, length of feeding affects gastric venting.. · BF might increase gastrointestinal reflux, while continuous feeding hinders gastric decompression.. · Among infants supported by NIV, feeding tolerance was comparable between bolus and continuous groups..

Same baby, different care: variations in practice between neonatologists and pediatric intensivists.

The aim of the study was to identify and explore areas in neonatal care in which significant differences in clinical care exist, among neonatal intensive care (NICU) and pediatric intensive care (PICU) physicians. A questionnaire presenting three common scenarios in neonatal critical care-severe pneumonia, post-cardiac-surgery care, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) was electronically sent to all PICU and NICU physicians in Israel. The survey was completed by 110 physicians. Significant differences were noted between NICU and PICU physicians' treatment choices. A non-cuffed endotracheal tube, initial high-frequency ventilation, and lower tidal volumes when applying synchronized-intermittent-mechanical-ventilation were selected more often by NICU physicians. For sedation/analgesia, NICU physicians treated as needed or by continuous infusion of a single agent, while PICU physicians more often chose to continuously infuse ≥ 2 medications. Fentanyl, midazolam, and muscle relaxants were chosen more often by PICU physicians. Morphine administration was similar for both groups. Treating CDH with pulmonary hypertension and systemic hypotension, NICU physicians more often began treatment with high dose dopamine and/or dobutamine, while PICU physicians chose low-dose adrenalin and/or milrinone. For vascular access NICU physicians chose umbilical lines most often, while PICU physicians preferred other central sites. CONCLUSION: Our study identified major differences in respiratory and hemodynamic care, sedation and analgesia, and vascular access between NICU and PICU physicians, resulting from field-specific consensus guidelines and practice traditions. We suggest to establish joint committees from both professions, aimed at finding the optimal treatment for this vulnerable population - be it in the NICU or in the PICU. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Variability in neonatal care between the neonatal and the pediatric intensive care units has been previously described. WHAT IS NEW: • This scenario-based survey study identified major differences in respiratory and hemodynamic care, sedation and analgesia, and vascular access between neonatologists and pediatric intensivists, resulting from lack of evidence-based literature to guide neonatal care, field-specific consensus guidelines, and practice traditions. • These findings indicate a need for joint committees, combining the unique skills and literature from both professions, to conduct clinical trials focusing on these specific areas of care, aimed at finding the optimal treatment for this vulnerable population - be it in the neonatal or the pediatric intensive care unit.

Continuous Noninvasive Carbon Dioxide Monitoring in Neonates: From Theory to Standard of Care.

Ventilatory support may affect the short- and long-term neurologic and respiratory morbidities of preterm infants. Ongoing monitoring of oxygenation and ventilation and control of adequate levels of oxygen, pressures, and volumes can decrease the incidence of such adverse outcomes. Use of pulse oximetry became a standard of care for titrating oxygen delivery, but continuous noninvasive monitoring of carbon dioxide (CO2) is not routinely used in NICUs. Continuous monitoring of CO2 level may be crucial because hypocarbia and hypercarbia in extremely preterm infants are associated with lung and brain morbidities, specifically bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, and cystic periventricular leukomalacia. It is shown that continuous monitoring of CO2 levels helps in maintaining stable CO2 values within an accepted target range. Continuous monitoring of CO2 levels can be used in the delivery room, during transport, and in infants receiving invasive or noninvasive respiratory support in the NICU. It is logical to hypothesize that this will result in better outcome for extremely preterm infants. In this article, we review the different noninvasive CO2 monitoring alternatives and devices, their advantages and disadvantages, and the available clinical data supporting or negating their use as a standard of care in NICUs.

Three-step management of a newborn with a giant, highly vascularized, cervical teratoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: A giant congenital cervical teratoma is often highly vascularized; thus, in addition to a life-threatening airway occlusion at birth it comprises a high risk for significant and lethal blood loss during resection. In the case presented, an endovascular embolization of the carotid artery that supplied a giant congenital cervical teratoma was done as part of a three-stage treatment soon after birth and contributed to an overall good outcome. Embolization in cases of cervical teratomas was not described previously. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a preterm newborn from a Sephardic jewish origin with a giant, highly vascularized, congenital cervical teratoma that was managed successfully in three stages: (1) delivery by an ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure after extensive preoperative planning and followed by tracheostomy, (2) endovascular embolization of the carotid artery that supplied the tumor in order to decrease blood loss during resection, and (3) complete surgical resection. The parents were involved in all the ethical and medical decisions, starting just after the cervical mass was diagnosed prenatally. CONCLUSION: The management of giant congenital cervical teratoma is often challenging from both a medical and ethical prospective. Meticulous perinatal planning and parents' involvement is crucial. Endovascular embolization of the tumor feeding vessels can significantly improve the resection outcome and overall prognosis.

Adding hydrocortisone as 1st line of inotropic treatment for hypotension in very low birth weight infants.

In this pilot study the authors demonstrate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of the combined early treatment with hydrocortisone and dopamine for refractory hypotension in preterm newborns. Very low birth weight infants born at gestational age < 30 wk or birth weight < 1250 g in the first 48 h of life with hypotension after receiving 10-20 mL/kg bolus of normal saline, were randomized to receive concurrently with the initiation of dopamine, intravenous hydrocortisone (11 infants) or an equivalent volume of placebo (11 infants). Despite no significant clinical difference between the groups including gestational age, birth weight, prevalence of chorioamnionitis, prenatal steroid treatment, cord PH, baseline cortisol level, there was a trend towards lower incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and higher survival without BPD rate in the hydrocortisone group. In this very sick small group of infants, hydrocortisone was not associated with more adverse effects, but rather showed a trend toward association with better outcome, including survival without BPD.

A pertussis outbreak among daycare children in Northern Israel: who gets sick?

BACKGROUND: An outbreak of pertussis occurred in a daycare center with 87.5% vaccination coverage. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of the acellular pertussis vaccine and prevention of pertussis after chemoprophylaxis with azithromycin. METHODS: We studied 31 daycare children aged 3-5.5 years exposed to a child with pertussis. Nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained for Bordetella pertussis culture and polymerase chain reaction initially, and at days 21 and 60 of follow-up, in cases exhibiting symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 31 daycare children 6 (19%) tested positive for 8. pertussis by PCR, 4 of whom had not been vaccinated against the disease. Of the two vaccinated children who contracted pertussis, one had milder symptoms and the other was asymptomatic. The incidence of pertussis was significantly lower in the vaccinated group (2/27) than in the unvaccinated group (4/4) (P = 0.000), with efficacy of the vaccine calculated to be 92.5%. Azithromycin chemoprophylaxis was taken only by 14 of the 25 exposed children (56%). On day 21 follow-up, there was no further laboratory-diagnosed B. pertussis cases in any of the exposed children, regardless of whether or not chemoprophylaxis was taken. CONCLUSIONS: Based o the children's clinical manifestations and PCR findings a pertussis outbreak had occurred in the daycare center studied. Our findings support the importance of pertussis vaccination since all the unvaccinated children in the daycare center contracted the infection.