Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty Performed by Surgeons versus Nonsurgeons: Trends in Procedure Rates, Complications, and Revisions.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fractures are the most common fragility fractures affecting osteoporotic patients. This study evaluated volume trends and outcomes across specialties performing cement augmentation procedures. METHODS: Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes for vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty from 2010 to 2019. Patients were grouped by surgical providers (orthopedic surgery and neurological surgery) or nonsurgical providers (anesthesia, pain medicine, radiology, and physical medicine and rehabilitation). Outcomes recorded included reoperation rates and postoperative complications occurring within 30 days. Logistic regression was employed to account for potential confounding variables, and odds ratios were obtained. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 80,864 patients who received cement augmentation. Surgeon specialists performed 51.7% of all procedures. Of procedures carried out by nonsurgeon specialists, radiologists performed the most. Despite a stable number of procedures performed over the period, the percentage of procedures performed by surgeons decreased from 58.8% to 49.9% (P < 0.001). Patients with procedures performed by surgeons experienced lower odds of reoperation at 30 days (P < 0.001) and 1 year (P < 0.001), but 5-year and overall rates were not significant (P > 0.05). Surgical patients had lower odds of acute kidney injury (P < 0.004) and pulmonary embolism (odds ratio = 0.62, P < 0.001), yet increased odds of surgical site infection (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Kyphoplasties and vertebroplasties are increasingly performed by nonsurgeon specialists. Although early reoperation rates are higher for nonsurgeon specialists, 5-year and overall reoperation rates were similar. Differing complication rates may relate to patient selection rather than operative technique and can be investigated with future studies.

Preoperative Resilience and Early Postoperative Outcomes following Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies identified a correlation between preoperative resilience scores and patient reported outcome measures in several surgical subspecialities. No previous studies, to our knowledge, have analyzed preoperative resilience and patient reported outcomes in lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: Patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion completed the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) preoperatively, in addition to measures of disability (Oswestry Disability index [ODI]), quality of life (PROMIS global physical and mental health scales and EuroQol5), and leg and back pain (VAS) at pre- and 3-months postoperatively. The 3-month follow-up was selected due to the association with return to work. Multiple linear regression evaluated relationships between resilience and postoperative changes in outcomes measures, controlling for baseline values and body mass index, age, number of levels fused, and severity of comorbidities. RESULTS: Ninety-five participants (mean age 58 years, 56% male) completed the BRS preoperatively and outcome measures before and 3 months after lumbar fusion. On average, participants reported significant postoperative improvements on all outcome measures (P < 0.001). Higher preoperative resilience scores related to greater postoperative improvements in back and leg pain, global mental and physical health and EuroQol scores (P < 0.05), after controlling for baseline values and other covariates. Resilience scores did not significantly correlate with postoperative changes in ODI (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative resilience is associated with improvement in pain and physical and mental health quality of life during the early postoperative period following lumbar spinal fusion. Additional research is needed to determine if improvements are maintained beyond this interval and whether resilience can be modified to optimize outcomes.

Lymphatic Injury with Lymph Fistula After Anterior Lumbar Fusion Managed with Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A Case Report.

CASE: A 40-year-old man underwent an L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and subsequently developed abdominal distention and persistent wound drainage. During wound reexploration, a substantial lymphocele and lymphatic fistula tracking from the ALIF site were visualized and evacuated. The deep space was coated with fibrin sealant. A deep drain and wound vacuum were placed within the retroperitoneal cavity, leading to progressive recovery. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative lymphatic injury during anterior spinal surgery can progress to the development of a lymphocele and lymphatic fistula, manageable with an exploratory laparotomy, fibrin sealant, and the use of a wound vacuum to promote fistula sealing.

Timing of Surgical Decompression for Cauda Equina Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a potentially devastating spinal condition requiring prompt diagnosis and intervention. This study examines the relationship between timing of surgery and patient outcomes such as mortality and total complications, and longitudinal trends in timing of operative treatment over the years 2000-2014. METHODS: This study considered patients in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample Database between 2000 and 2014 who had both an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification code for CES (344.61) and an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification procedure code for either disc excision (8051) or spinal canal exploration and decompression (0309) in their inpatient record. Patients were separated into an early surgical intervention cohort versus a delayed intervention cohort, and associated outcomes were analyzed using linear regression. Trends in timing of surgery were examined for the years 2000-2014, and linear regression was used to assess degree of change over time. RESULTS: In total, 20,924 patients with CES met inclusion criteria. Following adjustment for demographic variables, the delayed-intervention group was associated with statistically significant increased inpatient mortality (odds ratio [OR] 9.60, P = 0.002), total complications (OR 1.41, P = 0.018), and non-routine discharge (OR 2.37, P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients receiving early intervention within 48 hours remained unchanged from 2000 to 2014 ranging from 80.2% (2000-2002) to 76.2% (2012-2014) (P = 0.190). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest investigation to date examining CES and reveals the timing of surgical management for CES has not changed appreciably from 2000 to 2014 despite mounting evidence for early decompression. Patients receiving decompression within 0 or 1 day after admission are associated with improved inpatient outcomes, including lower complication and mortality rates.