Comparison of cytologic findings between specimens with and without high-risk HPV infection in those with ASC-US judgement.

The objective of the study was to realize whether specific signatures for high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) infection exist in the cytologic specimens with ASC-US judgement or not. The materials are 132 cytologic specimens with the diagnosis of ASC-US, including 56 cases with positive and 76 cases with negative HPV infection. Cytological findings are compared between two groups. Immature squamous metaplastic cells with nuclear atypia, SFT/IMT dyskaryotic cells, atypical parakeratosis, smudgy nuclei and multinucleated cells are the signature of high-risk HPV infection, whereas in the HPV(-) group immature metaplastic cells without atypia, moderately mature metaplastic cells without nuclear atypia and atrophic background are more popular. Instead, there are no differences on SFT/IMT background, microorganism infection and koilocytosis with or without nuclear atypia in both groups. The specific findings to confirm high-risk HPV infection are realized and the present results will contribute to decrease an unnecessary ASC-US judgement.

Evaluation of a New Automated Processing System (TACAS™ Pro) for Liquid-Based Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a fully automated processing system (TACAS™ Pro) for liquid-based procedures (LBPs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Materials were 3,483 and additionally 502 specimens that were taken at Kanagawa Health Service Association. Specimens obtained with a Cervex-Brush® were first smeared to glass slides using one side of the brush and then processed to TACAS Pro. RESULTS: (1) The microscopy watching time per normal case was 3.65 ± 0.85 min in the conventional procedure, whereas in the LBP it was 1.95 ± 0.60 min, and the latter reduced workload to 53%. (2) The handling time of TACAS Pro per day was 2 h and 25.8 min. The workload at a laboratory offset it and revealed the work saving to be 63.8%. (3) Unsatisfactory rates were 0% in the conventional procedure, whereas in the LBP it was 1.88% at first. The latter rate decreased to 0.5% after system improvement. (4) Specimens which may disturb microscopy analysis were found in 1.06%, including 3 cases of possible carry-over of cells to the following slides. An additional study with the revised system confirmed no carry-over. (5) Incidences of abnormal cytology were consistent between the two methods. CONCLUSIONS: The revised automated processing system TACAS Pro is a feasible and useful LBP and reduces the workload of cytology laboratories.

Optimal sampling devices for liquid-based procedure in screening for cervical cancer: comparison between cotton stick/Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush.

OBJECTIVE: To find an appropriate sampling device for a liquid-based procedure in the population screening for cervical cancer, focusing on bleeding at sampling and the amount of cells smeared. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 1,000 consecutive women who underwent primary screening were studied. The specimens were obtained with the cotton stick/Cytobrush® method in the first 500 cases or with the Cervex-Brush® in the following 500 subjects, and were processed using the Thinlayer Advanced Cytology Assay System (TACAS™) following the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: (1) Bleeding at cellular sampling using the cotton stick/Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush methods occurred in 1.2 and 8.8% of the cases, respectively (p < 0.0001). (2) The incidences of cells obtained with the two methods which covered the whole area, <1/2 and ≥1/4, and <1/4 of the observation fields were 55.4 versus 62.2% (p < 0.05), 14.6 versus 9.4% (p < 0.05), and 2.0 versus 4.0% (p < 0.05), respectively. (3) The incidences of endocervical or metaplastic cells obtained with ≥500 and <10 were 34.6 versus 20.0% (p < 0.01) and 9.4 versus 18.4% (p < 0.01), respectively. In cases of cells covering <1/4, incidences with <10 were 0 and 0.6% (n = 3), respectively. (4) Detection rates of abnormal cytology were 3.4 and 5.2% (n.s.), including atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in 2.4 and 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The cotton stick/Cytobrush is superior to the Cervex-Brush as a cellular sampling device for the TACAS liquid-based procedure.