Comparison of Pipeline embolization device versus Tubridge embolization device in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter, propensity score matched study.

BACKGROUND: Flow diverter devices (FDs) are increasingly used for treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), but limited studies compared different FDs. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a propensity score matched analysis comparing the Pipeline embolization device (PED) and Tubridge embolization device (TED) for UIAs. METHODS: Patients with UIAs treated with either PED or TED between July 2016 and July 2022 were included. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for age, sex, comorbidities, smoking, drinking, aneurysm size, morphology, neck, location, parent artery diameter, adjunctive coiling, and angiographic follow-up duration. Perioperative complications and clinical and angiographic outcomes were compared after matching. RESULTS: 735 patients treated by PED and 290 patients treated by TED were enrolled. Compared with the PED group, patients in the TED group had a greater number of women and patients with ischemia, a smaller proportion of vertebrobasilar and non-saccular aneurysms, a smaller size and neck, and fewer adjunctive coils and overlapping stents, but a larger parent artery diameter and lumen disparities. After adjusting for these differences, 275 pairs were matched. No differences were found in perioperative complications (4.4% vs 2.5%, P=0.350), in-stent stenosis (16.0% vs 15.6%, P>0.999), or favorable prognosis (98.9% vs 98.5%, P>0.999). However, PED showed a trend towards better complete occlusion over a median 8-month angiographic follow-up (81.8% vs 75.3%, P=0.077). CONCLUSION: Compared with PED, TED provides a comparable rate of perioperative and short-term outcomes. Nevertheless, a better occlusion status in the PED group needs to be further verified over a longer follow-up period.

SMIM20: a new biological signal associated with the prognosis of glioblastoma.

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most prevalent fatal central nervous system tumor. Notably, the survival rates after surgical intervention and active radiotherapy are not optimistic. Therefore, identifying new GBM-related biomarkers is a top priority in current research. Methods: Transcriptome and clinical information of patients with GBM were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases. According to the SMIM20 expression levels, the samples were divided into high- and low-expression groups and used for differential expression gene (DEG) analysis. Functional enrichment analyses, including Gene Ontology (GO), gene set enrichment analysis, and immune cell infiltration, were performed on SMIM20-related DEGs. Subsequently, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to screen the risk factors associated with the poor prognosis of SMIM20, and the clinical significance of SMIM20 in GBM was explored by constructing a prognostic nomogram. Results: In total, 156 DEGs were screened, of which 131 were upregulated and 25 were downregulated. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the total survival time of the SMIM20 high expression group was significantly lower than that of the SMIM20 low-expression group. Finally, the nomogram map had good predictive value for evaluating GBM prognosis of patients. Conclusions: High expression of SMIM20 is associated with poor outcomes in GBM. The DEGs and pathways identified in this study reveal potential molecular mechanisms underlying the occurrence and progression of GBM. Our study identifies potential new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the treatment of GBM.

Preclinical anti-angiogenic and anti-cancer activities of BAY1143269 in glioblastoma via targeting oncogenic protein expression.

Glioblastoma angiogenesis is critical for tumor growth, making it an appealing target for treatment development. BAY1143269 is a novel inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (MKN1) and has potent anti-cancer activity. We identified BAY1143269 as an angiogenesis inhibitor, by in vitro and in vivo glioblastoma angiogenesis models. BAY1143269 inhibited the capillary network formation of glioblastoma microvascular endothelial cells (GMECs), particularly the early stage of tubular structure formation. It also inhibited migration and proliferation, and induced apoptosis of GMECs isolated from glioblastoma patients. We found that BAY1143269 acted on GMECs by suppressing the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and eIF4E-mediated expression of oncogenic proteins, including those involved in cell cycle, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and pro-survival. In addition, BAY1143269 suppressed eIF4E phosphorylation, inhibited proliferation, and induced apoptosis of glioblastoma cells. Interestingly, it reduced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level in tumor cells and culturing medium, demonstrating the inhibitory effect of BAY1143269 on tumor proangiogenic microenvironment. We finally challenged BAY1143269 on the glioblastoma xenograft mice model and observed a significant tumor growth reduction without toxicity in mice receiving oral BAY1143269. Immunoblotting analysis demonstrated significantly less phosphorylated-eIF4E (p-eIF4E), cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31) (microvascular endothelial cell marker), and VEGF in tumors from drug-treated mice. In summary, the inhibition of glioblastoma angiogenesis with BAY1143269 may provide an alternative approach for anti-glioblastoma therapy.

Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Differentially Affect Glioblastoma Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion: A 2D-DIGE Proteomic Analysis.

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) display high tumor tropism and cause indirect effects through the cytokines they secrete. However, the effects of BM-MSCs on the biological behaviors of glioblastoma multiforme remain unclear. In this study, the conditioned medium from BM-MSCs significantly inhibited the proliferation of C6 cells (P < 0.05) but promoted their migration and invasion (P < 0.05). Two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) proteomic analysis revealed 17 proteins differentially expressed in C6 cells exposed to the BM-MSC-conditioned medium including five upregulated proteins and 12 downregulated proteins. Among these, six differentially expressed proteins (Calr, Set, Oat, Npm1, Ddah1, and Tardbp) were closely related to cell proliferation and differentiation, and nine proteins (Pdia6, Sphk1, Anxa4, Vim, Tuba1c, Actr1b, Actn4, Rap2c, and Tpm2) were associated with motility and the cytoskeleton, which may modulate the invasion and migration of tumor cells. Above all, by identifying the differentially expressed proteins using proteomics and bioinformatics analysis, BM-MSCs could be genetically modified to specifically express tumor-suppressive factors when BM-MSCs are to be used as tumor-selective targeting carriers in the future.

Monensin inhibits glioblastoma angiogenesis via targeting multiple growth factor receptor signaling.

Glioblastoma is characterized by the extensive vascularization with poor prognosis. Targeting both tumor cell and angiogenesis may present an effective therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma. Monensin, a polyether ionophore antibiotic, has been recently recognized as promising anticancer drug candidate due to its potent and selective anti-tumor activities. However, little is known on the effects of monensin on tumor angiogenesis. In this work, we investigated the effects and underlying mechanisms of monensin on glioblastoma angiogenesis and growth. We show that monensin at nanomolar concentrations inhibits early stages of capillary network formation of glioblastoma endothelial cell. Monensin inhibited multiple endothelial cellular events, including migration, growth and survival, without affecting adhesion to Matrigel. We further demonstrate that monensin acts on endothelial cells via suppressing VEGFR- and EGFR-mediated signaling pathways. Monensin also inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in a panel of glioblastoma cells. However, monensin is more effective in targeting endothelial cells than tumor cells. Using glioblastoma growth xenograft mice model, we show that monensin at tolerable dose effectively inhibits glioblastoma growth. Of note, there is a significant decreased tumor vascularization from monensin-treated mice. Our work clearly demonstrates the anti-angiogenic activity of monensin and its ability in suppressing multiple tyrosine kinase receptor-mediated pathways. Our findings suggest that is a useful addition to the treatment armamentarium for glioblastoma.

[Expression pattern of inflammatory cytokines at various inflammatory levels of adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the expression pattern of inflammatory cytokines at various inflammatory levels of adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma by cytokine antibody array. METHODS: The inflammatory levels of adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma were evaluated on the basis of the number of inflammatory cells at the interface of tumor and normal tissues. And the expression of inflammatory cytokines was examined at various inflammatory levels of adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma by inflammatory cytokine antibody array and the results were verified by Western blot. RESULTS: Compared with the mild inflammatory group, the levels of inflammatory cytokines of severe inflammatory group markedly increased, including pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and cytokine receptors. CONCLUSION: Antibody array demonstrates a significant change in cytokine profiles in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma with severe inflammation, as compared with those with mild inflammation.