Glycolysis in the tumor microenvironment: a driver of cancer progression and a promising therapeutic target.

Even with sufficient oxygen, tumor cells use glycolysis to obtain the energy and macromolecules they require to multiply, once thought to be a characteristic of tumor cells known as the "Warburg effect". In fact, throughout the process of carcinogenesis, immune cells and stromal cells, two major cellular constituents of the tumor microenvironment (TME), also undergo thorough metabolic reprogramming, which is typified by increased glycolysis. In this review, we provide a full-scale review of the glycolytic remodeling of several types of TME cells and show how these TME cells behave in the acidic milieu created by glucose shortage and lactate accumulation as a result of increased tumor glycolysis. Notably, we provide an overview of putative targets and inhibitors of glycolysis along with the viability of using glycolysis inhibitors in combination with immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Understanding the glycolytic situations in diverse cells within the tumor immunological milieu will aid in the creation of subsequent treatment plans.

Construction and validation of a m6A RNA methylation and ferroptosis-related prognostic model for pancreatic cancer by integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Background: Both N6-methyladenosine (m6A) ribonucleic acid (RNA) methylation and ferroptosis regulators are demonstrated to have significant effects on the malignant clinicopathological characteristics of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) patients. However, the currently available clinical indexes are not sufficient to predict precise prognostic outcomes pf PAAD patients accurately. This study aims to examine the clinicopathologic features of m6A RNA methylation and ferroptosis regulators in predicting the outcomes of different types of cancer. Methods: As the foundation for this research, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between PAAD tissues and adjacent normal tissues were first identified. Next, dimensional reduction analysis (DCA) based on m6A RNA methylation regulators and ferroptosis regulators were performed and DEGs between good/poor prognosis PAAD patient clusters were identified. DEGs were then screened by Cox analysis, and finally a risk signature was established by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analyses. The prediction model based on risk score was further evaluated by a validation set from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Results: In total, 4 m6A RNA methylation regulator genes and 29 ferroptosis regulator genes were found to have close causal relationships with the prognosis of PAAD, and a risk score with 3 m6A methylation regulators (i.e., IGF2BP2, IGF2BP3, and METTL16) and 4 ferroptosis regulators (i.e., ENPP2, ATP6V1G2, ITGB4, and PROM2) was constructed and showed to be highly involved in PAAD progression and could serve as effective markers for prognosis with AUC value equaled 0.753 in training set and 0.803 in validation set. Conclusions: The combined prediction model, composed of seven regulators of m6A methylation and ferroptosis, in this study more effectively reflects the progression and prognosis of PAAD than previous single genome or epigenetic analysis. Our study provides a broader perspective for the subsequent establishment of prognostic models and the patients may benefit from more precision management.