Shear-wave elastography quantitative assessment of the male breast: added value to distinguish benign and malignant palpable masses.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of shear-wave elastography (SWE) to distinguish between benign and malignant palpable masses of the adult male breast. METHODS: Clinical examination, mammography, B-mode and Doppler ultrasound findings and SWE quantitative parameters were compared in 50 benign lesions (including 40 gynaecomastias) and 15 malignant lesions (invasive ductal carcinomas) from 65 patients who were consecutively addressed for specialized advice at our comprehensive cancer centre. Mean elasticity (El mean), maximum elasticity (El max), El mean of the surrounding fatty tissue and lesion to fat ratio (El ratio) were reported for each patient. RESULTS: Malignant masses displayed significantly higher El mean (p < 0.0001), El max (p < 0.0001) and El ratio (p < 0.0001) compared to benign masses without overlap of values between the two groups. By adding SWE to clinical examination, mammography and ultrasound, all the lesions would have been retrospectively correctly diagnosed as benign or malignant. One false positive could have been downstaged, 14/65 undetermined masses could have been correctly reclassified as 4 malignant and 10 benign lesions, for which biopsies could have consequently been avoided. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of male breast palpable masses by SWE demonstrates that malignant masses are significantly stiffer lesions and may improve diagnostic management when clinical examination, mammography and conventional ultrasound are doubtful. Advances in knowledge: Quantitative SWE is feasible in male breast and could be of great interest to help classify doubtful lesions after classical clinical and radiological evaluations, probably because of different anatomy and different tumours epidemiology compared with female breast.

Is a one-year follow-up an efficient method for better management of MRI BI-RADS(®) 3 lesions?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the necessity of a prolonged follow-up after one year for lesions incidentally diagnosed as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)(®) 3 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Institutional review board approved this study (CRC_june 2014_ project 11). We retrospectively analysed 218 consecutive MRI BI-RADS(®) 3 lesions in 110 women followed-up at 6, 12, 18 and/or 24 months from 2011 through to 2015. We excluded MRI scans of BRCA mutation carriers, in staging before treatment and in patients undergoing therapy for breast cancer. Second-look ultrasound and mammography were normal. We analysed 43 masses, 46 foci and 129 non-mass enhancements. In the follow-up, the image was scored as BI-RADS(®) 2 if it was completely resolved, BI-RADS(®) 3 if it was stable, and BI-RADS(®) 4 if a suspicious change occurred. RESULTS: Forty-four lesions (20%) completely resolved during the follow-up. Six were scored as BI-RADS(®) 4: five at 6 months (benign) and one at 12 months (8 mm invasive ductal carcinoma). One hundred and sixty eight stable lesions were assigned BI-RADS(®) 2 at 18 or 24 months. The predictive positive value of cancer for BI-RADS(®) 3 lesions is 0.5% (95% CI [0.08-2.55]) in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a one year follow-up instead of two years is sufficient for BI-RADS 3 lesions, in case of using rigorous inclusion criteria. Given the very low PPV of the BI-RADS(®) 3 lesions incidentally found on MRI, further studies with very large inclusions are necessary to establish new guidelines for MRI follow-up.

Imaging features of sporadic breast cancer in women under 40 years old: 97 cases.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate characteristic features of mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sporadic breast cancer in women <40 years and to determine correlations with pathological and biological factors. METHODS: A retrospective review of radiological, clinicopathological and biological features of sporadic breast cancers for women under 40 years at our institution between 2007-2012 covering 91 patients. Mammography was available for 97 lesions, ultrasound for 94 and MRI for 38. RESULTS: The most common imaging features were masses, nearly all classified BI-RADS 4 or 5. On mammography microcalcifications alone accounted for 31 %, all suspicious. There were 42.6 % luminal B, 24.5 % luminal A, 19.1 % HER2-enriched and 10.6 % triple-negative (TN) tumours by immunohistochemistry. HER2 overexpression was correlated with the presence of calcifications at mammography (P = 0.03). TN cancers more often had an oval shape and abrupt interface at ultrasound and rim enhancement on MRI. MRI features were suspicious for all cancers and rim enhancement of a mass was a significant predictor of triple-negative tumours (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The imaging characteristics of cancers in patients under 40 years without proven gene mutations do not differ from their older counterparts, but appear correlated to phenotypic profiles, which have a different distribution in young women compared to the general population.

Triple-negative breast cancers: associations between imaging and pathological findings for triple-negative tumors compared with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative (TN) breast cancers have high malignancy potential and are often characterized by early systemic relapse. Early detection is vital, but there are few comprehensive imaging reports. Here we describe mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of TN breast cancers, investigate the specific features of this subtype, and compare the characteristics of TN breast cancers with those of hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2-negative breast cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2009 to June 2011, mammography and ultrasound findings of 210 patients with pathologically confirmed TN (n = 105) and HR-positive/HER-2-negative breast cancers (n = 105) were retrospectively reviewed from our institutional database. Ultrasound vascularity was notified in 88 cases and elasticity scores were notified in 49 cases overall. Thirty-five patients underwent MRI (22 TN and 13 HR-positive/HER-2-negative). Mammograms, ultrasound, and MRI were reviewed according to the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon and classification. RESULTS: TN breast cancers were more likely to show round, oval, or lobulated masses with indistinct margins on mammography than HR-positive/HER-2-negative breast cancers. On ultrasound, TN tumors were more likely than HR-positive/HER-2-negative breast cancers to show circumscribed or microlobulated margins and no posterior acoustic features or posterior enhancement-positive. On MRI, TN cancers exhibited suspicious aspects more often than HR-positive/HER-2-negative cancers, often with rim enhancement-positiveHER-2 (84.6% of masses were classified BI-RADS 5). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to describe findings on mammography, ultrasound, and MRI for TN breast cancers with a matched HR-positive/HER-2-negative control group. Several distinctive morphological features of these aggressive tumors are identified that can be used for earlier diagnosis and treatment, and ultimately to improve outcomes.