Risk factors for relapse of immune-related pneumonitis after 6-week oral prednisolone therapy: a follow-up analysis of a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related pneumonitis (irP) is one of the most important immune-related adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). After corticosteroid therapy irP frequently relapses, which can interfere with cancer therapy. However, risk factors for irP relapse are unknown. METHODS: This study was a follow-up analysis of a phase II study that evaluated 56 patients with grade ≥ 2 irP treated with oral prednisolone, 1 mg/kg/day, tapered over 6 weeks. Clinical factors including patient characteristics, blood test findings, and response to prednisolone therapy were assessed to identify risk factors for irP relapse using the Fine-Gray test. RESULTS: Among 56 patients with irP, 22 (39.3%) experienced irP relapse after 6 weeks of prednisolone therapy during the follow-up observation period. Radiographic organising pneumonia (OP) pattern and duration to irP onset ≥ 100 days from ICI initiation were determined to be significant risk factors for irP relapse in a multivariate Fine-Gray test (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.17, 95% CI 1.37-7.32, p = 0.007, and HR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.01-6.74, p = 0.048, respectively). Other patient characteristics, blood test findings, irP severity, and response to prednisolone therapy were not associated with irP relapse. CONCLUSIONS: In irP patients treated with 6-week prednisolone tapering therapy, OP pattern and duration to irP onset ≥ 100 days were associated with relapse risk. Assessment of the risk factors for irP relapse will be helpful for irP management.

CXCL10 predicts autoimmune features and a favorable clinical course in patients with IIP: post hoc analysis of a prospective and multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), which does not meet any of the criteria for connective tissue diseases (CTD), has been attracting an attention in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). However, the biomarkers that reflect the clinical course of these patients have not been fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To identify useful serum biomarkers reflecting CTD-related features and favorable prognoses in patients with IIP. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective and multicenter cohort study between 2015 and 2020. Newly diagnosed patients with IIP were consecutively enrolled, and 74 autoimmune features and autoantibodies were comprehensively checked during IIP diagnosis. Serum levels of CXCL10, CXCL1, CCL2, BAFF, angiopoietin-2, and leptin were evaluated at the time of IIP diagnosis. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients (159 men and 63 women) with IIP were enrolled. The median observation duration was 36 months. The median age was 71 years old, and median %forced vital capacity (FVC) was 84.1% at the time of IIP diagnosis. The proportion of patients who met the classification criteria for IPAF was 11.7%. In patients with high serum CXCL10, changes in both %FVC and %diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide at one year were significantly higher than those in patients with low CXCL10 (p = 0.014 and p = 0.009, respectively), whereas these changes were not significant for other chemokines and cytokines. High CXCL10 levels were associated with acute/subacute onset (p < 0.001) and the diagnosis of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia with organizing pneumonia overlap (p = 0.003). High CXCL10 levels were related to a higher classification of IPAF (relative risk for IPAF was 3.320, 95%CI: 1.571-7.019, p = 0.003) and lower classification of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF; relative risk for PPF was 0.309, 95%CI: 0.100-0.953, p = 0.027) compared to those with low CXCL10. Finally, survival was higher in patients with IPF and high CXCL10 (p = 0.044), and high CXCL10 was a significant prognostic factor in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models (hazard ratio 0.368, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: High serum levels of CXCL10 are associated with CTD-related features, the favorable clinical course, and survival in patients with IIP, especially IPF. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Obesity impairs ciliary function and mucociliary clearance in the murine airway epithelium.

Obesity is a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality in viral respiratory infection. Mucociliary clearance (MCC) in the airway is the primary host defense against viral infections. However, the impact of obesity on MCC is unclear, prompting this study. Using murine tracheal tissue culture and in vitro influenza A virus (IAV) infection models, we analyzed cilia-driven flow and ciliary beat frequency (CBF) in the airway epithelium to evaluate MCC. Short-term IAV infection increased cilia-driven flow and CBF in control mice, but not in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Basal cilia-driven flow and CBF were also lower in obese mice than in control mice. Mechanistically, the increase of extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release during IAV infection, which was observed in the control mice, was abolished in the obese mice; however, the addition of ATP increased cilia-driven flow and CBF both in control and obese mice to a similar extent. In addition, RNA sequencing and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction revealed the downregulation of several cilia-related genes, including Dnah1, Dnal1, Armc4, and Ttc12 (the dynein-related genes); Ulk4 (the polychaete differentiation gene); Cep164 (the ciliogenesis and intraflagellar transport gene); Rsph4a, Cfap206, and Ppil6 (the radial spoke structure and assembly gene); and Drc3(the nexin-dynein regulatory complex genes) in obese murine tracheal tissues compared with their control levels. In conclusion, our studies demonstrate that obesity attenuates MCC under basal conditions and during IAV infection by downregulating the expression of cilia-related genes and suppressing the release of extracellular ATP, thereby increasing the susceptibility and severity of IAV infection.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study shows that obesity impairs airway mucociliary clearance (MCC), an essential physical innate defense mechanism for viral infection. Mechanically, this is likely due to the obesity-induced downregulation of cilia-related genes and attenuation of extracellular ATP release. This study provides novel insights into the mechanisms driving the higher susceptibility and severity of viral respiratory infections in individuals with obesity.

Antifibrotics and mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: external validity and avoidance of immortal time bias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pooled analyses of previous randomized controlled trials reported that antifibrotics improved survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but the results were only based on short-term outcome data from selected patients who met strict criteria. Observational studies/meta-analyses also suggested that antifibrotics improve survival, but these studies failed to control for immortal time bias that considerably exaggerates drug effects. Therefore, whether antifibrotics truly improve long-term survival in patients with IPF in the real world remains undetermined and requires external validity. METHODS: We used data from the Japanese National Claims Database to estimate the intention-to-treat effect of antifibrotics on mortality. To address immortal time bias, we employed models treating antifibrotic initiation as a time-dependent covariate and target trial emulation (TTE), both incorporating new-user designs for antifibrotics and treating lung transplantation as a competing event. RESULTS: Of 30,154 patients with IPF, 14,525 received antifibrotics. Multivariate Fine-Gray models with antifibrotic initiation as a time-dependent covariate revealed that compared with no treatment, nintedanib (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.89) and pirfenidone (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.93) were associated with reduced mortality. The TTE model also replicated the associations of nintedanib (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.65-0.74) and pirfenidone (aHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78-0.85) with reduced mortality. Subgroup analyses confirmed this association regardless of age, sex, and comorbidities, excluding certain subpopulations. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large-scale real-world analysis support the generalizability of the association between antifibrotics and improved survival in various IPF populations.

Olanzapine Plus Triple Antiemetic Therapy for the Prevention of Carboplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiemetic therapy with olanzapine, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (RA), a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) RA, and dexamethasone for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients scheduled to receive carboplatin (AUC ≥5) were randomly assigned to receive either olanzapine 5 mg once daily (olanzapine group) or placebo (placebo group) in combination with aprepitant, a 5-HT3 RA, and dexamethasone. The primary end point was the complete response (CR; no vomiting and no rescue therapy) rate in the overall phase (0-120 hours). Secondary end points included the proportion of patients free of nausea and safety. RESULTS: In total, 355 patients (78.6% male, median age 72 years, 100% thoracic cancer), including 175 and 180 patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, were evaluated. The overall CR rate was 86.9% in the olanzapine group versus 80.6% in the placebo group. The intergroup difference in the overall CR rate was 6.3% (95% CI, -1.3 to 13.9). The proportions of patients free of chemotherapy-induced nausea in the overall (88.6% in the olanzapine group v 75.0% in the placebo group) and delayed (89.7% v 75.6%, respectively) phases were significantly higher in the olanzapine group than in the placebo group (both P < .001). Somnolence was observed in 43 (24.6%) and 41 (22.9%) patients in the olanzapine and placebo groups, respectively, and no events were grade ≥3 in severity. CONCLUSION: The addition of olanzapine was not associated with a significant increase in the overall CR rate. Regarding the prevention of nausea, adding olanzapine provided better control in patients receiving carboplatin-containing chemotherapy, which needs further exploration.

The emerging emetogenicity of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS­102) from patient self-reporting: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is an oral anticancer drug with adequate efficacy in unresectable colorectal cancer, but frequently also induces chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). To investigate the occurrence of CINV and antiemetic therapy in patients with colorectal cancer treated with TAS-102 (JASCC-CINV 2001). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study in patients with colorectal cancer who received TAS-102 without dose reduction for the first time. Primary endpoint was the incidence of vomiting during the overall period. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of nausea, significant nausea, anorexia, other adverse events (constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, fatigue, dysgeusia) and patient satisfaction. Patient diaries were used for primary and secondary endpoints. All adverse events were subjectively assessed using PRO-CTCAE ver 1.0. and CTCAE ver 5.0. RESULTS: Data from 100 of the 119 enrolled patients were analyzed. The incidence of vomiting, nausea, and significant nausea was 13%, 67%, and 36%, respectively. The incidence of vomiting in patients with and without prophylactic antiemetic therapy were 20.8% and 10.5%, respectively. Prophylactic antiemetics were given to 24% of patients, of whom 70% received D2 antagonists. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that experience of CINV in previous treatment tended to be associated with vomiting (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-58.5, P = 0.07), whereas prophylactic antiemetic administration was not (HR: 1.61, 95 CI: 0.50-5.21, P = 0.43). With regard to patient satisfaction, the proportion of patients who were "very satisfied," "satisfied," "slightly satisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" was 81.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The low incidence of vomiting and high patient satisfaction suggest that TAS-102 does not require the use of uniform prophylactic antiemetic treatments. However, patients with the experience of CINV in previous treatment might require prophylactic antiemetic treatment.

Characterization of BRAFThr599dup Mutation as a Targetable Driver Mutation Identified in Lung Adenocarcinoma by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling.

PURPOSE: Understanding the function of BRAF mutants is crucial for determining the best treatment strategy. This study aimed to characterize a rare BRAF variant, BRAFThr599dup, which was identified in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) by comprehensive genomic profiling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a case of LUAD with BRAFThr599dup treated with dabrafenib and trametinib. We conditionally expressed wild-type BRAF, BRAFV600E, or BRAFThr599dup in Ba/F3 cells and BEAS-2B cells. Ba/F3 cells carrying double-mutant BRAF (BRAFThr599dup/R509H, BRAFV600E/R509H, or BRAFK601E/R509H) that lacked the dimerizing ability were also established. Knockout of endogenous BRAF or CRAF in Ba/F3-BRAFThr599dup cells and Ba/F3-BRAFV600E cells was performed using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell viability, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling activity, and sensitivity to dabrafenib and trametinib were evaluated. RESULTS: The patient was revealed to have BRAFThr599dup-positive tumor cells as a predominant clone, and dabrafenib and trametinib treatment showed modest efficacy. In Ba/F3 cells, both BRAFThr599dup and BRAFV600E similarly caused interleukin-3-independent proliferation and activated the MAPK pathway. Moreover, BRAFThr599dup and BRAFV600E similarly caused a significant increase in the anchorage-independent growth ability of BEAS-2B cells. Along with Ba/F3-BRAFV600E cells, Ba/F3-BRAFThr599dup cells were highly sensitive to a monomer-specific BRAF inhibitor, dabrafenib, with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration value of 29.7 nM. In the absence of wild-type BRAF, wild-type CRAF, or an intact dimer interface, the ability to induce oncogenic addiction and MAPK pathway activation in Ba/F3-BRAFThr599dup cells was not affected, which was in contrast to the findings in the BRAFK601E/R509H double-mutant model. CONCLUSION: BRAFThr599dup is a potent driver oncogene that activates the MAPK pathway without the requirement for dimerization in vitro. Because BRAFThr599dup has been recurrently reported across various cancer types, our findings should be further investigated both mechanistically and clinically.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio being associated with mortality risk in patients receiving antifibrotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Antifibrotic therapy is widely used for patients with progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), regardless of etiology. There is an urgent need for a simple, inexpensive, and repeatable biomarker to evaluate disease severity and mortality risk. METHODS: This retrospective multicohort study assessed the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs) of 416 patients with ILD who received antifibrotic therapy (Hamamatsu cohort, n = 217; Seirei cohort, n = 199). The mortality risk vs. NLR relationship was evaluated at therapy initiation and 1 year. The optimal NLR cutoff of 2.7 was selected according to the mortality risk. RESULTS: Survival was shorter in patients with high NLR than with low NLR (median: 2.63 vs. 4.01 years). The NLR classification results (cutoff: 2.7) were longitudinally preserved in >70 % of the patients, and patients with consistently high NLR had a higher risk of mortality than others (median, 2.97 vs. 4.42 years). In multivariate analysis, high NLR was significantly associated with mortality independent of age, sex, forced vital capacity, lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), or the gender-age-physiology (GAP) index. A combined GAP index-NLR assessment classified mortality risk into four groups. Subset analyses revealed that NLR assessment was more applicable to patients without advanced disease, not taking steroids, and with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) than to patients with advanced disease, taking steroids, and patients with Non-IPF. CONCLUSION: High NLR was associated with an increased mortality risk in patients with ILDs receiving antifibrotic therapy. Assessment of NLR may help predict disease severity and mortality risk in antifibrotic therapy.

CD109 Attenuates Bleomycin-induced Pulmonary Fibrosis by Inhibiting TGF-ß Signaling.

Pulmonary fibrosis is a fatal condition characterized by fibroblast and myofibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. TGF-ß plays a pivotal role in the development of pulmonary fibrosis. Therefore, modulation of TGF-ß signaling is a promising therapeutic strategy for treating pulmonary fibrosis. To date, however, interventions targeting TGF-ß have not shown consistent efficacy. CD109 is a GPI-anchored glycoprotein that binds to TGF-ß receptor I and negatively regulates TGF-ß signaling. However, no studies have examined the role and therapeutic potential of CD109 in pulmonary fibrosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the role and therapeutic value of CD109 in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. CD109-transgenic mice overexpressing CD109 exhibited significantly attenuated pulmonary fibrosis, preserved lung function, and reduced lung fibroblasts and myofibroblasts compared with wild-type (WT) mice. CD109-/- mice exhibited pulmonary fibrosis comparable to WT mice. CD109 expression was induced in variety types of cells, including lung fibroblasts and macrophages, upon bleomycin exposure. Recombinant CD109 protein inhibited TGF-ß signaling and significantly decreased ACTA2 expression in human fetal lung fibroblast cells in vitro. Administration of recombinant CD109 protein markedly reduced pulmonary fibrosis in bleomycin-treated WT mice in vivo. Our results suggest that CD109 is not essential for the development of pulmonary fibrosis, but excess CD109 protein can inhibit pulmonary fibrosis development, possibly through suppression of TGF-ß signaling. CD109 is a novel therapeutic candidate for treating pulmonary fibrosis.

Impact of preexisting interstitial lung disease on mortality in COVID-19 patients from the early pandemic to the delta variant epidemic: a nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 patients with preexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD) were reported to have a high mortality rate; however, this was based on data from the early stages of the pandemic. It is uncertain how their mortality rates have changed with the emergence of new variants of concern as well as the development of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments. It is also unclear whether having ILD still poses a risk factor for mortality. As COVID-19 continues to be a major concern, further research on COVID-19 patients with preexisting ILD is necessary. METHODS: We extracted data on COVID-19 patients between January 2020-August 2021 from a Japanese nationwide insurance claims database and divided them into those with and without preexisting ILD. We investigated all-cause mortality of COVID-19 patients with preexisting ILD in wild-type-, alpha-, and delta-predominant waves, to determine whether preexisting ILD was associated with increased mortality. RESULTS: Of the 937,758 adult COVID-19 patients, 7,333 (0.8%) had preexisting ILD. The proportion of all COVID-19 patients who had preexisting ILD in the wild-type-, alpha-, and delta-predominant waves was 1.2%, 0.8%, and 0.3%, respectively, and their 60-day mortality was 16.0%, 14.6%, and 7.5%, respectively. The 60-day mortality significantly decreased from the alpha-predominant to delta-predominant waves (difference - 7.1%, 95% confidence intervals (CI) - 9.3% to - 4.9%). In multivariable analysis, preexisting ILD was independently associated with increased mortality in all waves with the wild-type-predominant, odds ratio (OR) 2.10, 95% CI 1.91-2.30, the alpha-predominant wave, OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.84-2.50, and the delta-predominant wave, OR 2.10, 95%CI 1.66-2.66. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause mortality rates for COVID-19 patients with preexisting ILD decreased from the wild-type- to the more recent delta-predominant waves. However, these patients were consistently at higher mortality risk than those without preexisting ILD. We emphasize that careful attention should be given to patients with preexisting ILD despite the change in the COVID-19 environment.

Pan-cancer assessment of antineoplastic therapy-induced interstitial lung disease in patients receiving subsequent therapy immediately following immune checkpoint blockade therapy.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) is a serious adverse event potentially induced by any antineoplastic agent. Whether cancer patients are predisposed to a higher risk of DIILD after receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown. METHODS: This study retrospectively assessed the cumulative incidence of DIILD in consecutive cancer patients who received post-ICI antineoplastic treatment within 6 months from the final dose of ICIs. There was also a separate control cohort of 55 ICI-naïve patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received docetaxel. RESULTS: Of 552 patients who received ICIs, 186 met the inclusion criteria. The cohort predominantly comprised patients with cancer of the lung, kidney/urinary tract, or gastrointestinal tract. The cumulative incidence of DIILD in the entire cohort at 3 and 6 months was 4.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4%-8.7%) and 7.2% (95% CI 4.0%-11.5%), respectively. There were significant differences according to cancer type (Gray's test, P = .04), with the highest cumulative incidence of DIILD in patients with lung cancer being 9.8% (95% CI 4.3%-18.0%) at 3 months and 14.2% (95% CI 7.3%-23.3%) at 6 months. DIILD was caused by docetaxel in six of these 11 lung cancer patients (54.5%). After matching, the cumulative incidence of docetaxel-induced ILD in patients with NSCLC in the post-ICI setting was higher than that in the ICI-naïve setting: 13.0% (95% CI 3.3%-29.7%) vs 4.3% (95% CI 0.3%-18.2%) at 3 months; and 21.7% (95% CI 7.9%-39.9%) vs 4.3% (95% CI 0.3%-18.2%) at 6 months. However, these were not significant differences (hazard ratio, 5.37; 95% CI 0.64-45.33; Fine-Gray P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lung cancer were at high risk of developing DIILD in subsequent regimens after ICI treatment. Whether NSCLC patients are predisposed to additional risk of docetaxel-induced ILD by prior ICIs warrants further study.

Association of the lung immune prognostic index with the survival of patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), a simple index calculated from the blood lactate dehydrogenase level and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, is thought to be associated with host immune status. However, the utility of LIPI in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) is unknown. METHODS: In this multicentre, retrospective, observational study, an association between LIPI and the survival of patients with IIPs was evaluated. RESULTS: Exploratory and validation cohorts consisting of 460 and 414 patients with IIPs, respectively, were included (159 and 159 patients had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF], and 301 and 255 had non-IPF, respectively). In the exploratory cohort, patients with IPF and a low LIPI had significantly better survival than those with a high LIPI (median of 5.6 years vs. 3.9 years, p = 0.016). The predictive ability of LIPI for the survival of patients with IPF was validated in the validation cohort (median of 8.5 years vs. 4.4 years, p = 0.003). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, LIPI was selected as an independent predictive factor for the survival of IPF patients. There was no significant association between LIPI and survival of non-IPF patients in the exploratory and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: The LIPI was a predictive factor for the survival of patients with IPF and could aid the management of IPF.

Prognostic Role of Interferon-λ3 in Anti-Melanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5-Positive Dermatomyositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Interferon-λ3 (IFNλ3) is a cytokine with antiviral functions on barrier surfaces, and it is associated with disease activity in autoimmune diseases. This study assessed the clinical significance of serum IFNλ3 levels in polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We measured serum IFNλ3 levels in 221 patients with PM/DM-ILD (155 in the derivation cohort, 66 in the validation cohort) and 38 controls. We evaluated factors associated with mortality risk among 79 patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive DM-ILD. RESULTS: Serum IFNλ3 levels at diagnosis were significantly higher in patients with PM/DM-ILD than in healthy controls. Remarkably, serum IFNλ3 levels were specifically increased in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD in both the derivation and validation cohorts. In anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD, patients with high IFNλ3 levels (>120 pg/mL) had significantly lower survival rates than those with low IFNλ3 levels (≤120 pg/mL). A multivariate analysis revealed that high IFNλ3 levels, as well as old age and low Pao2, were significantly associated with poor prognoses in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD. In a classification analysis of patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD based on age, IFNλ3 level, and Pao2, patients with old age (>53 years), high IFNλ3 levels (>120 pg/mL), and low Pao2 (<75 mm Hg) had the worst survival. In lung pathologic analyses, IFNλ3-positive staining was observed in macrophages, airway epithelial cells, the pleural region, and intrapulmonary veins in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD. CONCLUSION: Serum IFNλ3 is a promising biomarker for identifying patients at high risk of poor outcomes in anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM-ILD.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in patients with idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (iPPFE), a progressive fibrotic disease, is characterised by upper lobe-dominant lung fibrosis involving the pleura and subpleural lung parenchyma. However, no prognostic markers have been established for this condition. Associations between blood leucocyte levels and mortality have been reported in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; therefore, we hypothesised that peripheral leucocyte levels are associated with mortality risk in patients with iPPFE. METHODS: This retrospective study longitudinally assessed peripheral leucocyte counts at the time of diagnosis and 1 year after diagnosis in two cohorts of 127 patients with iPPFE (69 and 58 patients in Seirei and Hamamatsu cohorts, respectively). RESULTS: A comprehensive assessment of peripheral leucocytes revealed that the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with mortality in patients with iPPFE after adjusting for age, sex and forced vital capacity in multivariate analyses (adjusted HR, 1.131; 95% CI, 1.032 to 1.227). When the patients were classified based on the median NLR, those with a high NLR had shorter survival than those with a low NLR (median, 32.2 vs 79.8 months; HR, 2.270; 95% CI, 1.416 to 3.696). Interestingly, the results of the NLR classification by median were longitudinally preserved in >70% of patients, and patients with consistently high NLR were at a higher risk of mortality than others (median, 24.8 vs 79.6 months; HR, 3.079; 95% CI, 1.878 to 5.031). Compared with the gender-age-physiology model, a composite model comprising age, sex and NLR could successfully stratify patients with iPPFE into three groups according to mortality risk. CONCLUSION: The assessment of peripheral leucocyte counts is easy and might be useful in evaluating disease severity and mortality risk in patients with iPPFE. Our study suggests the importance of focusing on peripheral leucocyte levels in daily practice.

Pooled Analysis of Studies Evaluating Fosnetupitant and Risk Factors for Cisplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting During the Extended Overall Phase.

INTRODUCTION: Fosnetupitant is a novel neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA) with favorable antiemetic efficacy in patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy. This study assessed the efficacy of fosnetupitant in combination with palonosetron and dexamethasone and identified risk factors for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) for up to 168 h after treatment using pooled data from Japanese studies. METHODS: A pooled analysis of randomized phase II and phase III studies was performed to compare the efficacy of fosnetupitant and fosaprepitant in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The complete response (CR; no vomiting and no rescue medication) rate, CINV risk factors in various phases (0-120, 0-168, and 120-168 h), and impact of the number of risk factors on the time to treatment failure (TTF) were examined in the overall and NK1RA evaluable populations. RESULTS: In the combined cohort of NK1RA evaluable patients (n = 980), the CR rate at 0-168 h was significantly better in the fosnetupitant 235 mg group than in the fosaprepitant group (rate difference = 6.8%, 95% confidence interval = 1.0-12.7, p = 0.022). In the overall (n = 1368) and NK1RA evaluable populations, the CINV risk factor at 120-168 h was treatment failure in the first 120 h. TTF deteriorated as the number of identified CINV risk factors increased. CONCLUSION: This analysis revealed that fosnetupitant could have long-acting antiemetic potency (> 120 h) and indicated the importance of antiemetic therapy at 0-120 h for CINV up to 168 h after chemotherapy.

First-line nivolumab, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Updated survival analysis of the ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52 randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52 was performed in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan to determine the oncological effectiveness and safety of combining nivolumab or placebo with bevacizumab plus platinum chemotherapy for the initial (first-line) treatment of patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). At the interim analysis (minimum follow-up, 7.4 months), the independent radiology review committee-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the nivolumab arm, but overall survival (OS) data were immature. METHODS: Here, we present the updated OS data. Patients with treatment-naïve stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nsNSCLC without driver mutations in ALK, EGFR, or ROS1, were randomized 1:1 to receive either nivolumab or placebo. Patients in both arms received paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab, administered 3-weekly for a maximum of 6 cycles. Nivolumab/placebo and bevacizumab were subsequently continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Overall, 550 patients were randomized. At the time of the analysis (minimum follow-up: 19.4 months), the median OS was longer in the nivolumab arm than in the placebo arm (30.8 vs. 24.7 months; hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.94). The 12-month OS rates were 81.3% vs. 76.3% in the nivolumab vs. placebo arms, respectively. The respective 18-month OS rates were 69.0% vs. 61.9%. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus platinum chemotherapy and bevacizumab demonstrated longer OS vs. the placebo combination. We believe this regimen is viable as a standard, first-line treatment for patients with advanced nsNSCLC without driver mutations in ALK, EGFR, or ROS1.

Six-week oral prednisolone therapy for immune-related pneumonitis: a single-arm phase II study.

BACKGROUND: There has been no prospective trial for treatment of immune-related pneumonitis (irP) occurred after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: In this single-arm phase II study, patients with cancer with grade ≥2 irP received oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day), tapered over 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was a pneumonitis control rate at 6 weeks from the start of the study treatment, defined as complete disappearance or partial improvement of irP in high-resolution CT of the chest. RESULTS: Among 57 patients enrolled, 56 were included in the final analysis. The most frequent cause of irP was single ICI therapy (51.8%), followed by combination with chemotherapy plus ICI (39.3%). Thirty-five (62.5%) patients had grade 2 irP and 21 (37.5%) had grade ≥3. Fifty-one (91.1%) patients completed the study treatment while 5 discontinued the study treatment because of relapse of irP (n=1), death from cancer (n=1), occurrence of immune-related hepatitis (n=1), extension of the treatment duration more than 6 weeks (n=1), and attending physician's decision (n=1). Six weeks after the start of the study treatment, 16 (28.5%) patients demonstrated complete recovery from irP, 35 (62.5%) had a partial improvement in irP, 1 (1.8%) had a relapse of irP, and 4 (7.1%) were not evaluable. The pneumonitis control rate at 6 weeks was 91.1% (95% CI, 80.7% to 96.1%). Twelve weeks after the start of the study treatment, 5 (8.9%), 27 (48.2%), and 15 (26.8%) patients demonstrated complete recovery, partial improvement, and relapse, respectively, and 9 (16.1%) were not evaluable. The pneumonitis control rate at 12 weeks was 57.1% (95% CI, 44.1% to 69.2%). During the observation period, 18 (32.1%) patients experienced a relapse of irP, and of those, 17 received re-treatment with corticosteroids. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 10 (17.9%) patients, in which hyperglycemia was most frequent (n=6). There was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: In this first prospective study for irP, prednisolone at 1 mg/kg/day, tapered over 6 weeks, demonstrated a promising clinical benefit and manageable toxicity, suggesting a potential treatment option for irP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT: 1041190029.

Efficacy of Olanzapine in Addition to Standard Triplet Antiemetic Therapy for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy: A Secondary Analysis of the J-FORCE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: It is unknown whether olanzapine combined with triplet antemetic therapy is effective for all patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy. A secondary analysis of randomized clinical trials using olanzapine may provide insight into the effectiveness of olanzapine for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), including cisplatin. Objective: To examine the add-on effect of olanzapine according to risk factors for CINV. Design, Setting, and Participants: This preplanned secondary analysis evaluated results of the J-FORCE trial, a large double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted in Japan from February 9, 2017, to July 18, 2018. Participants were enrolled from 26 participating hospitals across Japan and included patients aged 20 to 75 years who had a malignant tumor and were cisplatin-naive. The efficacy analysis population of the J-FORCE trial was analyzed according to allocation adjustment factors (sex [male or female], age [≥55 years or <55 years], and cisplatin dose [≥70 mg/m2 or <70 mg/m2]) and patient-related risk factors (history of motion sickness, drinking habit [defined as alcoholic drinks consumption in excess of occasional drinking], and history of morning sickness during pregnancy). Statistical analysis was performed from February 18 to April 18, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 5 mg of olanzapine or placebo combined with standard triplet antiemetic therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was complete response (CR, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue medication) in the delayed phase (24-120 hours after cisplatin-based chemotherapy administration). Secondary end points were CR, complete control, and total control in the acute, delayed, and overall phases for 6 CINV risk factors as well as time to treatment failure. The CR point estimates and 95% CIs of the differences between groups were calculated, and a Mantel-Haenszel test was performed. Results: Of the 705 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.0 [9.2] years; 471 males [66.8%]) included in the efficacy analysis population; 581 patients (82.4%) were 55 years or older, and 526 (74.6%) were treated with a cisplatin dose of 70 mg/m2 or more. Risk difference (RD) for a CR in the delayed phase was significantly greater in the olanzapine group than the placebo group in males (RD, 12.6% [95% CI, 5.0%-20.1%]; P = .001); in females (RD, 14.5% [95% CI, 2.2%-26.3%]; P = .02); in those 55 years or older (RD, 11.1% [95% CI, 3.9%-18.2%]; P = .003) or younger than 55 years (RD, 23.6% [95% CI, 7.3%-38.3%]; P = .005); for a cisplatin dose of 70 mg/m2 or more (RD, 13.5% [95% CI, 5.9%-21.0%]; P < .001); for those without a history of motion sickness (RD, 13.9% [95% CI, 6.9%-20.6%]; P < .001); for those with a drinking habit (RD, 14.9% [95% CI, 6.1%-23.4%]; P = .001) or without a drinking habit (RD, 12.0% [95% CI, 2.5%-21.3%]; P = .01); and for those with a history of morning sickness during pregnancy (RD, 27.2% [9.7%-42.6%]; P = .002). In other subgroups, a delayed CR was higher in the olanzapine group than the placebo group, although not significantly higher. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest a benefit of using 5 mg of olanzapine plus triplet antiemetic therapy to counter CINV regardless of the presence or absence of risk factors. Trial Registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: UMIN000024676.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index is a predictor of tolerability of antifibrotic therapy and mortality risk in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by progressive lung fibrosis of unknown aetiology. Epidemiological studies have suggested that IPF progression may negatively affect nutritional status. Weight loss during antifibrotic therapy is also frequently encountered. The association of nutritional status and outcome has not been fully evaluated in IPF patients. METHODS: This retrospective multicohort study assessed nutritional status of 301 IPF patients receiving antifibrotic therapy (Hamamatsu cohort, n = 151; Seirei cohort, n = 150). Nutritional status was evaluated using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI). The GNRI was calculated based on body mass index and serum albumin. The relationship between nutritional status and tolerability of antifibrotic therapy as well as mortality was explored. RESULTS: Of 301 patients, 113 (37.5%) had malnutrition-related risk (GNRI < 98). Patients with malnutrition-related risk were older, had increased exacerbations and worse pulmonary function than those without a GNRI status <98. Malnutrition-related risk was associated with a higher incidence of discontinuation of antifibrotic therapy, particulary due to gastrointestinal disturbances. IPF patients with malnutrition-related risk (GNRI < 98) had shorter survival than those without such risk (median survival: 25.9 vs. 41.1 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, malnutrition-related risk was a prognostic indicator of antifibrotic therapy discontinuation and mortality, independent of age, sex, forced vital capacity, or gender-age-physiology index. CONCLUSION: Nutritional status has significant effects on the treatment and outcome in patients with IPF. Assessment of nutritional status may provide important information for managing patients with IPF.

Cytokine profiling identifies circulating IL-6 and IL-15 as prognostic stratifiers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy.

Whether circulating levels of specific cytokines at baseline link with treatment efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer remains unknown. In this study, serum samples were collected in two independent, prospective, multicenter cohorts before the initiation of ICB. Twenty cytokines were quantified, and cutoff values were determined by receiver operating characteristic analyses to predict non-durable benefit. The associations of each dichotomized cytokine status with survival outcomes were assessed. In the discovery cohort (atezolizumab cohort; N = 81), there were significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) in accordance with the levels of IL-6 (log-rank test, P = 0.0014), IL-15 (P = 0.00011), MCP-1 (P = 0.013), MIP-1ß (P = 0.0035), and PDGF-AB/BB (P = 0.016). Of these, levels of IL-6 and IL-15 were also significantly prognostic in the validation cohort (nivolumab cohort, N = 139) for PFS (log-rank test, P = 0.011 for IL-6 and P = 0.00065 for IL-15) and overall survival (OS; P = 3.3E-6 for IL-6 and P = 0.0022 for IL-15). In the merged cohort, IL-6high and IL-15high were identified as independent unfavorable prognostic factors for PFS and OS. The combined IL-6 and IL-15 status stratified patient survival outcomes into three distinct groups for both PFS and OS. In conclusion, combined assessment of circulating IL-6 and IL-15 levels at baseline provides valuable information to stratify the clinical outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with ICB. Further studies are required to decipher the mechanistic basis of this finding.