Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ann Oncol ; 30(2): 274-280, 2019 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30395144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients with cancer experience a high symptom burden, which is associated with poor health outcomes and increased health care utilization. However, studies investigating symptom monitoring interventions in this population are lacking. We conducted a pilot randomized trial to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a symptom monitoring intervention to improve symptom management in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with advanced cancer who were admitted to the inpatient oncology service to a symptom monitoring intervention or usual care. Patients in both arms self-reported their symptoms daily (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and Patient Health Questionnaire-4). Patients assigned to the intervention had their symptom reports presented graphically with alerts for moderate/severe symptoms during daily team rounds. The primary end point of the study was feasibility. We defined the intervention as feasible if >75% of participants hospitalized >2 days completed >2 symptom reports. We observed daily rounds to determine whether clinicians discussed and developed a plan to address patients' symptoms. We used regression models to assess intervention effects on patients' symptoms throughout their hospitalization, readmission risk, and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Among 150 enrolled patients (81.1% enrollment), 94.2% completed >2 symptom reports. Clinicians discussed 60.4% of the symptom reports and developed a plan to address the symptoms highlighted by the symptom reports 20.8% of the time. Compared with usual care, intervention patients had a greater proportion of days with lower psychological distress (B = 0.12, P = 0.008), but no significant difference in the proportion of days with improved Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-physical symptoms (B = 0.07, P = 0.138). Intervention patients had lower readmission risk (hazard ratio = 0.68, P = 0.224), although this difference was not significant. We found no significant intervention effects on hospital LOS (B = 0.16, P = 0.862). CONCLUSIONS: This symptom monitoring intervention is feasible and demonstrates encouraging preliminary efficacy for improving patients' symptoms and readmission risk.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02891993.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitoreo Ambulatorio/métodos , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos , Telemedicina , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Pronóstico , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Autoinforme , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
2.
Ann Oncol ; 27(8): 1607-12, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27177859

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Family caregivers (FCs) are critically important for patients with cancer, yet they may experience psychological distress related to caregiving demands. We sought to describe rates of depression and anxiety in FCs of patients with incurable cancer and identify factors associated with these symptoms to determine those at greatest risk for psychological distress. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a randomized trial of early palliative care. We assessed depression and anxiety using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients within 8 weeks of diagnosis of incurable lung or gastrointestinal cancer and their FCs. We also assessed patients' quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General), coping strategies (Brief COPE), and their report of the primary goal of their cancer treatment. We used linear regression with purposeful selection of covariates to identify factors associated with FC depression and anxiety symptoms. RESULTS: We enrolled 78.6% (n = 275) of potentially eligible FCs. The majority were female (69.1%) and married to the patient (66.2%). While the proportion of FCs and patients reporting depression did not differ (16.4% versus 21.5%, P = 0.13), FCs were more likely to report anxiety compared with patients (42.2% versus 28.4%, P < 0.001). Patients' use of acceptance coping was associated with lower FC depression (B = -0.42, P < 0.001), while emotional support coping was associated with higher FC depression (B = 0.69, P = 0.001) and lower FC anxiety (B = -0.70, P < 0.001). Patient report that their primary goal of their treatment was to 'cure my cancer' was associated with higher FC depression (B = 0.72, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with incurable cancer and their FCs report high levels of depression and anxiety symptoms. We demonstrated that patients' coping strategies and prognostic understanding were associated with FC depression and anxiety symptoms, underscoring the importance of targeting these risk factors when seeking to address the psychological distress experienced by FCs.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Cuidadores/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicología , Anciano , Trastornos de Ansiedad/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/fisiopatología , Emociones/fisiología , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/fisiopatología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 50(8): 1119-24, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25961772

RESUMEN

Little is known about how patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) and their family caregivers (FC) perceive their prognosis. We examined prognostic understanding in patients undergoing HCT and their FC and its relationship with quality of life (QOL) and mood. We conducted a longitudinal study of patients (and FC) hospitalized for HCT. We used a questionnaire to measure participants' prognostic understanding and asked the oncologists to estimate patients' prognosis prior to HCT. We assessed QOL and mood weekly and evaluated the relationship between prognostic understanding, and QOL and mood using multivariable linear mixed models. We enrolled 90 patients undergoing (autologous (n=30), myeloablative (n=30) or reduced intensity allogeneic (n=30)) HCT. About 88.9% of patients and 87.1% of FC reported it is 'extremely' or 'very' important to know about prognosis. However, 77.6% of patients and 71.7% of FC reported a discordance and more optimistic prognostic perception compared to the oncologist (P<0.0001). Patients with a concordant prognostic understanding with their oncologists reported worse QOL (ß=-9.4, P=0.01) and greater depression at baseline (ß=1.7, P=0.02) and over time ((ß=1.2, P<0.0001). Therefore, Interventions are needed to improve prognostic understanding, while providing patients with adequate psychological support.


Asunto(s)
Afecto , Depresión/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Aloinjertos , Autoinjertos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA