Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
1.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 2024 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872409

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Minimal residual disease (MRD) status in multiple myeloma (MM) is an important prognostic biomarker. Personalized blood-based targeted mass spectrometry detecting M-proteins (MS-MRD) was shown to provide a sensitive and minimally invasive alternative to MRD-assessment in bone marrow. However, MS-MRD still comprises of manual steps that hamper upscaling of MS-MRD testing. Here, we introduce a proof-of-concept for a novel workflow using data independent acquisition-parallel accumulation and serial fragmentation (dia-PASEF) and automated data processing. METHODS: Using automated data processing of dia-PASEF measurements, we developed a workflow that identified unique targets from MM patient sera and personalized protein sequence databases. We generated patient-specific libraries linked to dia-PASEF methods and subsequently quantitated and reported M-protein concentrations in MM patient follow-up samples. Assay performance of parallel reaction monitoring (prm)-PASEF and dia-PASEF workflows were compared and we tested mixing patient intake sera for multiplexed target selection. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in lowest detectable concentration, linearity, and slope coefficient when comparing prm-PASEF and dia-PASEF measurements of serial dilutions of patient sera. To improve assay development times, we tested multiplexing patient intake sera for target selection which resulted in the selection of identical clonotypic peptides for both simplex and multiplex dia-PASEF. Furthermore, assay development times improved up to 25× when measuring multiplexed samples for peptide selection compared to simplex. CONCLUSIONS: Dia-PASEF technology combined with automated data processing and multiplexed target selection facilitated the development of a faster MS-MRD workflow which benefits upscaling and is an important step towards the clinical implementation of MS-MRD.

2.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 62(8): 1626-1635, 2024 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38332688

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by a monoclonal expansion of plasma cells that secrete a characteristic M-protein. This M-protein is crucial for diagnosis and monitoring of MM in the blood of patients. Recent evidence has emerged suggesting that N-glycosylation of the M-protein variable (Fab) region contributes to M-protein pathogenicity, and that it is a risk factor for disease progression of plasma cell disorders. Current methodologies lack the specificity to provide a site-specific glycoprofile of the Fab regions of M-proteins. Here, we introduce a novel glycoproteogenomics method that allows detailed M-protein glycoprofiling by integrating patient specific Fab region sequences (genomics) with glycoprofiling by glycoproteomics. METHODS: Glycoproteogenomics was used for the detailed analysis of de novo N-glycosylation sites of M-proteins. First, Genomic analysis of the M-protein variable region was used to identify de novo N-glycosylation sites. Subsequently glycopeptide analysis with LC-MS/MS was used for detailed analysis of the M-protein glycan sites. RESULTS: Genomic analysis uncovered a more than two-fold increase in the Fab Light Chain N-glycosylation of M-proteins of patients with Multiple Myeloma compared to Fab Light Chain N-glycosylation of polyclonal antibodies from healthy individuals. Subsequent glycoproteogenomics analysis of 41 patients enrolled in the IFM 2009 clinical trial revealed that the majority of the Fab N-glycosylation sites were fully occupied with complex type glycans, distinguishable from Fc region glycans due to high levels of sialylation, fucosylation and bisecting structures. CONCLUSIONS: Together, glycoproteogenomics is a powerful tool to study de novo Fab N-glycosylation in plasma cell dyscrasias.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/metabolismo , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Glicosilación , Proteómica/métodos , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Glicoproteínas/metabolismo , Cromatografía Liquida , Proteínas de Mieloma/metabolismo , Proteínas de Mieloma/análisis
3.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 62(3): 540-550, 2024 Feb 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823394

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Minimal residual disease status in multiple myeloma is an important prognostic biomarker. Recently, personalized blood-based targeted mass spectrometry (MS-MRD) was shown to provide a sensitive and minimally invasive alternative to measure minimal residual disease. However, quantification of MS-MRD requires a unique calibrator for each patient. The use of patient-specific stable isotope labelled (SIL) peptides is relatively costly and time-consuming, thus hindering clinical implementation. Here, we introduce a simplification of MS-MRD by using an off-the-shelf calibrator. METHODS: SILuMAB-based MS-MRD was performed by spiking a monoclonal stable isotope labeled IgG, SILuMAB-K1, in the patient serum. The abundance of both M-protein-specific peptides and SILuMAB-specific peptides were monitored by mass spectrometry. The relative ratio between M-protein peptides and SILuMAB peptides allowed for M-protein quantification. We assessed linearity, sensitivity and reproducibility of SILuMAB-based MS-MRD in longitudinally collected sera from the IFM-2009 clinical trial. RESULTS: A linear dynamic range was achieved of over 5 log scales, allowing for M-protein quantification down to 0.001 g/L. The inter-assay CV of SILuMAB-based MS-MRD was on average 11 %. Excellent concordance between SIL- and SILuMAB-based MS-MRD was shown (R2>0.985). Additionally, signal intensity of spiked SILuMAB can be used for quality control purpose to assess system performance and incomplete SILuMAB digestion can be used as quality control for sample preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to SIL peptides, SILuMAB-based MS-MRD improves the reproducibility, turn-around-times and cost-efficacy of MS-MRD without diminishing its sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, SILuMAB can be used as a MS-MRD quality control tool to monitor sample preparation efficacy and assay performance.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Neoplasia Residual , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Péptidos , Isótopos
4.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 83(3): 415-419, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37734685

RESUMEN

Monoclonal gammopathy with cryoactivity (ie, cryoglobulins) that causes glomerulonephritis is considered within the spectrum of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Cryofibrinogenemia (cryoactivity of coagulation factors) is very rarely associated with glomerulonephritis. We present a 39-year-old woman with a relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Laboratory investigation detected cryofibrinogen; the precipitate consisted of fibrinogen and a monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein; IgG-λ), and the latter was also detected in serum (4g/L). Initial conventional immunosuppressive therapy resulted in temporary renal remission. In view of the M-protein, subsequent therapy consisted of bortezomib/dexamethasone and high-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and resulted in a very good partial hematological response and temporary renal remission. However, after hematological and renal relapse, we performed unique experiments to clarify the role of the M-protein. Mixing patient serum with donor plasma resulted in cryoactivity, composed of M-protein+fibrinogen. Patient plasma deprived of M-protein did not have cryoactivity. Therefore, cryoactivity was dependent on the M-protein. We started lenalidomide, which resulted in very good partial hematological and renal remission. Thus, cryofibrinogenemia can be the consequence of an M-protein, which we suggest should be defined as monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance.


Asunto(s)
Crioglobulinemia , Glomerulonefritis , Paraproteinemias , Vasculitis , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Paraproteinemias/complicaciones , Paraproteinemias/terapia , Fibrinógeno
5.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci ; 60(7): 518-534, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37232394

RESUMEN

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by the clonal expansion of plasma cells and the excretion of a monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein), or fragments thereof. This biomarker plays a key role in the diagnosis and monitoring of MM. Although there is currently no cure for MM, novel treatment modalities such as bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapies have led to substantial improvement in survival. With the introduction of several classes of effective drugs, an increasing percentage of patients achieve a complete response. This poses new challenges to traditional electrophoretic and immunochemical M-protein diagnostics because these methods lack sensitivity to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD). In 2016, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) expanded their disease response criteria with bone marrow-based MRD assessment using flow cytometry or next-generation sequencing in combination with imaging-based disease monitoring of extramedullary disease. MRD status is an important independent prognostic marker and its potential as a surrogate endpoint for progression-free survival is currently being studied. In addition, numerous clinical trials are investigating the added clinical value of MRD-guided therapy decisions in individual patients. Because of these novel clinical applications, repeated MRD evaluation is becoming common practice in clinical trials as well as in the management of patients outside clinical trials. In response to this, novel mass spectrometric methods that have been developed for blood-based MRD monitoring represent attractive minimally invasive alternatives to bone marrow-based MRD evaluation. This paves the way for dynamic MRD monitoring to allow the detection of early disease relapse, which may prove to be a crucial factor in facilitating future clinical implementation of MRD-guided therapy. This review provides an overview of state-of-the-art of MRD monitoring, describes new developments and applications of blood-based MRD monitoring, and suggests future directions for its successful integration into the clinical management of MM patients.

9.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 60(3): 379-385, 2022 02 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34969184

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Free light chains (FLC) are important in the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of therapy response of patients with monoclonal gammopathies. In this study, we performed a method comparison of three FLC assays on the Cobas 6000 c501 chemistry analyzer of Roche Diagnostics. METHODS: Samples of 119 patients with various monoclonal gammopathies and 26 control patients were measured with the Freelite (The Binding Site), Diazyme (Diazyme Laboratories) and KLoneus (Trimero Diagnostics) FLC assays. A method comparison was performed and reference intervals of the three assays were validated. RESULTS: The analysis of the Bland-Altman agreement showed bias between the three FLC assays, ranging from -62.7 to 5.1% for κFLC and between -29.2 to 80.5% for λFLC. The Freelite and Diazyme assays have the highest agreement. The concordance of the FLC-ratio ranges from 41 to 75%, with the highest concordance between the Freelite and KLoneus assays. The FLC-ratio in 25 sera from healthy controls were within the reference ranges of the Freelite and KLoneus assays. The FLC-ratio was elevated in all 25 samples tested with the Diazyme assay. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement for the free light chains is highest between the Freelite and the Diazyme assay and fair for the KLoneus assay. However, concordance of the FLC-ratio is highest when the Freelite and KLoneus assays were compared. Our data suggest that concordance for the Diazyme assay could be improved by recalibration. Because of absolute differences between the three methods in individual patients, none of the three FLC assays can be used interchangeably.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Paraproteinemias , Bioensayo , Humanos , Cadenas Ligeras de Inmunoglobulina , Cadenas kappa de Inmunoglobulina , Cadenas lambda de Inmunoglobulina , Laboratorios , Paraproteinemias/diagnóstico , Proyectos de Investigación
10.
Clin Chem ; 67(12): 1689-1698, 2021 11 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34643690

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimal residual disease (MRD) status assessed on bone marrow aspirates is a major prognostic biomarker in multiple myeloma (MM). In this study we evaluated blood-based targeted mass spectrometry (MS-MRD) as a sensitive, minimally invasive alternative to measure MM disease activity. METHODS: Therapy response of 41 MM patients in the IFM-2009 clinical trial (NCT01191060) was assessed with MS-MRD on frozen sera and compared to routine state-of-the-art monoclonal protein (M-protein) diagnostics and next-generation sequencing (NGS-MRD) at 2 time points. RESULTS: In all 41 patients we were able to identify clonotypic M-protein-specific peptides and perform serum-based MS-MRD measurements. MS-MRD is significantly more sensitive to detect M-protein compared to either electrophoretic M-protein diagnostics or serum free light chain analysis. The concordance between NGS-MRD and MS-MRD status in 81 paired bone marrow/sera samples was 79%. The 50% progression-free survival (PFS) was identical (49 months) for patients who were either NGS-positive or MS-positive directly after maintenance treatment. The 50% PFS was 69 and 89 months for NGS-negative and MS-negative patients, respectively. The longest 50% PFS (96 months) was observed in patients who were MRD-negative for both methods. MS-MRD relapse during maintenance treatment was significantly correlated to poor PFS (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate proof-of-principle that MS-MRD evaluation in blood is a feasible, patient friendly alternative to NGS-MRD assessed on bone marrow. Clinical validation of the prognostic value of MS-MRD and its complementary value in MRD-evaluation of patients with MM is warranted in an independent larger cohort.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Médula Ósea/metabolismo , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Humanos , Espectrometría de Masas , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico
11.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 59(12): 1963-1971, 2021 11 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34392637

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The therapeutic monoclonal antibody (t-mAb) daratumumab, used to treat multiple myeloma (MM) patients, interferes with routine, electrophoretic based M-protein diagnostics. Electrophoretic response assessment becomes increasingly difficult when multiple t-mAbs are combined for use in a single patient. This is the first study to address the analytical challenges of M-protein monitoring when multiple t-mAbs are combined. METHODS: In this proof-of-principle study we evaluate two different methods to monitor M-protein responses in three MM patients, who receive both daratumumab and nivolumab. The double hydrashift assay aims to resolve t-mAb interference on immunofixation. The MS-MRD (mass spectrometry minimal residual disease) assay measures clonotypic peptides to quantitate both M-protein and t-mAb concentrations. RESULTS: After exposure to daratumumab and nivolumab, both t-mAbs become visible on immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) as two IgG-kappa bands that migrate close to each other at the cathodal end of the γ-region. In case the M-protein co-migrates with these t-mAbs, the observed interference was completely abolished with the double IFE hydrashift assay. In all three patients the MS-MRD assay was also able to distinguish the M-protein from the t-mAbs. Additional advantage of the MS-MRD assay is that this multiplex assay is more sensitive and allows quantitative M-protein-, daratumumab- and nivolumab-monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Daratumumab and nivolumab interfere with electrophoretic M-protein diagnostics. However, the M-protein can be distinguished from both t-mAbs by use of a double hydrashift assay. The MS-MRD assay provides an alternative method that allows sensitive and simultaneous quantitative monitoring of both the M-protein and t-mAbs.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoelectroforesis , Laboratorios , Espectrometría de Masas , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico
12.
Clin Chem ; 67(6): 867-875, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33709101

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Due to improved treatment, more patients with multiple myeloma (MM) reach a state of minimal residual disease (MRD). Different strategies for MM MRD monitoring include flow cytometry, allele-specific oligonucleotide-quantitative PCR, next-generation sequencing, and mass spectrometry (MS). The last 3 methods rely on the presence and the stability of a unique immunoglobulin fingerprint derived from the clonal plasma cell population. For MS-MRD monitoring it is imperative that MS-compatible clonotypic M-protein peptides are identified. To support implementation of molecular MRD techniques, we studied the presence and stability of these clonotypic features in the CoMMpass database. METHODS: An analysis pipeline based on MiXCR and HIGH-VQUEST was constructed to identify clonal molecular fingerprints and their clonotypic peptides based on transcriptomic datasets. To determine the stability of the clonal fingerprints, we compared the clonal fingerprints during disease progression for each patient. RESULTS: The analysis pipeline to establish the clonal fingerprint and MS-suitable clonotypic peptides was successfully validated in MM cell lines. In a cohort of 609 patients with MM, we demonstrated that the most abundant clone harbored a unique clonal molecular fingerprint and that multiple unique clonotypic peptides compatible with MS measurements could be identified for all patients. Furthermore, the clonal immunoglobulin gene fingerprints of both the light and heavy chain remained stable during MM disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the use of the clonal immunoglobulin gene fingerprints in patients with MM as a suitable MRD target for MS-MRD analyses.


Asunto(s)
Genes de Inmunoglobulinas/fisiología , Mieloma Múltiple , Péptidos/química , Biomarcadores , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Neoplasia Residual/genética , Péptidos/genética
14.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 58(4): 547-559, 2020 03 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31940285

RESUMEN

Background Electrophoretic methods to detect, characterize and quantify M-proteins play an important role in the management of patients with monoclonal gammopathies (MGs). Significant uncertainty in the quantification and limit of detection (LOD) is documented when M-proteins are <10 g/L. Using spiked sera, we aimed to assess the variability in intact M-protein quantification and LOD across 16 laboratories. Methods Sera with normal, hypo- or hyper-gammaglobulinemia were spiked with daratumumab or elotuzumab, with concentrations from 0.125 to 10 g/L (n = 62) along with a beta-migrating sample (n = 9). Laboratories blindly analyzed samples according to their serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP)/isotyping standard operating procedures. LOD and intra-laboratory percent coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated and further specified with regard to the method (gel/capillary electrophoresis [CZE]), gating strategy (perpendicular drop [PD]/tangent skimming [TS]), isotyping (immunofixation/immunosubtraction [ISUB]) and manufacturer (Helena/Sebia). Results All M-proteins ≥1 g/L were detected by SPEP. With isotyping the LOD was moderately more sensitive than with SPEP. The intensity of polyclonal background had the biggest negative impact on LOD. Independent of the method used, the intra-laboratory imprecision of M-protein quantification was small (mean CV = 5.0%). Low M-protein concentration and high polyclonal background had the strongest negative impact on intra-laboratory precision. All laboratories were able to follow trend of M-protein concentrations down to 1 g/L. Conclusions In this study, we describe a large variation in the reported LOD for both SPEP and isotyping; overall LOD is most affected by the polyclonal immunoglobulin background. Satisfactory intra-laboratory precision was demonstrated. This indicates that the quantification of small M-proteins to monitor patients over time is appropriate, when subsequent testing is performed within the same laboratory.


Asunto(s)
Electroforesis de las Proteínas Sanguíneas/métodos , Laboratorios de Hospital/normas , Proteínas de Mieloma/análisis , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/química , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/química , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Isotipos de Inmunoglobulinas/química , Límite de Detección , Paraproteinemias/diagnóstico
15.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 58(4): 533-546, 2020 03 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31940284

RESUMEN

Background Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) is used to quantify the serum monoclonal component or M-protein, for diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal gammopathies. Significant imprecision and inaccuracy pose challenges in reporting small M-proteins. Using therapeutic monoclonal antibody-spiked sera and a pooled beta-migrating M-protein, we aimed to assess SPEP limitations and variability across 16 laboratories in three continents. Methods Sera with normal, hypo- or hypergammaglobulinemia were spiked with daratumumab, Dara (cathodal migrating), or elotuzumab, Elo (central-gamma migrating), with concentrations from 0.125 to 10 g/L (n = 62) along with a beta-migrating sample (n = 9). Provided with total protein (reverse biuret, Siemens), laboratories blindly analyzed samples according to their SPEP and immunofixation (IFE) or immunosubtraction (ISUB) standard operating procedures. Sixteen laboratories reported the perpendicular drop (PD) method of gating the M-protein, while 10 used tangent skimming (TS). A mean percent recovery range of 80%-120% was set as acceptable. The inter-laboratory %CV was calculated. Results Gamma globulin background, migration pattern and concentration all affect the precision and accuracy of quantifying M-proteins by SPEP. As the background increases, imprecision increases and accuracy decreases leading to overestimation of M-protein quantitation especially evident in hypergamma samples, and more prominent with PD. Cathodal migrating M-proteins were associated with less imprecision and higher accuracy compared to central-gamma migrating M-proteins, which is attributed to the increased gamma background contribution in M-proteins migrating in the middle of the gamma fraction. There is greater imprecision and loss of accuracy at lower M-protein concentrations. Conclusions This study suggests that quantifying exceedingly low concentrations of M-proteins, although possible, may not yield adequate accuracy and precision between laboratories.


Asunto(s)
Electroforesis de las Proteínas Sanguíneas/métodos , Laboratorios de Hospital/normas , Proteínas de Mieloma/análisis , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/química , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/química , Humanos , Isotipos de Inmunoglobulinas/química , Límite de Detección , Paraproteinemias/diagnóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
16.
J Proteome Res ; 19(7): 2845-2853, 2020 07 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31895568

RESUMEN

Serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) are standard tools for multiple myeloma (MM) routine diagnostics. M-protein is a biomarker for MM that can be quantified with SPE and characterized with IFE. We have investigated combining SPE/IFE with targeted mass spectrometry (MS) to detect and quantify the M-protein. SPE-MS assay offers the possibility to detect M-protein with higher sensitivity than SPE/IFE, which could lead to better analysis of minimal residual disease in clinical laboratories. In addition, analysis of archived SPE gels could be used for retrospective MM studies. We have investigated two different approaches of measuring M-protein and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (t-mAbs) from SPE/IFE gels. After extracting proteotypic peptides from the gel, they can be quantified using stable isotope labeled (SIL) peptides and measured by Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Alternatively, extracted peptides can be labeled with tandem mass tags (TMT). Both approaches are not hampered by the presence of t-mAbs. Using SIL peptides, limit of detection of the M-protein is approximately 100-fold better than with routine SPE/IFE. Using TMT labeling, M-protein can be compared in different samples from the same patient. We have successfully measured M-protein proteotypic peptides extracted from the SPE/IFE gels utilizing SIL peptides and TMT.


Asunto(s)
Flujo de Trabajo , Electroforesis de las Proteínas Sanguíneas , Humanos , Inmunoelectroforesis , Espectrometría de Masas , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 58(1): 85-94, 2019 Dec 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31730518

RESUMEN

Background Serum free light chain (sFLC) measurements are increasingly important in the context of screening for monoclonal gammopathies, prognostic stratification and monitoring of therapy responses. In this study we have performed a method comparison of four sFLC assays that are currently available for routine clinical use. Methods In a retrospective study, sFLC analyses were performed on a cohort that included 139 patients with various monoclonal gammopathies and 54 control sera without an M-protein. Method comparisons of the following four FLC assays were performed: Freelite (Binding Site), N-Latex FLC (Siemens), Seralite (Abingdon Health) and Sebia FLC (Sebia). Results Bland-Altman agreement analysis showed biases varying between -0.1 and 16.2 mg/L for κFLC, -6.0 and 6.8 mg/L for λFLC and -0.04 and 0.38 for the ratio of the involved to uninvolved FLC. Strong agreements were observed for FLC-concentrations below 100 mg/L. The clinical concordance of the κ/λFLC-ratio of the four methods varied between 86% and 92%. Significant quantitative differences were observed between the different methods, mainly in sera with high FLC concentrations. Most assays consistently overestimated FLC concentrations compared to SPE. Conclusions Good overall clinical concordances were observed between the four sFLC assays that were compared in this study. Although good agreements were observed between the FLC assays, significant absolute differences in FLC concentrations in individual patients can be seen, particularly at higher FLC concentrations. Because of inequivalent absolute sFLC values between the methods in individual patients, none of the four sFLC assays can be used interchangeably.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Químico de la Sangre/métodos , Cadenas Ligeras de Inmunoglobulina/sangre , Humanos , Límite de Detección
18.
J Transl Med ; 17(1): 174, 2019 05 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31122289

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) are protected against invasive bacterial infections due to IgG replacement therapy, but are still at higher risk for mucosal infections of the gut and respiratory tract. This might be explained by to the lack of IgA and IgM, as these antibodies are especially important for protection against invading bacterial pathogens on the mucosal surface. METHODS: In an attempt to eliminate a chronic norovirus infection in a patient with X-linked agammaglobulinemia, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) was given two times a week for 3 weeks. At each visit, pre- and post-FFP infusion serum and saliva was collected to determine IgG-, IgA- and IgM-concentrations and serum half-life was calculated. Functionality of the immunoglobulins pre- and post-FFP infusion in both serum and saliva was tested by measuring complement activation, agglutination and killing of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi). RESULTS: Administration of FFP failed to eradicate the chronic norovirus infection. Serum IgA and IgM half-life was 4.2 ± 0.3 and 3.8 ± 0.3 days, respectively. The presence of serum IgM was associated with increased complement binding and complement-mediated killing of NTHi. IgA in saliva was detectable post-FFP and was associated with increased agglutination of NTHi. IgM in saliva was not detectable. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that FFP treatment, although ineffective in clearing a chronic norovirus infection in this single patient, might be beneficial to prevent or eliminate bacterial infections in XLA patients by increasing IgM dependent complement-mediated killing in serum and IgA dependent bacterial agglutination on the mucosal surface.


Asunto(s)
Agammaglobulinemia/sangre , Agammaglobulinemia/terapia , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X/sangre , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X/terapia , Inmunoglobulina A/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Plasma/metabolismo , Saliva/metabolismo , Agammaglobulinemia/microbiología , Aglutinación , Preescolar , Complemento C3/metabolismo , Citotoxicidad Inmunológica , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X/microbiología , Haemophilus influenzae/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Unión Proteica , Adulto Joven
19.
Nat Commun ; 9(1): 3317, 2018 08 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30127440

RESUMEN

Type I interferon (IFN) is a key driver of immunity to infections and cancer. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are uniquely equipped to produce large quantities of type I IFN but the mechanisms that control this process are poorly understood. Here we report on a droplet-based microfluidic platform to investigate type I IFN production in human pDCs at the single-cell level. We show that type I IFN but not TNFα production is limited to a small subpopulation of individually stimulated pDCs and controlled by stochastic gene regulation. Combining single-cell cytokine analysis with single-cell RNA-seq profiling reveals no evidence for a pre-existing subset of type I IFN-producing pDCs. By modulating the droplet microenvironment, we demonstrate that vigorous pDC population responses are driven by a type I IFN amplification loop. Our study highlights the significance of stochastic gene regulation and suggests strategies to dissect the characteristics of immune responses at the single-cell level.


Asunto(s)
Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Interferón Tipo I/biosíntesis , Comunicación Paracrina , Análisis de la Célula Individual/métodos , Microambiente Celular , Reactividad Cruzada , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Células Jurkat , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN , Procesos Estocásticos , Receptores Toll-Like/metabolismo
20.
J Proteome Res ; 17(3): 1326-1333, 2018 03 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29424538

RESUMEN

M-protein diagnostics can be compromised for patients receiving therapeutic monoclonal antibodies as treatment in multiple myeloma. Conventional techniques are often not able to distinguish between M-proteins and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies administered to the patient. This may prevent correct response assessment and can lead to overtreatment. We have developed a serum-based targeted mass-spectrometry assay to detect M-proteins, even in the presence of three therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (daratumumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab). This assay can target proteotypic M-protein peptides as well as unique peptides derived from therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. We address the sensitivity in M-protein diagnostics and show that our mass-spectrometry assay is more than two orders of magnitude more sensitive than conventional M-protein diagnostics. The use of stable isotope-labeled peptides allows absolute quantification of the M-protein and increases the potential of assay standardization across multiple laboratories. Finally, we discuss the position of mass-spectrometry assays in monitoring minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma, which is currently dominated by molecular techniques based on plasma cell assessment that requires invasive bone marrow aspirations or biopsies.


Asunto(s)
Bioensayo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Proteínas de Mieloma/metabolismo , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/sangre , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/sangre , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/inmunología , Expresión Génica , Humanos , Ipilimumab/sangre , Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico , Marcaje Isotópico/métodos , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , Proteínas de Mieloma/genética , Proteínas de Mieloma/inmunología , Neoplasia Residual , Nivolumab , Péptidos/química , Péptidos/inmunología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA