Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterocalicostomy in the Setting of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Multi-Institutional Cohort.

PURPOSE: Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) after failed pyeloplasty is a complex surgical dilemma. The robot-assisted laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy (RALUC) is a potential surgical approach, but widespread adoption is limited due to the perceived technical challenge of the procedure. We present a multi-institutional pediatric cohort undergoing RALUC for recurrent or complex UPJO, and hypothesize that the procedure is reproducible, safe and efficacious. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3-center multi-institutional collaboration was initiated and medical records of children undergoing RALUC between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The details on baseline demographics, perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were aggregated. RESULTS: During the study period 24 patients, 7 (29%) females and 17 (71%) males, were identified. Of the patients 21 (86%) had a history of previous pyeloplasty prior to RALUC, of whom 5 (24%) had 2 prior failed ipsilateral pyeloplasties. The reason for performing RALUC was short ureter in 3 (13%), intrarenal pelvis in 5 (21%) and extensive scarring at the ureteropelvic junction locus in 16 (67%) patients. The median age of patients at time of surgery was 5.1 years (IQR: 1.9, 14.7). Of the patients 9 (38%) had percutaneous nephrostomy prior to surgery; if percutaneous nephrostomy tubes were placed for relief of obstruction, an antegrade contrast study was done postoperatively to confirm resolution of obstruction. No 30-day Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V complications were noted. During the median followup of 16.1 months (IQR: 6, 47.5), 22 (92%) had improved symptoms and hydronephrosis with no further intervention; 2 (8%) patients underwent endoscopic interventions after RALUC and both ultimately underwent nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional cohort demonstrates that RALUC is a safe and efficacious salvage option for failed pyeloplasty or complex anatomy with an acceptable success profile, especially in cases of extensive scarring at the UPJO or an intrarenal pelvis.

Pelviureteric Junction Obstruction in Ectopic Kidneys with Extrarenal Calyces: A Rare Renal Anomaly.

Extrarenal calyces (ERC) is a rare renal anomaly where calyces lie outside the renal parenchyma and are connected to pelvis by draining infundibulum. Its presentation with pelviureteric junction obstruction presents a confusing intraoperative finding. We report two cases of ERC with pelviureteric junction obstruction in the ectopic kidney. Emphasis is laid on the defining the anatomy so that reader can identify the condition if he comes across similar situation. The two patients were managed by minimal access approach. Management of these cases and review of pediatric cases reported in literature are discussed.

Outcomes of complex robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation after failed ipsilateral endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic injection (EI) has been considered a minimally invasive option with high success rates. However, in clinical settings where EI has failed, and after repeat injections or worsening clinical presentation, different treatment modalities may be offered. Open ureteral reimplantation has emerged as a safe option in patients who have failed EI for VUR treatment. Currently there is limited literature describing success of complex robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) following primary EI for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe our surgical technique and outcomes using RALUR approach following failed EI for VUR. We hypothesize RALUR can be a safe, salvage option in patients who have failed EI for VUR in the setting of recurrent VUR or ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO). METHODS: A single site, retrospective study using electronic medical records of all patients who underwent RALUR between 2013 and 2019 following history of previous ipsilateral EI using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (DHA) for diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was conducted. Primary outcomes were radiographic resolution and/or clinical resolution. RESULTS: A total of 17 RALUR procedures were reviewed in 16 patients. There were 14 females (87.5%) and 2 males (12.5%). Seven patients had two prior EI. Median (range) age at time of RALUR was 10.1 (5.7-17.9) years, and the average time between EI and RALUR was 5.9 years [1-13]. The average VUR recurrence grade after failed EI was 3 (ranges 2-4) on preoperative VCUG. History of bilateral EI using dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (DHA), was observed in 14 patients. Surgical diagnosis at time of RALUR included persistent VUR (N = 10) or symptomatic ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO, N = 6). Mean console times were 102 min (range 70-240 min) for RALUR vs 128 min (range 70-180 min) for cases requiring ureteral tailoring. Six complications occurred in 16 patients (37.6%): Using the Clavien-Dindo classification scale, four patients (25%) were grade I, one (6.3%) grade II, and one (6.3%) was grade IIIb, which required additional procedures for ureteral obstruction. CONCLUSION: RALUR after failed EI should be considered a reasonably safe and effective surgical approach in older children with persistent VUR or acquired UVJO.

Standardized protocol for voiding cystourethrogram: Are recommendations being followed?

BACKGROUND: Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) images the urethra and bladder during filling and emptying, as well as ureters and kidneys when vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is present, providing detailed information about both anatomical and functional status of the urinary tract. Given the importance of information obtained, and the varying quality depending on VCUG technique and radiology reporting, the American Academy of Pediatrics Sections on Urology and Radiology published a joint standardized VCUG protocol in 2016. OBJECTIVE: We compared VCUG reports from multiple institutions before and after publication of the protocol to determine adherence to recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: VCUG reports generated during two separate time periods were assessed - before and after publication - to evaluate impact of the protocol. Adherence to the reporting template was evaluated. Studies performed on patients >18 years of age and those obtained for trauma evaluation were excluded from study. RESULTS: A total of 3121 VCUG reports were analyzed, 989 (31.7%) were generated before and 2132 (68.3%) after protocol publication. Comparing cohorts, there was no difference in gender (62.6% female versus 61.4%; p = 0.53) though children in the post-cohort were slightly older (3.34 ± 3.82 versus 3.68 ± 4.19 years; p = 0.03). A significant increase in scout image reporting (91.5%) and cyclic studies (20.5%) were observed in the post-cohort, in comparison to 79.2% and 13.1%, respectively, in the pre-protocol cohort (p < 0.001) [Figure]. Measured PVR and recorded infused volume actually decreased between study periods (84.7% vs 72.8% and 97.2% vs 91.5%, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between VUR grade reporting (99.4 vs 98.5%, p = 0.25). Recorded volume in which reflux occurred increased between periods (0.6% vs 2.3%, p < 0.05), while reporting of filling vs voiding reflux decreased in the post-cohort (84.4% pre-vs 77.4% post-protocol, p < 0.008). DISCUSSION: The 2016 VCUG protocol recommended inclusion of various data points, however the volume at which reflux occurs remained vastly underreported. Timing of reflux has been shown to predict likelihood of spontaneous resolution and risk of breakthrough urinary tract infection; thus, its omission may limit the information used to counsel families and provide individualized care. CONCLUSION: Despite consensus on standard VCUG protocol to best perform and record data, reports remain inconsistent. While VUR grade is routinely reported, other important anatomic and functional findings which are known to impact resolution and breakthrough urinary tract infection rates, such as volume at which reflux occurs, are consistently underreported.

Could Nonenhanced Computer Tomography Suffice as the Imaging Study of Choice for the Screening of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the noncontrast and contrast-enhanced phases of computed tomographic urography for detection of upper urinary tract findings in adults undergoing initial evaluation of newly diagnosed asymptomatic microscopic hematuria to determine if less-intensive noncontrast imaging has the potential to become a suitable imaging alternative in the work-up of this common condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review from 2010-2015 for adults who underwent computed tomographic urography for initial evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. Three nonblinded physicians independently categorized the upper urinary tract findings described in the computed tomography reports into one of three groups: normal, benign, or suspicious for malignancy. The noncontrast images of a randomized portion of the studies categorized as normal and all studies categorized as suspicious and benign were submitted to two blinded radiologists who independently classified each study into one of the aforementioned categories. RESULTS: The noncontrast images for 475 subjects were blindly reviewed. When compared to the computed tomographic urography reports, the negative predictive values of noncontrast images were 97.25% and 94.92% for radiologist 1 and radiologist 2, respectively, with an associated specificity of 88.6% and 97.95%. Of the 5 true upper tract malignancies, both blinded radiologists correctly identified 4 of the 5. CONCLUSION: Contrast imaging added little diagnostic value when compared with noncontrast imaging for most subjects undergoing initial evaluation for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. Less-intensive imaging with nonenhanced computed tomography could reduce the nontrivial risks associated with multiphasic contrast imaging but further work is necessary to identify risk-stratifying criteria.

Filariasis Orchitis-Differential for Acute Scrotum Pathology.

Granulomatous Orchitis secondary to lymphatic filiarisis is a rare diagnosis within the United States. We report a case of a 22yo Male from Sri Lanka, with a new onset scrotal swelling and palpable right testicular mass. Ultrasound identified a 1 cm right testicular mass with signs of tunica albuginea invasion. A right inguinal radical orchiectomy was performed and pathology showed Filarial orchitis. This report describes the detailed history, physical exam, and diagnostic workup and treatment options for a rare entity for acute scrotal pathology.

Colonoscopy after Hinchey I and II left-sided diverticulitis: utility or futility?

BACKGROUND: Modern 64- to 128-slice computed tomography (CT) scanners have questioned the need for routine colonoscopy after hospital admission for presumed uncomplicated diverticulitis. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients (>18 years) who underwent planned colonoscopy after admission for Hinchey I or II acute diverticulitis (January 2009 to January 2014). The findings on the final radiologist report were then correlated with the colonoscopy results. RESULTS: In total, 110 patients (mean age, 55.2 ± 16; 46.4% female) underwent a subsequent colonoscopy (median, 60 days) after admission for diverticulitis. Overall, 102 patients (92.7%) had CT findings consistent with definitive diverticulitis, 6 patients had a diagnosis suggestive of diverticulitis on CT scan, and 2 patients had masses on their admission CT scans. Within the group with definitive diverticulitis, follow-up colonoscopy identified diverticulosis in 99 (97.0%), whereas the other 3 had normal findings. Of the patients with CT scans suggestive of diverticulitis, follow-up colonoscopy showed 3 with diverticulosis, 2 with malignancies, and 1 with nonspecific inflammation. The reliability of CT scans for diverticulitis compared with colonoscopy was found to have a kappa = .829 (P < .001; 95% confidence interval, .629, 1.21). CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up colonoscopy should be performed when a CT scan suggests malignancy, nonspecific inflammatory findings, or the patient is otherwise due for routine screening or surveillance. In this study, there was no benefit of follow-up colonoscopy in patients with CT-confirmed diverticulitis in the absence of other concerning or indeterminate findings.