Association of Lipoprotein Subfractions With Presence and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Referred for Coronary Angiography.

Lipoprotein subfractions (LS) can be used for better risk stratification in subjects deemed not at high risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). In this study, we evaluated the correlation between LS with CAD presence and severity. This is a prospective case-control study of 157 patients referred for coronary angiography who were not on lipid-lowering therapy and had LS measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) scores were calculated to estimate CAD severity. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine correlation of LS with CAD presence and severity and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). There was significant association of certain LS (positive for total low-density lipoprotein particle [LDL-P], small LDL-P and apolipoprotein B, negative for large high-density lipoprotein particle [HDL-P] and apolipoprotein A1 [ApoA1]) with the presence of obstructive CAD and CAD severity. Small LDL-P and HDL-P were still predictive for obstructive CAD after adjusting for traditional risk factors, 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score and in those with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/100 ml. Total LDL-P and ApoA1 were predictive of CAD severity on multivariable analysis. Higher small LDL-P and lower large HDL-P were associated with ACS presence, although only large HDL-P had a significant inverse correlation with ACS on adjusted analysis (odds ratio 0.74 95% confidence interval 0.58, 0.95) In conclusion, in our cohort of patients referred for coronary angiography, total LDL-P, small LDL-P, and apolipoprotein B had significant direct correlation, and large HDL-P and ApoA1 had significant inverse correlation with obstructive CAD and CAD severity.

Practical considerations for colorectal cancer screening in older adults.

Recent guidelines recommend that colorectal cancer (CRC) screening after age 75 be considered on an individualized basis, and discourage screening for people over 85 due to competing causes of mortality. Given the heterogeneity in the health of older individuals, and lack of data within current guidelines for personalized CRC screening approaches, there remains a need for a clearer framework to inform clinical decision-making. A revision of the current approach to CRC screening in older adults is even more compelling given the improvements in CRC treatment, post-treatment survival, and increasing life expectancy in the population. In this review, we aim to examine the personalization of CRC screening cessation based on specific factors influencing life and health expectancy such as comorbidity, frailty, and cognitive status. We will also review screening modalities and endoscopic technique for minimizing risk, the risks of screening unique to older adults, and CRC treatment outcomes in older patients, in order to provide important information to aid CRC screening decisions for this age group. This review article offers a unique approach to this topic from both the gastroenterologist and geriatrician perspective by reviewing the use of specific clinical assessment tools, and addressing technical aspects of screening colonoscopy and periprocedural management to mitigate screening-related complications.

Colorectal cancer screening in the COVID-19 era.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed form of cancer and second most deadly cancer worldwide. Introduction of better screening has improved both incidence and mortality. However, as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic began, healthcare resources were shunted away from cancer screening services resulting in a sharp decrease in CRC screening and a backlog of patients awaiting screening tests. This may have significant effects on CRC cancer mortality, as delayed screening may lead to advanced cancer at diagnosis. Strategies to overcome COVID-19 related disruption include utilizing stool-based cancer tests, developing screening protocols based on individual risk factors, expanding telehealth, and increasing open access colonoscopies. In this review, we will summarize the effects of COVID-19 on CRC screening, the potential long-outcomes, and ways to adapt CRC screening during this global pandemic.