Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Heart J ; 63(3): 433-440, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35650144

RESUMEN

The timing of surgery for ventricular septal rupture (VSR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. This study investigated the benefits and risks of delayed surgery for post-AMI VSR and examined differences in echocardiographic findings between early and delay groups.A total of 38 consecutive patients with post-AMI VSR who underwent surgery at our hospital between May 2003 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Our strategy was to delay surgery until 2 weeks after AMI. If patients demonstrated organ dysfunction, we considered early surgery. Patients were divided into early (n = 20; 53%) and delay (n = 18; 47%) groups. Risks and benefits were investigated based on echocardiographic findings during the waiting period. The delay group had more preoperative intravenous catheter infections (P = 0.008) but fewer reoperations (P = 0.02) and lower operative mortality (P = 0.04) than the early group. The VSR defect diameter and total pulmonary blood flow to total systemic blood flow (Qp/Qs) increased in both groups while waiting. Nevertheless, the early group had a significantly higher Qp/Qs change rate than the delay group (P = 0.05). The 30 day and hospital mortality rates were 5.3% and 13.2%, respectively.The VSR defect diameter and Qp/Qs in both groups increased with time and can therefore become risk factors. Nonetheless, the benefit of waiting exceeded the risk because our outcomes were better than those previously reported.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Rotura Septal Ventricular , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Rotura Septal Ventricular/etiología , Rotura Septal Ventricular/cirugía
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 112(4): e241-e243, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33549522

RESUMEN

Secondary aortoesophageal fistula is rare but is associated with serious complications and high mortality. We devised a treatment strategy involving a covered esophageal stent, instead of esophageal resection, and placing the latissimus dorsi muscle around the infected aorta without removing the aorta and the stent graft. A 72-year-old man with a history of total arch replacement with a frozen elephant trunk for a thoracic dissecting aneurysm developed aortoesophageal fistula and underwent surgical treatment using our strategy. He recovered well, with no evidence of reinfection 6 months after surgery. This strategy may be a less invasive surgical option.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Fístula Esofágica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Stents , Fístula Vascular/cirugía , Anciano , Fístula Esofágica/diagnóstico , Fístula Esofágica/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fístula Vascular/diagnóstico , Fístula Vascular/etiología
3.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 22(7): 713-721, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33434446

RESUMEN

Background: Mycotic aneurysms (MAs) are relatively rare but life-threatening. Some recent reports have described the use of endovascular therapy for their treatment; however, this still is a controversial treatment, and a definite target population has not been determined. Methods: We performed surgery on 34 patients with MAs from March 2005 to March 2019. Twenty patients who underwent open surgery (OS) first comprised the OS group, and 14 patients who underwent endovascular therapy first comprised the stent-graft (SG) group. We analyzed between-group differences, long-term outcomes, and risk factors for death retrospectively. Patients in the OS group had a higher initial white blood cell count than those in the SG group (p = 0.047). The SG group had more patients with a low albumin concentration (≤2.0 mg/dL) than did the OS group (p = 0.026). Results: There were no significant differences in the operative mortality rates between the groups (p = 0.773). Additional procedures were required more often in the SG than the OS group (p = 0.0013). The overall survival rate as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 88% at 1 month, 67% at 1 year, 57% at 3 years, and 45% at 10 years. In the univariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was a risk factor for death (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Endovascular therapy for MAs produced reasonable outcomes when patient selection was based on the activity level, nutritional condition, and degree of inflammation. Endovascular therapy may become an option for patients with a low albumin concentration or COPD despite the fact that additional procedures may be needed.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Infectado , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Infectado/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Humanos , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Case Rep Surg ; 2019: 1628157, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31179150

RESUMEN

A 56-year-old man presenting with massive melena and loss of consciousness was diagnosed with an infected thoracoabdominal aneurysm, an aortoduodenal fistula, and Leriche syndrome following an evaluation by computed tomography. Emergency surgery for uncontrolled infection included the reconstruction of the superior mesenteric and bilateral renal arteries using a four-branched graft. The aortoduodenal fistula was resected after omental filling, and an enterostomy was performed for feeding. Intestinal reconstruction was performed in two stages. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 48 and was without evidence of recurrence at 23 months postoperatively.

5.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 53(5): 433-436, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31010401

RESUMEN

We describe renal stent migration following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection. A 68-year-old male presented with type B aortic dissection. His course was complicated by renal and lower extremity malperfusion. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed and completion angiogram showed no flow in the left renal artery. A renal stent was deployed with the proximal margin of the stent 1 mm into the aortic true lumen, providing improved renal perfusion. One week after TEVAR, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed that the renal stent had embolized to the aortic bifurcation. Additional endovascular therapy successfully crushed the renal stent against the iliac artery wall utilizing a larger bare metal stent. At 3 year follow-up, contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated good patency of the left renal artery and right iliac artery. This complication alerts physicians to consider subsequent aortic remodeling during endovascular intervention for acute aortic dissection with malperfusion.


Asunto(s)
Aorta , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/cirugía , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Stents , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía/métodos , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Remoción de Dispositivos , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/diagnóstico por imagen , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Renal/fisiopatología , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/etiología , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
6.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 53(3): 199-205, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30558509

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES:: Patients with chronic aortic dissection often require repeat interventions due to enlargement of the pressurized false lumen or disseminated intravascular coagulation even after additional thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to occlude the entry tear. Residual false lumen flow can persist even after performing the candy-plug technique or branched stent-graft placement in some cases. We have devised a new method for false lumen closure. METHODS:: From December 2010 to May 2017, 5 patients (mean age: 57 [13] years, range: 43-77 years) with chronic dissection at the aortic arch and descending aorta, who underwent initial TEVAR, required additional treatment. Using an open surgical approach, the endograft was fixed with an outer felt under cardiopulmonary bypass after the endograft with stent was expanded by fenestration. The false lumen was closed using this procedure, and the aortotomy was repaired by direct closure in 2 cases and by graft replacement in 3 cases. RESULTS:: No major operative complications occurred, such as respiratory failure or paraplegia. Postoperative enhanced computed tomography (CT) images showed that the false lumen flow disappeared in all cases. All patients were discharged under normal conditions. They were all followed up and their CT did not indicate any complications for a mean of 33.6 (20.3) months. CONCLUSIONS:: Our combined procedure was effective and provided a higher success rate compared with endovascular therapy alone. This staged treatment approach, using a combination of TEVAR and false lumen closure, is less invasive compared with open surgery alone and may represent a valid treatment option for chronic type B dissection.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/fisiopatología , Aortografía/métodos , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crónica , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 66(3): 227-232, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29462826

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic prosthetic graft infection is a rare but serious complication with no standard management. We reported our surgical experience on graft-sparing strategy for thoracic prosthetic graft infection. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent graft-sparing surgery for thoracic prosthetic graft infection at Matsubara Tokushukai Hospital in Japan from January 2000 to October 2017. RESULTS: There were 17 patients included in the analyses, with a mean age at surgery of 71.0 ± 10.5 years; 11 were men. In-hospital mortality was observed in five patients (29.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Graft-sparing surgery for thoracic prosthetic graft infection is an alternative option particularly for early graft infection after hemiarch replacement.


Asunto(s)
Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Desbridamiento , Epiplón/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/microbiología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Desbridamiento/efectos adversos , Desbridamiento/mortalidad , Drenaje , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Japón , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Irrigación Terapéutica , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 66(3): 222-226, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29078229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the results of acute type A aortic dissection repair have improved, late reoperation for residual dissection has become increasingly important. We report our experience of graft replacement via extended approaches after a previous acute type A aortic dissection repair. METHODS: From April 2003 to September 2016, 17 patients underwent reoperation via extended (repeat median sternotomy plus left thoracotomy) approaches after a previous repair of an acute type A aortic dissection at the Matsubara Tokushukai Hospital in Japan and were included in the analyses (males, 16; mean age at surgery, 60.0 ± 9.3 years). RESULTS: The postoperative stroke and in-hospital mortality rates were 0 and 5.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Extended approach after a previous acute type A aortic dissection repair showed acceptable outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Esternotomía , Toracotomía , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Aortografía/métodos , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Japón , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Esternotomía/efectos adversos , Esternotomía/mortalidad , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Toracotomía/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Cardiol ; 71(5): 488-493, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29174599

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The timing of surgical repair for ventricular septal perforation (VSP) is important because patients are susceptible to bleeding from fragile myocardial tissue or residual shunt during the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to assess the results of delayed surgery for VSP performed 2 weeks after AMI. METHODS: In total, 24 consecutive postinfarction patients with VSP (mean age: 72.6±10.4 years; 13 males) underwent operation between May 2003 and June 2016. We postponed surgery during the acute phase and performed an elective surgery if the patient could wait for 2 weeks with support from intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) and respiratory management. If we could not control heart failure and organ function worsened during that period, we performed emergency surgery. Postoperative outcomes included complications, 30-day mortality rate, long-term hospital death, reoperation rate, and risk factors for hospital mortality. We examined whether organ function was maintained by delaying the surgery. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients, 11 (45.8%) required emergency surgery, and 13 (54.2%) could wait 2 weeks for surgery. The average time from AMI onset to diagnosis of VSP was 4.5±1.6 days, and the average time from VSP diagnosis to surgery was 9.0±6.0 days; 5 patients (20.8%) required resurgery for VSP due to residual shunt, recurrent VSP, or pseudoaneurysm of the left ventricle. The 30-day mortality rate was 4.2% (1 patient), and long-term hospital mortality rate was 12.5% (3 patients). Organ function was maintained in 10 patients (76.9%) who underwent elective surgery, and organ dysfunction was not advanced by delaying the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We could delay surgery for an average of 9 days from VSP onset by means of IABP or respiratory management without the deterioration of organ function. The 30-day mortality and long-term outcome were favorable.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/efectos adversos , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Rotura Septal Ventricular/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Rotura Septal Ventricular/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA