Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 18(5): e1031-e1036, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29625911

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women with breast imaging often seek second opinions at tertiary care centers. Our study measures the frequency of discrepancy between initial and second opinion breast imaging recommendations and evaluates the impact on patient management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 504 consecutive patients with second opinion breast radiology interpretations performed by 6 sub-specialized breast radiologists at a dedicated cancer center from January 1, 2014 through September 1, 2014. Outside imaging reports were compared with second opinion reports to categorize discrepancies. Interpretations were considered discrepant in cases with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category changes, recommendation for additional imaging, or identification of previously undiagnosed additional extent of disease greater than 5 cm. The frequencies of discrepancy, alterations in surgical management, and incremental cancer detection were measured. Statistical analysis of associated factors was performed with the Fisher exact test, with a P-value < .05 considered significant. RESULTS: Second opinion evaluation discrepancies were seen in 287 (57%) patients and resulted in percutaneous image-guided biopsies in 92 (18%). Forty-five additional sites of cancer were biopsy-detected in 41 (8%) patients, including 20 breast malignancies and 25 axillary metastases. Another 9 biopsies yielded high-risk pathology. Second opinion interpretations altered surgical management in 66 (13%) patients. Factors associated with increased discrepancy frequency were cancer diagnosis at presentation (P = .004), dense breasts (P = .005), and the absence of prior studies for comparison (P = .007). CONCLUSION: Although additional imaging and resources are required, second opinion radiology review by subspecialized breast radiologists increases cancer detection and results in clinically relevant changes in patient management.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Axila , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Radiólogos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
2.
Breast J ; 21(5): 545-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26183811

RESUMEN

Angiosarcoma of the breast represent <1% of breast malignancies. It can arise de novo (primary) or following treatment for breast carcinoma (secondary). Primary breast angiosarcoma usually affects young women and is extremely rare in the male patient population. Imaging features can have a nonspecific appearance. Histologically, the diagnosis can be challenging, especially in small core needle biopsies. Mastectomy or wide local excision is the usual treatment for both forms of angiosarcoma. Prognosis and recurrence is worse with increasing grade of tumor. Herein, we discuss the rare occurrence of primary breast angiosarcoma in a man with history of immunodeficiency. Clinical, radiological and pathologic findings will be discussed.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Hemangiosarcoma/patología , Hemangiosarcoma/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Mastectomía Simple/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA