A Phase â ¡ Study of Ubenimex Combined With Pembrolizumab, Nab-Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin for Previously Untreated Advanced Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: TORG2241 (UBE-Q).

BACKGROUND: According to the results of the KEYNOTE-407 trial, pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with previously untreated advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ubenimex, a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor, is an oral drug with immunostimulatory and antitumor activities. We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of ubenimex in combination with pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial is conducted to confirm the tolerability and efficacy of the tested drugs. Patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC will receive a predetermined daily dose of ubenimex orally plus 4 cycles of pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin, followed by continuous administration of ubenimex and pembrolizumab for a maximum of 2 years. To confirm tolerability, the daily dose of ubenimex will begin at level 1 (30 mg), which will be increased to levels 2 (60 mg) and 3 (120 mg) according to the escalation criteria, with a standard 3 + 3 design for achieving the target dose-limiting toxicity rate of 33%. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ubenimex at the determined dose level will be analyzed. The primary endpoint of the efficacy evaluation will be the objective response rate assessed by an independent review committee. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ubenimex combined with pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC. The results will help devise future treatment strategies.

Using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict the outcome of individuals with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer receiving pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed.

BACKGROUND: Factors predicting the response to pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed combination therapy (Pemb-Plt-PEM) in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC) are unclear. We investigated the Glasgow Prognostic (GP) score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and body mass index (BMI) as predictors of response to initial treatment with combination therapy in individuals with advanced non-sq NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 236 patients who received initial treatment with combination therapy for non-sq NSCLC at 13 institutions between December 2018 and December 2020. The usefulness of the GP score, NLR, and BMI as prognostic indicators was assessed. Cox proportional hazard models and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The response rate was 51.2% (95% CI: 44.9-57.5%). The median PFS and OS after beginning Pemb-Plt-PEM were 8.8 (95% CI: 7.0-11.9) months and 23.6 (95% CI: 18.7-28.6) months, respectively. The NLR independently predicted the efficacy of Pemb-Plt-PEM-the PFS and OS were more prolonged in individuals with NLR <5 than in those with NLR ≥5 (PFS: 12.8 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.0002; OS: 29.4 vs. 12.0 months, p < 0.0001). BMI predicted the treatment response-individuals with BMI ≥22.0 kg/m2 had longer OS than did those with BMI < 22.0 kg/m2 (OS: 28.4 vs. 18.4 months, p = 0.0086). CONCLUSIONS: The NLR significantly predicted PFS and OS, whereas BMI predicted OS, in individuals who initially received Pemb-Plt-PEM for non-sq NSCLC. These factors might be prognosis predictors in non-sq NSCLC.

Randomized, Phase II study of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab versus pemetrexed alone after treatment with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer: TORG (thoracic oncology research group) 1321.

INTRODUCTION: Cisplatin plus pemetrexed followed by pemetrexed is an efficacious platinum combination regimen for advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data regarding the addition of bevacizumab, especially in maintenance treatment, are insufficient. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included: no prior chemotherapy; advanced, non-squamous, NSCLC; performance status ≤1; and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-negative. Patients (N = 108) received induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab every 3 weeks for four cycles, and tumor response was needed to confirm four-week response duration. Patients with at least stable disease were randomized to pemetrexed/bevacizumab or pemetrexed alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after induction chemotherapy. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) counts of peripheral blood samples were also analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients each were randomized to the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group and the pemetrexed alone group. PFS was significantly better in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group than in the pemetrexed alone group (7.0 vs. 5.4 months, hazard ratio: 0.56 [0.34-0.93], log-rank p = 0.023). In patients with partial response to induction therapy, median overall survival was 23.3 months in the pemetrexed alone group and 29.6 months in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group (log-rank p = 0.077). Pretreatment monocytic (M)-MDSC counts tended to be greater in the pemetrexed/bevacizumab group with poor PFS than in those with good PFS (p = 0.0724). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed as maintenance therapy prolonged PFS in patients with untreated, advanced, non-squamous NSCLC. Furthermore, an early response to induction therapy and pretreatment M-MDSC counts may be related to the survival benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed.

Phase I/II study of nedaplatin and nab-paclitaxel for patients with previously untreated advanced squamous cell lung cancer: Kanto Respiratory Disease Study Group (KRSG) 1302.

BACKGROUND: Nedaplatin and nab-paclitaxel are each efficacious in the treatment of squamous cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria were: no prior chemotherapy, advanced squamous cell lung cancer; performance status 0-1, age > 20 years but < 75 years, and adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function. Patients received escalating doses of nab-paclitaxel under a fixed dose of nedaplatin (100 mg/m2, day 1) every 3 weeks in phase I. The initial nab-paclitaxel dose was 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (level 1), and the next dose was 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 (level 2). In phase II, patients received the recommended doses. The primary endpoint was tumor response rate. RESULTS: In phase I, three patients at level 1 experienced no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and two patients at level 2 experienced DLTs. Level 1 was thus determined as the recommended dose. Twenty-three patients were enrolled in phase II. The 3 patients in level 1 and 23 patients in phase II were included together for analyses. Three of these 26 patients were excluded from response analysis due to pneumonia and patient refusal. Response rate was 91.3% (95% confidence interval, 72.0-98.9%). Toxicities observed during all cycles were tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for this combination was nedaplatin at 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and nab-paclitaxel at 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The combination of nedaplatin and nab-paclitaxel appears safe and efficacious in patients with untreated advanced squamous cell lung cancer.

Clinical Outcomes of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Surgically Resected High-Grade Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Data on the clinical outcomes of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resected high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) (large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HGNEC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with surgically resected HGNEC at five institutions in Japan between January 2006 and May 2016. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were enrolled. Among them, 65 received adjuvant chemotherapy. Four patients who participated in clinical trials were excluded; the remaining 61 patients were included in the study. Fifty-six patients received adjuvant small-cell lung cancer-based chemotherapy. Twenty-five of 29 patients who relapsed after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy received chemotherapy. The most commonly administered chemotherapy agent was amrubicin. The 3-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 55.2% and 66.8%, respectively. The median relapse-free and overall survival times for the 25 patients who received chemotherapy after relapse were 12.9 and 27.5 months, respectively. Among them, 22 relapsed within 2 years. Patients who received platinum-doublet chemotherapy after relapse tended to have better time to progression disease and overall survival than those who received single-agent chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with HGNEC received small-cell lung cancer-based regimens as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Those who relapsed after adjuvant chemotherapy were mainly treated with amrubicin. Our findings suggest that platinum-doublet chemotherapy tends to improve the time to progression disease and overall survival in patients who relapse after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Effectiveness and Safety of EGFR-TKI Rechallenge Treatment in Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Drug-Sensitive EGFR Mutations.

Background and Objectives: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective first-line chemotherapeutic agents for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. However, the effectiveness of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment is not sufficient in elderly patients (over 75 years of age) harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. Materials and Methods: Between April 2008 and December 2015, we analyzed 78 elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations with first-line EGFR-TKI treatment at four Japanese institutions. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety profiles of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R mutation). Results: Twenty-two patients in the cohort were rechallenged with EGFR-TKI. The median age was 79.5 years (range 75-87 years). Despite the fact that it was a retrospective analysis, even with EGFR-TKI rechallenge treatment the response rate was 23%, progression-free survival was 5.3 months, and overall survival was 14.4 months. Common adverse events included rash acneiform, paronychia, diarrhea, and anorexia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Due to the occurrence of adverse events of grade 2 or more, dose reduction was performed in 15 (68.2%) of 22 cases. Conclusions: EGFR-TKI rechallenge treatment after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations was one of the limited, safe and effective treatment options for elderly EGFR-positive lung cancer patients.

Pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score predicts survival among patients with high PD-L1 expression administered first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: There are no established biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. In this study, we investigated whether the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and body mass index (BMI) can be used to evaluate the effect of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who express high levels of PD-L1. METHODS: We reviewed data from 142 patients with high PD-L1 expression who underwent first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC at six Japanese institutions between February 2017 and June 2019 and assessed the prognostic value of the GPS, NLR, and BMI. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The GPS, NLR, and BMI were calculated using C-reactive protein and albumin concentrations, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, and body weight and height, respectively. RESULTS: The GPS independently predicted the first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy efficacy, as a good GPS (GPS 0-1) was associated with a significantly better PFS and OS compared to a poor GPS (GPS 2) (PFS: 11.8 vs. 2.9 months, p < 0.0001; OS: not reached vs. 8.3 months, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, BMI independently predicted efficacy, as patients with high BMI (BMI ≥21.4) exhibited significantly better OS compared to those with low BMI (BMI <21.4) (OS: not reached vs. 14.1 months, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC, the GPS is significantly correlated with both PFS and OS, and BMI with OS, indicating that they could be used to predict treatment outcome in these patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the relationship among the GPS, NLR, and BMI and survival among patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC.

Post-Progression Survival Influences Overall Survival among Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the impact of first-line treatment on overall survival (OS) may be influenced by subsequent therapies. Thus, using patient-level data, we assessed the relationships of progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS) with OS among patients with high-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC. METHODS: We reviewed data from 133 patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC at 6 Japanese centers between February 2017 and December 2018. The correlations of PFS and PPS with OS were evaluated at the patient level. RESULTS: Linear regression analyses and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient revealed that PPS was strongly correlated with OS (r = 0.76, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.65), while PFS was only moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.71, p < 0.05, and R2 = 0.4). Furthermore, PPS was significantly associated with performance status at the end of pembrolizumab monotherapy, as well as the use of platinum-based combination chemotherapy after pembrolizumab monotherapy (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high PD-L1 expression undergoing first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for NSCLC, PPS was more strongly correlated with OS, relative to the relationship between PFS and OS. Therefore, subsequent treatment appears to significantly influence OS in patients with disease progression following first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Randomized phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin or docetaxel plus cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is considered standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). This study examined two regimens of chemotherapy in concurrent chemoradiation. Eligible patients with unresectable, radically irradible LA-NSCLC were randomized to either the SP (S-1 and cisplatin) or DP (docetaxel and cisplatin) arms with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy, comprising 2 Gy per daily fraction. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) rate at 2 years (the 2-year OS rate). From May 2011 to August 2014, 110 patients were enrolled. Of 106 eligible patients, the 2-year OS rates were 79% (95% CI: 66%-88%) and 69% (95% CI: 55%-80%) the SP and DP arms, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months for the SP arm and 19.9 months for the DP arm, while the median survival time was 55.2 months for the SP arm and 50.8 months for the DP arm. Grade 3/4 leukopenia were more frequent in DP arm. The incidences of febrile neutropenia and pneumonitis tended to be higher in DP arm. There were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. The primary endpoint was met in both arms. The SP arm as a future reference regimen will be chosen due to fewer toxicities and better OS.

Phase II study of amrubicin plus erlotinib in previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (TORG1320).

Background Amrubicin (AMR) is a completely synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline and clinically active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study of AMR and erlotinib (ERL) combination therapy in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC and have already reported the safety and effectiveness. Methods We conducted a multi-center, single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of AMR and ERL combination therapy in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC harboring wild-type EGFR, PS 0-1 and < 75 years of age. Patients were treated at 3-week intervals with AMR plus ERL. The primary endpoint was the PFS, and the secondary endpoints were the response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. The trough ERL concentration (Ctrough) was measured as an exploratory study to analyze the relationship between the efficacy/safety and pharmacokinetics. Results From June 2013 to July 2016, 25 patients were enrolled in this trial. The PFS according to the central test was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval 2.1-5.1). The RR and DCR were 24.0% and 64.0%, respectively. We had no treatment-related deaths in this study. Conclusions The PFS of AMR and ERL combination therapy was superior to that of AMR monotherapy in the historical setting, but the primary endpoint was not met in this trial. In our study, the pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the Ctrough of ERL was elevated with combination therapy. This combination therapy might be a viable treatment for previously treated NSCLC patients without a driver oncogene mutation. Clinical trial information UMIN 000010582.

Randomized Phase III Study of Irinotecan Plus Cisplatin Versus Etoposide Plus Cisplatin for Completely Resected High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: JCOG1205/1206.

PURPOSE: To verify the superiority of irinotecan plus cisplatin over etoposide plus cisplatin as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pathologic stage I-IIIA, completely resected, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) of the lung. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, phase III study on patients with completely resected stage I-IIIA HGNEC of the lung. They were randomly assigned to receive either etoposide (100 mg/m2, days 1-3) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m2, day 1) or irinotecan (60 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 1) up to four cycles. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS) in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180216). RESULTS: Between April 2013 and October 2018, 221 patients were enrolled (etoposide plus cisplatin arm, 111 patients; irinotecan plus cisplatin arm, 110 patients). In the second interim analysis, early termination of the trial was recommended because of futility. At a median follow-up of 24.1 months, the 3-year RFS was 65.4% for etoposide plus cisplatin and 69.0% for irinotecan plus cisplatin, with a hazard ratio of 1.076 (95% CI, 0.666 to 1.738; one-sided log-rank P = .619). Grade 3-4 adverse events were more frequent in the etoposide plus cisplatin arm, with febrile neutropenia (20% of 109 patients v 4% of 107 patients) and neutropenia (97% v 36%) being the most common. Meanwhile, grade 3-4 anorexia (6% v 11%) and diarrhea (1% v 8%) were more frequently observed in the irinotecan plus cisplatin arm. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan plus cisplatin is not superior to etoposide plus cisplatin for improving RFS in patients with completely resected HGNEC; thus, etoposide plus cisplatin remains the standard treatment.

Prognostic value of morphological characteristics assessed by CT scan in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab is known to demonstrate superior overall survival compared with docetaxel in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is reported to predict the outcome of treatment by nivolumab in lung cancer patients. However, the significance of the morphological characteristics of chest computed tomography (CT) as predictors of nivolumab efficacy for advanced NSCLC patients remains unknown. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective trial from April 2013 to March 2017, to assess the significance of CT morphological characteristics as predictors of nivolumab efficacy for advanced NSCLC patients. A total of 78 NSCLC patients pretreated with nivolumab were enrolled. A chest radiologist used chest CT to assess the following morphological characteristics of each patient's main tumor and intrathoracic status prior to nivolumab treatment; interstitial septal thickening, peritumoral ground-glass opacity, spiculated margin, air bronchogram, cavity or necrosis, adjacent organ invasion, bulky lymph node, and accumulation of small lymph nodes. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 60 (77%) patients were male and 72 (92%) had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1. The objective response rates of male patients and heavy smokers were significantly higher than those of female patients and light or never smokers, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified light or never smoking, poor PS, histological type of squamous cell carcinoma, and interstitial septal thickening as independent negative predictors of progression free survival (PFS). CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial septal thickening was a significant and independent predictor of PFS in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: Interstitial septal thickening is an independent predictor of progression free survival in non-small lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: The current study reveals the significance of morphological characteristics obtained via chest computed tomography as a predictor of nivolumab efficacy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy in previously treated elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: S-1 monotherapy is effective and feasible for previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it is not clear whether its effectiveness and tolerability in elderly patients are equivalent to those in younger patients. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC who had previously received other treatments. METHODS: We included 96 elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with advanced NSCLC treated with S-1 alone as a subsequent-line treatment at 12 medical facilities between January 2005 and March 2018 in this study. The baseline characteristics of the patients, response to S-1 monotherapy, and adverse events (AEs) were investigated, retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 68 male and 28 female patients (median age, 78 [range: 75-86] years) were analyzed. In elderly patients who were treated with S-1 monotherapy as a subsequent-line treatment, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 8.3%, 43.8%, 3.4 months, and 9.6 months, respectively. Observed AEs included anorexia, anemia, nausea, fatigue, reduced platelet count, and skin hyperpigmentation. Treatment-related death was observed in one patient because of pneumonitis. In patients who experienced no progressive disease, subsequent-line S-1 alone was associated with longer PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: S-1 monotherapy is effective and feasible as a subsequent-line treatment in elderly patients who were previously treated for NSCLC, and it produces results. S-1 monotherapy could be one of the treatment choices for elderly patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor: A retrospective multicenter study of its real-world efficacy and safety in advanced/recurrent non-small cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is recommended for T790M mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to first- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Recently, some reports exist on the real-world use of osimertinib; however, reports involving third/later-line use are few. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib used in various treatment lines for T790M-positive NSCLC patients. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study included T790M-positive advanced/recurrent NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib from May 2016 to March 2018. The clinical characteristics, efficacy, and adverse events were retrospectively investigated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS-associated clinical characteristics were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 60.7% and 91.1%, respectively; the median PFS was 11.0 months. There were no significant differences in the median PFS for patients treated with osimertinib as second-line and third-/later-line (14.5 vs. 11.0 months respectively, P = 0.327). Analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model for clinical features affecting PFS also revealed no significant factors. Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were reported in 15 patients (26.8%); the most common were anemia (n = 3) and cutaneous toxicity (n = 3). Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in one patient; any-grade pneumonitis was observed in six patients (10.7%), including one with grade 3 pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib demonstrated efficacy even when administered as third-/later-line treatment to NSCLC patients. Osimertinib-related pneumonitis was observed more frequently than previously reported. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study Osimertinib shows efficacy even as later-line treatment in T790M mutation-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with EGFR-TKIs. However, the incidence of ≥ grade 3 adverse events, especially pneumonitis, was higher than that previously reported by other studies. What this study adds Osimertinib was approved for previously EGFR-TKI-treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC. With the increasing frequency of its use as first-line treatment, this study provides valuable evidence for the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for previously EGFR-TKI-treated NSCLC.

A phase I and extension study of S-1 and carboplatin for previously untreated patients aged 75 years or more with advanced non-small cell lung cancer -TCOG 1101.

PURPOSE: Combination carboplatin and S-1 is active in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on this combination for elderly patients with NSCLC are insufficient. METHODS: Eligibility criteria were no prior chemotherapy, Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, performance status 0-1, age ≥ 75 years, and adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal functions. Carboplatin was administered on day 1 and S-1 was administered orally, twice a day, between days 1 and 14, repeated every 3 weeks. In phase I, the primary purpose was determination of the recommended dose. Starting doses of carboplatin and S-1 were area under the curve (AUC) of 4 and 80 mg/m2/day, respectively. In the extension study, the effects and tolerability of this combination therapy of recommended dose were confirmed. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients were entered into phase I and 14 patients were entered into the extension study. The recommended doses for this drug combination are AUC 5 for carboplatin and 80 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks for S-1. With carboplatin and S-1 combination therapy at the recommended dose, the response rate was 30.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-54%] and the disease control rate was 90.0% (95% CI 68-99%). Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended doses for this combination therapy are carboplatin AUC 5 and S-1 80 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks, and this combination is effective with tolerable toxicities for advanced NSCLC patients ≥ 75 years old.

Intrathecal nusinersen treatment after ventriculo-peritoneal shunt placement: A case report focusing on the neurofilament light chain in cerebrospinal fluid.

BACKGROUND: In July 2018, a rare and serious adverse effect (AE), namely, communicating hydrocephalus unrelated to meningitis or bleeding, was reported in relation to five patients treated with nusinersen for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Some patients were managed using a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VPS) implant and continued to receive nusinersen treatment. However, there is limited information concerning the effectiveness and safety of nusinersen treatment for patients with a VPS. CASE REPORT: A female patient exhibited general hypotonia soon after birth and was diagnosed, using genetic analysis, with spinal muscular atrophy. She required permanent invasive ventilation from 2 months of age. She developed a progressive hydrocephalus and underwent placement of a VPS in infancy. Treatment with nusinersen was initiated when she was 7 years old. The neurofilament light-chain (NfL) concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) decreased over time with nusinersen treatment. Twelve months have passed since the start of nusinersen treatment and no AEs have been observed. CONCLUSION: Nusinersen treatment may be effective and safe, even after placement of a VPS. NfL levels in the CSF could be valuable markers of disease activity/treatment response even in advanced stages of SMA.

Definitive Local Therapy for Oligo-recurrence in Patients With Completely Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to elucidate a curable subgroup among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who developed postoperative recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1986 and 2012, among the 1408 patients who underwent complete anatomic lung resection for NSCLC at our institution, 420 developed recurrence. After excluding 14 patients with insufficient information about recurrence, 406 were included in this retrospective study. We investigated the association between several clinicopathologic factors and postrecurrence overall survival (PR-OS) and postrecurrence progression-free survival (PR-PFS). RESULTS: The 5-year PR-OS and PR-PFS rates were 14.0% and 5.9%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, female sex, longer disease-free interval, specific targeted therapy, recent recurrence, oligo-recurrence, and definitive local therapy (DLT) were found to be independent favorable prognostic factors for both PR-OS and PR-PFS. Among these 6 prognostic factors, although female sex, longer disease-free interval, and specific targeted therapy were associated with a prolonged median PR-PFS time, they were not associated with an improved 5-year PR-PFS rate. In contrast, recent recurrence, oligo-recurrence, and DLT were associated with improvement in both the median PR-PFS time and 5-year PR-PFS rate. CONCLUSIONS: We found that recent recurrence, oligo-recurrence, and DLT were associated with an improved median PR-PFS time and long-term PR-PFS rate in patients with postoperative recurrence after complete resection of NSCLC. On the basis of these results, we believe that DLT should be considered first for patients with oligo-recurrence before applying noncurative treatment.

Efficacy and safety of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Pembrolizumab is an effective front-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients expressing high levels of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, it is unclear whether first-line pembrolizumab has similar efficacy among elderly (aged ≥ 75 years) and younger patients. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of front-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in older adults with NSCLC expressing high PD-L1. METHODS: A total of 128 patients with advanced NSCLC expressing high PD-L1, including 47 older adults, received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy at ten institutions in Japan, between February 2017 and February 2018. Data related to patient characteristics, efficacy of pembrolizumab therapy, and the type and severity of adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 47 patients [40 men and 7 women; median age 79 (range 75-88) years] were included in our analysis. In patients who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy, overall response, disease control rates, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were 53.1%, 74.4%, 7.0 months, and not reached, respectively. Common adverse events included anorexia, fatigue, skin rash, and hypothyroidism. Two treatment-related deaths were noted, due to pneumonitis and infection. First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with improved PFS in patients with non-progressive disease (PD). In patients with non-PD and good performance status (PS), pembrolizumab monotherapy improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with NSCLC expressing high PD-L1 tolerated front-line pembrolizumab monotherapy well. Their survival outcomes were equivalent to those of younger patients. In patients with non-PD, first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy may improve PFS; in conjunction with good PS, it additionally improves OS.

Phase I/II study of intermitted erlotinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (WJOG4708L).

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data suggest sequential administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) following chemotherapy may improve efficacy. We hypothesized that intermittent delivery of EGFR-TKI following chemotherapy may increase efficacy. METHODS: This was a multicenter, single-arm phase I/II study to evaluate the efficacy of intermitted erlotinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with EGFR-negative NSCLC who failed one prior chemotherapy. The phase I primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of erlotinib. Erlotinib was administered orally once per day on days 2-16 in combination with 60 mg/m2 docetaxel on day1 for 21 days. A standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design was employed for erlotinib from 100 to 150 mg/dose. The phase II primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The ORR and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a binomial distribution. This study required 45 patients. RESULTS: In the phase I part, the planned dose escalation was completed without reaching MTD. The RD of erlotinib was determined as 150 mg/dose. In the phase II part, the ORR and disease control rate were 17.1% (95%CI: 7.2-32.1%) and 53.7% (95%CI: 37.4-69.3%), respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.5 (95%CI: 3.1-4.5) and 11.3 (95%CI: 8.6-16.6) months, respectively. The common non-hematological adverse event was febrile neutropenia (grade 3-4:19.6%). Two treatment-related deaths were occurred because of interstitial lung disease and pleural infection. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent dosing of erlotinib plus docetaxel is clinically feasible in phase I part but did not significantly improve ORR in phase II part.