Acute rejection after renal transplantation is reduced by approximately 50% by prior therapeutic blood transfusions, even in tacrolimus-treated patients.

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated the relationship between therapeutic blood transfusion before renal transplantation and rejection rates in cyclosporine- and tacrolimus-treated patients. METHODS: In one center, 265 consecutive recipients were studied. Protocol induction was with azathioprine, prednisolone, and cyclosporine or tacrolimus; 37% had biopsy-proven acute rejection in the first 6 months and 46% had received zero to two units of blood before transplantation. RESULTS: Lower risk of rejection was associated with tacrolimus induction (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.95; P=0.049), prior transfusion of three or more units of blood (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33-0.90; P=0.024), and older age at transplantation (mean, 44.23 +/- 12.56 [+/- SD] years vs. 38.96 +/- 12.37 years; P=0.001). Multiple logistic regression modeling showed the effect of three or more prior transfusions on acute rejection was as follows: OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.83; P=0.008. CONCLUSIONS: Induction immunosuppression should take account of the higher risk of rejection in patients coming to transplantation who have previously received zero to two units of blood.

A randomized, double-blind trial of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis plus triple therapy in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was performed to assess whether immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab (Simulect) could reduce the incidence of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine (Neoral), steroids, and azathioprine. METHODS: Three hundred forty patients received either placebo or basiliximab at a dose of 20 mg, given intravenously on days 0 and 4. All patients received cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine. The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute rejection at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included the safety and tolerability of basiliximab and placebo, 1-year patient and graft survival, and significant medical events up to 12 months. RESULTS: During the first 6 months posttransplantation, acute rejection occurred in 20.8% of patients given basiliximab versus 34.9% of patients administered placebo (P=0.005). Similarly, there was a reduction in biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months in the patients receiving basiliximab (P=0.023). One-year patient survival was 97.6% with basiliximab and 97.1% with placebo, graft survival was 91.5% versus 88.4%, respectively (NS). The adverse-events profile of patients treated with basiliximab was indistinguishable from that of patients treated with placebo. The number of patients with infections was similar (65.5% for basiliximab vs. 65.7% for placebo), including cytomegalovirus infections (17.3% vs. 14.5%, P=0.245). Nine neoplasms (three in the basiliximab group, six in the placebo arm) were recorded up to 1 year from transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab in combination with cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine triple therapy was highly effective in reducing the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection without increasing the incidence of infections and other side effects.

Recurrent pyogenic cholangiohepatitis.

Three cases of complicated oriental cholangiohepatitis are described in patients of Asian origin. The development of high biliary strictures in two patients required liver resection; in the third patient the process was complicated by a presumed bile duct malignancy. Oriental cholangiohepatitis may be expected in UK surgical practice given the increased frequency of migration from Asia.