Does Radical Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Improve Overall Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of radical local treatment (RLT) on overall survival (OS) and other survival outcomes in patients with OligoMetastatic Prostate Cancer (OMPC). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases until May 2023. We included RCTs that randomized patients to RLT (either radical prostatectomy [RP] or external beam radiotherapy [EBRT]) and standard of care and reported on OMPC. Our primary objective was to analyze OS with a minimum median follow-up of 4years (PROSPERO-CRD42023422736). RESULTS: We analyzed 3 RCTs, presenting data across 5 papers. OS was significantly higher in the RLT group (HR - 0.643, 95%CI 0.514-0.8, P-value <.001). The data on EBRT was drawn from 520 patients and that of RP was from 85. The post-hoc power analysis showed 81% power to detect a difference of 10% with an alpha error of 0.01. Pooled prevalence of grade 3-4 bowel and bladder toxicity was 4.5%. Health-Related Quality of Life was similar in both groups (mean difference - 1.54, 95%CI -0.625 -3.705, P-value .163). The risk of bias as per the RoB2 tool was low for all domains and overall bias. As per GRADE criteria, the certainty of evidence was high. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis underscores the evidence-based significance of RLT, particularly emphasizing the benefits of EBRT in patients with OMPC. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies and the relatively small sample sizes, especially in the RP subgroup. Future investigations in OMPC should consider incorporating EBRT in their standard treatment approach.

Comparison of Postoperative Chronic Groin Pain After Repair of Inguinal Hernia Using Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Mesh Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed in general surgery. Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty is a commonly practiced technique for open inguinal hernia repair. Out of many other complications postoperatively, chronic groin pain is one of the patients' most common postoperative complaints. There is no direct evidence to explain the cause of post-mesh hernioplasty pain. Only a few studies have been done to judge the effect of suture material used for mesh fixation on chronic groin pain. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the postoperative groin pain level in mesh hernioplasty using nonabsorbable versus absorbable sutures for mesh fixation at predetermined intervals using a visual analog scale (VAS) score. METHODS:  A prospective, single-center, non-randomized, observational study was conducted. All patients per inclusion and exclusion criteria of inguinal hernia planned for surgery were admitted electively on the day of surgery and were operated on in minor OT under local anesthesia for open mesh hernioplasty. The VAS score assessed the postoperative pain level. RESULTS:  This observational study was done to look for any difference in postoperative chronic groin pain after mesh fixation with either nonabsorbable, prolene sutures (PS) or absorbable vicryl sutures (VS). One hundred and ten patients fulfilling the department of general surgery inclusion criteria were admitted to the study. In our study, postoperatively, the incidence of chronic groin pain was assessed and followed up to six months. After six months, 25%of patients had pain. Of this 25%, the majority (70%) of patients had mild pain, 15% had moderate pain, and 15% had severe pain. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of mesh fixation by nonabsorbable versus absorbable sutures. CONCLUSION: Inguinal hernia is one of the most typical conditions seen in general surgery clinics with male predominance. Definitive management of inguinal hernia is surgery. There is no difference in postoperative chronic groin pain with either type of suture material i.e., nonabsorbable or absorbable (prolene vs vicryl) sutures. To conclude, fixation material for mesh does not influence chronic inguinodynia. However, further studies are required for the same.

Case for resurgence of radical perineal prostatecomy in Indian subcontinent.

INTRODUCTION: Radical perineal prostatectomy was the first surgery described for prostatic carcinoma (Young, 1904) but it lost its eminent status after Walsh's description in 1982 of anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy followed by the enthusiasm in laparoscopy and now robotics. It made resurgence after it was realized in early 1990s that the pelvic lymph node dissection is needed only in selected cases. Last decade witnessed over 80 publications addressing the results and advances in the perineal approach. Strangely, centres from the subcontinent have chosen to ignore this resurgence. We describe our early experience with the technique in 35 patients and present the case for its more widespread usage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty five patients of clinically localized carcinoma prostate were operated by perineal route in our institution from December 2006 onwards. All patients had serum prostate specific antigen levels less than 10 ng/ml. RESULTS: Operating time was 2 to 3.5 hours (mean 2.5 hours). Rectal injury occurred in three patients but was closed primarily in all and none required a colostomy. Mean duration of hospital stay was four days. The disease was organ confined in 25(71%). Positive margins were seen in 5(14%) patients. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 17% patients at one year. Seventy six percent patients had achieved continence at one year. CONCLUSIONS: As the world is taking note of radical perineal prostatectomy again, with a very small learning curve, minimal invasion and good oncological control urologists from Indian subcontinent should also embrace this procedure in view of the relative limited resources available.