Trachoma in the Pacific Islands: evidence from Trachoma Rapid Assessment.

AIMS: To establish the presence or absence of trachoma in the Pacific Island region. METHODS: Trachoma Rapid Assessment methodology was used in Kiribati, Nauru, Vanuatu, Solomon Islands and Fiji. Advised by key informants, high-risk communities were chosen from each country. All available children aged 1-9 years and adults > or = 40 years were examined. RESULTS: A total of 903 adults > or = 40 years and 3102 children aged 1-9 years were screened at 67 sites. Rates of active trachoma in children were >15% in all sites in Kiribati and >20% in all sites in Nauru. However, there was a high variability of rates of active trachoma in survey sites in Vanuatu, Solomon Islands and Fiji with rates ranging from 0% to 43% (average 23.3%), 6.0% to 51.9% (average 30.5%) and 0% to 48.8% (average 22.1%) respectively. Average rates of scarring trachoma in adults were 61.9% in Kiribati, 12.5% in Nauru, 38.2% in Vanuatu, 67.0% in the Solomon Islands and 18.8% in Fiji. Rates of trichiasis and trichiasis surgeries suggest the possibility of blinding trachoma in the region. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that trachoma is present in all the Pacific Island countries screened. Further prevalence studies are required, and trachoma control measures should be considered.

Comparative study of the polaroid and digital non-mydriatic cameras in the detection of referrable diabetic retinopathy in Australia.

AIM: To show that the non-mydriatic retinal camera (NMRC) using polaroid film is as effective as the NMRC using digital imaging in detecting referrable retinopathy. METHODS: A series of patients with diabetes attending the eye out-patients department at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital had single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs taken using first a digital and then a polaroid camera. Dilated 30 degrees seven-field stereo fundus photographs were then taken of each eye as the gold standard. The photographs were graded in a masked fashion. Retinopathy levels were defined using the simplified Wisconsin Grading system. We used the kappa statistics for inter-reader and intrareader agreement and the generalized linear model to derive the odds ratio. RESULTS: There were 196 participants giving 325 undilated retinal photographs. Of these participants 111 (57%) were males. The mean age of the patients was 68.8 years. There were 298 eyes with all three sets of photographs from 154 patients. The digital NMRC had a sensitivity of 86.2%[95% confidence interval (CI) 65.8, 95.3], whilst the polaroid NMRC had a sensitivity of 84.1% (95% CI 65.5, 93.7). The specificities of the two cameras were identical at 71.2% (95% CI 58.8, 81.1). There was no difference in the ability of the polaroid and digital camera to detect referrable retinopathy (odds ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.80, 1.40, P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that non-mydriatic retinal photography using polaroid film is as effective as digital imaging in the detection of referrable retinopathy in countries such as the USA and Australia or others that use the same criterion for referral.

Vision impairment in the Pacific region.

The Western Pacific region is one of great diversity, containing the most populous country, China, and many small Pacific island countries. This review describes the prevalence of blindness and vision loss, illustrates the changing trends in the important causes of vision loss and blindness, and the stages of development of the delivery of eye care services across this region.

Changes in management of diabetic retinopathy by Australian ophthalmologists as a result of the NHMRC clinical guidelines.

PURPOSE: To document changes in management of diabetic retinopathy by Australian ophthalmologists after release of the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) clinical guidelines. METHODS: Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to Australian ophthalmologists prior to release of the NHMRC guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy, and at one and 2.5 years after release of the guidelines. The questionnaires elicited information about current management practices in relation to diabetic retinopathy RESULTS: The response rate for the baseline and two follow-up surveys was 82%, 81%, and 80%, respectively. More than 85% of the ophthalmologists responded that the guidelines were useful in improving management, were easy to understand, and were already part of their routine clinical practice. A relatively small percentage (12%) felt that the guidelines made recommendations that were not practical or feasible. Contrary to the NHMRC guidelines, at the second follow-up survey, only 50% of the ophthalmologists said that they would almost never perform fluorescein angiography in eyes with mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The change from baseline to the second follow-up in the percentage of ophthalmologists who would perform cataract surgery after treating clinically significant macular oedema (as advised by the NHMRC guidelines) was statistically significant (baseline = 83.7%, 95% confidence limit = 80.4, 87.0; second follow up = 90.4, 95% confidence limit = 87.3, 93.5). CONCLUSIONS: Distribution of the printed NHMRC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Diabetic Retinopathy and full colour Retinopathy Chart resulted in a significant change in the recommended order of treatment of clinically significant macular oedema. However no significant change in the use of fluorescein angiography was documented.

Costs of mobile screening for diabetic retinopathy: a practical framework for rural populations.

Australia's rural and remote residents experience considerably higher hospitalisation and death rates due to diabetes than their metropolitan counterparts. There is clearly a need for improved diabetes care services in these areas and interventions that target conditions associated with diabetes will yield beneficial results for the community. All people with diabetes are at risk for diabetic retinopathy, which can cause vision loss and blindness. Although vision loss and blindness due to diabetes is nearly 100% preventable through regular eye examinations, 35% of Victoria's rural population with diabetes do not have their eyes examined on a regular basis. A pilot, mobile screening program for the early detection of diabetic eye disease was conducted in rural Victoria and proved to be a successful model of adjunct eye care for people with diabetes. Actual costs from the pilot screening were applied to a permanent model for rural eye care. At A$41 per participant, costs for mobile screening were competitive with Medicare rebate costs for eye examinations. The model addresses barriers of accessibility and availability, targets a portion of the rural population with diabetes that is not otherwise having eye examinations, and is cost-saving to the Government.

Changes in attitudes and practices of optometrists in their management of diabetic retinopathy after the release of NHMRC guidelines. National Health and Medical Research Council.

The purpose of this study was to document attitudes and practices of Australian optometrists in their management of diabetic retinopathy prior to the release of the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy and at two time points following their release. A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to a stratified random sample of 500 Australian optometrists at the three time points. The same sample was used for the first two surveys and a new random sample was drawn for the second follow-up survey. The response to the three questionnaires was 86%, 80% and 84%, respectively. More than 90% of optometrists reported receiving a copy of the guidelines and 82% reported receiving the supplementary Retinopathy Chart. Fifty-seven per cent reported having read the guidelines at least once in entirety and 65% reported that they refer to the Retinopathy Chart at least monthly in their clinical practice. There was a significant decrease in the number of optometrists who reported that patient unwillingness to be dilated and their fear of precipitating angle closure glaucoma were moderate or major barriers to performing dilated ophthalmoscopy. Concomitantly, the percentage of optometrists who reported that they often or always perform dilated ophthalmoscopy on new patients with diabetes increased significantly from 74.5% (95% confidence limit = 70.2, 78.8) to 81.5% (95% confidence limit = 77.5, 85.5). There have been some significant changes in the self-reported management practices of optometrists in relation to diabetic retinopathy since the release of the NHMRC guidelines and Retinopathy Chart.

Diabetic retinopathy: effects of national guidelines on the referral, examination and treatment practices of ophthalmologists and optometrists.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes in referral, examination and treatment practices for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and optometrists following the release of national guidelines. METHODS: A two-page self-administered questionnaire was mailed to all Australian ophthalmologists and a random sample of 500 Australian optometrists prior to and 1 year after release of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetic retinopathy. The questionnaires elicited information about current practice related to the management of patients with diabetic retinopathy. RESULTS: Of the 464 contactable ophthalmologists who responded to the baseline survey, 374 (80.6% response) completed the follow-up survey The response rate for the contactable optometrists was 80.1% (310 of 384). There were almost no significant changes in management practices from baseline to follow up. For example, the percentage of ophthalmologists who reported that they were often or almost always confident in detecting moderate retinal thickening near the macula remained nearly identical from baseline to follow up (80.2% vs 79.1 %). The rate was also similar from baseline to follow up for optometrists (31.1% vs 28.8%). The one area in which ophthalmologists reported significant changes in management towards agreement with the NHMRC guidelines was use of angiography; they were less likely to manage their patients this way (20.4% vs 14.2% with laser and 48.9% vs 38.4% without laser for increasing level of severity in clinical signs; both P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The NHMRC guidelines for diabetic retinopathy have been successfully distributed to ophthalmologists and optometrists in Australia. However, the mere provision of the guidelines has had little impact on management practices. It will be important to determine if ongoing dissemination and implementation strategies not only increase awareness of health-care practitioners to the guidelines, but also change behaviours.

Detection of vision impairment in people admitted to aged care assessment centres.

Vision is not routinely tested when the health of older people is assessed, and the aim of this study was to detect older people with vision impairment for referral to appropriate eye care services. People admitted for assessment and or rehabilitation in three aged care assessment centres had distance and near visual acuity assessed with a simplified vision test. A pinhole test was used when necessary. Referral criteria were distance visual acuity of less than 6/12; near vision of less than N8, and people with diabetes who had not attended a dilated fundus examination in the last 2 years. Visual acuity results were obtained in 93% of patients (685/735). Those unable to perform the vision test were very ill or had severe cognitive impairment. Forty-three per cent of patients (266/646) had impaired vision and, of these, 70.6% (188/266) were referred to eye care specialists. Forty-five per cent were referred to ophthalmologists, 36% to optometrists and 20% to low vision services. This significant proportion of patients with poor vision suggests that vision screening is warranted.

Management of diabetic retinopathy by Australian ophthalmologists. Working Group on Evaluation of the NHMRC Retinopathy Guideline Distribution. National Health and Medical Research Council.

OBJECTIVE: To describe current management practices of diabetic retinopathy used by Australian ophthalmologists. SETTING: Two-page self-administered questionnaire mailed to 622 ophthalmologists listed with the Royal Australian College of Ophthalmologists. METHODS: The survey included questions about practice details such as size and location; specialty; current practice with regard to management of patients with diabetes; confidence in screening for diabetic retinopathy; and a number of patient scenarios related to screening, follow-up and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. RESULTS: Of the 577 eligible ophthalmologists, 475 (82%) completed the questionnaire. They had been practicing ophthalmology between 1 and 50 years (median 16 years) and 89 (19%) indicated that they had a subspecialty interest either in vitreo-retinal surgery or in medical retina. For 145 (30.5%) of the ophthalmologists, at least one of their practices was located in a country area. The estimated percentage of patients with diabetes ranged from 0.1 to 60% (mean = 9.9%). Retinal specialists perform between 0 and 750 macular focal photocoagulation procedures per year (mean = 94) compared with a range of 0-350 for nonretinal specialists (mean = 10.3) (t = 6.1, P < 0.001). The ophthalmologists were presented with a hypothetical patient with cataract requiring surgery and clinically significant macular oedema that would be difficult to treat (but not impossible) because of the cataract. Seventy-seven ophthalmologists (16%) said they would delay the macular laser therapy until after the cataract surgery had been performed. In multivariate logistic regression models, nonretinal specialists were 4.44 times as likely to perform the cataract surgery first (95%CL = 1.57, 12.6) and ophthalmologists who had been in practice more than 15 years were 2.50 times as likely to perform cataract surgery first (95%CL = 1.47, 4.26). There were other examples of practice that differed from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines in patient scenarios. The majority of ophthalmologists (60%) expressed a moderate or strong need to learn more about the management of diabetic retinopathy. DISCUSSION: The variability in the management of diabetic retinopathy by Australian ophthalmologists and the desire of ophthalmologists to learn more about diabetic retinopathy provide evidence to support the need for the NHMRC Guidelines for Diabetic Retinopathy. These data will be used to evaluate changes in practice as a result of the implementation of the guidelines.

Compliance with recommendations from a screening programme for diabetic retinopathy.

METHODS: General practitioner compliance with recommendations for patient follow-up after participation in a screening programme for diabetic retinopathy was assessed. Six months after screening with non-mydriatic retinal photography in four areas of Victoria, the genera practitioner of each participant was surveyed if the participant reported no examination for diabetic retinopathy in the past 2 years and if the results of the screening indicated the need for further assessment. RESULTS: Overall, 208 of 253 (82%) completed questionnaires were analysed. A total of 123 (59%) patients were referred by their doctors for further assessment and 97 (79%) of those referred were reported to have complied with the referral. Of the 85 (41%) patients who were not referred for further assessment, 31 (36%) were reported by their doctors to be already under regular review by an ophthalmologist. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with genera practitioner referrals suggests that this screening programme was effective and a useful means by which to remind general practitioners of the importance of regular eye examinations for people with diabetes.

The need for cataract surgery: projections based on lens opacity, visual acuity, and personal concern.

AIM: To assess the projected needs for cataract surgery by lens opacity, visual acuity, and patient concern. METHODS: Data were collected as part of the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project, a population based study of age related eye disease in a representative sample of Melbourne residents aged 40 and over. Participants were recruited by a household census and invited to attend a local screening centre. At the study sites, the following data were collected: presenting and best corrected visual acuity, visual fields, intraocular pressure, satisfaction with current vision, personal health history and habits, and a standardised eye examination and photography of the lens and fundus. Lens photographs were graded twice and adjudicated to document lens opacities. Cataract was defined as nuclear greater than or equal to standard 2, 4/16 or greater cortical opacity, or any posterior subcapsular opacities. RESULTS: 3271 (83% response) people living in their own homes were examined. The participants ranged in age from 40 to 98 years and 1511 (46.2%) were men. Previous cataract surgery had been performed in 107 (3.4%) of the participants. The overall prevalence of any type of cataract that had not been surgically corrected was 18%. If the presence of cataract as defined was considered the sole criterion for cataract surgery with no reference to visual acuity, there would be 309 cataract operations per 1000 people aged 40 and over (96 eyes of people who were not satisfied with their vision, 210 eyes of people who were satisfied with their vision, and three previous cataract operations). At a visual acuity criterion of less than 6/12 (the vision required to legally drive a car), 48 cataract operations per 1000 would occur and people would be twice as likely to report dissatisfaction with their vision. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of the need for cataract surgery vary dramatically by level of lens opacity, visual acuity, and patient concern. These data should be useful for the planning of health services.

Use of focus groups to identify health promotion strategies for the early detection of diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: People with diabetes do not regularly utilise eye services for the early prevention of vision loss due to diabetic eye disease. A community-based screening program has been initiated in Victoria to address this issue. To encourage people to take preventive eye health care measures, the most effective health promotion strategies were identified. METHODS: Thirty-three health professionals were invited to attend focus groups. A sample of 35 people with diabetes was approached by their GPs or diabetes educators because of their motivation to participate in diabetes activities. Each group consisted of 10 members. Discussion points included the type of education messages available to people with diabetes; use of eye services among the participants with diabetes; and strategies required promoting the screening service. RESULTS: Five focus groups were conducted. The discussions highlighted that a great deal could be achieved by using local community networks to promote the benefits of early detection of diabetic retinopathy and local screening program. The group members recommended that particular attention be directed to general practitioners and their distribution of materials to patients. Key issues for planning and implementing the program were highlighted. The groups urged development of strategies to encourage people with diabetes in rural Victoria to participate in a program for the early detection of diabetic retinopathy.

Prueba de tamizaje simplificada para identificar a personas con visión disminuida en países en desarrollo / A simplified screening test for identifying people with low vision in developing countries

Se han creado pruebas sencillas pero útiles para el tamizaje de personas con visión disminuida en países en desarrollo. Estas pruebas, que miden la visión de lejos y de cerca y que se basan en el uso de una figura en E, fueron evaluadas y respaldadas mediante ensayos en que participaron personas de 4 a 90 años de edad, y se han puesto a prueba en los servicios de salud, educación y rehabilitación de 32 países en desarrollo. Se han calculado su sensibilidad y especificidad como instrumentos para la detección de la visión disminuída: en la prueba de visión a distancia, la sensibilidad es de 85 por ciento y la especificidad, de 96 por ciento; en la prueba de visión cercana, la sensibilidad es de 100 por ciento y la especificidad, de 84 por ciento. Se ha demostrado que el contenido y el formato de las pruebas son adecuados para países en desarrollo y se ha comprobado la utilidad de las mismas para el tamizaje de la visión disminuida

Simple but effective tests have been produced for screening subjects with low vision in developing countries. These tests of distance and near vision, based on the E test, were evaluated and validated in trials with people aged 4­90 years, and have been field tested in the health, education and rehabilitation services in 32 developing countries. Their sensitivity and specificity as screening tools for low vision have been calculated: sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 96% for the distance vision test, and sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 84% for the near vision test. The content and format of the tests have been demonstrated to be appropriate for developing countries, and their effectiveness for screening for low vision has been confirmed.

Cataract surgery in Australia 1985-94.

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is the most common form of major ophthalmic surgery in Australia and a common surgical procedure among the elderly. The purpose of this report is to compile the numbers and rates of cataract extractions and implant of IOLs over the period 1985-94 for Australia. METHODS: Data were obtained for public and private cataract extractions and IOL implants from state and territory ministries of health and from the Health Insurance Commission. The data relating to cataract surgery were compared with the growth in the proportion of elderly people in the population. RESULTS: The number of cataract extractions has increased by 2.6 times over the ten-year period to 67,459 in 1994 and IOL implants have increased by 2.9 times over the same period to 70,084. The increase in the elderly population for the period was 1.3 times so that there is a relative doubling in the rate of surgery. The proportion of public patients has risen from 19% to 28% from 1985 to 1994. CONCLUSIONS: The numbers of cataract extractions and IOL implants was increased at double the rate expected from the growth in the elderly population. Advances in microsurgery and IOL technology have resulted improved outcomes and have created a greater patient demand. The improved outcomes have also lead to ophthalmologists recommending cataract surgery at better visual acuity levels than previously.

Referral to low vision services by ophthalmologists.

PURPOSE: People in need of low vision rehabilitation services often experience delays in referral to services. This study investigates referral criteria of Australian ophthalmologists, the frequency of referral of their patients with low vision and their perceptions of low vision services. METHODS: A survey was sent to a representative, random sample of 200 ophthalmologists. They were asked about criteria used for the referral of their patients with low vision. The survey included questions on the frequency with which they prescribed low vision devices (LVD) and referral of their patients to low vision and rehabilitation services and peer support groups. Perceptions of the quality and availability of low vision services were also investigated. RESULTS: The response rate was 82%. Approximately 11% of ophthalmologists' patients have low vision. It is uncommon for ophthalmologists to prescribe LVD but 67% refer most of their patients with low vision. It is less common for them to refer to rehabilitation services (29%) or peer support services (18%). The perceived local availability of services influences the rate of referral. Ophthalmologists who used the criteria of moderate low vision (< 6/21 to < 6/60) are more likely to refer more of their patients than those who use the criteria of severe low vision. CONCLUSIONS: Australian ophthalmologists refer most of their visually impaired patients to low vision services, but infrequently to rehabilitation services or peer support groups. Differences in perceived need for low vision services indicated by the criteria used for referral, and the perceived availability, influence the rate at which ophthalmologists refer their patients for services. Ophthalmologists are encouraged to refer patients with permanent visual loss to low vision services earlier.

Diabetic retinopathy: examination practices and referral patterns of general practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate general practitioners' (GPs') examination and referral practices for diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: A questionnaire survey of a random stratified sample of 500 Victorian GPs. RESULTS: The response rate was 88%. 53% of GPs examined none or less than half of their patients with diabetes for diabetic retinopathy. Those who did examine for retinopathy rarely performed funduscopy through a dilated pupil and 65% reported that they never did. Only 37% had dilating drops in their surgery. Only 45% often or always tested visual acuity. 88% often or always referred patients at the recommended frequency to an ophthalmologist. CONCLUSIONS: Although most GPs do not perform dilated fundus examinations, they report referring their patients with diabetes for assessment by an ophthalmologist at an early stage to prevent vision loss. Referral chain breakdown may explain the discrepancy between GPs' reported referral rates and the lower rates of ophthalmic examination reported in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project.