Ten Years of VASARI Glioma Features: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Their Impact and Performance.

BACKGROUND: Visually Accessible Rembrandt (Repository for Molecular Brain Neoplasia Data) Images (VASARI) features, a vocabulary to establish reproducible terminology for glioma reporting, have been applied for a decade, but a systematic performance evaluation is lacking. PURPOSE: Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of the VASARI features set for glioma assessment. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched until September 26, 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Original articles predicting diagnosis, progression, and survival in patients with glioma were included. DATA ANALYSIS: The modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was applied to evaluate the risk-of-bias. The meta-analysis used a random effects model and forest plot visualizations, if ≥5 comparable studies with a low or medium risk of bias were provided. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty-five studies (3304 patients) were included. Risk-of-bias scores were medium (n = 33) and low (n = 2). Recurring objectives were overall survival (n = 18) and isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation (IDH; n = 12) prediction. Progression-free survival was examined in 7 studies. In 4 studies (glioblastoma n = 2, grade 2/3 glioma n = 1, grade 3 glioma n = 1), a significant association was found between progression-free survival and single VASARI features. The single features predicting overall survival with the highest pooled hazard ratios were multifocality (hazard ratio = 1.80; 95%-CI, 1.21-2.67; I2 = 53%), ependymal invasion (hazard ratio = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.45-2.05; I2 = 0%), and enhancing tumor crossing the midline (hazard ratio = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.35-3.18; I2 = 52%). IDH mutation-predicting models combining VASARI features rendered a pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.88) at considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 100%). Combined input models using VASARI plus clinical and/or radiomics features outperformed single data-type models in all relevant studies (n = 17). LIMITATIONS: Studies were heterogeneously designed and often with a small sample size. Several studies used The Cancer Imaging Archive database, with likely overlapping cohorts. The meta-analysis for IDH was limited due to a high study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Some VASARI features perform well in predicting overall survival and IDH mutation status, but combined models outperform single features. More studies with less heterogeneity are needed to increase the evidence level.

Brain Tumor Imaging without Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: Feasible or Fantasy?

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) form the cornerstone of current primary brain tumor MRI protocols at all stages of the patient journey. Though an imperfect measure of tumor grade, GBCAs are repeatedly used for diagnosis and monitoring. In practice, however, radiologists will encounter situations where GBCA injection is not needed or of doubtful benefit. Reducing GBCA administration could improve the patient burden of (repeated) imaging (especially in vulnerable patient groups, such as children), minimize risks of putative side effects, and benefit costs, logistics, and the environmental footprint. On the basis of the current literature, imaging strategies to reduce GBCA exposure for pediatric and adult patients with primary brain tumors will be reviewed. Early postoperative MRI and fixed-interval imaging of gliomas are examples of GBCA exposure with uncertain survival benefits. Half-dose GBCAs for gliomas and T2-weighted imaging alone for meningiomas are among options to reduce GBCA use. While most imaging guidelines recommend using GBCAs at all stages of diagnosis and treatment, non-contrast-enhanced sequences, such as the arterial spin labeling, have shown a great potential. Artificial intelligence methods to generate synthetic postcontrast images from decreased-dose or non-GBCA scans have shown promise to replace GBCA-dependent approaches. This review is focused on pediatric and adult gliomas and meningiomas. Special attention is paid to the quality and real-life applicability of the reviewed literature.

Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 2.

Preoperative clinical MRI protocols for gliomas, brain tumors with dismal outcomes due to their infiltrative properties, still rely on conventional structural MRI, which does not deliver information on tumor genotype and is limited in the delineation of diffuse gliomas. The GliMR COST action wants to raise awareness about the state of the art of advanced MRI techniques in gliomas and their possible clinical translation. This review describes current methods, limits, and applications of advanced MRI for the preoperative assessment of glioma, summarizing the level of clinical validation of different techniques. In this second part, we review magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST), susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), MRI-PET, MR elastography (MRE), and MR-based radiomics applications. The first part of this review addresses dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, arterial spin labeling (ASL), diffusion-weighted MRI, vessel imaging, and magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF). EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 1.

Preoperative clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for gliomas, brain tumors with dismal outcomes due to their infiltrative properties, still rely on conventional structural MRI, which does not deliver information on tumor genotype and is limited in the delineation of diffuse gliomas. The GliMR COST action wants to raise awareness about the state of the art of advanced MRI techniques in gliomas and their possible clinical translation or lack thereof. This review describes current methods, limits, and applications of advanced MRI for the preoperative assessment of glioma, summarizing the level of clinical validation of different techniques. In this first part, we discuss dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, arterial spin labeling, diffusion-weighted MRI, vessel imaging, and magnetic resonance fingerprinting. The second part of this review addresses magnetic resonance spectroscopy, chemical exchange saturation transfer, susceptibility-weighted imaging, MRI-PET, MR elastography, and MR-based radiomics applications. Evidence Level: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.

The patients' experience of neuroimaging of primary brain tumors: a cross-sectional survey study.

PURPOSE: To gain insight into how patients with primary brain tumors experience MRI, follow-up protocols, and gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) use. METHODS: Primary brain tumor patients answered a survey after their MRI exam. Questions were analyzed to determine trends in patients' experience regarding the scan itself, follow-up frequency, and the use of GBCAs. Subgroup analysis was performed on sex, lesion grade, age, and the number of scans. Subgroup comparison was made using the Pearson chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney U-test for categorical and ordinal questions, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 93 had a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis, and seven were considered to have a slow-growing low-grade tumor after multidisciplinary assessment and follow-up. 61/100 patients were male, with a mean age ± standard deviation of 44 ± 14 years and 46 ± 13 years for the females. Fifty-nine patients had low-grade tumors. Patients consistently underestimated the number of their previous scans. 92% of primary brain tumor patients did not experience the MRI as bothering and 78% would not change the number of follow-up MRIs. 63% of the patients would prefer GBCA-free MRI scans if diagnostically equally accurate. Women found the MRI and receiving intravenous cannulas significantly more uncomfortable than men (p = 0.003). Age, diagnosis, and the number of previous scans had no relevant impact on the patient experience. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary brain tumors experienced current neuro-oncological MRI practice as positive. Especially women would, however, prefer GBCA-free imaging if diagnostically equally accurate. Patient knowledge of GBCAs was limited, indicating improvable patient information.

Current state and guidance on arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in clinical neuroimaging.

This article focuses on clinical applications of arterial spin labeling (ASL) and is part of a wider effort from the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) Perfusion Study Group to update and expand on the recommendations provided in the 2015 ASL consensus paper. Although the 2015 consensus paper provided general guidelines for clinical applications of ASL MRI, there was a lack of guidance on disease-specific parameters. Since that time, the clinical availability and clinical demand for ASL MRI has increased. This position paper provides guidance on using ASL in specific clinical scenarios, including acute ischemic stroke and steno-occlusive disease, arteriovenous malformations and fistulas, brain tumors, neurodegenerative disease, seizures/epilepsy, and pediatric neuroradiology applications, focusing on disease-specific considerations for sequence optimization and interpretation. We present several neuroradiological applications in which ASL provides unique information essential for making the diagnosis. This guidance is intended for anyone interested in using ASL in a routine clinical setting (i.e., on a single-subject basis rather than in cohort studies) building on the previous ASL consensus review.

Reproducibility of 3 T APT-CEST in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Brain Glioma.

BACKGROUND: Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging is a chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) technique offering potential clinical applications such as diagnosis, characterization, and treatment planning and monitoring in glioma patients. While APT-CEST has demonstrated high potential, reproducibility remains underexplored. PURPOSE: To investigate whether cerebral APT-CEST with clinically feasible scan time is reproducible in healthy tissue and glioma for clinical use at 3 T. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, longitudinal. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one healthy volunteers (11 females; mean age ± SD: 39 ± 11 years) and 6 glioma patients (3 females; 50 ± 17 years: 4 glioblastomas, 1 oligodendroglioma, 1 radiologically suspected low-grade glioma). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T, Turbo Spin Echo - ampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution - chemical exchange saturation transfer (TSE SPACE-CEST). ASSESSMENT: APT-CEST measurement reproducibility was assessed within-session (glioma patients, scan session 1; healthy volunteers scan sessions 1, 2, and 3), between-sessions (healthy volunteers scan sessions 1 and 2), and between-days (healthy volunteers, scan sessions 1 and 3). The mean APTCEST values and standard deviation of the within-subject difference (SDdiff ) were calculated in whole tumor enclosed by regions of interest (ROIs) in patients, and eight ROIs in healthy volunteers-whole-brain, cortical gray matter, putamen, thalami, orbitofrontal gyri, occipital lobes, central brain-and compared. STATISTICAL TESTS: Brown-Forsythe tests and variance component analysis (VCA) were used to assess the reproducibility of ROIs for the three time intervals. Significance was set at P < 0.003 after Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Intratumoral mean APTCEST was significantly higher than APTCEST in healthy-appearing tissue in patients (0.5 ± 0.46%). The average within-session, between-sessions, and between-days SDdiff of healthy control brains was 0.2% and did not differ significantly with each other (0.76 > P > 0.22). The within-session SDdiff of whole-brain was 0.2% in both healthy volunteers and patients, and 0.21% in the segmented tumor. VCA showed that within-session factors were the most important (60%) for scanning variance. DATA CONCLUSION: Cerebral APT-CEST imaging may show good scan-rescan reproducibility in healthy tissue and tumors with clinically feasible scan times at 3 T. Short-term measurement effects may be the dominant components for reproducibility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Synthetic MRI with Magnetic Resonance Spin TomogrAphy in Time-Domain (MR-STAT): Results from a Prospective Cross-Sectional Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic Resonance Spin TomogrAphy in Time-domain (MR-STAT) can reconstruct whole-brain multi-parametric quantitative maps (eg, T1 , T2 ) from a 5-minute MR acquisition. These quantitative maps can be leveraged for synthetization of clinical image contrasts. PURPOSE: The objective was to assess image quality and overall diagnostic accuracy of synthetic MR-STAT contrasts compared to conventional contrast-weighted images. STUDY TYPE: Prospective cross-sectional clinical trial. POPULATION: Fifty participants with a median age of 45 years (range: 21-79 years) consisting of 10 healthy participants and 40 patients with neurological diseases (brain tumor, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis or stroke). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T/Conventional contrast-weighted imaging (T1 /T2 weighted, proton density [PD] weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]) and a MR-STAT acquisition (2D Cartesian spoiled gradient echo with varying flip angle preceded by a non-selective inversion pulse). ASSESSMENT: Quantitative T1 , T2 , and PD maps were computed from the MR-STAT acquisition, from which synthetic contrasts were generated. Three neuroradiologists blinded for image type and disease randomly and independently evaluated synthetic and conventional datasets for image quality and diagnostic accuracy, which was assessed by comparison with the clinically confirmed diagnosis. STATISTICAL TESTS: Image quality and consequent acceptability for diagnostic use was assessed with a McNemar's test (one-sided α = 0.025). Wilcoxon signed rank test with a one-sided α = 0.025 and a margin of Δ = 0.5 on the 5-level Likert scale was used to assess non-inferiority. RESULTS: All data sets were similar in acceptability for diagnostic use (≥3 Likert-scale) between techniques (T1 w:P = 0.105, PDw:P = 1.000, FLAIR:P = 0.564). However, only the synthetic MR-STAT T2 weighted images were significantly non-inferior to their conventional counterpart; all other synthetic datasets were inferior (T1 w:P = 0.260, PDw:P = 1.000, FLAIR:P = 1.000). Moreover, true positive/negative rates were similar between techniques (conventional: 88%, MR-STAT: 84%). DATA CONCLUSION: MR-STAT is a quantitative technique that may provide radiologists with clinically useful synthetic contrast images within substantially reduced scan time. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.

High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 1: Perfusion and Diffusion Techniques.

Objective: Summarize evidence for use of advanced MRI techniques as monitoring biomarkers in the clinic, and highlight the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Methods: Experts in advanced MRI techniques applied to high-grade glioma treatment response assessment convened through a European framework. Current evidence regarding the potential for monitoring biomarkers in adult high-grade glioma is reviewed, and individual modalities of perfusion, permeability, and microstructure imaging are discussed (in Part 1 of two). In Part 2, we discuss modalities related to metabolism and/or chemical composition, appraise the clinic readiness of the individual modalities, and consider post-processing methodologies involving the combination of MRI approaches (multiparametric imaging) or machine learning (radiomics). Results: High-grade glioma vasculature exhibits increased perfusion, blood volume, and permeability compared with normal brain tissue. Measures of cerebral blood volume derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI have consistently provided information about brain tumor growth and response to treatment; it is the most clinically validated advanced technique. Clinical studies have proven the potential of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for distinguishing post-treatment related effects from recurrence, but the optimal acquisition protocol, mode of analysis, parameter of highest diagnostic value, and optimal cut-off points remain to be established. Arterial spin labeling techniques do not require the injection of a contrast agent, and repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow can be performed. The absence of potential gadolinium deposition effects allows widespread use in pediatric patients and those with impaired renal function. More data are necessary to establish clinical validity as monitoring biomarkers. Diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient analysis, diffusion tensor or kurtosis imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, and other microstructural modeling approaches also allow treatment response assessment; more robust data are required to validate these alone or when applied to post-processing methodologies. Conclusion: Considerable progress has been made in the development of these monitoring biomarkers. Many techniques are in their infancy, whereas others have generated a larger body of evidence for clinical application.

A systematic review on the use of quantitative imaging to detect cancer therapy adverse effects in normal-appearing brain tissue.

Cancer therapy for both central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS tumors has been previously associated with transient and long-term cognitive deterioration, commonly referred to as 'chemo fog'. This therapy-related damage to otherwise normal-appearing brain tissue is reported using post-mortem neuropathological analysis. Although the literature on monitoring therapy effects on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well established, such macroscopic structural changes appear relatively late and irreversible. Early quantitative MRI biomarkers of therapy-induced damage would potentially permit taking these treatment side effects into account, paving the way towards a more personalized treatment planning.This systematic review (PROSPERO number 224196) provides an overview of quantitative tomographic imaging methods, potentially identifying the adverse side effects of cancer therapy in normal-appearing brain tissue. Seventy studies were obtained from the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. Studies reporting changes in normal-appearing brain tissue using MRI, PET, or SPECT quantitative biomarkers, related to radio-, chemo-, immuno-, or hormone therapy for any kind of solid, cystic, or liquid tumor were included. The main findings of the reviewed studies were summarized, providing also the risk of bias of each study assessed using a modified QUADAS-2 tool. For each imaging method, this review provides the methodological background, and the benefits and shortcomings of each method from the imaging perspective. Finally, a set of recommendations is proposed to support future research.

DCE-MRI in Glioma, Infiltration Zone and Healthy Brain to Assess Angiogenesis: A Biopsy Study.

PURPOSE: To explore the focal predictability of vascular growth factor expression and neovascularization using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in glioma. METHODS: 120 brain biopsies were taken in vital tumor, infiltration zone and normal brain tissue of 30 glioma patients: 17 IDH(isocitrate dehydrogenase)-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM), 1 IDH-wildtype astrocytoma °III (together prognostic group 1), 3 IDH-mutated GBM (group 2), 3 anaplastic astrocytomas IDH-mutated (group 3), 4 anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and 2 low-grade oligodendrogliomas (together prognostic group 4). A mixed linear model evaluated the predictabilities of microvessel density (MVD), vascular area ratio (VAR), mean vessel size (MVS), vascular endothelial growth factor and receptors (VEGF-A, VEGFR­2) and vascular endothelial-protein tyrosine phosphatase (VE-PTP) expression from Tofts model kinetic and model-free curve parameters. RESULTS: All kinetic parameters were associated with VEGF­A (all p < 0.001) expression. Ktrans, kep and ve were associated with VAR (p = 0.006, 0.004 and 0.01, respectively) and MVS (p = 0.0001, 0.02 and 0.003, respectively) but not MVD (p = 0.84, 0.74 and 0.73, respectively). Prognostic groups differed in Ktrans (p = 0.007) and ve (p = 0.004) values measured in the infiltration zone. Despite significant differences of VAR, MVS, VEGF­A, VEGFR­2, and VE-PTP in vital tumor tissue and the infiltration zone (p = 0.0001 for all), there was no significant difference between kinetic parameters measured in these zones. CONCLUSION: The DCE-MRI kinetic parameters show correlations with microvascular parameters in vital tissue and also reveal blood-brain barrier abnormalities in the infiltration zones adequate to differentiate glioma prognostic groups.

From research to clinical practice: a European neuroradiological survey on quantitative advanced MRI implementation.

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative MRI (qMRI) methods provide versatile neuroradiological applications and are a hot topic in research. The degree of their clinical implementation is however barely known. This survey was created to illuminate which and how qMRI techniques are currently applied across Europe. METHODS: In total, 4753 neuroradiologists from 27 countries received an online questionnaire. Demographic and professional data, experience with qMRI techniques in the brain and head and neck, usage, reasons for/against application, and knowledge of the QIBA and EIBALL initiatives were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-two responders in 23 countries used the following techniques clinically (mean values in %): DWI (82.0%, n = 223), DSC (67.3%, n = 183), MRS (64.3%, n = 175), DCE (43.4%, n = 118), BOLD-fMRI (42.6%, n = 116), ASL (37.5%, n = 102), fat quantification (25.0%, n = 68), T2 mapping (16.9%, n = 46), T1 mapping (15.1%, n = 41), PET-MRI (11.8%, n = 32), IVIM (5.5%, n = 15), APT-CEST (4.8%, n = 13), and DKI (3.3%, n = 9). The most frequent usage indications for any qMRI technique were tissue differentiation (82.4%, n = 224) and oncological monitoring (72.8%, n = 198). Usage differed between countries, e.g. ASL: Germany (n = 13/63; 20.6%) vs. France (n = 31/40; 77.5%). Neuroradiologists endorsed the use of qMRI because of an improved diagnostic accuracy (89.3%, n = 243), but 50.0% (n = 136) are in need of better technology, 34.9% (n = 95) wish for more communication, and 31.3% need help with result interpretation/generation (n = 85). QIBA and EIBALL were not well known (12.5%, n = 34, and 11.0%, n = 30). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical implementation of qMRI methods is highly variable. Beyond the aspect of readiness for clinical use, better availability of support and a wider dissemination of guidelines could catalyse a broader implementation. KEY POINTS: • Neuroradiologists endorse the use of qMRI techniques as they subjectively improve diagnostic accuracy. • Clinical implementation is highly variable between countries, techniques, and indications. • The use of advanced imaging could be promoted through an increase in technical support and training of both doctors and technicians.

High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 2: Spectroscopy, Chemical Exchange Saturation, Multiparametric Imaging, and Radiomics.

Objective: To summarize evidence for use of advanced MRI techniques as monitoring biomarkers in the clinic, and to highlight the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Methods: The current evidence regarding the potential for monitoring biomarkers was reviewed and individual modalities of metabolism and/or chemical composition imaging discussed. Perfusion, permeability, and microstructure imaging were similarly analyzed in Part 1 of this two-part review article and are valuable reading as background to this article. We appraise the clinic readiness of all the individual modalities and consider methodologies involving machine learning (radiomics) and the combination of MRI approaches (multiparametric imaging). Results: The biochemical composition of high-grade gliomas is markedly different from healthy brain tissue. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy allows the simultaneous acquisition of an array of metabolic alterations, with choline-based ratios appearing to be consistently discriminatory in treatment response assessment, although challenges remain despite this being a mature technique. Promising directions relate to ultra-high field strengths, 2-hydroxyglutarate analysis, and the use of non-proton nuclei. Labile protons on endogenous proteins can be selectively targeted with chemical exchange saturation transfer to give high resolution images. The body of evidence for clinical application of amide proton transfer imaging has been building for a decade, but more evidence is required to confirm chemical exchange saturation transfer use as a monitoring biomarker. Multiparametric methodologies, including the incorporation of nuclear medicine techniques, combine probes measuring different tumor properties. Although potentially synergistic, the limitations of each individual modality also can be compounded, particularly in the absence of standardization. Machine learning requires large datasets with high-quality annotation; there is currently low-level evidence for monitoring biomarker clinical application. Conclusion: Advanced MRI techniques show huge promise in treatment response assessment. The clinical readiness analysis highlights that most monitoring biomarkers require standardized international consensus guidelines, with more facilitation regarding technique implementation and reporting in the clinic.

GliMR: Cross-Border Collaborations to Promote Advanced MRI Biomarkers for Glioma.

Purpose: There is an annual incidence of 50,000 glioma cases in Europe. The optimal treatment strategy is highly personalised, depending on tumour type, grade, spatial localization, and the degree of tissue infiltration. In research settings, advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown great promise as a tool to inform personalised treatment decisions. However, the use of advanced MRI in clinical practice remains scarce due to the downstream effects of siloed glioma imaging research with limited representation of MRI specialists in established consortia; and the associated lack of available tools and expertise in clinical settings. These shortcomings delay the translation of scientific breakthroughs into novel treatment strategy. As a response we have developed the network "Glioma MR Imaging 2.0" (GliMR) which we present in this article. Methods: GliMR aims to build a pan-European and multidisciplinary network of experts and accelerate the use of advanced MRI in glioma beyond the current "state-of-the-art" in glioma imaging. The Action Glioma MR Imaging 2.0 (GliMR) was granted funding by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) in June 2019. Results: GliMR's first grant period ran from September 2019 to April 2020, during which several meetings were held and projects were initiated, such as reviewing the current knowledge on advanced MRI; developing a General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliant consent form; and setting up the website. Conclusion: The Action overcomes the pre-existing limitations of glioma research and is funded until September 2023. New members will be accepted during its entire duration.

Multiple system atrophy mimicry in MRI: Watch out for paraneoplastic rhombencephalitis.

The hot cross bun (HCB) sign describes cruciform-shaped T2-weighted hyperintensities of pontocerebellar fibers within the pons and is a typical, but not specific imaging hallmark of the cerebellar variant of multiple system atrophy (MSA-C). We report a case of a 51-year-old woman who was first diagnosed with MSA-C based on progressive cerebellar ataxia, the HCB sign and T2-weighted hyperintensities in middle cerebellar peduncles on MRI. However, further diagnostic work-up revealed positive anti-amphiphysin antibodies in blood and cerebrospinal fluid and subsequently breast cancer. This report of a paraneoplastic rhombencephalitis which initially mimicked MSA-C imaging features stresses the importance of considering immune-mediated rhombencephalitis as differential diagnosis in cases of progressive cerebellar ataxia and the HCB sign on T2-weighted MRI, especially in the absence of pontocerebellar atrophy.

Surgery for temporal glioblastoma: lobectomy outranks oncosurgical-based gross-total resection.

OBJECTIVE: Supra-total glioblastoma resection has gained growing attention with regard to superior long-term disease control. However, aggressive onco-surgical approaches-geared beyond conventional gross total resections (GTR)-are limited by the impairment of adjacent eloquent areas at risk that may entail severe postoperative functional morbidity. Against this backdrop we analyzed our institutional database with regard to potential survival benefits of anterior temporal lobectomy as a paradigm for supra-total resection in patients with precisely temporal-located, non-eloquent glioblastoma. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, 38 patients with isolated temporal glioblastoma underwent GTR or temporal lobectomy at the authors' institution. Both groups of differing resection modalities were compared with regard to postoperative Karnofsky performance score (KPS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Patients with temporal lobectomy exhibited significantly superior median KPS at the 12 months follow-up compared to the GTR group (median KPS of 80 vs. 60, p = 0.04). Temporal lobectomy was associated with significantly prolonged PFS (p = 0.005) and OS (p = 0.002) coming up to 15 months (95% CI 9.7-22.1) and 23 months (95% CI 14.8-34.5) compared to 7 months (95% CI 3.3-8.3) and 11 months (95% CI 9.2-17.9) for the GTR group. Multivariate analysis revealed temporal lobectomy as the only predictor for both superior PFS (p = 0.037, OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.1-47.4) and OS (p = 0.04, OR 7.8, 95% CI 1.1-55.2). CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly suggest temporal lobectomy as an aggressive supra-total resection policy to constitute the surgical modality of choice for isolated temporal-located glioblastoma.

PDGRFB mutation-associated myofibromatosis: Response to targeted therapy with imatinib.

Heterozygous activating mutations in platelet-derived growth factor receptor B (PDGFRB) have been recently identified as a cause of autosomal-dominant infantile myofibromatosis. We describe a 36-year-old man with PDGFRB c.1681C>T (p.R561C) mutation. Upon progressive disease, the patient received treatment with imatinib and showed a remarkable response with remission of multiple lesions after 12 months. This is the first report of an adult patient with PDGFRB c.1681C>T mutation treated with imatinib.

Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for more effective therapies for glioblastoma. Data from a previous unrandomised phase 2 trial suggested that lomustine-temozolomide plus radiotherapy might be superior to temozolomide chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylation of the MGMT promoter. In the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial, we aimed to further investigate the effect of lomustine-temozolomide therapy in the setting of a randomised phase 3 trial. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients from 17 German university hospitals who were aged 18-70 years, with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter, and a Karnofsky Performance Score of 70% and higher. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a predefined SAS-generated randomisation list to standard temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (75 mg/m2 per day concomitant to radiotherapy [59-60 Gy] followed by six courses of temozolomide 150-200 mg/m2 per day on the first 5 days of the 4-week course) or to up to six courses of lomustine (100 mg/m2 on day 1) plus temozolomide (100-200 mg/m2 per day on days 2-6 of the 6-week course) in addition to radiotherapy (59-60 Gy). Because of the different schedules, patients and physicians were not masked to treatment groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the modified intention-to-treat population, comprising all randomly assigned patients who started their allocated chemotherapy. The prespecified test for overall survival differences was a log-rank test stratified for centre and recursive partitioning analysis class. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01149109. FINDINGS: Between June 17, 2011, and April 8, 2014, 141 patients were randomly assigned to the treatment groups; 129 patients (63 in the temozolomide and 66 in the lomustine-temozolomide group) constituted the modified intention-to-treat population. Median overall survival was improved from 31·4 months (95% CI 27·7-47·1) with temozolomide to 48·1 months (32·6 months-not assessable) with lomustine-temozolomide (hazard ratio [HR] 0·60, 95% CI 0·35-1·03; p=0·0492 for log-rank analysis). A significant overall survival difference between groups was also found in a secondary analysis of the intention-to-treat population (n=141, HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·35-1·03; p=0·0432 for log-rank analysis). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed in 32 (51%) of 63 patients in the temozolomide group and 39 (59%) of 66 patients in the lomustine-temozolomide group. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that lomustine-temozolomide chemotherapy might improve survival compared with temozolomide standard therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter. The findings should be interpreted with caution, owing to the small size of the trial. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Meningioma assessment: Kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI appear independent from microvascular anatomy and VEGF expression.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Kinetic parameters of T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) are considered to be influenced by microvessel environment. This study was performed to explore the extent of this association for meningiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI kinetic parameters (contrast agent transfer constants Ktrans and kep, volume fractions vp and ve) were determined in pre-operative 3T MRI of meningioma patients for later biopsy sites (19 patients; 15 WHO Io, no previous radiation, and 4 WHO IIIo pre-radiated recurrent tumors). Sixty-three navigated biopsies were consecutively retrieved. Biopsies were immunohistochemically investigated with endothelial marker CD34 and VEGF antibodies, stratified in a total of 4383 analysis units and computationally assessed for VEGF expression and vascular parameters (vessel density, vessel quantity, vascular fraction within tissue [vascular area ratio], vessel wall thickness). Derivability of kinetic parameters from VEGF expression or microvascularization was determined by mixed linear regression analysis. Tissue kinetic and microvascular parameters were tested for their capacity to identify the radiation status in a subanalysis. RESULTS: Kinetic parameters were neither significantly related to the corresponding microvascular parameters nor to tissue VEGF expression. There was no significant association between microvessel density and its presumed correlate vp (P=0.07). The subgroup analysis of high-grade radiated meningiomas showed a significantly reduced microvascular density (AUC 0.91; P<0.0001) and smaller total vascular fraction (AUC 0.73; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In meningioma, DCE-MRI kinetic parameters neither allow for a reliable prediction of tumor microvascularization, nor for a prediction of VEGF expression. Kinetic parameters seem to be determined from different independent factors.