The sex parameter in estimation of total blood volume for pediatric erythrocytapheresis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Estimation of the total blood volume (TBV) is fundamental to the control of automated red cell exchange (RCE). Error in the TBV estimate can produce outcomes that deviate from the prescribed targets, and may endanger the patient. Both the Spectra Optia and the COBE Spectra use the Nadler formulae to estimate TBV. There is a potential for large overestimates of TBV when the Nadler formula for males is applied to prepubertal boys. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study uses our large clinical experience with RCE to examine procedure outcomes when RCE in prepubertal boys is programed with the female parameter instead of male. We determined the differences between programmed and measured values for three outcomes: (a) Programmed End Hematocrit - Post spun HCT by Hemata Stat II, (b) Programmed End Hematocrit - Post CBC HCT, and (c) Predicted Post Hgb S+C - Measured Post Hgb S+C. We defined the experimental group as Male-Female, where the biological sex was male but programmed sex was female, and two control groups where programmed and biological sex were the same. RESULTS: Small but statistically significant differences were demonstrated between the mean programmed-to-observed deviations of these outcome measures in all but two group and subgroup comparisons; however, the absolute magnitudes of the observed differences were not clinically significant. The suggested weight cutoff to begin programming males as male is 35 kg. CONCLUSION: The study provides experiential validation that performing RCE in prepubertal boys using the female parameter is safe.

Report of the ASFA apheresis registry on muscle specific kinase antibody positive myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-muscle specific kinase antibody positive (MuSK Ab) myasthenia gravis (MG) patients are known to have different clinical course compared to anti-acetylcholine receptor Ab positive MG patients. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been reported to be effective; however, little is known of the response and of TPE procedural information. An ASFA Apheresis Registry was developed to analyze those data. METHODS: The study collected detailed de-identified patient data, TPE procedures, and treatment outcome/complications. Collected data was described in aggregate. RESULTS: A total of 15 MuSK Ab MG patients with exacerbation of MG symptoms, 13 females/2 males, median age 44, were investigated. Thirty TPE courses (median 5 procedures/course, total 145 procedures) were evaluated. All TPE procedures were performed with citrate anticoagulation, 1 - 1.25 plasma volume exchange in 100% fluid balance, and 90% of courses used only albumin as replacement. Calcium was added to albumin or given orally as needed. TPE was performed every other day in 55% of courses. Adverse events occurred in 3.4% of procedures. Ten patients (67%) experienced relapses within a median of 7 weeks. Objective symptoms were resolved in more than 75% of courses. Overall subjective improvement rates were 94.1%/93.3% after 3/4 TPE procedures, respectively. Thirty-one percent of patients responded poorly with minimal recovery. CONCLUSION: Overall subjective improvement was seen up to 94% of patients after one course of TPE. Some patients were poor-responders. Five TPE may be adequate for initial course with additional TPE as needed. Based upon this preliminary data, we will modify our future data collection. J. Clin. Apheresis 32:5-11, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Extracorporeal photopheresis practice patterns: An international survey by the ASFA ECP subcommittee.

BACKGROUND: Although many apheresis centers offer extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), little is known about current treatment practices. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to assess ECP practice internationally. RESULTS: Of 251 responses, 137 met criteria for analysis. Most respondents were from North America (80%). Nurses perform ECP at most centers (84%) and the majority of centers treat adults only (52%). Most centers treat fewer than 50 patients/year (83%) and perform fewer than 300 procedures/year (70%). Closed system devices (XTS and/or Cellex) are used to perform ECP at most centers (96%). The most common indications for ECP are acute/chronic skin graft versus host disease (89%) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (63%). The typical wait time for ECP treatment is less than 2 weeks (91%). Most centers do not routinely perform quality control assessment of the collected product (66%). There are device-specific differences in treatment parameters. For example, XTS users more frequently have a minimum weight limit (P = 0.003) and use laboratory parameters to determine eligibility for treatment (P = 0.03). Regardless of device used, the majority of centers assess the clinical status of the patient before each procedure. Greater than 50% of respondents would defer treatment for hemodynamic instability due to active sepsis or heart failure, positive blood culture in the past 24 h or current fever. CONCLUSION: This survey based study describes current ECP practices. Further research to provide evidence for optimal standardization of patient qualifications, procedure parameters and product quality assessment is recommended.

Venous access for hematopoietic progenitor cell collection: An international survey by the ASFA HPC donor subcommittee.

PURPOSE: Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell (HPC) collection by apheresis is performed in patients and donors to obtain HPCs for transplantation. Although studies have shown these procedures to be safe, successful collection cannot be performed without establishment of venous access. This project's objective was to ascertain the current practices of donor vein assessment and central venous catheter (CVC) usage. METHODS: The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) HPC subcommittee created an electronic survey about precollection vein assessment and line placement, care, and removal in autologous and allogeneic donors. It was distributed to >5,000 possible participants, with one response analyzed per institution. RESULTS: One hundred centers performing autologous and/or allogeneic procedures provided adequate responses for analysis. Donor vein assessment is most often performed by apheresis staff more than 1 week prior to collection. For patients with questionable access, the next step performed most often is secondary assessment for autologous procedures and CVC placement for allogeneic procedures. Most centers use interventional radiology to place CVCs in jugular veins on collection day with placement verification through electronic medical records. Verbal and written postinsertion CVC care instructions are routinely provided. The apheresis team frequently provides postinsertion CVC care for autologous patients. Heparin is used most often for CVC lock. When used, tissue plasminogen activator is usually instilled for up to 60 min. CONCLUSION: These data summarize the largest single survey of donor vein assessment at institutions performing HPC collections by apheresis. The variations identified in donor venous access practice warrant further investigation and consensus to establish best practices. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:529-534, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Use of laboratory tests to guide initiation of autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell collection by apheresis: results from the multicenter hematopoietic progenitor cell collection by Apheresis Laboratory Trigger Survey.

Limited literature describes the value of laboratory "triggers" to guide collection of peripheral blood (PB) hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) by apheresis [HPC(A)]. We used a web-based survey to determine which parameters are used to initiate autologous HPC(A) collection in adult and pediatric patients and to identify common practice patterns. Members of the AABB Cellular Therapy Product Collection and Clinical Practices Subsection and the American Society for Apheresis HPC Donor Subcommittee drafted and developed relevant survey questions. A web link to the survey was distributed by electronic newsletter or email. Responses from 67 programs that perform autologous HPC(A) collections, including academic medical centers (n = 46), blood centers (n = 10), community hospitals (n = 5), and a variety of other medical institutions (n = 6), were analyzed. Ninety-three percent (62/67) of programs used a laboratory parameter to initiate HPC(A) collection. In both adult (40/54, 74%) and pediatric (29/38, 76%) patients, the PB CD34+ cell count was the most common parameter used to initiate HPC(A) collection. The median PB CD34+ trigger value was 10/µL for both patient populations. Among centers routinely using the PB CD34+ cell count to initiate apheresis, 51% (22/43) first sent the test before the patient presented for collection. Although more than 90% of centers used a laboratory test to trigger apheresis in cytokine-mobilized (44/48) or chemomobilized patients (50/53), only 57% (30/53) used a laboratory trigger if the patient was mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus plerixafor. Forty-two percent (21/50) of programs that routinely measured the PB CD34+ count before collection and discontinued further HPC(A) collection based on product CD34+ cell yield also stopped if the PB CD34+ value before apheresis was considered too low to proceed. Most programs use the PB CD34+ cell count to trigger autologous HPC(A) collection. Some centers also use this parameter to stop further collections. Laboratory tests are used less frequently to initiate apheresis when patients are mobilized with plerixafor. These data reveal ongoing diversity in clinical practices and suggest that consensus guidelines on use of laboratory parameters may further optimize HPC(A) collection.

An international survey of pediatric apheresis practice.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric apheresis (PA) has distinct characteristics compared to adult apheresis, and requires specialized knowledge and experience to perform safely, particularly in low-weight patients. As evidence-based medicine advances the field of therapeutic apheresis, increased attention must be paid to pediatric patients with conditions for which apheresis is indicated. METHODS: An electronic survey of >5,000 potential participants throughout the world was conducted to ascertain the scope and the current state of practice. RESULTS: The survey elicited 159 responses from 12 countries; 107 of the responses provided sufficient information for analysis. Participants performed an average of 176 PA procedures/year (range: 1-2,000). The types of PA procedures were therapeutic plasma exchange (92% of centers), red cell exchange (86%), leukocyte depletion (87%) and peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell collection (72%). More than 65% of the centers had treated children older than 5 years with PA. Many centers had also performed PA on younger children; 40% have treated patients <12 months of age; 61% had treated patients 1-5 years old. 36% of centers reported that they would perform apheresis regardless of patient weight; 18% used a 5 kg threshold, 11% used 5-10 kg, and 17% used 10 kg as their weight threshold. CONCLUSION: This report is the largest single survey of centers performing PA. The results provide information about the scope and diversity of PA and identify areas where considerable variability in practice exists. Further exploration of these differences could establish best practices in PA through international research and collaboration.