Comparison of Health Care Providers Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol in the Management of Pain and Other Symptoms in Cancer Patients.

Background: Medical marijuana (MM) and cannabidiol (CBD) have received increasing attention to manage pain and other symptoms even with limited scientific evidence. Objectives: We examined the attitudes and beliefs of health care providers toward MM and CBD compared to standard treatments for cancer-associated pain and various symptoms. Design: Two sets of anonymous surveys (MM and CBD) containing similar items were completed by clinicians of four symptom-focused specialties. Results: A minority of respondents preferred recommending MM (9%) and CBD (13%), respectively, over opioids for cancer pain, while 11% and 22% felt that MM and CBD, respectively, would be useful to combine with opioids to treat cancer pain. Respondents did not favor MM or CBD over common treatment options for nonpain symptoms. Conclusion: MM and CBD were not preferred over current standard treatments for pain and other symptoms. Responses from the four specialties aligned with unique aspects of their clinical practice.

A systematic review and quality analysis of cancer pain guidelines.

Background and Aims: Cancer pain guidelines remain confined due to implementation barriers, preventing them from attaining a global perspective. The guidelines must be robust in development and inculcate high-quality content to achieve practical utility. Quality indicators related to safe opioid practice empower effective guideline implementation. Methods: The protocol was registered prospectively in PROSPERO (CRD42021244823). Guidelines published over the last decade providing insights into cancer pain management and incorporating safe opioid practice were evaluated. The review's primary outcome was to evaluate the quality of cancer pain guidelines. Appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument was used to assess a guideline's quality. The ADAPTE collaboration-guideline adaptation resource tool kit (ADAPTE) provided insights into its adaptation based on specific questions within the guideline. Results: Fourteen cancer pain guidelines met the eligibility criteria and were included for quality evaluation. Eight guidelines were evaluated with combined AGREE II and ADAPTE process, attaining >66.7% in the rigour of development domain score, summated scaled domain score, and specific ADAPTE tools to evaluate the quality of each guideline. The intra-class correlation coefficient was utilised for resolving inter-rater agreement. 'Safe opioid practice' within a guideline was assessed for quality content implementation. Conclusion: Combined AGREE II and ADAPTE identified four cancer pain guidelines, namely Ministry of Health Malaysia, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCEC-National Clinical Guideline, and World Health Organization, which were of the highest quality and incorporated safe opioid practice effectively.

Methylene blue for intractable pain from oral mucositis related to cancer treatment: a randomized phase 2 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis (OM) in patients receiving cancer therapy is thus far not well managed with standard approaches. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of methylene blue (MB) oral rinse for OM pain in patients receiving cancer therapy. METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind phase 2 clinical trial, patients were randomized to one of four arms: MB 0.025%+conventional therapy (CTx) (n = 15), MB 0.05%+CTx (n = 14), MB 0.1%+CTx (n = 15), or CTx alone (n = 16). Intervention groups received MB oral rinse every 6 h for 2 days with outcomes measured at days 1-2; safety was evaluated up to 30 days. The primary outcome measured change in the pain numeric rating scale (0-10) from baseline to day 2. Secondary outcome measured change in oral function burden scores from baseline to day 2, World Health Organization OM grades, morphine equivalent daily doses, and adverse events. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03469284. RESULTS: Sixty patients (mean age 43, range 22-62 years) completed the study. Compared with those who received CTx alone, those who received MB had a significant reduction of pain scores at day 2 of treatment (mean ± SD); 0.025%: 5.2 ± 2.9, 0.05%: 4.5 ± 2.9, 0.1%: 5.15 ± 2.6) and reduction of oral function burden scores (0.025%: 2.5 ± 1.55, 0.05%: 2.8 ± 1.7, 0.1%: 2.9 ± 1.60). No serious adverse events were noted, but eight patients reported burning sensation of the oral cavity with the first dose, and this caused one patient to discontinue therapy. CONCLUSIONS: MB oral rinse showed significant pain reduction and improved oral functioning with minimal adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03469284.

Management of Chronic Pain in Survivors of Adult Cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based guidance on the optimum management of chronic pain in adult cancer survivors. METHODS: An ASCO-convened expert panel conducted a systematic literature search of studies investigating chronic pain management in cancer survivors. Outcomes of interest included symptom relief, pain intensity, quality of life, functional outcomes, adverse events, misuse or diversion, and risk assessment or mitigation. RESULTS: A total of 63 studies met eligibility criteria and compose the evidentiary basis for the recommendations. Studies tended to be heterogeneous in terms of quality, size, and populations. Primary outcomes also varied across the studies, and in most cases, were not directly comparable because of different outcomes, measurements, and instruments used at different time points. Because of a paucity of high-quality evidence, many recommendations are based on expert consensus. RECOMMENDATIONS: Clinicians should screen for pain at each encounter. Recurrent disease, second malignancy, or late-onset treatment effects in any patient who reports new-onset pain should be evaluated, treated, and monitored. Clinicians should determine the need for other health professionals to provide comprehensive pain management care in patients with complex needs. Systemic nonopioid analgesics and adjuvant analgesics may be prescribed to relieve chronic pain and/or to improve function. Clinicians may prescribe a trial of opioids in carefully selected patients with cancer who do not respond to more conservative management and who continue to experience distress or functional impairment. Risks of adverse effects of opioids should be assessed. Clinicians should clearly understand terminology such as tolerance, dependence, abuse, and addiction as it relates to the use of opioids and should incorporate universal precautions to minimize abuse, addiction, and adverse consequences. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/chronic-pain-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.

The association of presurgery psychological symptoms with postsurgery pain among cancer patients receiving implantable devices for pain management.

PURPOSE: Psychological symptoms are a common part of the cancer pain experience, yet little is known about how these factors relate to implantable device outcomes in patients with cancer pain. The purpose of this study was to examine how psychological symptoms relate to implantable device outcomes in cancer pain management. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the medical records of 79 cancer patients, collecting information on psychological symptoms and pain, as assessed on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. Data were collected prior to and at three points following the implantation of either a spinal cord stimulator or an intrathecal pump. RESULTS: Pain was correlated with both anxiety, r = 0.39 (n = 74, p < 0.01), and depression, r = 0.38, (n = 75, p < 0.01), at the presurgery baseline. Results of linear mixed model (LMM) analysis indicated that neither baseline anxiety nor baseline depression main effects were significantly associated with pain at postimplant assessments, when adjusting for baseline pain, demographics, and clinical factors. However, the group-by-time interaction was significant for anxiety (beta = 0.223, p value = 0.037). The trajectory of pain scores over time differed by baseline anxiety scores, with pain scores increasing over time at a higher rate for those with a high baseline anxiety score, compared to those with low baseline anxiety scores. CONCLUSION: Presurgery psychological symptoms should be considered, along with other medical, psychosocial, and individual characteristics in multidisciplinary treatment planning. Multidisciplinary care which includes aspects of mood management or supportive psychotherapy would likely be beneficial to cancer patients presenting with high psychological symptoms.

Preliminary evaluation of an educational model for promoting positive team attitudes and functioning among pain medicine fellows.

OBJECTIVE: In response to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) new pain medicine fellowship requirement, which emphasizes multidisciplinary training strategies aimed at providing improved clinical care for pain patients, we developed a multidisciplinary team training education model for trainees in our institution's Fellowship Program in Pain Medicine. Although the biopsychosocial model guides the delivery of care by multidisciplinary pain teams, there is a gap on how to improve team attitudes and functioning within an already extensive pain medicine curriculum. The current study aimed to fill that gap by developing and incorporating an educational model that focuses on interpersonal relationships among team members and strategies for improving team performance over time. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTION, AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Here, we provide a brief overview of our institution's pain medicine fellowship training program highlighting how we have included a team training component into lectures, interdisciplinary case conferences, and journal club articles that focus on topics in the ACGME pain medicine curriculum. We present data from a team attitude and functioning assessment battery administered to 11 pain medicine fellows at the outset and end of their fellowship. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Mean assessment scores increased from the beginning of the fellowship to the end of the fellowship on interdisciplinary pain team knowledge, current team skills, and attitude toward health care teams. The current study demonstrated effective ways for assessing team attitudes and functioning and including this educational component into a 1-year pain medicine curriculum. Based on our results, we will continue to teach and model effective teamwork in an effort to enhance our trainees' attitudes toward working on an interdisciplinary pain team.