Microbiology of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections in Greece: A proposed clinical prediction score for the causative pathogen.

Although clinical definitions of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection (ABSSSI) are now well established, guidance of the prediction of likely pathogens based on evidence is missing. This was a large survey of the microbiology of ABSSSIs in Greece. During the period November 2014 to December 2016, all admissions for ABSSSI in 16 departments of internal medicine or surgery in Greece were screened to determine the likely bacterial aetiology. Samples were cultured on conventional media. Expression of the SA442, mecA/mecC and SCCmec-orfX junction genes was assessed. Following univariate and forward logistic regression analysis, clinical characteristics were used to develop scores to predict the likely pathogen with a target of 90% specificity. In total, 1027 patients were screened and 633 had positive microbiology. Monomicrobial infection by Gram-positive cocci occurred in 52.1% and by Gram-negative bacteria in 20.5%, and mixed infection by Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacteria in 27.3%. The most common isolated pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Resistance to methicillin was 57.3% (53.5-61.1%). Three predictive scores were developed: one for infection by methicillin-resistant S. aureus, incorporating recent hospitalisation, atrial fibrillation, residency in long-term care facility (LTCF) and stroke; one for mixed Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections, incorporating localisation of ABSSSI in lumbar area, fluoroquinolone intake in last 6 days, residency in LTCF and stroke; and another for Gram-negative infection, incorporating skin ulcer presentation, peptic ulcer and solid tumour malignancy. In conclusion, methicillin-resistant staphylococci are the main pathogens of ABSSSIs. The scores developed may help to predict the likely pathogen.

The level of endotoxemia in sepsis varies in relation to the underlying infection: Impact on final outcome.

Former studies of our group have shown that the innate and adaptive immune status may differ in relation with the causative infection. To this same end, it was investigated if kinetics of circulating lipopolysaccharide (LPS) leading to inflammatory response may differ. Blood was sampled from 189 patients with sepsis and 206 with severe sepsis/shock starting 24h from advent of sepsis and repeating on day 3. Serum LPS was measured by Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay. From 59 patients, circulating monocytes were isolated and incubated in the absence/presence of LPS. Concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) were measured in supernatants by an enzyme immunoassay. In either category of severity, circulating LPS was greater among sufferers from primary Gram-negative bacteremia (BSI) and from community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) than sufferers from other underlying infections. LPS were greater among patients with BSI compared to patients with secondary Gram-negative bacteremia and patients without bacteremia. Greater decrease of circulating LPS over 48h was recorded for survivors compared to non-survivors only within sufferers from BSI and CAP. Significant endotoxemia was considered for patients with serum LPS within the upper quartile of distribution; their monocytes were less potent for release of TNFα. It is concluded that endotoxemia in sepsis varies greatly with the underlying infection; this is related with immunoparalysis of monocytes with implications on final outcome.