Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
2.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 42(5): 857-66, x, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19909864

RESUMEN

Synechiae and ostial stenosis are common and troublesome complications following endoscopic sinus surgery. Many investigators have advocated the use of stents to minimize the risk of postoperative stenosis while others have found their use to be of no benefit. This article reviews the advantages and disadvantages of various stents used in sinus surgery, and discusses such innovations as drug-releasing stents.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Stents , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Doxiciclina/administración & dosificación , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Endoscopía , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Mucosa Nasal/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/patología , Choque Séptico/etiología , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología
3.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 140(6): 834-40, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19467399

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Less invasive instruments such as balloon catheters are available for sino-ostial dilation during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Currently, balloon catheter position is confirmed under fluoroscopic visualization. Radiation exposure has been an area of concern. This study was initiated to determine surgeon radiation exposure when fluoroscopy is used during ESS with balloon catheters. STUDY DESIGN: A multi-center, prospective evaluation of surgeon radiation exposure was conducted. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: For three months, 14 sinus surgeons wore dosimeters to record radiation exposure while using C-arm fluoroscopy during balloon catheter-aided sinus surgery. One dosimeter was placed at collar level (chest), outside the lead apron and another dosimeter was placed on a finger (extremity). These dosimeters were sent for readings. Deep, eye, and shallow radiation dose for each surgeon was calculated. RESULTS: Thirteen chest badges recorded annualized averages of 191.08, 193.54, and 187.69 mrems for deep, eye, and shallow exposure respectively. Eleven ring badges recorded 584.00 mrems. CONCLUSIONS: A recent publication reported low levels of surgeon radiation exposure during ESS with balloon catheters. This study validates radiation exposure among experienced surgeons is well below the annual occupational radiation exposure limit of 50,000 mrem. With vigilant technique and education, fluoroscopy reliance can be minimized.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo , Fluoroscopía/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/terapia , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosimetría Termoluminiscente
4.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 17(3): 204-8, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19346944

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review is timely and relevant because rhinosinusitis is a disease process that is heterogeneous in its clinical and pathologic manifestations. Therefore, no one causative factor has been identified that fully accounts for all rhinosinusitis. The purpose of this review is to provide a succinct update of rhinosinusitis classification, pathophysiology, and management given the new movement toward evidence-based guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: The term rhinosinusitis reflects the concurrent inflammatory and infectious processes that affect the nasal passages and the contiguous paranasal sinuses. The most recent classification scheme is intended primarily to guide clinical research and divides rhinosinusitis into four categories: acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, chronic sinusitis with nasal polyposis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. The goals of treatment include reduction of mucosal edema, reestablishment of sinus ventilation, and eradication of infecting pathogens. Multiple therapies are available for the management of chronic rhinosinusitis, including antibiotics, hypertonic and isotonic saline irrigations or sprays, topical and systemic glucocorticords, antileukotriene agents, and endoscopic sinus surgery. SUMMARY: Rhinosinusitis is a common medical problem that interferes with patient quality of life and loss of work productivity. Because of the heterogeneity that underlies its pathology, no one treatment regimen exists for the management of rhinosinusitis.


Asunto(s)
Rinitis/diagnóstico , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Infecciones Bacterianas/clasificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/fisiopatología , Infecciones Bacterianas/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Eosinofilia/clasificación , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Eosinofilia/fisiopatología , Eosinofilia/terapia , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Micosis/clasificación , Micosis/diagnóstico , Micosis/fisiopatología , Micosis/terapia , Mucosa Nasal/fisiopatología , Pólipos Nasales/clasificación , Pólipos Nasales/diagnóstico , Pólipos Nasales/fisiopatología , Pólipos Nasales/terapia , Recurrencia , Rinitis/clasificación , Rinitis/fisiopatología , Rinitis/terapia , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/clasificación , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/fisiopatología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/terapia , Sinusitis/clasificación , Sinusitis/fisiopatología , Sinusitis/terapia , Virosis/clasificación , Virosis/diagnóstico , Virosis/fisiopatología , Virosis/terapia
5.
Laryngoscope ; 119(6): 1229-32, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19365848

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The frontal recess is the drainage pathway that connects the frontal sinus to the anterior ethmoid sinus. Mechanical obstruction is the primary cause of chronic frontal sinusitis with or without a secondary inflammatory process. Eosinophilic inflammation is one of the underlying causes for chronic rhinosinusitis. OBJECTIVES/HYPHOTHESIS: To evaluate long-term frontal sinus patency after endoscopic frontal sinusotomy in chronic rhinosinusitis patients and to assess the effect of eosinophilic inflammation on frontal sinus patency. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. Symptom assessment and archived endoscopic photographs were prospectively collected on patients who underwent frontal sinusotomy between 7-1-1999 and 12-31-2000. Subjective symptom improvements were evaluated using the SNOT-20 = 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test. Objective findings of endoscopic frontal sinus patency were documented by archived digital photography. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients with 294 frontal sinuses who underwent endoscopic frontal sinus surgery in the 18 months had an average follow-up of 45.9 months. The patient population was divided into two groups: 58 patients had eosinophilic CRS (ECRS), and 103 patients had CRS without eosinophils (non-ECRS). The mean follow-up for patients with ECRS is 61.6 months and 37.0 months for non-ECRS patients. The non-ECRS patients had a documented endoscopic frontal sinus patency of 90%, and the ECRS patients had an endoscopic frontal sinus patency of 85%. The overall frontal ostium patency rate for all patients was 88.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term endoscopic confirmation of frontal ostium patency demonstrates that endoscopic frontal sinusotomy can yield high quality, durable results. There was no significant difference in patency results between ECRS and non-ECRS patients. Laryngoscope, 2009.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/cirugía , Endoscopía/métodos , Seno Frontal/cirugía , Sinusitis Frontal/cirugía , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/cirugía , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Crónica , Constricción Patológica/diagnóstico por imagen , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico por imagen , Eosinofilia/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Seno Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Sinusitis Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Pólipos Nasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Pólipos Nasales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 139(3 Suppl 3): S27-37, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18707992

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to assess the long-term effectiveness of balloon catheter sinusotomy. METHODS: Patients who had sinus ostia dilated with balloon catheters were prospectively evaluated 1 year after surgery with nasal endoscopy, a CT scan, and the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (202 sinuses) were examined. One hundred seventy-two of 202 sinus ostia (85%) were endoscopically patent, 1 percent (2/202) were nonpatent, and ostial patency could not be determined by endoscopy in 28 of 202 (14%). In these "indeterminate" sinuses, the CT scans were normal in 13, implying functional patency in 91.6 percent of sinuses (185/202). Sinus CT scan scores were 1.95 at 1 year versus 8.89 at baseline (P < 0.001), and 1-year SNOT-20 scores (0.91) were significantly improved from baseline (2.14, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Balloon catheter sinusotomy results were durable over the study period, showing long-term effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/instrumentación , Endoscopios , Endoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/instrumentación , Sinusitis/cirugía , Diseño de Equipo , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 139(3 Suppl 3): S38-46, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18707993

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Assess two-year postoperative clinical outcomes for patients receiving balloon catheter sinusotomy. METHODS: Patients who had sinus ostia dilated with balloon catheters were prospectively evaluated two years after surgery by Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) and computed tomographic (CT) scan. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (195 ballooned sinuses) were followed for two years after surgery, including 34 "balloon-only" patients and 31 "hybrid" patients. SNOT-20 symptom scores were significantly improved from baseline (0.87 vs 2.17 baseline, P < 0.001) and stable compared to six months and one year; this was the case for both balloon-only (1.09 vs 2.09, P < 0.001) and hybrid (0.64 vs 2.26, P < 0.001) patients. Lund-MacKay CT scores were significantly improved from baseline (2.69 vs 9.66, P < 0.001) and stable compared to one year, confirmed for both balloon-only (1.75 vs 5.67, P < 0.015) and hybrid (3.25 vs 12.05, P < 0.001) subsets of patients. A total of 85% of patients reported improvement of their sinus symptoms, with 15% same and 0% worsened. Revision treatment was required in seven of 195 sinuses (3.6%) in six of 65 patients (9.2%). CONCLUSION: Patients who receive balloon catheter sinusotomy in endoscopic sinus surgery have significant improvement in symptoms two years after surgery. Radiographic evidence also confirms resolution of disease after two years. This demonstrates durability of clinical results previously reported at 24 weeks and one year after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/instrumentación , Endoscopios , Endoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/instrumentación , Sinusitis/cirugía , Diseño de Equipo , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 138(2): 187-91, 2008 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18241714

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the extent of radiation exposure to the patient and the surgeon in balloon catheter dilation. METHODS: Dosimeters were used to record radiation exposure to both patients and surgeons. The mean radiation dose per sinus treated and per patient treated was calculated for each dosimeter location. RESULTS: The mean patient dose (108 sinuses treated in 34 patients), was 0.32 mSv per sinus and 1.02 mSv per patient over the eye and 1.33 mSv per sinus and 4.22 mSv per patient over the temple. The average total fluoroscopy time was 3.6 minutes per patient. The average number of sinuses treated was 3.2. The mean surgeon dose at the chest (254 sinuses in 89 patients) was 0.025 mSv per sinus and 0.072 mSv per patient. The mean surgeon dose at the hand (182 sinuses in 68 patients) was 0.009 mSv per sinus and 0.023 mSv per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The use of fluoroscopy in balloon catheter dilation exposes both the patient and surgeon to very low doses of radiation.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/métodos , Fluoroscopía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/terapia , Dosis de Radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Seno Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Seno Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Protección Radiológica , Factores de Riesgo , Seno Esfenoidal/diagnóstico por imagen
10.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 137(1): 10-20, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17599558

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of balloon catheter devices to dilate obstructed sinus ostia/perform sinusotomy. METHODS: Through a prospective, multicenter evaluation, safety was assessed by rate of adverse events, patency was determined by endoscopic examination, and sinus symptoms were determined by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT 20). RESULTS: At the conclusion of the 24-week analysis, endoscopy determined that the sinusotomy was patent in 80.5% (247 of 307) sinuses and nonpatent in 1.6% (5 of 307), and could not determine ostial patency status in 17.9% (55 of 307). Of the ostia visualized on endoscopy, 98% were patent (247 of 252), while 2% (5 of 252) were considered nonpatent. SNOT 20 scores showed consistent symptomatic improvement over baseline. Revision treatment was required in 3 sinuses (3 of 307 sinuses, 0.98%) in 3 patients (3 of 109 patients, 2.75%). CONCLUSION: Balloon catheter technology appears safe and effective in relieving ostial obstruction. Patients were pleased and indicated that they experienced symptomatic improvement.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo , Sinusitis/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Estudios de Cohortes , Endoscopía , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Sinusitis Frontal/cirugía , Sinusitis Frontal/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Sinusitis Maxilar/cirugía , Sinusitis Maxilar/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Retratamiento , Seguridad , Sinusitis/cirugía , Sinusitis del Esfenoides/cirugía , Sinusitis del Esfenoides/terapia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 98(1): 32-5, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17225717

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maximal medical therapy is poorly defined in chronic sinusitis treatment. OBJECTIVE: To objectively evaluate the radiographic response of chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis after 3 and 6 weeks of oral antibiotics. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with confirmed chronic sinusitis without polyposis (disease apparent on initial computed tomography [CT] with appropriate symptom duration) were prescribed 6 weeks of antibiotics. When possible, culture-directed antibiotics were used; otherwise clindamycin was used empirically. A CT was performed after 3 and 6 weeks of therapy. CTs were then graded by the Lund-Mackay system. Demographic data were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients, 16 underwent all 3 CT scans and completed all 6 weeks of antibiotics. Three patients completed only 3 weeks of antibiotics, and 16 did not undergo the interval 3-week CT. Six patients (38%) had statistically significant improvement in their CT scans between weeks 3 and 6. In this subset of patients who improved, 37% of their overall radiographic improvement occurred in the 3- to 6-week treatment interval. No prognostic variables predicted which patients would radiographically improve after 3 weeks of antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Some patients achieve radiographic improvement and disease resolution after the completion of a 3-week course of antibiotics. Therefore, maximal medical therapy for chronic sinusitis may consist of longer than 3 weeks of therapy to ensure maximal benefit.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Rinitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pólipos Nasales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
13.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 39(3): 437-61, viii, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16757224

RESUMEN

This article the most useful procedures into into a comprehensive integrated approach to frontal sinus surgery. It begins with the least invasive and progresses to the most invasive procedure in a step-by-step fashion, which can be applied as needed. The selection of procedure is governed the patient's disease anatomy,and the surgeons skill. The least invasive procedure that can be used should be attempted first, and then, if more is needed, other procedures can be added, either at the same sitting or in subsequent revisions.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/métodos , Seno Frontal/anatomía & histología , Seno Frontal/cirugía , Sinusitis Frontal/cirugía , Seno Frontal/fisiología , Humanos , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 134(1): 18-24, 2006 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16399174

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Management of frontal sinus tumors has traditionally been through open approaches with obliteration of the sinus. Recently, increased comfort with endoscopic techniques has made endoscopic resection an alternative to more morbid approaches. However, many skilled endoscopists still champion obliteration of the frontal sinus after the open treatment of large osteomas. METHODS: A retrospective review of the senior author's experience with frontal sinus osteomas was performed. RESULTS: Twelve frontal sinus osteomas were treated surgically without obliteration. All patients with greater than 2 cm vertical extension of their tumor into the frontal sinus required an open approach (n = 4), whereas the remainder (n = 8) were treated endoscopically. Frontal ostia were stented if greater that 40% of the mucosa of the frontal recess was denuded. Eleven of 12 patients had patent, functional frontal sinuses. CONCLUSION: Successful resection of frontal sinus osteomas can be performed with preservation of the natural drainage of the frontal sinus in almost all cases. EBM RATING: C-4.


Asunto(s)
Seno Frontal/cirugía , Osteoma/patología , Osteoma/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/patología , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Adulto , Endoscopía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am ; 38(3): 535-49, 2005 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15907902

RESUMEN

There are circumstances in which image guidance is clearly useful to facilitate a more complete operation. By confirming the identity of known anatomic structures, a knowledgeable surgeon's understanding of the disease process can improve and only the necessary structures removed. CT guidance is a clear aid to understanding altered anatomy when combined with a thorough analysis of the preoperative CT scan and office nasal endoscopy. It is the combination of this preoperative planning with image guidance that allows a skilled surgeon to operate with confidence. This discussion intentionally did not refer to image guidance as the standard of care, because although this technology is clearly useful, valuable, and helpful in confirming anatomy and performing many procedures, it is not always necessary in achieving a complete operation. Therefore, it should not be considered the standard of care.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Técnicas Estereotáxicas , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Endoscopía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Sinusitis/cirugía , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/legislación & jurisprudencia
16.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 131(3): 164-73, 2004 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15365531

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Describe frontal sinus pneumatization in patients with no history of frontal sinus disease. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All 1-mm axial sinus CT scans performed from 2001 through 2003 were eligible for review on a CBYON Suite workstation (CBYON, Mountain View, CA). Exclusion criteria included frontal sinusitis, sinonasal polyposis, age < 18 years, sinus malignancy, fibroosseous lesions, maxillofacial trauma, congenital anomaly, and sinus surgery. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of each structure was: agger nasi cell (89%), type 1 frontal cell (37%), type 2 frontal cell (19%), type 3 frontal cell (8%), type 4 frontal cell (0%), supraorbital ethmoid cell (62%), suprabullarcell (15%), frontal bullar cell (9%), interfrontal septal cell (14%), and recessus terminalis (22%). CONCLUSIONS: This study describes frontal pneumatization in patients without a history of conditions that influence frontal pneumatization. The results characterize normal frontal recess/sinus pneumatization patterns.


Asunto(s)
Seno Frontal/anatomía & histología , Seno Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagenología Tridimensional , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
17.
Am J Rhinol ; 18(2): 119-24, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15152878

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Traditional frontal sinus stents serve only as mechanical devices. It has been proposed that stents also may serve as drug-delivery systems for the topical application of drugs that minimize postoperative scarring. Paclitaxel (Taxol), which has recognized antiscarring effects, may be incorporated via a polymeric formulation into standard rubber stents. The impact of topically applied paclitaxel on the morphology of the nasal mucosa is unknown. METHODS: An adult sheep model was used for this study. A modified rubber T-tube stent (incorporating paclitaxel at varying dosages) was secured to each side of the septum in four animals (eight sides). An unmodified T-tube was placed on each side of one animal, a T-tube with the drug carrier (but no paclitaxel) was placed on each side of the second animal, and T-tubes with varying paclitaxel were placed on each side of the final two animals. After 4 weeks, animals were killed and the nasal mucosa was harvested. The nasal mucosa was sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. A pathologist then assessed the nasal mucosa for vascular congestion, glandular atrophy, chronic inflammation, mucosal metaplasia, and mucosal ulceration. RESULTS: No consistent histopathological differences were noted in the specimens. All specimens showed varying degrees of vascular congestion, glandular atrophy, chronic inflammation, and mucosal metaplasia; the paclitaxel-impregnated stents were not consistently associated with more severe mucosal injury. Finally, mucosal ulceration was noted to be very rare in all specimens. CONCLUSION: This preliminary report describes the impact of paclitaxel-impregnated stents on sheep nasal mucosa, which tolerated these stents very well. Because paclitaxel minimizes scarring reactions at very low concentrations, paclitaxel-impregnated stents may prove useful in clinical situations in which frontal sinus stenting is deemed necessary. Additional investigations with animal models, as well as clinical trials, may be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Mucosa Nasal/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Nasal/patología , Paclitaxel/farmacología , Stents , Animales , Biopsia con Aguja , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Proyectos Piloto , Distribución Aleatoria , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Oveja Doméstica
18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14515093

RESUMEN

Since allergic fungal sinusitis was initially described by Millar in 1981, many have tried to define and explain the disorder. It has been labeled as the sinonasal equivalent of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; however, allergic fungal sinusitis cannot be categorized so easily. According to the literature at this time, there are five major criteria and six associated characteristics or minor criteria of patients with allergic fungal sinusitis. In reality, patients may not develop all five major criteria or have any of the associated criteria for years. Allergic fungal sinusitis is not only difficult to diagnose, but it is one of the most complicated conditions rhinologists must manage. Endoscopic sinus surgery must be used in conjunction with long-term medical therapy, oral and nasal corticosteroids, immunotherapy, antifungal therapy, and antimicrobial agents to effectively control the problem. Allergic fungal sinusitis is most likely the endpoint in a spectrum of sinonasal disease, driven by the presence of fungus and eosinophils with their inflammatory mediators. The affected nasal mucosa no longer functions properly, and a cycle of chronic edema, stasis, and bacterial superinfection results. Therapy entails disrupting the inflammatory process to allow normal mucosal function to resume.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Micosis/diagnóstico , Micosis/terapia , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Sinusitis/terapia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/complicaciones , Micosis/complicaciones , Sinusitis/etiología
19.
Am J Rhinol ; 17(6): 347-50, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14750610

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fibrosarcomas of the paranasal sinuses and skull base are uncommon tumors. Traditionally, "open approach" surgery remains the mainstay for treatment of choice for these tumors. METHODS: A 49-year-old man underwent resection of a right anterior skull base fibrosarcoma using the endoscopic approach. RESULTS: Close follow-up using both endoscopic and imaging methods over a period of four years has revealed a well-healed skull base with no evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSION: Significant resistance exists at present for such a technique to deal with malignant diseases of the head and neck but results from advanced centers continue to prove that this may be a technique worth mastering and improving on.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía , Fibrosarcoma/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Trasplante Óseo , Fascia/trasplante , Fibrosarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA