Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 30(6): 1139-43, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17874163

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of elective bilateral femoral arterial punctures for uterine artery embolization (UAE) of symptomatic fibroids on fluoroscopy and procedural time, patient dose, and ease of procedure. We conducted a prospective study of UAE with either the intention to catheterize both uterine arteries using a single femoral puncture (n = 12) or elective bilateral arterial punctures from the outset (n = 12). The same two operators undertook each case. Main outcome measures were total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, dose-area product (DAP), and total skin dose. A simulation was then performed on an anthropomorphic phantom using the mean in vivo fluoroscopy parameters to estimate the ovarian dose. Bilateral UAE was achieved in all patients. None of the patients with initial unilateral arterial puncture required further contralateral arterial puncture. The mean fluoroscopy time in the group with elective bilateral punctures was 12.8 min, compared with a mean of 16.6 min in patients with unilateral puncture (p = 0.046). There was no significant difference in overall procedure time (p = 0.68). No puncture-site complications were found. Additional catheters were required only following unilateral puncture. The simulated dose was 25% higher with unilateral puncture. Although there was no significant difference in measured in vivo patient dose between the two groups (DAP, p = 0.32), this is likely to reflect the wide variation in other patient characteristics. Allowing for the small study size, our results show that the use of elective bilateral arterial punctures reduces fluoroscopy time, requires less catheter manipulation, and, according to the simulation model, has the potential to reduce patient dose. The overall procedure time, however, is not significantly reduced.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Arteria Femoral , Leiomioma/terapia , Punciones/métodos , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Útero/irrigación sanguínea , Adulto , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional , Piel/efectos de la radiación , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Útero/efectos de la radiación
2.
Br J Radiol ; 74(878): 134-41, 2001 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11718384

RESUMEN

Rotational digital subtraction angiography (RDSA) allows multidirectional angiographic acquisitions with a single injection of contrast medium. The role of RDSA was evaluated in 60 patients referred over a 7-month period for diagnostic renal angiography and 12 patients referred for renal transplant studies. All angiograms were assessed for their diagnostic value, the presence of anomalies and the quantity of contrast medium used. The effective dose for native renal RDSA was determined. 41 (68.3%) native renal RDSA images and 8 (66.7%) transplant renal RDSA images were of diagnostic quality. Multiple renal arteries were identified in 9/41 (22%) native renal RDSA diagnostic images. The mean volume of contrast medium in the RDSA runs was 51.2 ml and 50 ml for native and transplant renal studies, respectively. The mean effective dose for 120 degrees native renal RDSA was 2.36 mSv, equivalent to 1 year's mean background radiation. Those RDSA images that were non-diagnostic allowed accurate prediction of the optimal angle for further static angiographic series, which is of great value in transplant renal vessels.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía de Substracción Digital/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosis de Radiación , Radiometría/métodos , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
3.
Clin Radiol ; 56(2): 99-106, 2001 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11222065

RESUMEN

There is growing concern regarding the radiation dose delivered during interventional procedures, particularly in view of the increasing frequency and complexity of these techniques. This paper reviews the radiation dose levels currently encountered in interventional procedures, the consequent risks to operators and patients and the dose reduction that may be achieved by employing a rigorous approach to radiation protection.


Asunto(s)
Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Exposición Profesional , Dosis de Radiación , Procesos Estocásticos
4.
Clin Radiol ; 55(11): 811-6, 2000 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11069734

RESUMEN

AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess screening times and resulting dose implication at pneumatic reduction of intussusception in the paediatric age group and to examine the relationship with the outcome of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the case notes and departmental records of 143 children who had undergone a total of 153 pneumatic reductions in our department over a 4-year period. Success rates, screening times and available dose-area products (DAP) were recorded. The DAPs were converted to effective dose (ED) for 77 procedures. RESULTS: A 76.5% (117/153) success rate was achieved with a recurrence rate of 6.5% and only one complication: a perforation. Screening times were recorded in 137 reductions and ranged from 15 s to 22.6 min. Although the longest screening time was associated with an unsuccessful outcome, the second longest time of 21 min was successful. This gave a DAP of 1278 cGy cm(2)and an ED of 12.73 mSv, which is equivalent to approximately 400 abdominal films for a 1-year-old. A lifetime risk of fatal cancer of one in 1000 was achieved, assuming the worst case, after a screening time of 30 min on our conventional fluoroscopy unit. CONCLUSION: Our success rate compares well with other centres. Our institution is a tertiary referral centre and the occasional long screening time may reflect the delay and complex nature of the patients referred. Persistence at air reduction may be successful and the success rate increases with delayed attempts but the risks of the increasing radiation burden must be weighed against the risks of emergency surgery and anaesthesia.Heenan, S. D. (2000). Clinical Radiology 55, 811-816.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuflación/efectos adversos , Insuflación/métodos , Intususcepción/diagnóstico por imagen , Aire , Niño , Preescolar , Enema/efectos adversos , Enema/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Intususcepción/terapia , Masculino , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA