Greater trochanteric pain after primary total hip replacement, comparing the anterior and posterior approach: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Greater trochanteric pain (GTP) after total hip replacement is a common cause of residual lateral hip pain, regardless of the approach used. The goal of our study was to evaluate GTP after a direct anterior approach (DAA) compared to a posterior approach (PA) as well as the clinical outcomes of both approaches and answer the following: 1) What is the incidence of trochanteric pain after primary THA with two different surgical approaches? 2) What is the functional outcome of patients with GTP? 3) What proportion of patients with GTP resort to peritrochanteric injections? HYPOTHESIS: Our hypothesis is that GTP is present with both approaches but satisfaction is lower with the PA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of a previously published clinical trial with 55 total hip arthroplasty patients randomized in one of two surgical approaches: 27 patients underwent the anterior modified Hueter approach, while the other group of 28 patients were operated using the posterior approach. Study outcomes were Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), satisfaction score, pain when lying on the affected side, and requiring an injection. Hip offset, femur lateralization and leg lengthening were measured before and after surgery. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were available for complete follow-up at a mean of 62 months (range: 48-74). The incidence of GTP was higher in the posterior approach [PA: 6/21 (29%) vs DAA 4/24 (17%)) (p=0.3). Patients operated through a PA experienced more pain [5/21 (24%) of patients; VAS=mean 5.3] when lying on their operated side, compared to DAA patients [2/24 (8%) of patients; VAS=mean 2) (p=0.2)]. However, MHHS, patient satisfaction with surgery, radiological assessment for hip offset, femur lateralization or leg lengthening, and injections required were similar for both approaches. Overall, satisfaction and functional outcome with surgery was significantly lower in GTP patients, regardless of the approach. CONCLUSIONS: GTP impacts patient satisfaction and functional outcome in total hip arthroplasty patients. PA patients reported more trochanteric pain than DAA patients, which affected their clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The ideal approach for a total hip arthroplasty (THA) would be kind to soft tissues, have the lowest complication rates and be easily reproducible. Although there have been several attempts to find the best approach for THA in the last decade, a definitive answer has not been found. We performed a prospective study to compare the direct anterior and posterior approaches for THA in terms of hospital length of stay, functional outcome, pain, implant position, complications and surgical time. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical study was conducted between February 2011 and July 2013, with an average follow-up of 55 months. Patients undergoing the direct anterior or posterior approach for THA were enrolled. Hospital length of stay, surgical time and complications were documented. The Harris Hip Score and visual analogue scale were used to monitor functional outcome and pain until 5 years postoperatively. Radiologic analysis was used to assess implant position. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (28 undergoing the direct anterior approach, 27 undergoing the posterior approach) were enrolled in this study. Length of stay, functional outcome, pain, implant position and complications were similar for the 2 approaches. There was a trend toward a better functional outcome for patients who underwent the direct anterior approach in the first 3 months postoperatively, with a peak at 4 weeks (Harris Hip Score 76.7 v. 68.7; p = 0.08). Average surgical time for the direct anterior approach was significantly longer (69.9 v. 45.7 min; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The direct anterior approach for THA appears to be a safe and effective option. However, there is no significant difference in hospital length of stay or postoperative recovery between the 2 approaches. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT03673514.

CONTEXTE: L'approche idéale pour l'arthroplastie totale de la hanche (ATH) serait douce pour les tissus mous, aurait le taux de complications le plus bas et serait facilement reproductible. Dans les 10 dernières années, on a tenté à de nombreuses reprises de déterminer quelle est la meilleure approche, sans obtenir de réponse concluante. Nous avons mené une étude prospective visant à comparer la durée du séjour à l'hôpital, les résultats fonctionnels, la douleur, la position de l'implant, les complications et le temps de chirurgie associés aux approches antérieure directe et postérieure pour l'ATH. MÉTHODES: Un essai clinique randomisé prospectif multicentrique a été mené auprès de patients ayant subi une ATH par voie antérieure directe ou postérieure entre février 2011 et juillet 2013; le suivi moyen était de 55 mois. La durée du séjour à l'hôpital, le temps de chirurgie et les complications ont été notés. Le score de Harris pour la hanche et l'échelle analogique visuelle ont servi au suivi des résultats fonctionnels et de la douleur dans les 5 ans suivant l'opération. Des clichés radiologiques ont été analysés pour évaluer la position de l'implant. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 55 patients ont été recrutés (28 ayant subi une ATH par voie antérieure directe, et 27, une ATH par voie postérieure). La durée du séjour, les résultats fonctionnels, la douleur, la position de l'implant et les complications étaient sensiblement les mêmes, quelle que soit l'approche utilisée. Dans les 3 premiers mois suivant l'opération, les patients ayant subi une ATH par voie antérieure directe avaient tendance à présenter de meilleurs résultats fonctionnels que les autres, en particulier à la quatrième semaine postopératoire (score de Harris pour la hanche : 76,7 c. 68,7; p = 0,08). Le temps de chirurgie moyen pour l'approche antérieure directe était significativement plus long (69,9 c. 45,7 min; p = 0,002). CONCLUSION: La voie antérieure directe semble être une approche efficace et sûre. Aucune différence significative n'a toutefois été observée entre les 2 approches quant à la durée du séjour à l'hôpital ou au rétablissement postopératoire. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'ESSAI: ClinicalTrials.gov, no NCT03673514.

Deltopectoral vs. deltoid split approach for proximal HUmerus fracture fixation with locking plate: a prospective RAndomized study (HURA).

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the functional and clinical outcomes between the deltoid split (DS) approach and the classic deltopectoral (DP) approach for locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in a prospective randomized multicenter study. METHODS: From 2007 to 2015, all patients with a PHF Neer II/III were invited to participate. Exclusion criteria were pre-existing pathology to the limb, patient refusing or too ill to undergo surgery, patient needing another type of treatment (nail, arthroplasty), and axillary nerve impairment. After consent, patients were randomized to one of the 2 treatments using the dark envelope method. Functional outcome was evaluated by validated questionnaires (12-Item Short Form Health Survey: version 2, Quick-DASH) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Complications were noted. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients (44 DS, 41 DP) were randomized (mean age of 62). Groups were equivalent in terms of age, gender, body mass index, severity of fracture, and preinjury scores. The mean follow-up was 26 months. All clinical outcome measures were in favor of the deltopectoral approach. Specifically, the Q-DASH and SF-12v2 were better in the DP group (12 vs. 26, P = .003 and 56 vs. 51, P = .049, respectively). There were more complications in DS patients, but they did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The primary hypothesis on the superiority of the deltoid split incision was rebutted. On the basis of our study, the DP approach seems to offer better function compared with the DS approach for fixation of Neer 2 and 3 PHF fractures fixed with a locking plate.

Factors affecting outcome of partial radial head fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate which factors will affect range of motion (ROM) and function in partial radial head fractures. The hypothesis is that conservative treatment yields better outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective comparative cohort study included 43 adult volunteers with partial radial head fracture, a minimum 1-year follow up, separated into a surgical and non-surgical group. Risk factors were: associated injury, heterotopic ossification, worker's compensation, and proximal radio ulnar joint (PRUJ) implication. Outcomes included radiographic ROM measurement, demographic data, and quality of life questionnaires (PREE, Q-DASH, MEPS). RESULTS: Mean follow up was 3.5 years (1-7 years). Thirty patients (70%) had associated injuries with decreased elbow extension (-11°, p=0.004) and total ROM (-14°, p=0.002) compared to the other group. Heterotopic ossification was associated with decreased elbow flexion (-9.00°, p=0.001) and fractures involved the PRUJ in 88% of patients. Only worker's compensation was associated with worse scores. There was no difference in terms of function and outcome between patients treated non-surgically or surgically. DISCUSSION: We found that associated injuries, worker's compensation and the presence of heterotopic ossification were the only factors correlated with a worse prognosis in this cohort of patients. Given these results, the authors reiterate the importance of being vigilant to associated injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Retrospective study.

Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in 2372 knee and hip replacement patients after discharge: data from a thromboprophylaxis registry in Montreal, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is a recommended anticoagulant for thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery. Dabigatran etexilate is an oral anticoagulant recognized as noninferior to LMWH. We aimed to assess the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) after discharge in patients who underwent joint replacement, using a hospital registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent total knee and hip arthroplasty between September 2011 and March 2015 were selected. Subcutaneous enoxaparin (30 mg twice daily) was given during hospitalization. At discharge, patients received either enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily/40 mg once daily or dabigatran 220 mg/150 mg once daily. Patients were seen or called at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery. Outcomes were the number of VTEs, including deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and the number of major/minor bleeding events after discharge. RESULTS: After discharge, 1468 patients were prescribed enoxaparin and 904 dabigatran (1396 total knee arthroplasty and 976 total hip arthroplasty patients). Mean age was 66±10 years, and 60% were female. The cumulative incidence of VTEs during the 12-week follow-up was 0.7%. One patient sustained a VTE during the switch window. Seven patients sustained a pulmonary embolism (0.3%). There was no statistical difference between the total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty groups. The incidence of major and minor bleeding events during follow-up was 0.3% and 30.3%, respectively. These events had a higher incidence in the dabigatran group compared to the enoxaparin group after discharge (p<0.05), but not between knee and hip replacement groups for major bleeding events. CONCLUSION: A pharmaceutical prophylaxis protocol using LMWH and dabigatran during the post-discharge period resulted in low incidences of VTE and equivalence between treatments. However, the increased number of major and minor bleeding events in patients taking dabigatran is of concern regarding the safety and needs to be evaluated using analyses adjusted for risk factors.

Preexisting Carpal and Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Has No Impact on Function after Distal Radius Fractures.

Background Functional outcomes of distal radius fractures vary widely regardless of treatment methods. Purpose This study aims to verify whether preexisting carpal and carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) will negatively impact wrist functional outcome in patients with distal radius fractures. Patients and Methods A retrospective case-control study was done using a prospective trauma database. Patients were matched 1:1 in two groups based on the presence of wrist or carpal arthritis (OA). The groups were matched for sex, follow-up, and treatment type. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year and functional outcomes were assessed using validated scores. Results A total of 61 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years (range: 20-85) and average follow-up was 26 months. There were 31 patients in the OA+ group and 30 in the OA- group. Forty-one patients were treated surgically and 20 nonoperatively. None of the patients in the OA- developed OA during follow-up. Both groups were comparable for sex, residual deformity, and follow-up. There was no significant difference for the visual analog scale, Short Form-12, Quick Disability Arm Shoulder Hand, and Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, or for radiographic outcomes. Conclusion Preexisting OA in the wrist or CMC does not seem to impact outcomes of distal radius fractures, regardless of treatment, age, or sex. Although this is a negative study, the results are important to help counsel patients with distal radius fractures. Further work must be done to identify other potential causes for negative outcomes. Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.

Tourniquet and closed-suction drains in total knee arthroplasty. No beneficial effects on bleeding management and knee function at a higher cost.

BACKGROUND: Blood loss is a major concern in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) along with postoperative knee function. The present study explores the impact of tourniquet (T) and closed-suction drains (D) on these parameters in TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 111 patients admitted for TKA. Subjects were divided into three groups: 36 in group T+D+, 42 in T-D+ and 33 in T-D- (where T+: prolonged tourniquet use, T-: cementation-only tourniquet, D+: closed-suction drain use, and D-: no drain). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups(T+D+, T-D+ and T-D-) for total blood loss, hemoglobin levels over the first six postoperative weeks and blood transfusion rate. Intraoperative bleeding was significantly reduced in T+ subjects compared to T- subjects (100±88mL vs. 279±235mL respectively, P<0.001), yet length of surgery was unaffected. Hidden blood loss was lower in D+ subjects compared to D- subjects (1161±554mL vs. 1667±554mL respectively, P<0.001), but was offset by the blood loss in the drains. Early postoperative range of motion (ROM) was superior in group T-D- compared to group T+D+. Nevertheless, postoperative week 6 ROM was similar between the 3 groups as was patient-reported postoperative pain. A patient with a drain represents 35min of extra nursing time and a total cost of $31.87 CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-course tourniquet and closed-suction drain use in TKA do not yield beneficial results while increasing costs. Their use is therefore deemed unnecessary. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (case control prospective study).

Impact of olecranon fracture malunion: Study on the importance of PUDA (Proximal Ulna Dorsal Angulation).

PURPOSE: The Proximal Ulna Dorsal Angulation (PUDA) is part of the proximal ulna's normal anatomy. The importance of restoring ulnar anatomy characteristics precisely after olecranon fracture is not known, however, failure to recreate the PUDA after surgery may result in poorer functional outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of minimal proximal ulna malunion on elbow ROM and function at least one year after olecranon ORIF. METHOD: A retrospective comparative cohort study took place in three level-1 trauma centers. Forty-nine adult volunteers who underwent ORIF for olecranon fracture were included. Patients were separated into two groups according to PUDA malreduction-defined as more than 5° of difference between the fractured and the contralateral elbow. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiographic ROM measurement, demographic data and quality of life questionnaires were recorded (PREE, MEPS, Q-DASH, SF12, VAS). RESULTS: The mean follow up was 3 years and 9 months (1-7 years). There was no difference in terms of outcome, quality of reduction or range of motion between patients treated with plate or tension band. The mean PUDA on the fracture side was different from the normal side (2.20 vs 4.90, p<0.001). Fourteen patients (29%) had PUDA malunion. Those patients had decreased elbow flexion (-7°, p=0.011), extension (-11.2°, p=0.013) and total ROM (-18.6°, p=0.006) as opposed to the control group. Both groups had comparable quality of life questionnaire scores. Alcohol consumption was the only risk factor associated with worse scores. CONCLUSION: Incidence of olecranon malunion-as defined by PUDA measurement - was 29% and it was associated with decreased elbow range of motion. Alcohol consumption was correlated with a worse prognosis in our series of patients. Tension band and plate fixation can maintain a good reduction in terms of PUDA and the choice of fixation method does not influence outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Therapeutic study.

Effect of elbow position on radiographic measurements of radio-capitellar alignment.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of different elbow and forearm positions on radiocapitellar alignment. METHODS: Fifty-one healthy volunteers were recruited and bilateral elbow radiographs were taken to form a radiologic database. Lateral elbow radiographs were taken with the elbow in five different positions: Maximal extension and forearm in neutral, maximal flexion and forearm in neutral, elbow at 90° and forearm in neutral, elbow at 90° and forearm in supination and elbow at 90° and forearm in pronation. A goniometer was used to verify the accuracy of the elbow's position for the radiographs at a 90° angle. The radiocapitellar ratio (RCR) measurements were then taken on the collected radiographs using the SliceOmatic software. An orthopedic resident performed the radiographic measurements on the 102 elbows, for a total of 510 lateral elbow radiographic measures. ANOVA paired t-tests and Pearson coefficients were used to assess the differences and correlations between the RCR in each position. RESULTS: Mean RCR values were -2% ± 7% (maximal extension), -5% ± 9% (maximal flexion), and for elbow at 90° and forearm in neutral -2% ± 5%, supination 1% ± 6% and pronation 1% ± 5%. ANOVA analyses demonstrated significant differences between the RCR in different elbow and forearm positions. Paired t-tests confirmed significant differences between the RCR at maximal flexion and flexion at 90°, and maximal extension and flexion. The Pearson coefficient showed significant correlations between the RCR with the elbow at 90° - maximal flexion; the forearm in neutral-supination; the forearm in neutral-pronation. CONCLUSION: Overall, 95% of the RCR values are included in the normal range (obtained at 90° of flexion) and a value outside this range, in any position, should raise suspicion for instability.

Transosseous braided-tape and double-row fixations are better than tension band for avulsion-type greater tuberosity fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal treatment for avulsion-type greater tuberosity fractures is yet to be determined. Three fixation methods are tested: tension band with #2 wire suture (TB), double-row suture bridge with anchors (DR), and simple transosseous fixation with braided tape (BT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four porcine proximal humeri were randomised into three groups: TB, DR and BT. A standardised greater tuberosity (GT) osteotomy was performed at 90° to the humeral diaphysis axis. A mechanical testing machine was used to simulate supraspinatus contraction. The force required to produce 3mm and 5mm displacement, as well as complete failure was measured with an axial load cell. Also, three cycles of shoulder flexion/extension with 25 N of supraspinatus contraction were performed. Maximum GT fragment translation and rotation amplitude during one cycle were measured. RESULTS: During supraspinatus contraction, DR and BT groups (p < 0.05) were superior to TB group for both displacements. The BT technique had the strongest maximal load to failure (BT = 466 N; DR = 386 N; TB = 320 N). For the flexion/extension, DR and BT groups had less displacement and rotation than TB group (anterio-posterior displacement: BT = 2.0mm, DR = 1.9 mm, TB = 5.8 mm; anterio-posterior angular displacement: BT = 1.4°, DR = 1.0°, TB = 4.8°). No significant difference was observed between DR and BT groups, except for the medio-lateral rotation favouring the DR group. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, BT and DR are good fixation methods to treat displaced avulsion-type greater tuberosity fractures. They have similar mechanical properties, and are stronger and more stable that the TB construct. Potential advantages of the BT over the DR may be a lower cost and easier surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study (LEVEL II).

Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum during cup insertion: posterior column stability is crucial.

Periprosthetic hip fractures around acetabular components are rare with little information available to guide surgical management of these complex injuries. A retrospective review of intraoperative isolated acetabular periprosthetic fractures from three tertiary surgical units was done. A total of 32 patients were identified with 9 initially missed. Acetabular components were stable (type 1) in 11 patients with no failures; unstable (type 2) in 12 patients and treated with supplemental fixation. Non-union and displacement were correlated with absent posterior column plating. Missed fractures (type 3) had the highest reoperation rate. Anterior patterns all healed, whereas fractures with posterior column instability had a 67% failure rate. Periprosthetic acetabular fracture can heal successfully with posterior column stability. Plating is mandatory for large posterior wall fragments to achieve osteointegration.

Anterior locking plate reduces trochanteric fracture migrations during hip extension.

BACKGROUND: Greater trochanter fractures or osteotomies fixed with lateral plates still present high rates of complications. Unblocked greater trochanter anterior movement during hip extension might be a possible cause of failure. This study aimed to determine, under stair climbing conditions, the biomechanical behaviour of a greater trochanter fragment and the impact of an anterior locking plate on its migration. METHODS: Eighteen femurs paired from nine fresh frozen cadaveric specimens were tested on a quasi-dynamic stair climbing cycling test bench. Left and right sides with greater trochanter fractures were randomly fixed either with an antero-lateral locking plate or with a lateral locking plate. Migrations, defined as the remaining movements of the unloaded greater trochanter fragment, were measured for all 18 femurs. FINDINGS: During hip extension, multi-directional greater trochanter fragment movements occurred and showed a back-and-forth anterior rotation. The lateral locking plate failed due to greater trochanter fragment rotation around the superior axis and anterior translation. The antero-lateral locking plate significantly reduced greater trochanter anterior migration (-0.9 mm ± 1.6) compared to the lateral locking plate (9.6 mm ± 9.5). INTERPRETATION: Hip extension provides a plausible explanation for the high rate of post-operative failures of greater trochanter fixations. An antero-lateral locking plate represents an efficient surgical alternative counteracting the multi-directional greater trochanter movements occurring during hip extension.

Accurate Measurement of Greater Tuberosity Displacement Without Computed Tomography: Validation of a Method on Plain Radiography to Guide Surgical Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Residual displacement of greater tuberosity (GT) fractures has been shown to negatively affect shoulder function. However, accurate measurement of GT displacement remains a problem with errors up to 13 mm on plain radiography (XR). A new GT ratio for measuring fracture displacement on XR is described, validated, and correlated with computed tomography (CT) and surgical decision making. METHODS: A retrospective review of shoulder radiographs was performed from 2007 to 2010 to identify all cases of isolated GT fractures with both XR and CT. The GT ratio was performed on all XR and correlated with superior GT displacement measured on CT. The GT ratio was then tested for accuracy of surgical decision using 5-mm superior displacement on CT as the cutoff. Finally, the inter- and intraobserver reliabilities of the GT ratio were calculated and compared with the Neer and Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classifications. RESULTS: Forty cases of acute GT fractures with XR and CT were identified. The GT ratio correlated very well with superior displacement on CT (Pearson correlation = 0.852, P < 0.01) and accurately classified GT fractures as "surgical" (n = 9, 23%) or "nonsurgical" (n = 31, 77%). GT ratios ≤0.00 were nonsurgical, ≥0.50 were surgical, and 0.00-0.50 warranted further imaging (P < 0.01). The GT ratio performed as well as or better than the AO and Neer classifications for inter- and intraobserver reliabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The GT ratio described in this study correlates very well with CT for superior GT fracture displacement. It involves significantly less radiation and accurately classifies GT fractures as nonsurgical (ratio < 0.00), surgical (ratio > 0.50), or as benefiting from further imaging (0.00-0.50). It performs as well or better than the Neer or AO classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A biomechanical study comparing polyaxial locking screw mechanisms.

OBJECTIVE: Locking plates have become ubiquitous in modern fracture surgery. Recently, manufacturers have developed locking plates with polyaxial screw capabilities in order to optimise screw placement. It has already been demonstrated that inserting uniaxial locking screws off axis results in weaker loads to failure. Our hypothesis was that even implants specifically designed for polyaxial insertion would experience a drop-off in resistance when using non-perpendicular screws. METHODS: Four different types (one monoaxial and three polyaxial locking plates) of readily available small fragment plates were tested. A biomechanical model was developed to test the screws until failure (defined as breakage and rapid loss of >50% force). Screws were inserted at 0, 10 and 15°. RESULTS: The standard monoaxial locking mechanism sustained saw a 60% reduction in force (332N vs. 134N) when screws were inserted cross-threaded at 10°. Two polyaxial systems saw similar significant reductions in force of 45% and 34%, respectively at 15°. A third system utilizing an end cap locking mechanism showed highly variable results with large standard deviations. Polyaxial screws showed on average only limited reduction at 10 degrees of insertion angle. CONCLUSION: Newer designs of locking plates have attractive properties to allow more surgical options during fixation. However this freedom comes at the price of reduced force. Our results show that the safe zone for inserting these screws is closer to 20°, rather than the 30° indicated by the manufacturers. Also, the various polyaxial locking mechanisms seem to influence the overall resistance of the screws.

Heterotopic ossification following total hip replacement for acetabular fractures.

Early total hip replacement (THR) for acetabular fractures offers accelerated rehabilitation, but a high risk of heterotopic ossification (HO) has been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of HO, its associated risk factors and functional impact. A total of 40 patients with acetabular fractures treated with a THR weres retrospectively reviewed. The incidence and severity of HO were evaluated using the modified Brooker classification, and the functional outcome assessed. The overall incidence of HO was 38% (n = 15), with nine severe grade III cases. Patients who underwent surgery early after injury had a fourfold increased chance of developing HO. The mean blood loss and operating time were more than twice that of those whose surgery was delayed (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). In those undergoing early THR, the incidence of grade III HO was eight times higher than in those in whom THR was delayed (p = 0.01). Only three of the seven patients with severe HO showed good or excellent Harris hip scores compared with eight of nine with class 0, I or II HO (p = 0.049). Associated musculoskeletal injuries, high-energy trauma and head injuries were associated with the development of grade III HO.The incidence of HO was significantly higher in patients with a displaced acetabular fracture undergoing THR early compared with those undergoing THR later and this had an adverse effect on the functional outcome.

Demographic and anthropometric factors affecting elbow range of motion in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: To use elbow range of motion routinely as a diagnostic index, it is important to explain the normal variability among the population. Consequently, this study assessed the possible associations between age, sex, laterality, body mass index, joint laxity, level of physical activities, upper limb dimensions, and the elbow range of motion in flexion/extension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Maximal flexion and extension were measured on the lateral radiographs of 102 elbows of 51 volunteers. The difference of range of motion regarding sex and laterality was assessed with Student t tests. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between elbow mobility and the other factors, and a stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Among the 51 volunteers, a correlation was found between flexion and body mass index, age, and midbrachial and forearm circumferences (r = -0.234 to -0.594). Age (r = 0.268) and hyperlaxity (r = -0.323) were the only factors associated with a change in elbow extension. No correlation was found between the level of physical activity or with the laterality and changes in elbow mobility. Finally, women presented with more flexion and total elbow range of motion than men. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the association between various demographic and anthropometric factors and elbow range of motion in healthy adults. Among these, the body mass index and forearm circumference are the most likely responsible for mobility variations among the population.

Bias towards dementia: are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review.

Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies and this may impact outcomes. This was a two part study; the first analyzing databases of two ongoing large-scale multi-centred hip fracture trials and the second being a systematic review. The FAITH and HEALTH studies were analyzed for exclusion incidence directly related to dementia. The second part consisted of a systematic search of all relevant studies within the last 20 years. In the FAITH study, a total of 1690 subjects were excluded, 375 (22.2%) of which were due to dementia or cognitive impairment. In the HEALTH study, 575 were excluded with dementia/cognitive impairment representing 207 patients (36%). Following the systematic review, 251 articles were identified 17 of which were retained. The overall prevalence of dementia was 27.9% (range 2-51%). Only two studies compared demented and non-demented groups. In these studies significant increases in both mortality and complications were found. In summary, when investigating hip fractures, choosing appropriate objective endpoints is essential to ensure results are also applicable to patients with dementia.

Reattachment of complex femoral greater trochanteric nonunions with dual locking plates.

The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate complex nonunions of the trochanter fixed with dual locking plates after failed cable fixation devices. Fifteen consecutive patients were operated on for greater trochanteric nonunion and with a mean follow-up of 53.1 months (range, 26-88 months). Fixation was achieved with dual locking plates contoured on the anterolateral and posterolateral surface of the greater trochanter. Trochanteric union was achieved in 13 patients (87%). Failures occurred only when the trochanter was reattached to a proximal femoral allograft. The average total hip score was 14.8 ± 2.2 (Merle d'Aubigné ) and 77.6 (±12.8) (Harris Hip score). However, 20% of successful cases needed painful hardware removal. Greater trochanter nonunions can be successfully reattached with locking plates especially if bone-to-bone apposition is achieved at surgery.

Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of trabecular metal (TM) acetabular components used in revision hip arthroplasty with major bone deficiency. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 46 patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular bone loss. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities, and Short-Form 12. Mean follow-up was 50 months. All patients had Paprosky type IIc or III acetabular bone deficiency. Major complications included 1 infection, 2 dislocations, and 1 arterial bleeding. Average Harris Hip Score was 78.2. Short-Form 12 scores were within population-based age-matched averages. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities scores were mainly in the 2 lowest disability categories. Porous tantalum shows promising results in revision arthroplasty with severe acetabular bone loss.

Internal fixation of osteopenic acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate.

BACKGROUND: Older patients tend to have acetabular fractures with medial displacement patterns and associated comminution, particularly of the quadrilateral surface. Our goal was to investigate the appropriateness of open reduction and internal fixation using an infra-pectineal buttress plate for osteopenic acetabular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review involving twenty one consecutive patients over the course of 4 years with an acetabular fracture in an academic level 1 trauma centre. We performed the modified Stoppa approach with buttress plating of the quadrilateral surface. Clinical examination radiographs was done using criteria described by Matta. Functional outcome was evaluated using surveys including SF-12, WOMAC, Harris Hip score and modified Postel Merle D'Aubigne. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 4.2 years with a minimum of 2 years. Mean age for patients was 64.3 years. We obtained anatomic reduction in 52.4% (11/21) of cases, imperfect reduction in 38.1% (8/21) of cases and poor reduction in 9.5% (2/21) of cases. Significant loss of reduction was seen in 2 patients. A superior dome impaction (a Gull sign) was correlated to arthroplasty (p=0.02) and reduced quality of initial reduction (p=0.02). Two patients required re-intervention with a total hip arthroplasty. There was one traumatic injury to the obturator nerve and 2 patients were noted to have temporary weakness of the hip adductors postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Internal fixation using the modified Stoppa approach to buttress the quadrilateral plate should be considered a viable alternative to total hip arthroplasty for the initial treatment of acetabular fractures in the elderly.