Current challenges in focal epilepsy treatment: An Italian Delphi consensus.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy, a globally prevalent neurological condition, presents distinct challenges in management, particularly for focal-onset types. This study aimed at addressing the current challenges and perspectives in focal epilepsy management, with focus on the Italian reality. METHODS: Using the Delphi methodology, this research collected and analyzed the level of consensus of a panel of Italian epilepsy experts on key aspects of focal epilepsy care. Areas of focus included patient flow, treatment pathways, controlled versus uncontrolled epilepsy, follow-up protocols, and the relevance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This method allowed for a comprehensive assessment of consensus and divergences in clinical opinions and practices. RESULTS: The study achieved consensus on 23 out of 26 statements, with three items failing to reach a consensus. There was strong agreement on the importance of timely intervention, individualized treatment plans, regular follow-ups at Epilepsy Centers, and the role of PROs in clinical practice. In cases of uncontrolled focal epilepsy, there was a clear inclination to pursue alternative treatment options following the failure of two previous therapies. Divergent views were evident on the inclusion of epilepsy surgery in treatment for uncontrolled epilepsy and the routine necessity of EEG evaluations in follow-ups. Other key findings included concerns about the lack of pediatric-specific research limiting current therapeutic options in this patient population, insufficient attention to the transition from pediatric to adult care, and need for improved communication. The results highlighted the complexities in managing epilepsy, with broad consensus on patient care aspects, yet notable divergences in specific treatment and management approaches. CONCLUSION: The study offered valuable insights into the current state and complexities of managing focal-onset epilepsy. It highlighted many deficiencies in the therapeutic pathway of focal-onset epilepsy in the Italian reality, while it also underscored the importance of patient-centric care, the necessity of early and appropriate intervention, and individualized treatment approaches. The findings also called for continued research, policy development, and healthcare system improvements to enhance epilepsy management, highlighting the ongoing need for tailored healthcare solutions in this evolving field.

Cenobamate in refractory epilepsy: Overview of treatment options and practical considerations.

Management of drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) represents a challenge to the treating clinician. This manuscript addresses DRE and provides an overview of treatment options, medical, surgical, and dietary. It addresses treatment strategies in polytherapy, then focuses on the role cenobamate (CNB) may play in reducing the burden of DRE while providing practical advice for its introduction. CNB is a recently approved, third generation, anti-seizure medication (ASM), a tetrazole-derived carbamate, thought to have a dual mechanism of action, through its effect on sodium channels as well as on GABAA receptors at a non-benzodiazepine site. CNB, having a long half-life, is an effective add-on ASM in refractory focal epilepsy with a higher response rate and a higher seizure-freedom rate than is usually seen in regulatory clinical trials. Experience post-licensing, though still limited, supports the findings of clinical trials and is encouraging. Its spectrum of action in relation to generalized epilepsies and seizures remains to be established, and there are no data on its efficacy in monotherapy. At the time of writing, CNB has been prescribed for some 50 000 individuals with DRE and focal epilepsy. A larger number is needed to fully establish its safety profile. It should at all times be introduced slowly to minimize the risk of serious allergic drug reactions. It has clinically meaningful interactions which must be anticipated and managed to maximize tolerability and likelihood of successful treatment. Despite the above, it may well prove to be of major benefit in the treatment of many patients with drug resistant epilepsy.

B-mode transorbital ultrasonography for the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the role of B-mode transorbital ultrasonography (TOS) for the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in adults. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (1966-May 2022) were searched to identify studies reporting ultrasonographic data about the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and optic disc elevation (ODE) in adults with IIH compared to subjects without IIH. The quality of the included studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included (total of 439 patients). The values of ODE ranged from 0.6 to 1.3 mm in patients with IIH. The values of ONSD ranged from 4.7 to 6.8 mm in IIH patients and from 3.9 to 5.7 mm in controls. In IIH patients, the ONSD was significantly higher compared to controls (standardized mean difference: 2.5 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-3.4 mm). Nine studies provided data about the presence of papilledema and the pooled prevalence was 95% (95% CI, 92-97%). CONCLUSIONS: In adults, the thickness of ONSD and the entity of ODE were significantly associated with IIH. B-mode TOS enables to noninvasively detect increased ICP and should be performed, potentially routinely, in any patient with suspected IIH.

Adult epilepsy.

Epilepsy is a common medical condition that affects people of all ages, races, social classes, and geographical regions. Diagnosis of epilepsy remains clinical, and ancillary investigations (electroencephalography, imaging, etc) are of aid to determine the type, cause, and prognosis. Antiseizure medications represent the mainstay of epilepsy treatment: they aim to suppress seizures without adverse events, but they do not affect the underlying predisposition to generate seizures. Currently available antiseizure medications are effective in around two-thirds of patients with epilepsy. Neurosurgical resection is an effective strategy to reach seizure control in selected individuals with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Non-pharmacological treatments such as palliative surgery (eg, corpus callosotomy), neuromodulation techniques (eg, vagus nerve stimulation), and dietary interventions represent therapeutic options for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not suitable for resective brain surgery.

The broad-spectrum activity of perampanel: state of the art and future perspective of AMPA antagonism beyond epilepsy.

Glutamate is the brain's main excitatory neurotransmitter. Glutamatergic neurons primarily compose basic neuronal networks, especially in the cortex. An imbalance of excitatory and inhibitory activities may result in epilepsy or other neurological and psychiatric conditions. Among glutamate receptors, AMPA receptors are the predominant mediator of glutamate-induced excitatory neurotransmission and dictate synaptic efficiency and plasticity by their numbers and/or properties. Therefore, they appear to be a major drug target for modulating several brain functions. Perampanel (PER) is a highly selective, noncompetitive AMPA antagonist approved in several countries worldwide for treating different types of seizures in various epileptic conditions. However, recent data show that PER can potentially address many other conditions within epilepsy and beyond. From this perspective, this review aims to examine the new preclinical and clinical studies-especially those produced from 2017 onwards-on AMPA antagonism and PER in conditions such as mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, idiopathic and genetic generalized epilepsy, brain tumor-related epilepsy, status epilepticus, rare epileptic syndromes, stroke, sleep, epilepsy-related migraine, cognitive impairment, autism, dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases, as well as provide suggestions on future research agenda aimed at probing the possibility of treating these conditions with PER and/or other AMPA receptor antagonists.

Perampanel in Brain Tumor-Related Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.

Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common comorbidity in patients with brain neoplasms and it may be either the first symptom or develop after the tumor diagnosis. Increasing evidence suggests that brain tumors and BTRE share common pathophysiological mechanisms. Glutamatergic mechanisms can play a central role in promoting both primary brain tumor growth and epileptogenesis. Perampanel (PER), which acts as a selective antagonist of glutamate α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors, may play a role both in the reduction in tumor growth and the control of epileptiform activity. This systematic review aimed to summarize the pre-clinical and clinical evidence about the antitumor properties, antiseizure effects and tolerability of PER in BTRE. Eight pre-clinical and eight clinical studies were identified. The currently available evidence suggests that PER can be an effective and generally well-tolerated therapeutic option in patients with BTRE. In vitro studies demonstrated promising antitumor activity of PER, while no role in slowing tumor progression has been demonstrated in rat models; clinical data on the potential antitumor activity of PER are scarce. Additional studies are needed to explore further the effects of PER on tumor progression and fully characterize its potentialities in patients with BTRE.

Physicians' beliefs about brain surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy: A global survey.

PURPOSE: To investigate the opinions of physicians about brain surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy worldwide. METHODS: Practicing neurologists, psychiatrists, and neurosurgeons from around the world were invited to participate in an online survey. The survey anonymously collected data about demographics, years in clinical practice, discipline, nation, work setting, and answers to the questions about beliefs and attitudes about brain surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. RESULTS: In total, 1410 physicians from 20 countries and different world regions participated. The propensity to discuss brain surgery with patients, who have drug-resistant seizures, was higher among men (versus women) [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.67, 95% CI 1.20-2.31; p = 0.002]. In comparison to neurologists, psychiatrists were less likely (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17-0.47; p < 0.001) and neurosurgeons were more likely (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.08-3.72; p = 0.028) to discuss about it. Survey participants working in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and the Former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics showed a lower propensity to discuss epilepsy surgery with patients. CONCLUSION: This study showed that on an international level, there is still a knowledge gap concerning epilepsy surgery and much needs to be done to identify and overcome barriers to epilepsy surgery for patients with drug-resistant seizures worldwide.

Mortality of early treatment for radiation-induced brain necrosis in head and neck cancer survivors: A multicentre, retrospective, registry-based cohort study.

Background: The evidence of early treatment for radiation-induced brain necrosis (RN) in head and neck cancer survivors remains insufficient. This study aimed to determine whether early anti-RN treatment was associated with lower mortality. Methods: In this cohort study, we utilized data from the Study in Radiotherapy-related Nervous System Complications (NCT03908502) and Hong Kong Cancer Registry. We included consecutive patients who had received radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancers and had subsequently developed RN between Jan 8, 2005 and Jan 19, 2020. Patients who had tumor progression before the diagnosis of RN, underwent surgical brain necrosis lesions resection before corticosteroids and/or bevacizumab treatment, had intracranial metastases before the diagnosis of RN, lacked follow-up data, or had a follow-up period of less than three months were excluded. Individual-level data were extracted from electronic medical records of the above-mentioned registries. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The vital status of each patient was confirmed through a standardized telephone interview. We compared patients who received early treatment (initiating bevacizumab or corticosteroids treatment within three months after RN diagnosis) with patients who did not (following a "watch-and-wait" policy). Findings: Of 641 eligible patients, 451 patients (70·4%) received early treatment after RN diagnosis and 190 patients (29·6%) did not. Overall, 112 patients (17·5%) died, of whom 73 (16·2%) in the early treatment group and 39 (20·5%) in the watch-and-wait group, during a median follow-up of 3·87 years. The early treatment group showed a lower risk of all-cause death compared with the watch-and-wait group after adjusting for age, sex, absence or presence of neurological symptoms at baseline, RN lesion features on brain magnetic resonance imaging, history of stroke, prior tumor-related characteristics (TNM stage, RT dose and techniques, and chemotherapy), and the time interval from RT to RN (HR 0·48, 95%CI 0·30 to 0·77; p = 0·0027), and extensive sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. There was no significant difference in the effect of early treatment on post-RN survival among subgroups stratified by presence or absence of neurological symptoms at diagnosis (p for interaction=0·41). Interpretation: Among head and neck cancer survivors with RN, initiating treatment early after RN diagnosis is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality as compared with following the watch-and-wait policy, irrespective of whether patients exhibit symptoms or not. Further prospective randomised studies would be needed to validate our findings since the observational study design might lead to some potential confounding. In the absence of data from randomised trials, our study will have an important implication for clinicians regarding the optimal timing of treatment for RN, and provides the foundation and supporting data for future trials on this topic. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China (81925031, 81820108026, 81872549, 81801229, 82003389), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (202007030001), Young Teacher Training Program of Sun Yat-sen University (20ykpy106), Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2018B030340001), the National Medical Research Council Singapore Clinician Scientist Award (NMRC/CSA-INV/0027/2018, CSAINV20nov-0021), the Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Program Goh Foundation Proton Research Programme, NCCS Cancer Fund, the Kua Hong Pak Head and Neck Cancer Research Programme, and the National Research Foundation Clinical Research Programme Grant (NRF-CRP17-2017-05).

Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on the Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE) Parameters to Predict 30-day Mortality in Status Epilepticus.

BACKGROUND: To develop a nomogram using the parameters of the Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE) and to evaluate its accuracy compared with the EMSE alone in the prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: We included a cohort of patients with SE aged ≥ 21 years admitted from 2013 to 2021. Regression coefficients from the multivariable logistic regression model were used to generate a nomogram predicting the risk of 30-day mortality. Discrimination of the nomogram was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC) with 95% confidence interval. Internal validation was performed by bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: Among 698 patients with SE, the 30-day mortality rate was 28.9% (202 of 698). On the multivariable analysis, all EMSE parameters (except for the comorbidity group including metastatic solid tumor or AIDS) were associated with a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality and were included in the nomogram. The discriminatory capability of the nomogram with bootstrap resampling (5000 resamples) had an AUCROC of 0.830 (95% confidence interval 0.798-0.862). Conversely, the AUCROC of the EMSE was 0.777 (95% confidence interval 0.742-0.813). Thus, the probability that a patient who died within 30 days from SE had a higher score than a patient who survived was 83%, indicating good discriminatory power of the nomogram. Conversely, the risk predicted using the EMSE alone was 77%. The nomogram was well calibrated. CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram based on EMSE parameters appears superior to the EMSE in predicting the risk of 30-day mortality after SE. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram shows a better predictive accuracy than the EMSE alone.

Drug-resistant epilepsy at the age extremes: Disentangling the underlying etiology.

The incidence of epilepsy is highest at the extreme age ranges: childhood and elderly age. The most common syndromes in these demographics - self-limited epilepsies of childhood and idiopathic generalized epilepsies in pediatric age, focal epilepsy with structural etiology in older people - are expected to be drug responsive. In this work, we focus on such epilepsy types, overviewing the complex clinical background of unexpected drug-resistance. For self-limited epilepsies of childhood and idiopathic generalized epilepsies, we illustrate drug-resistance resulting from syndrome misinterpretation, reason on possible unexpected courses of epilepsy, and explicate the influence of inappropriate treatments. For elderly-onset epilepsy, we show the challenges in differential diagnosis possibly leading to pseudoresistance and analyze how drug-resistant epilepsy can arise in stroke, neurocognitive disorders, brain tumors, and autoimmune encephalitis. In children and senior people, drug-resistance can be regarded as a hint to review the diagnosis or explore alternative therapeutic strategies. Refractory seizures are not only a therapeutic challenge, but also a cardinal sign not to be overlooked in syndromes commonly deemed to be drug-responsive.

Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib for Radiation-induced Brain Injury Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Study.

PURPOSE: The treatment of radiation-induced brain injury (RI) caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer is challenging. Antiangiogenic therapy is a promising treatment. Apatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with RI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this phase 2, open-label, single-arm, prospective study, we recruited patients aged 35 to 80 years with prior radiation therapy history for head and neck cancer who had newly diagnosed RI at the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, China. Apatinib was administered at a dosage of 250 mg once daily orally for 4 weeks. A Simon minimax 2-stage design was performed. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with overall clinical efficacy, defined as a radiographic response of ≥25% reduction in baseline brain edema volume on magnetic resonance fluid attenuated inversion recovery images at week 4. Secondary end points were the overall improvement rate of brain necrosis, neurologic function, and safety. RESULTS: We screened 37 patients, 36 of whom were enrolled between October 17, 2019, and August 3, 2020. At the cutoff date, 36 patients were assessed for efficacy and safety (19 were enrolled in stage 1 and 17 in stage 2). Of the 36 patients evaluated for overall clinical efficacy, 22 patients (61.1%; 95% CI, 43.5%-76.9%) achieved the primary end point at week 4. Among the 31 patients with brain necrosis lesions, 19 patients (61.3%; 95% CI, 42.2%-78.2%) showed improvement of brain necrosis. The most common grade 1 to 2 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, and hypertension There were no treatment-related grade 4 to 5 toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Oral apatinib shows promising efficacy and is well-tolerated in patients with RI. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted.

Inflammation markers in moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea: the influence of sex.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most prevalent sleep-related breathing disorder, with a negative impact on cardiovascular health. Different OSA symptoms and treatment response in males and females have been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate inflammatory markers in patients with OSA and the relationship of those markers to disease severity in male and female subjects. METHODS: We considered consecutive subjects referred to the outpatient Sleep Disorder Service of the Respiratory Medicine Department, San Marino Hospital. We included patients with a diagnosis of moderate or severe OSAS and an age range of 45-80 years. Concomitant inflammatory conditions were an exclusion criterion. A polygraphic study and a blood draw for inflammatory markers were performed for each subject. RESULTS: Of 110 subjects, 59 were males. Severe OSA affected 72 subjects. We analyzed data through a 4-level categorical variable according to sex and OSA severity (moderate OSA, males; severe OSA, males; moderate OSA, females; severe OSA, females), which showed significant differences for interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. A significant difference in IL-6 levels with a significant ascending trend (p = 0.045) from females with moderate OSAS to males with severe OSAS emerged in our pairwise comparison for estimated marginal means. Also, a significant trend (p = 0.0001) for CRP levels from males with moderate OSAS to females with severe OSAS was shown. CONCLUSIONS: OSA and inflammation are interconnected, and both are associated with vascular diseases. Sex-related differences in OSA phenotypes may help the clinicians aim for a more personalized approach.

An Open Retrospective Study of a Standardized Cannabidiol Based-Oil in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy.

Introduction: Cannabidiol (CBD) has antiseizure properties but no psychoactive effects. Randomized controlled trials of an oral, pharmaceutical formulation of highly purified CBD are promising; however, data regarding other formulations are sparse and anecdotal. We evaluated the effectiveness of add-on therapy with a standardized CBD-based oil in treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE) patients. Materials and Methods: An open retrospective study was carried out on patients with refractory epilepsy of different etiology. We reviewed clinical data from medical charts and caregiver's information. Participants received add-on with 24% CBD-based oil, sublingually administered, at the starting dose of 5-10 mg/[kg·day] up to the maximum dose of 50 mg/[kg·day], based on clinical efficacy. Efficacy was evaluated based on patients being seizure free or experiencing at ≥50% improvement on seizure frequency. Tolerability and suspected adverse drug reaction data were also analyzed. Results: We included 37 patients (46% female) with a median age of 16.1 (range: 2-54) years. Twenty-two (60%) patients suffered from epileptic encephalopathy, 9 (24%) from focal epilepsy, and 6 (16%) from generalized epilepsy. Mean follow-up duration was 68 (range: 24-72) weeks. The average age at seizure onset was 3.8±2.1 years (range: 7 days-21 years). The median achieved CBD-based oil dose was 4.2±11.4 (range: 0.6-50) mg/[kg·day]. At 40-month follow-up, 7 (19%) patients were seizure free, 27 (73%) reported >50% improvement, 2 (5%) patients reported <50% improvement, and 1 patient discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy. Weaning from concomitant antiepileptic drugs was obtained after 24 weeks from CBD introduction in 10 subjects. Mild and transitory adverse events, including somnolence or loss of appetite, occurred in nine (25%) patients. Discussion and Conclusion: We showed the efficacy of a CBD-based oil formulation with few significant side effects in patients with TRE of various etiologies.

Unraveling the enigma of new-onset refractory status epilepticus: a systematic review of aetiologies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a clinical presentation, neither a specific diagnosis nor a clinical entity. It refers to a patient without active epilepsy or other pre-existing relevant neurological disorder, with a NORSE without a clear acute or active structural, toxic or metabolic cause. This study reviews the currently available evidence about the aetiology of patients presenting with NORSE and NORSE-related conditions. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out for clinical trials, observational studies, case series and case reports including patients who presented with NORSE, febrile-infection-related epilepsy syndrome or the infantile hemiconvulsion-hemiplegia and epilepsy syndrome. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty records were initially identified, of which 197 were included in the review. The selected studies were retrospective case-control (n = 11), case series (n = 83) and case reports (n = 103) and overall described 1334 patients both of paediatric and adult age. Aetiology remains unexplained in about half of the cases, representing the so-called 'cryptogenic NORSE'. Amongst adult patients without cryptogenic NORSE, the most often identified cause is autoimmune encephalitis, either non-paraneoplastic or paraneoplastic. Infections are the prevalent aetiology of paediatric non-cryptogenic NORSE. Genetic and congenital disorders can have a causative role in NORSE, and toxic, vascular and degenerative conditions have also been described. CONCLUSIONS: Far from being a unitary condition, NORSE is a heterogeneous and clinically challenging presentation. The development and dissemination of protocols and guidelines to standardize diagnostic work-up and guide therapeutic approaches should be implemented. Global cooperation and multicentre research represent priorities to improve the understanding of NORSE.

Laminectomy versus Unilateral Hemilaminectomy for the Removal of Intraspinal Schwannoma: Experience of a Single Institution and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Spinal schwannomas are benign slow-growing tumors, and gross total resection is the gold standard of treatment. The conventional surgical approach is laminectomy, which provides a wide working area. Today minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is popular because it is associated with shorter hospital stay, less operative blood loss, minimized tissue traumas and relative postoperative pain, and, and spine surgery, avoidance of spinal instability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2019, we operated on 40 patients with spinal intradural extramedullary tumor (schwannoma) with laminectomy or hemilaminectomy. Baseline medical data, including patients' sex and age, tumor location, days of postoperative bed rest, operative time, length of hospitalization, and 1-month visual analog scale (VAS) value were collected and analyzed. Data analysis was performed using STATA/IC 13.1 statistical package (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, United States). RESULTS: Hemilaminectomy was associated with faster operative time (p < 0.001), shorter postoperative time spent in bed (p < 0.001), and shorter hospitalization (p < 0.001). At 1-month follow-up, the mean VAS score was 4.6 (1.7) among the laminectomy patients and 2.5 (1.3) among the hemilaminectomy patients (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications occurred in 1 (7.7%) and 7 (25.9%) patients in the hemilaminectomy and laminectomy groups, respectively (p = 0.177). CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral hemilaminectomy has significant advantages compared with laminectomy in spinal schwannoma surgery including shorter operative time, less time spent in bed, shorter hospitalization, and less postoperative pain.

Clinical phenotypes of embolic strokes of undetermined source.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) represents a heterogeneous clinical entity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether distinct clinical phenotypes may be identified in the ESUS population. METHODS: We retrospectively identified consecutive patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke who met the ESUS diagnostic criteria. Baseline characteristics and diagnostic workup findings were collected. Hierarchical cluster analysis was carried out to classify clinical features and identify different groups of ESUS patients. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients with a mean age of 68.6 (12.5) years were included. Three main clusters were identified. The first cluster associated young age, male sex, presence of patent foramen ovale, and posterior circulation infarct. The second phenotype linked hypertension, severe stroke, left atrial cardiopathy, diabetes mellitus, and involvement of multiple vascular territories. The third cluster gathered smoking, dyslipidemia, ipsilateral vulnerable sub-stenotic carotid plaque, and infarct of anterior vascular territory. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct clinical phenotypes have been identified within the ESUS population, which may supply clues to the underlying pathogenic mechanisms.

Central Nervous System Manifestations Associated with COVID-19.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global health crisis of our time. The disease arises from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors on host cells for its internalization. COVID-19 has a wide range of respiratory symptoms from mild to severe and affects several other organs, increasing the complexity of the treatment. There is accumulating evidence to suggest that SARS-CoV-2 can target the nervous system. In this review, we provide an account of the COVID-19 central nervous system (CNS) manifestations. RECENT FINDINGS: A broad spectrum of the CNS manifestations including headache, impaired consciousness, delirium, loss of smell and taste, encephalitis, seizures, strokes, myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neurogenic respiratory failure, encephalopathy, silent hypoxemia, generalized myoclonus, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and Kawasaki syndrome has been reported in patients with COVID-19. CNS manifestations associated with COVID-19 should be considered in clinical practice. There is a need for modification of current protocols and standing orders to provide better care for COVID-19 patients presenting with neurological symptoms.

A nomogram to predict symptomatic epilepsy in patients with radiation-induced brain necrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a nomogram to predict epilepsy in patients with radiation-induced brain necrosis (RN). METHODS: The nomogram was based on a retrospective analysis of 302 patients who were diagnosed with symptomatic RN from January 2005 to January 2016 in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital using the Cox proportional hazards model. Discrimination of the nomogram was assessed by the concordance index (C index) and the calibration curve. The results were internally validated using bootstrap resampling and externally validated using 128 patients with RN from 2 additional hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients with RN with a median follow-up of 3.43 years (interquartile range 2.54-5.45) were included in the training cohort; 65 (21.5%) developed symptomatic epilepsy during follow-up. Seven variables remained significant predictors of epilepsy after multivariable analyses: MRI lesion volume, creatine phosphokinase, the maximum radiation dose to the temporal lobe, RN treatment, history of hypertension and/or diabetes, sex, and total cholesterol level. In the validation cohort, 28 out of 128 (21.9%) patients had epilepsy after RN within a median follow-up of 3.2 years. The nomogram showed comparable discrimination between the training and validation cohort (corrected C index 0.76 [training] vs 0.72 [95% confidence interval 0.62-0.81; validation]). CONCLUSION: Our study developed an easily applied nomogram for the prediction of RN-related epilepsy in a large RN cohort. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that a nomogram predicts post-RN epilepsy.

Clinical and radiological risk factors of autograft cranioplasty resorption after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: The repositioning of an autologous bone flap after decompressive craniectomy (DC) for traumatic intracranial hypertension remains the first-line treatment for cranial reconstruction. Aseptic autologous bone flap resorption (BFR) is the most frequent complication. The identification of possible predictive parameters for BFR would help to improve the management of these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and nine patients undergoing autologous bone flap repositioning after previous DC for TBI between September 2003 and September 2017 were included in the study. RESULTS: BFR was identified in 76 (24,59 %) of the 309 patients undergoing autologous CP. Age of ≤ 45 years and CP bone fragmentation were seen to be significant independent risk factors for BFR (p =  0.001 and p =  0.018, respectively) using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Of the radiologic predictors, CP size and the gap between CP and the skull defect were independently associated with BFR (p =  0.034 and p =  0.0003, respectively). The Youden index and ROC curve analysis were used to estimate the cut-off values for the continuous parameters and determine the sensitivity and specificity of the radiologic risk factors. The cut-off value for these two factors was found to be 114,98 cm2 and ≥ 578,5 mm2, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.627 for bone flap size and 0.758 for the DC-CP gap. The DC-CP gap had greater sensitivity and specificity as a predictor of BFR, compared to bone flap size (p = 0.079 and p = ≤ 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients with autologous cranioplasty, younger age, fragmented autologous bone flap and a wide gap between CP and cranial defect were predictive of bone flap resorption.