The Sex or Race of Program Directors May Not Play a Significant Role in Impacting Diversity Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.

PURPOSE: To identify the influence of residency program characteristics, including the presence of under-represented minorities in medicine (URiM) and/or female program directors (PDs), on the race and sex distribution of orthopaedic surgery residency trainees. METHODS: All active and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs from 2017-2021 that reported usable information in the Residency Explorer Tool were included. Data collected included program characteristics, as well as faculty and resident sex distribution, ethnicity, race, and demographic characteristics. The PDs' specific sex, ethnicity, race, and demographic characteristics were collected using residency program websites. The prevalence of factors in programs with the top quartile of female and URiM residents was compared with that in programs with the bottom 3 quartiles. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 148 of 200 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs (3,694 residents). The 52 excluded programs had no usable information in the Residency Explorer Tool or on an identifiable program website. Overall, 15.9% of residents in orthopaedic surgery residency programs were women and 14% were under-represented minorities. The rates of female PDs and chairs were 12.4% and 6.9%, respectively, whereas those of URiM PDs and chairs were 8.3% and 4.6%, respectively. Programs with more female residents were not associated with female PDs (P = .79) or URiM PDs (P = .48). Programs with a greater percentage of URiM residents were not associated with URiM PDs (P = .16). Larger programs (P = .021) and university-based programs (P = .048) had a greater percentage of female residents. Orthopaedic residency programs with visa sponsorship had a greater percentage of URiM residents (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Programs with a higher percentage of female or URiM residents did not show a significant association with having female or URiM PDs. Larger programs and university-affiliated programs were more likely to have a larger percentage of female residents, whereas programs that offered visa sponsorship had a higher percentage of URiM residents. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study highlights factors influencing diversity among orthopaedic surgery residents. Although the presence of female or URiM PDs does not influence the percentage of female or URiM residents, other program characteristics such as size, affiliation, and visa sponsorship offer potentially actionable insights for promoting greater diversity in orthopaedic training. Doing so may increase under-represented groups within the field and could ultimately impact patient care and improve health care equity.

Outcomes Following Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Infection.

BACKGROUND: In comparison to primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) procedures, revision arthroplasty can be a longer and more complex procedure leading to an increased risk of complications. The reported rates of infection in primary RSA range from 1% to 19% and the cost impact on patients and healthcare systems is significant, leading to multiple revision surgeries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcomes, complications, and revision rates for revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rRSA) due to infection compared to rRSA for non-infectious causes. METHODS: Patients who underwent rRSA between 2009 and 2020 by a single fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon at a single institution were retrospectively identified through a prospectively collected database. Patients were separated into two cohorts based on revision diagnosis: (1) rRSA due to infection (rRSAi), and (2) rRSA due to non-infectious causes (rRSAn). Patient-reported outcome scores (PROs), including the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart score (SAS), and active range of motion (ROM) were collected preoperatively and at a minimum one year follow-up. Postoperative complications and revision rates were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients (n=19 rRSAi group, n=74 rRSAn group) with a mean age of 68 years were included in this analysis. All baseline demographics were comparable between groups. No significant differences were found in preoperative or postoperative PROs and ROM between the two groups. Postoperative complication rates and revision rates were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty due to infection results in similar patient-reported outcome scores, range of motion, and revision rates when compared to rRSA for non-infectious causes. Our results suggest that despite the unique challenges associated with rRSA for infection, patient outcomes do not differ from cases attributed to non-infectious causes. Further efforts are warranted to further validate and contextualize these findings, considering the protentional influence of patient-specific and implant-specific factors.

Telemedicine in orthopaedics during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative landscape.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive analysis on observed trends regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telemedicine application in orthopaedics compared to other procedural, non-emergent specialties. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all telemedicine and in-person visits at a large single institution from January to December 2020. The number of patient visits, visit type, location, and provider specifics were collected. Comparisons were made between subspecialties (orthopaedic surgery, oncology, family medicine, rheumatology) for analyses. RESULTS: All specialties included were not conducting virtual visits at the beginning of 2020. By April 2020, orthopaedic virtual visits spiked to an all-time high of 33.5% of all patient visits as compared to oncology at 25.5%, rheumatology at 92.9%, and family medicine at 94%. By the end of the study period, orthopaedic virtual visits decreased back down to 6.5% of patient visits compared to oncology at 7.0%, and family medicine (17.4%) and rheumatology (26.2%). Orthopaedic providers practicing greater than 20 years had the highest average virtual visit rates. CONCLUSION: Although the COVID-19 pandemic has posed unique challenges for healthcare providers, there was a great advancement in the rollout and application of telemedicine. To mitigate the spread of infection from coronavirus and given the recent adjustments to reimbursement policies and HIPAA regulations, orthopaedics saw a dramatic expansion of telemedicine since April 2020. The pandemic may have served as a catalyst to adopt telehealth into clinical practice. However, telehealth saw a downtrend trend by December 2020, particularly in procedure-based fields like orthopaedics and oncology.

Factors influencing physical therapy utilization after shoulder surgery: a retrospective review.

Background: Postoperative physical therapy (PT) is a cornerstone to achieve optimal patient outcomes. Access to postoperative PT can be limited by insurance type, coverage, and cost. With copayments (CP) for PT as high as $75 per visit, PT can be costprohibitive for patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors affecting PT utilization among patients that underwent shoulder surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of 80 shoulder surgery patients with postoperative PT sessions attended at a single institution from 2017 to 2019. Patients were divided based on insurance type: private insurance (PI), and Medicare with or without supplemental insurance (MI), and CP or no copayment. Demographics, CP, total, and postoperative number of PT sessions utilized was collected and analyzed. Results: The cohort had 53 females and an average age of 62. There was no significant difference between PI and MI at baseline other than surgery performed (P = .03), older MI group (69 years vs. 56 years: P < .01), and more females in PI group (76% vs. 55%; P = .05). There was no significant difference in the number of PT sessions between groups. The PI group was more likely to have a CP (P < .01). The CP group more often had PI and significantly more total PT visits (P = .05), while the no copayment group more often had Medicare (P < .01). CP was not independently associated with a change in the number of PT visits or total PT visits. Conclusions: The utilization of PT after shoulder surgery was found to not be influenced by insurance type or CP as determined by the number of PT sessions attended. Further investigations are necessary to better understand the relationship between CP and different insurance types and develop effective strategies to increase access to PT for postoperative shoulder patients.

Application of risk assessment tools to predict opioid usage after shoulder surgery.

Background: Currently 128 people die daily from opioid-related overdoses in the United States. This burden has instigated a search for viable means to guide postoperative prescription decision-making. The Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patient with Pain (SOAPP) are validated risk assessment tools to predict opioid usage in high-risk populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of these opioid risk assessments and pain intensity scores, including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), to predict postoperative opioid use and dependence in shoulder surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of 81 patients who underwent shoulder surgery and completed 3 preoperative risk and pain assessments within a single hospital system from 2018 to 2020 was performed. Demographic variables and ORT-O, SOAPP-R (the revised version of the SOAPP assessment), and PROMIS 3a scores were recorded from preoperative assessments. Opioid prescriptions were recorded from Electronic-Florida Online Reporting of Controlled Substances Evaluation. Dependence was defined as opioid prescriptions at or greater than 3 months after surgery. Risk assessment scores were compared and tested against postoperative opioid prescriptions using statistical analyses and logistic regression modeling. Results: In the cohort, there were 36 female and 45 male patients with an average age of 64.5 years and body mass index of 28.0. Preoperatively, the average pain score was 6.2, and 7.8% of patients reported prolonged preoperative narcotics use. The average ORT-O score was 3.0, with 35.8% of patients defined as either medium or high risk, and the average PROMIS pain intensity preoperatively was 10.8. Neither the ORT-O nor the PROMIS pain score were good predictors of postoperative opioid dependence (area under curve = 0.39 and 0.43, respectively). The SOAPP-R performed slightly better (area under curve = 0.70) and was the only assessment with significantly different mean scores between patients with postoperative opioid dependence and those without (33.4 and 24.5, respectively, P = .049) and a moderate correlation to postoperative total morphine equivalents (R = 0.46, P = .007). Conclusion: With recent focus on preoperative risk assessments to predict postoperative opioid use and dependence, it is important to understand how well these tools work when applied to orthopedic patients. While the ORT may be helpful in other fields, it does not seem to be a strong predictor of postoperative opioid use or dependence in patients undergoing various types of shoulder surgery. Future studies are needed to explore the utility of the SOAPP-R in a larger sample and identify tools applicable to the orthopedic population to assist surgeons in screening at-risk patients.

Performance metrics and economics of superior labrum anterior-posterior tear repairs in Major League Baseball pitchers.

Background: Superior labrum anterior-posterior tears (SLAP) can be a career-altering injury for Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. Surgery and postoperative rehabilitation keep pitchers on the injured list (IL) for extended time, which results in a significant cost to a team. To date, no analyses have focused on the financial cost of SLAP repairs in MLB pitchers. Methods: A retrospective review of MLB pitchers with SLAP repair from 2004 to 2019 was conducted utilizing IL and financial contract data from the MLB website. Cost of injury was calculated from salary of the player. Performance metrics including earned run average, walks + hits per innings pitched, and innings pitched (IP) were averaged for one and all seasons played before and after injury. Return to play and return to prior performance rates were calculated and reported. Results: Of the 55 players identified, 22 players (40%) returned to play and 18 of these 22 players (82%) returned to prior performance. Annual cost increased over the study period (R2 = 0.288) averaging $3.5 million, and a stable average of 172 days was spent on the IL (R2 = 0.001). Performance was negligible except IP (106.95 vs. 50.85; P < .01) for 1 season before and after injury. For all seasons, earned run average and walks + hits per innings pitched significantly increased (4.13 vs. 5.19; P = .030, and 1.36 vs. 1.53; P = .033, respectively), while IP downtrended without significance (P = .058). Conclusion: SLAP repairs in MLB pitchers have significant financial impact and time spent on the IL, which surprisingly has not changed over time. It is encouraging to know return-to-play pitchers return without profound decline in performance level following SLAP repair.

The use of preoperative planning to decrease costs and increase efficiency in the OR.

Background: Shoulder arthroplasty (SA) incurs up to $1.8B per year in societal costs. With the increasing demand for SA and the steady decrease of annual reimbursements for orthopedic procedures, it has become crucial to control costs. In SA, there has been an interest in using preoperative planning software to improve accuracy in positioning and implant selection, ultimately optimizing outcomes. However, the use of preoperative planning to increase efficiency has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative planning could increase efficiency and decrease costs in the operating room. Methods: This retrospective review included 94 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty and had a CT scan with a preoperative plan by a single orthopedic surgeon between 2017 and 2020. The patients were divided based on the use of the preoperative plan during surgery. Group 1 included 65 patients with a preoperative plan used during surgery, and group 2 included 29 patients without a preoperative plan utilized during surgery. Average preparation time, surgical time, time in the operating room, the number of trays sterilized, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed between the two groups. Subanalysis was done to find a statistical difference in the cost of sterilization for both groups. Results: The cohort had 55% males, with an average age of 71 years and an average BMI of 29.9. There were no significant differences between the groups for age, BMI, or ASA class. There was no significant difference between groups in preparation time (group 1: 53.3 min, group 2: 53.1 min P = .924), surgical time (group 1: 119.7 min, group 2: 111.9 min; P = .25), or time in the OR (group 1: 183.2 min, group 2: 173.2 min; P = .156). There was a statistical difference in the number of trays (5 vs. 8; P < .01) and cost of sterilization between groups ($487.30 vs. $842.86; P < .01). No correlation between the number of trays and preparation time (group 1: -0.05, group 2: -0.28) or trays and surgical time was found for either group (group 1: r = -0.31, group 2: r = -0.22). There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes between the groups. Conclusion: While preoperative planning did not reduce time in the OR for shoulder arthroplasty, it was correlated to a significant reduction in the number and cost of sterilized trays with comparable postoperative outcomes.

Patients' perception of physical therapy after shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Formal physical therapy (PT) traditionally has been a critical part of postoperative recovery, but recently, because of cost containment, coverage of PT has become limited. Alternatives to formal PT have been proposed, including telerehabilitation, internet-based PT (IBPT), and home-based physician-guided PT. The purpose of this study was to understand patient perceptions of PT, the benefits, perception of improvements, access to PT, and alternative forms of PT after shoulder surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent orthopedic shoulder surgery were anonymously surveyed at one institution. Demographics, PT access, number of PT sessions, insurance, copayment, patients' perceptions of improvement, and their opinion about IBPT were collected. Answers were designed using Likert-scale or open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were used to report survey data. Analyses were performed based on demographic variables using independent t-test, chi-square tests, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Patients attended an average of 16.3 ± 13.8 PT sessions, with 65% ± 32.2 attributing average improvement to their sessions. Average copay was $18 ± 20.8 per session, which 56.1% agreed was reasonable. Almost all patients (94.8%) agreed their therapist took time to educate them. Half (52.5%) disagreed that successful PT could be achieved by IBPT, and 68.6% of patients responded they would not consider using IBPT even after a few in-person sessions. CONCLUSION: Patients have a positive perception of their therapist, cost, number of sessions, and utility of PT to impact improvements after orthopedic shoulder surgery. For IBPT to be a viable alternative, it should involve close engagement of a physical therapist given patients' perceptions of PT.

The impact of state-mandated opioid prescribing restrictions on prescribing patterns surrounding reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgeons are the third-highest prescribers of opioid medications, and the recent opioid crisis has placed more scrutiny on physicians and their prescribing habits. House Bill 21, a new law limiting the prescription of opioid medications, was signed in Florida on July 1, 2018 and similar laws have been passed in a number of other states as well. The purpose of this study was to understand the effect of new legal mandates on opioid prescribing patterns and dependence rates for patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review of 143 patients who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty from 2017 to 2019 was performed. There were 87 patients in the pre-legislation group (group 1), compared to 56 in the post-legislation group (group 2). Demographics data and opioid prescriptions provided 90 days before and after surgery were obtained using the physician drug monitoring database. Descriptive statistics and Student's t-tests were used to examine differences. RESULTS: Preoperatively, both groups received similar numbers of pills and total morphine equivalents (TMEs; group 1: 47.3 pills and 59.9 TMEs, group 2: 30.9 pills and 24.8 TMEs) (P = .292, P = .081). Group 1 had 88.5% of patients fill an opioid prescription postoperatively, compared to 50.9% of group 2 (P < .001). Postoperatively, initial opioid prescriptions were higher in average pills for group 1 (26 pills with an average of 375.6 TMEs) compared to group 2 (18 pills with an average of 199.6 TMEs) (P < .001, P = .122). For the entire postoperative course, patients in group 1 filled prescriptions for an average of 1740.7 TMEs and 84 pills, compared to 461.9 TMEs and 32 pills in group 2 (P = .035, P < .001). In the cohort, 17.8% of group 2 had multiple recorded opioid prescriptions, compared to 70.1% of group 1. There were also significant differences observed in postoperative dependence rates, with 23.0% in group 1 compared to 12.5% in group 2 (P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: State-mandated opioid prescribing restrictions have been successful in decreasing opioid prescribing and dependence rates for orthopedic shoulder patients. Further efforts are required to reduce preoperative prescriptions involving chronic shoulder pathology as current legislature has not had an impact on this. Legislative changes may be an effective way to help reduce abuse and opioid dependence in shoulder arthroplasty patients; however, further research is needed.

Rehabilitation Protocols for Superior Capsular Reconstruction Are Variable: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To screen manuscripts that discuss rehabilitation protocols for patients who underwent superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) to elucidate whether a standard rehabilitation algorithm exists for SCR. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (i.e., PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed (MEDLINE) and Embase were searched using pertinent Boolean operation terms "superior capsular reconstruction" and "rotator cuff repair rehabilitation," and articles that included rehabilitation protocols following superior capsular reconstruction surgery were reviewed. Two independent reviewers performed the search and quality assessment. RESULTS: A total of 549 articles were yielded after our database search. Fourteen studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Study designs included 9 editorials, 3 case series, and 2 case reports. Each study included in this review used a unique rehabilitation algorithm that posed significant variability between the protocols. Four phases were identified to summarize each protocol and were used as a basis of discussion-sling versus brace time (3-6 weeks for comfort/removal vs complete immobilization), passive range of motion (immediately after surgery to initiation at 6 weeks), active range of motion (4-8 weeks), and strengthening/return to full activity (12-52 weeks). Initiation of rehabilitation, length of time spent in each phase, types of exercises, and overarching goals for return to function were significantly variable and were decided upon by the surgeon based on current massive rotator cuff repair protocols. Presently, there is no standard rehabilitation protocol for SCR. CONCLUSIONS: SCR is a relatively new procedure that is gaining rapid popularity with promising outcomes. Based on our review, there is no standard rehabilitation protocol in place; thus, it is not possible to recommend an evidence-based rehabilitation protocol following SCR at this time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, systematic review of Level IV and V studies.