Salvage surgeries for splanchnic artery aneurysms after failed endovascular therapy: case series.

INTRODUCTION: Splanchnic arterial aneurysms are a rare but potentially lethal disease with a mortality rate of more than 10% after rupture. Endovascular therapy is the first-line treatment for splanchnic aneurysms. However, appropriate management for splanchnic aneurysms after failed endovascular therapy remained inconclusive. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for consecutive patients (from 2019 to 2022) who underwent salvage surgeries for splanchnic artery aneurysms following failed endovascular therapy. The authors defined failed endovascular therapy as the technical infeasibility to apply endovascular therapy, the incomplete exclusion of the aneurysm, or the incomplete resolution of preoperative aneurysm-associated complications. Salvage operations included aneurysmectomy with vascular reconstruction and partial aneurysmectomy with directly closing of bleeders from the intraluminal space of the aneurysms. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients received endovascular therapies for splanchnic aneurysms, and 13 failed endovascular trials. The authors performed salvage surgeries for five patients and enrolled them in this study, including four false aneurysms of the celiac or superior mesenteric arteries and a true aneurysm of the common hepatic artery. The causes of failed endovascular therapy included coil migration, insufficient space for safely deploying the covered stent, a persistent mass effect from the postembolized aneurysm, or infeasibility for catheter cannulation. The mean hospital stay was nine days (mean±SD, 8.8±1.6 days), with no one suffering 90-day surgical morbidity and mortality, and all patients getting symptoms improvement. During the follow-up period (mean±SD, 24±10 months), one patient suffered a small residual asymptomatic celiac artery aneurysm (8 mm in diameter) and was treated conservatively due to underlying liver cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: Surgical management is a feasible, effective, and safe alternative for splanchnic aneurysms after failed endovascular therapy.

Trends of polypharmacy among older people in Asia, Australia and the United Kingdom: a multinational population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy among older people represents a global challenge due to its association with adverse drug events. The reported prevalence of polypharmacy varies widely across countries, and is particularly high in Asian countries. However, there is no multinational study using standardised measurements exploring variations in prescribing trends. OBJECTIVE: To compare polypharmacy trends in older people in Asia, Australia and the United Kingdom. DESIGN: Multinational, retrospective, time-trend, observational study using a common study protocol. SETTING: Outpatient and community settings. SUBJECTS: All individuals aged ≥ 65 years between 2013 and 2016. METHODS: We defined polypharmacy as the concomitant use of ≥5 medications for ≥45 days per year. We estimated the annual prevalence of polypharmacy and calculated average annual percentage change (AAPC) to assess the time trends. RESULTS: A total of 1.62 million individuals were included in this study. The highest prevalence of polypharmacy was observed in Hong Kong (46.4%), followed by Taiwan (38.8%), South Korea (32.0%), the United Kingdom (23.5%) and Australia (20.1%) in 2016. For the time trend, the Asian region showed a steady increase, particularly in Hong Kong and South Korea (AAPC: Hong Kong, 2.7%; South Korea, 1.8%; Taiwan, 1.0%). However, Australia and the United Kingdom showed a decreasing trend (Australia, -4.9%; the United Kingdom, -1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy prevalence in older people was higher in Hong Kong, Taiwan and South Korea, with an increasing trend over time, compared with Australia and the United Kingdom. Our findings underline the necessity to monitor polypharmacy among older people in Asia by conducting government-level interventions and introducing medicine-optimisation strategies.

Comparative Treatment Persistence with Bone-Targeting Agents Among Asian Patients with Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors: A Multinational Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of bone-targeting agents has been confirmed, but the generalizability of results to Asia is in question. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate and compare treatment persistence and re-initiation with different bone-targeting agents among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. METHODS: This population-based cohort study included patients with bone metastasis with breast, lung, or prostate cancer who initiated bone-targeting agents, including denosumab, zoledronic acid, and pamidronate in Taiwan (2013-17), Hong Kong (2013-17), and Korea (2012-16). We described the patients' persistence with bone-targeting agents, by evaluating the interruption probability, and compared risks of treatment interruption. The rates of re-initiation with index bone-targeting agents were evaluated. RESULTS: We included 5127 patients (denosumab: 3440, zoledronic acid: 1210, pamidronate: 477) from Taiwan, 883 patients (denosumab: 458, zoledronic acid: 357, pamidronate: 68) from Hong Kong, and 4800 patients (zoledronic acid: 4068, pamidronate: 732) from Korea. Compared with zoledronic acid, denosumab had a lower risk of interruption in Taiwan (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.48) and Hong Kong (0.36; 0.28-0.45). However, pamidronate was more likely to be interrupted than zoledronic acid in Taiwan (1.31; 1.11-1.54) and Korea (2.06; 1.83-2.32), but not in Hong Kong (1.13; 0.71-1.78). After discontinuation, original treatments with denosumab in Taiwan and zoledronic acid in Hong Kong were more likely to be resumed, while in Korea, the rates were similar among the bisphosphonates. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab was associated with a lower risk of interruption than bisphosphonates in patients with bone metastases in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Further investigations may be required to verify patients' actual reasons for discontinuation.

Effect Modification by Indication to the Risks of Major Thromboembolic Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The association between intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment and the risk of major thromboembolic adverse events (TAEs) remains under debate. This study aimed to examine associated risks of TAEs in patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment, and effect modification by different indications. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database during 2011-2017 to identify neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME) patients newly receiving intravitreal aflibercept or ranibizumab. We followed up patients for 2 years, or until the occurrence of TAEs, including ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism, death, or the end of the study period (i.e., 31 December 2018). We compared the risk of TAEs between patients with aflibercept and ranibizumab using Cox-proportional hazard models. We examined statistical interactions between the anti-VEGF treatment (i.e., ranibizumab and aflibercept) and indications (i.e., nAMD and DME) with regard to the outcome of TAEs. RESULTS: We included 12,215 nAMD and 7532 DME patients. Among nAMD patients, those receiving aflibercept had lower risk of TAEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% CI 0.77-0.94) compared with those receiving ranibizumab. However, among DME patients, those receiving aflibercept had no differences in the risk of TAEs (1.14; 0.97-1.35) compared with those receiving ranibizumab. Among patients treated with ranibizumab, the DME group had a higher risk of TAEs than the nAMD group (HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.03-1.28); similar results were observed in patients treated with aflibercept (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.27-1.85). When DME patients were treated with aflibercept, the risk of TAEs was 31% higher than when nAMD patients were treated with ranibizumab (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.09-1.56; p < 0.05). The p-value for statistical interaction between the anti-VEGF treatment and indications was 0.0033. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with aflibercept or ranibizumab for different indications may be associated with varying risk of TAEs. The findings provide evidence to support treatment selection, taking indications and TAE risk into consideration.

Bone-targeting agents in major solid tumour metastases: a multinational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and utilisation patterns of bone-targeting agents (BTAs) in patients with bone metastases from breast, prostate and lung cancer. METHODS: This is a multinational retrospective cohort study including patients with three major solid tumours (breast, prostate and lung cancer) and newly initiated on BTAs (ie, denosumab, zoledronic acid and pamidronate). Records were retrieved from nationwide health databases from Hong Kong and Taiwan (HK and TW: 2013-2017) and Korea (KR: 2012-2016). Descriptive analyses included the annual incidence rates of bone metastases and the cumulative incidence curves of BTA initiation. We used Sankey diagrams to visualise the dynamic BTA utilisation patterns. RESULTS: The annual incidence rate of bone metastases ranged from 3.5% to 4.5% in TW, from 9.6% to 10.3% in HK and from 2.9% to 3.8% in KR. We identified 14.1% (5127), 9.3% (883) and 9.4% (4800) of patients with bone metastases newly initiated on BTAs in TW, HK and KR, respectively. The most frequently used BTA in TW (67.1%) and HK (51.9%) was denosumab, while in KR (84.8%) it was zoledronic acid. Sankey diagrams indicated the proportion of patients remaining on denosumab was highest in TW and HK, while it was zoledronic acid in KR. Specifically, in TW, patients who were on bisphosphonates or had discontinued treatment frequently switched to or reinitiated denosumab. CONCLUSIONS: We found the rate of BTA utilisation remained low across all sites and tumour types in recent years. The dynamic utilisation patterns of BTAs provide better understanding of the treatment landscape for future evaluation of associated outcomes of patients.

Comparative Risk of Arterial Thromboembolic Events Between Aflibercept and Ranibizumab in Patients with Maculopathy: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The increasing numbers of elderly patients and rising incidence of maculopathy raise concerns over arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) with the use of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medications. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the risk of ATEs between aflibercept and ranibizumab for maculopathy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study analyzing Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database during 2011-2017 to identify patients with maculopathy receiving intravitreal aflibercept or ranibizumab. The primary outcome was any hospitalization or emergency room visit because of ATEs, including ischemic heart disease (IHD), ischemic stroke (IS), and transient ischemic attack (TIA). The secondary outcome was mortality within 30 days after occurrence of ATE. We employed propensity score methods to generate more homogeneous groups for comparison. RESULTS: We included 5791 aflibercept users and 14,534 ranibizumab users in this study. Compared with the ranibizumab group, the aflibercept group was associated with a lower risk of ATE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.91), with HRs of 0.86 for IHD (95% CI 0.80-0.93), 0.87 for IS (95% CI 0.76-1.00), and 0.57 for TIA (95% CI 0.46-0.71). The risk of 30-day mortality after ATE (HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.80-2.43) and the risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.89-1.17) in the aflibercept group was similar to that in the ranibizumab group. CONCLUSION: The use of aflibercept in patients with maculopathy was associated with a lower risk of ATE than was the use of ranibizumab. There was no difference in mortality risk between the two groups. Our study could provide strong grounds for future prospective studies to confirm the findings.

Use of hydrochlorothiazide and risk of skin cancer: a nationwide Taiwanese case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The antihypertensive agent hydrochlorothiazide has been associated with increased risks of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and possibly some melanoma subtypes. Previous studies were, however, conducted in predominantly Caucasian populations. We therefore examined the association between hydrochlorothiazide and skin cancer risk in an Asian population. METHODS: By using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), we conducted three separate case-control studies of lip cancer, non-lip non-melanoma skin cancer and melanoma. Cases (n = 29,082) with a first-ever skin cancer diagnoses (2008-2015) were matched 1:10 to population controls. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) associating hydrochlorothiazide use with skin cancer risk by using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Hydrochlorothiazide use showed no overall association with any of the three outcomes: ORs for high cumulative use of HCTZ (≥50,000 mg) were 0.86 (95% CI 0.09-7.81) for lip cancer, 1.16 (95% CI 0.98-1.37) for non-lip NMSC and 1.07 (95% CI 0.65-1.76) for melanoma. There was some evidence of a dose-response pattern for non-lip NMSC, with an OR of 1.66 (95% CI 0.82-3.33) for 100,000-149,999 mg of HCTZ. The null findings were robust across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Use of HCTZ appears safe in terms of skin cancer risk in an Asian population.