Esophageal Hypervigilance and Visceral Anxiety Contribute to Symptom Severity of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

INTRODUCTION: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a clinical conundrum without a diagnostic gold standard. The Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale (EHAS) is a questionnaire designed for cognitive-affective evaluation of visceral sensitivity. We hypothesized that esophageal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety have an etiopathological role in generation of LPR symptoms, especially when gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) cannot explain these symptoms. METHODS: Consecutive patients with LPR and/or GERD symptoms lasting >3 months were prospectively enrolled and characterized using the Reflux Symptom Index, GERD questionnaire, and EHAS. Eligible patients with negative endoscopy underwent 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring off acid suppression for phenotyping GERD and assessment of reflux burden, using conventional metrics (acid exposure time and number of reflux episodes) and novel metrics (mean nocturnal baseline impedance and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index). RESULTS: Of 269 enrolled patients (mean age 47.1 years, 21-65 years, 60.6% female), 90 patients were with concomitant GERD and LPR symptoms, 32 patients were with dominant LPR symptoms, 102 patients were with dominant GERD symptoms, and 45 were controls. Patients with concomitant GERD and LPR symptoms had higher EHAS than those with dominant GERD symptoms and controls ( P ≤ 0.001); patients with dominant LPR symptoms had higher EHAS than controls ( P = 0.007). On Pearson correlation, EHAS positively correlated with the Reflux Symptom Index. DISCUSSION: Esophageal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety may be more important than reflux burden in LPR symptom perception.

Effects of the GABA(B) agonist baclofen on volitional swallowing in normal subjects.

The GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen is known to suppress the rate of spontaneous swallowing but not pharyngeal muscle contraction. The extent to which baclofen may alter volitional swallowing is not currently known. We investigated the effects of baclofen in healthy subjects, hypothesizing that baclofen exposure would alter volume-regulation and/or piecemeal deglutition behaviors during volitional swallowing attempts. Pharyngeal high-resolution manometry impedance (P-HRM-I) protocol was used to assess swallowing function of 22 healthy adult volunteers (median 29 years) who were investigated on two occasions, receiving 40 mg baclofen (oral) 1 h before study, or placebo (randomized). Standard swallow function variables recommended by the pharyngeal HRM Working Group were derived for 5 ml, 10 ml, and 20 ml volumes of thin and extremely thick liquid challenges. Multiple swallow behaviors, comprising two swallows <5 s apart, were characterized. The spontaneous swallow rate was also determined. Baclofen exposure had no overall significant effect on swallow variables. Upper esophageal sphincter pressure was weaker during exposure to baclofen, during both the pre-deglutitive and post-deglutitive phases of the swallow (p < 0.05 during thick liquid swallows). Piecemeal swallows, where the bolus is separated in two potions, were significantly more common during 20 ml boluses (p = 0.002). Baclofen decreased the frequency of piecemeal deglutition overall. Baclofen has limited to no effect on volitional swallowing measures, however, does reduce the likelihood of initiation of piecemeal deglutition to large volume challenges.

Current advances in the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is very common and defined as troublesome symptoms owing to excessive acid reflux. The spectrum of GERD is broad, including not only erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus but also nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), reflux hypersensitivity, and functional heartburn. Patients with reflux symptoms despite normal endoscopy remain common clinical presentation, can be heterogeneous overlapping with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring with and without impedance helps the diagnosis of NERD. Metrics such as baseline impedance and postreflux swallow induced peristaltic wave enhance diagnostic accuracy in patients with inconclusive diagnoses. The major treatment of all manifestations of GERD is acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors, while other therapies, such as reflux-reducing agents and adjunctive medications, can be individualized where the response to traditional management is incomplete. GERD patients often need long-term treatment due to frequent relapses. Anti-reflux surgery can be effective too. Endoscopic therapies have some promising results, but long-term outcomes remain to be determined.

Analysis of contractile segment impedance during straight leg raise maneuver using high-resolution impedance manometry increases diagnostic yield in reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Contractile segment impedance (CSI) obtained from high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) is a measure of mucosal integrity that predicts gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). While straight leg raise (SLR) maneuver augments esophageal peristaltic vigor, it remains unclear whether SLR affects CSI values. This study was aimed to evaluate whether CSI with SLR is feasible and useful to complement the diagnosis of GERD. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 48 patients with typical GERD symptoms who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, HRIM with SLR maneuver, and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) testing. The capability of mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI), resting baseline impedance (RBI), CSI with or without SLR maneuver in predicting GERD was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. KEY RESULTS: Among 20 GERD patients and 28 non-GERD patients, all values of impedance-based metrics were lower in GERD patients compared to non-GERD patients (p < 0.001). For GERD identification, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values of CSI with SLR maneuver, CSI, MNBI, and RBI were 0.901, 0.858, 0.865, and 0.797. Particularly in ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) patients, SLR maneuver increased mean distal contractile integral from 436 to 828.7 mmHg.s.cm (p = 0.018) and enhanced AUROC values of CSI for GERD identification from 0.917 to 0.958. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: CSI measurement during HRIM appears to be a reliable, time-saving, and less invasive tool for complementing GERD diagnosis. Our results also suggest a simple SLR maneuver during HRIM could enhance diagnostic accuracy of CSI for GERD identification especially in IEM patients.

Effects of menthol on esophageal motility in humans: Studies using high-resolution manometry.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The cold receptor, transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8), has been reported to be expressed in esophageal vagal afferents. Esophageal infusion of menthol modulates esophageal perception in reflux patients via TRPM8, but the effects of menthol on esophageal motility are not well investigated. This study aimed to test the hypothesis whether the infusion of menthol into the esophagus could affect esophageal peristaltic characteristics. METHODS: Eighteen healthy adults (men 13, mean age 27) underwent high-resolution manometry (HRM) using a catheter with the injection port located in mid-esophagus. Primary peristalsis was performed with ten wet swallows, while secondary peristalsis was generated by 10 rapid air injections. Two different sessions were randomly performed including acute administration of menthol (3 mM) and the placebo. RESULTS: Menthol significantly decreased upper esophageal (UES) pressure of primary peristalsis than the placebo (p = 0.019). There was no difference in distal contractile integral (p = 0.33), distal latency (p = 0.86), basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure (p = 0.19), or 4-second integrated relaxation pressure (p = 0.75) between menthol and placebo. Menthol significantly decreased the frequency of secondary peristalsis subsequent to the administration of menthol during rapid injections with 20 mL air (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Intraluminal infusion of menthol reduces UES basal pressure and inhibits peristaltic frequency of secondary peristalsis. The data suggest that the triggering of secondary peristalsis is probably modulated by TRPM8-sensitive mechanoreceptors; however, the activation of TRPM8 from menthol does not alter esophageal motility following deglutition or distension-induced secondary peristalsis.

Effects of codeine on esophageal peristalsis in humans using high resolution manometry.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Opioid receptors agonists have been demonstrated to impair lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation and induce spastic esophageal dysmotility, but little was known for their impact on distension-induced secondary peristalsis. The aim of the study was to investigate the hypothesis whether acute administration of codeine can influence physiological characteristics of primary and secondary peristalsis in healthy adults. METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers (13 men, mean age 27.5 years, aged 20-43 years) underwent high resolution manometry (HRM) with a catheter containing an injection port in mid-esophagus. Secondary peristalsis was performed with 10 and 20 mL rapid air injections. Two different sessions including acute administration of codeine (60 mg) or the placebo were randomly performed. RESULTS: Codeine significantly increased 4-s integrated relaxation pressure (IRP-4s) (P = 0.003) and shortened distal latency (DL) (P = 0.003) of primary peristalsis. The IRP-4s of secondary peristalsis was also significantly higher after codeine than the placebo during air injections with 10 mL (P = 0.048) and 20 mL (P = 0.047). Codeine significantly increased the frequency of secondary peristalsis during air injections with 10 mL than the placebo (P = 0.007), but not for air injection with 20 mL (P = 0.305). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to impair LES relaxation and reduce distal latency of primary peristalsis, codeine impairs LES relaxation of secondary peristalsis and increases secondary peristaltic frequency. Our study supports the notion in human esophagus that the impact of opioids on peristaltic physiology appears to be present in both primary and secondary peristalsis.

Application of a novel straight leg raise test during high-resolution manometry can predict esophageal contractile reserve in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Increased intra-abdominal pressure from abdominal compression augments esophageal peristalsis during high-resolution manometry (HRM), and straight leg raise (SLR) while supine increases intra-abdominal pressure. We determined if water swallows performed during SLR can mimic contraction reserve seen with multiple rapid swallows (MRS). METHODS: Consecutive patients evaluated for GERD symptoms completed validated GERD questionnaires, esophageal HRM, and upper endoscopy. Distal contractile integral (DCI) was analyzed during single water swallows (10 × 5 mL), MRS (5 × 2 mL), and during SLR (5x5 mL). Peristaltic breaks were measured using software tools with a 20 mm Hg isobaric contour. Univariate correlational analyses were performed to compare esophageal motor patterns and DCI values during single water swallows, MRS, and SLR. RESULTS: Of 103 study patients (mean age: 46.7 ± 12.3 years, 56.3% female), 50 (48.5%) had ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). Contraction reserve was observed on MRS in 62% with IEM, and 35.8% with normal motility (p = 0.008). DCI was significantly higher during SLR compared to mean single swallow DCI in both IEM and normal motility patients (p < 0.001 for each comparison). In IEM patients, SLR significantly reduced swallows with peristaltic breaks (6.1 ± 3.7 vs 3.6 ± 3.6; p < 0.001) and shortened the length of the largest break (4.8 ± 3.4 vs 3.0 ± 3.0 cm; p < 0.001). DCI response following MRS correlated with DCI with swallows during SLR, with a correlational coefficient (Pearson's r) of 0.70 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Swallowing against the resistance of increased intra-abdominal pressure from SLR improves esophageal body peristaltic performance and predicts esophageal body contraction reserve.

Association between use of proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) use is associated with hypergastrinemia and gut microbiota alteration. Concern over the risk that these factors may increase chances of colorectal cancer (CRC) has risen. To investigate the association between PPIs use and CRC using a large population-based cohort and examine whether the PPIs may differ regarding the risk of CRC. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study using a database from Taiwan National Health Insurance followed up longitudinally from 1999 through 2011. Patients with PPIs use were compared with non-use controls at a 1:1 ratio, for age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. We performed Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis to estimate the association between PPIs use and the development of CRC. RESULTS: Among the 45382 eligible PPIs users, 172 (0.4%) developed CRC during a median follow-up of 5.4 years. PPIs use was associated with a higher risk of CRC with an adjusted HR of 2.03 (95% CI 1.56-2.63, P<0.001). The risk increased with more frequent use of PPIs (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.19-2.14; 2.59, 95% CI 1.84-3.65 and 4.33, 95% CI 2.75-6.80 for ≤30 cDDD per year, 30-90 cDDD per year, and ≥90 cDDD per year, respectively). There was also a statistically significant trend toward an increased risk with long-term PPIs use for more than one year. All PPIs, except pantoprazole and rabeprazole, were associated with an increased risk of CRC. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that PPIs use might increase the risk of CRC in a dose-dependent manner.

Effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil on esophageal secondary peristalsis: Studies with high-resolution manometry.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Secondary peristalsis contributes to the clearance of retained refluxate from the esophagus. Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, inhibits primary esophageal peristalsis, but its effects on secondary peristalsis remain unknown. This study sought to investigate whether sildenafil could influence physiological characteristics of secondary peristalsis by applying high-resolution manometry (HRM). METHODS: Seventeen healthy volunteers (15 men and 2 women, aged 30.2 ± 6.4 years) underwent two HRM studies on separate days following the administration of either a placebo or 50 mg of sildenafil in a random order. Both studies were performed using a water-perfused HRM catheter containing one air injection channel positioned in the mid-esophagus. Secondary peristalsis was stimulated by a rapid mid-esophageal injection of 10 or 20 mL of air 1 h after the administration of either the placebo or sildenafil. The frequency and distal contractile integral of secondary peristalsis were then compared. RESULTS: Complete secondary peristalsis triggered by the 20-mL air injection was more frequent than observed with the 10-mL air injection (P < 0.001). The vigor of secondary peristalsis triggered by the injection of either volume of air was lower than that of primary peristalsis (P < 0.001). Sildenafil significantly reduced the success rate (P ≤ 0.001) and vigor (P < 0.001) of secondary peristalsis relative to the effects of the placebo at both distension volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary peristalsis can be successfully triggered by rapid air injection during HRM. Sildenafil reduces both the success rate and the vigor of secondary peristalsis, similar to that seen with primary peristalsis.

Impact of ineffective esophageal motility on secondary peristalsis: Studies with high-resolution manometry.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim was to investigate whether there is a difference in secondary peristalsis on high-resolution manometry (HRM) among gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with and without ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and healthy individuals. METHODS: Twenty-eight GERD patients and seventeen healthy controls were included. Secondary peristalsis was stimulated by a rapid injection of 20 ml air in mid-esophagus. We compared HRM metrics and the response and effective rate of triggering secondary peristalsis between patients with and without IEM and healthy controls. RESULTS: Sixteen patients had IEM, and the remaining 12 had normal manometry. By triggering of secondary peristalsis, patients without IEM and healthy controls had significantly higher distal contractile integral (DCI) values than IEM patients (p = 0.006). A successful secondary peristalsis was triggered more frequently in healthy controls than in GERD patients with normal peristalsis or IEM (56.9% vs. 20.2% vs. 9.1%, all p < 0.001). The effective rate which determined as DCI > 450 mm Hg.cm.s was higher in healthy controls compared to patients with normal peristalsis (36.5% vs. 19.4%, p < 0.001) and IEM (36.5% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001). Patients with IEM had lower successful triggering response (9.1% vs. 20.2%) and effective secondary peristalsis (6.3% vs. 19.4%) compared with patients without IEM (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our work has demonstrated that GERD patients, in particular those with IEM, have significant defects in the triggering of secondary peristalsis on HRM. HRM helps characterize esophageal secondary peristalsis which exhibits differently in patients with and without IEM.

Effect of prucalopride on sildenafil-induced inhibition of esophageal peristalsis in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Prucalopride, a high-affinity 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor agonist, promotes esophageal peristalsis, while phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor sildenafil inhibits esophageal peristalsis. The present study was aimed to evaluate whether prucalopride would augment esophageal peristalsis subsequent to the application of sildenafil. METHODS: Seventeen healthy adults underwent high-resolution manometry by a catheter with one injection port located in the mid-esophagus. Secondary peristalsis was assessed by rapid air injections after water swallows. Two sessions were randomly performed including acute administration of sildenafil 50 mg after pretreatment with prucalopride or the placebo. RESULTS: The frequency of primary peristalsis subsequent to the administration of sildenafil was significantly increased by prucalopride (P = 0.02). Prucalopride also significantly increased distal contractile integral of primary peristalsis subsequent to the administration of sildenafil (P = 0.03). No difference in the frequency of secondary peristalsis subsequent to the administration of sildenafil for air injects of 10 mL (P = 0.14) or 20 mL (P = 0.21) was found between prucalopride and placebo. Prucalopride did not change distal contractile integral of secondary peristalsis subsequent to the administration of sildenafil for air injections of 10 mL (P = 0.09) or 20 mL (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Prucalopride modulates sildenafil-induced inhibition of primary peristalsis by increasing its effectiveness and peristaltic wave amplitude. Our findings suggest that activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptors plays a role in mediating sildenafil-induced inhibition of esophageal primary peristalsis rather than secondary peristalsis.

Esophageal acid sensitivity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: Does esophageal hypomotility matter?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Esophageal acid sensitivity plays a role in symptomatic manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Esophageal hypomotility is common in patients with GERD. We aimed to determine whether esophageal acid sensitivity may differ between patients with and without esophageal hypomotility. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 41 consecutive patients (10 females, mean age 53 years, range 32-79) with typical reflux symptoms and 10 healthy subjects (5 females, mean age 45 years, range 28-56) for esophageal acid sensitivity and motility tests. Demographics, body mass index (BMI), and reflux symptoms using a validated questionnaire (GERDQ) were recorded. All subjects underwent infusion of 0.1 N hydrochloric acid in the esophagus at a rate of 10 mL/min for 10 minutes. The parameters for esophageal acid infusion included lag time, intensity rating, and acid sensitivity score. RESULTS: Esophageal motility diagnosis included 24 patients with normal motility and 17 patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). Lag time was similar between the patient groups. No differences between patients with normal motility and IEM were found for any of other acid infusion parameters. There was a positive correlation between lag time and BMI (r = .33, P = .04). GERDQ was negatively correlated to lag time (r = -.73, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal acid sensitivity was similar in GERD patients with and without hypomotility. Decreased acid sensitivity in individuals with increasing body mass index may play a pathological role in symptomatic modulation of patients with GERD.

Does prucalopride reduce the dose of sodium phosphate in bowel preparation? A single-blind, randomized, and prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Sodium phosphate solution (NaP) in oral form is well known and frequently used for good quality bowel cleansing before a colonoscopy, but it carries the potential risk of electrolyte disturbance and dehydration. Prucalopride mitigates severe constipation by promoting colon motility. We evaluated the hypothesis that prucalopride plus one single dose of 45 mL NaP could be used as an alternative bowel preparation. METHODS: Consenting adult patients undergoing a screening colonoscopy were randomized to receive 90 mL NaP (90-NaP) in two split doses or prucalopride 2 mg plus 45 mL NaP (P-NaP). Patients completed a questionnaire about adverse gastrointestinal symptoms and acceptability for bowel preparation. The effectiveness of colon preparation was evaluated according to the Ottawa bowel preparation scale. RESULTS: Bowel cleansing was achieved in 92 patients with 90-NaP and in 97 patients with P-NaP. There was no significant difference in bowel cleansing level and adverse gastrointestinal symptoms between the two groups. However, more patients in the P-NaP group were willing to undertake the same regimen for a subsequent colonoscopy bowel preparation than those in 90-NaP group (82/97; 85% vs 51/92; 55%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The combination of 2 mg prucalopride and 45 mL NaP appeared to provide the same level of bowel cleansing, but it was more acceptable than the 90 mL NaP in split doses.

Sleep Disturbance and Its Association with Gastrointestinal Symptoms/Diseases and Psychological Comorbidity.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We aimed to investigate gastrointestinal symptoms, clinical characteristics, and psychological factors in subjects with and without sleep disturbance (SD) in a health screening cohort. METHODS: We enrolled 2,752 consecutive subjects during their health checkups. All participants underwent an evaluation with questionnaires. Demographic characteristics and biochemical data were recorded. SD was confirmed when Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score was greater than 5. RESULTS: Among the study population (n = 2,674), 956 (36%) individuals had SD. SD was associated with female gender, older age, lower level of education, higher systolic blood pressure, higher serum high-density lipoprotein levels and higher prevalence of functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). SD subjects also had more depression, more anxiety, more severe gastrointestinal reflux disease symptoms and higher prevalence of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD; p < 0.001). SD was -independently associated with female gender (OR 1.75, p < 0.001), older age (OR 1.03, p < 0.001), NERD (OR 1.88, p = 0.004), IBS (OR 1.51, p = 0.043), and depression (OR 1.16, p < 0.001) by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies will be needed to clarify the interrelationships among SD, psychological stress, and functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Association of coffee consumption and liver fibrosis progression in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: A 5-year population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Although coffee consumption has been associated with decreased risk of liver fibrosis progression, cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with HCV infection or fatty liver diseases, its effect on hepatitis B patients remains unclear. We aimed to examine the effect of coffee consumption on liver fibrosis progression and cirrhosis-related complications in patients with chronic HBV infection. METHODS: Coffee consumption was assessed in 2604 participants who were previously recruited from a population-based GERD survey. The primary endpoints of this study were the impact of coffee consumption on the development of cirrhosis-related complications, including liver cirrhosis, esophageal varices, or hepatocellular carcinoma at the end of 5-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were the declines of serum predicting indices of liver fibrosis (AST/ALT, APRI, FIB-4, Hui score) or liver function tests (AST, ALT). RESULTS: 328 patients with chronic HBV infection were enrolled into this study. At baseline, coffee consumption was associated with higher education level, more frequent tobacco use and normal blood pressure (p < 0.05 for all). Patients with higher coffee consumption had a significant lower serum AST, APRI and FIB-4 index value than non-coffee drinkers [adjusted HR 0.30, 95% CI(0.11-0.82) for AST; 0.30, 95% CI (0.11-0.84) for APRI; 0.30, 95% CI (0.13-0.69) for FIB-4]. However, higher coffee consumption didn't change serum AST levels, APRI, FIB-4 index values or incidences of cirrhosis-related complications at the end of 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Coffee consumption was not associated with fibrosis progression or HCC risk in chronic hepatitis B patients over the 5-year observation period.

Influence of prucalopride on esophageal secondary peristalsis in reflux patients with ineffective motility.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Secondary peristalsis contributes to esophageal clearance. Prucalopride promotes secondary peristalsis by stimulating 5-hydroxytrypatamine 4 receptors in the esophagus. We aimed to determine whether prucalopride would augment secondary peristalsis in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with IEM. METHODS: After a baseline recording of primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis was stimulated by slow and rapid mid-esophageal injections of air in 15 patients with IEM. Two separate sessions with 4-mg oral prucalopride or placebo were randomly performed. RESULTS: Prucalopride significantly increased primary peristaltic wave amplitude (68.1 ± 10.0 vs 55.5 ± 8.8 mmHg, P = 0.02). The threshold volume for triggering secondary peristalsis was significantly decreased by prucalopride during slow (9.3 ± 0.8 vs 12.0 ± 0.8 mL; P = 0.04) and rapid air injection (4.9 ± 0.3 vs 7.1 ± 0.1 mL; P = 0.01). Secondary peristalsis was triggered more frequently after application of prucalopride (55% [43-70%]) than placebo (45% [33-50%]) (P = 0.008). Prucalopride did not change pressure wave amplitudes during slow air injection (84.6 ± 8.1 vs 57.4 ± 13.8 mmHg; P = 0.19) or pressure wave amplitudes during rapid air injection (84.2 ± 8.6 vs 69.5 ± 12.9 mmHg; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Prucalopride enhances primary peristalsis and mechanosensitivity of secondary peristalsis with limited impact on secondary peristaltic activities in IEM patients. Our study suggests that prucalopride appears to be useful in augmenting secondary peristalsis in patients with IEM only via sensory modulation of esophageal secondary peristalsis.

Influence of Rectal Decompression on Abdominal Symptoms and Anorectal Physiology following Colonoscopy in Healthy Adults.

Background. Postcolonoscopy abdominal discomfort and bloating are common. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether rectal decompression improved distension-induced abdominal symptoms and influenced anorectal physiology. Methods. In 15 healthy subjects, rectal distension was achieved by direct air inflation into the rectum by colonoscopy. Placement of rectal and sham tube was then performed in each subject on a separate occasion. The anorectal parameters and distension-induced abdominal symptoms were recorded. Results. Anorectal parameters were similar between placements of rectal tube and sham tube except for greater rectal compliance with rectal tube than with sham tube (P < 0.05). Abdominal pain and bloating were significantly reduced by rectal tube and sham tube at 1 minute (both P < 0.05) and 3 minutes (both P < 0.05). After placement of rectal tube, abdominal pain at 3 minutes correlated positively with first sensation (r = 0.53, P = 0.04), and bloating at 3 minutes also correlated positively with urge sensation (r = 0.55, P = 0.03). Conclusions. Rectal decompression with either rectal or sham tube improved distension-induced abdominal symptoms. Our study indicates that the mechanisms that improved abdominal symptoms by rectal decompression might be mediated by a central pathway instead of a peripheral mechanism.

Comparison of rectal suction versus rectal tube insertion for reducing abdominal symptoms immediately after unsedated colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Abdominal discomfort and bloating are common symptoms after colonoscopy. We aimed to compare the effects of direct rectal suction with insertion of a rectal tube on reducing abdominal symptoms after unsedated colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to have direct rectal suction or placement of a rectal tube immediately after colonoscopy. Post-procedure abdominal pain and bloating were measured with a 0 - 100 visual analogue scale. All participants ranked their satisfaction with either direct rectal suction or insertion of a rectal tube. RESULTS: Abdominal pain and bloating were significantly reduced by direct rectal suction and placement of a rectal tube at 1 minute (both P < 0.05) and 3 minutes (both P < 0.05) after the colonoscopy. Direct rectal suction significantly reduced abdominal pain at 1 minute (P = 0.001) and 3 minutes (P = 0.005) after colonoscopy compared with rectal tube insertion. Bloating was significantly lower in patients with direct rectal suction compared to those with rectal tube insertion at 1 minute (P = 0.03) after colonoscopy. Greater satisfaction was found in patients with direct rectal suction compared to those with rectal tube insertion (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Direct rectal suction is more effective than rectal tube placement in reducing abdominal symptoms immediately after colonoscopy. Our study suggests that direct rectal suction is useful in providing relief of symptoms when patients are having difficulty expelling air or are experiencing abdominal symptoms following colonoscopy.

Clinical, metabolic, and psychological characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease overlap with irritable bowel syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are highly prevalent in the general population, with significant symptom overlap, whereas the interaction between both remains poorly understood. We aim to identify the clinical and psychological factors that contribute toward the overlap of GERD and IBS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a case-control study among 806 GERD and 176 IBS patients from a health check-up cohort (n=2604). All participants were evaluated using the Reflux Disease Questionnaire score, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score, the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire score, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score. Endoscopic findings were classified according to the Los Angeles classification. IBS was diagnosed on the basis of Rome III criteria, and metabolic syndrome was defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition. RESULTS: Among the study population, 727 individuals had GERD, 97 individuals had IBS, and 79 individuals had a diagnosis of both GERD and IBS (GERD-I). GERD-I patients had more severe GERD symptoms compared with patients with GERD or IBS alone (P<0.0001). Moreover, GERD-I patients had more frequent healthcare-seeking behavior, decreased quality of sleep, and higher depression scores than patients with GERD (P<0.0001) or IBS alone (P<0.05). In addition, GERD-I patients had lower blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, and higher serum high-density lipoprotein levels than those with GERD alone (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: GERD patients overlapping with IBS have different clinical and psychological profiles than those with GERD or IBS alone. Our study suggests that awareness of these symptom presentations will help optimize the treatment of these conditions.

Atypical symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Atypical symptoms are common in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD) exhibit different clinical characteristics and responses to acid suppression treatment. We aimed to compare atypical characteristics in patients with NERD and ERD. We also investigated the presence of histological esophagitis in patients with NERD and ERD. METHODS: Eligible patients completed a questionnaire regarding reflux symptoms and concomitant atypical symptoms. Endoscopic biopsies with histological examination were performed. RESULTS: Of the 210 patients with GERD, 90 patients with ERD and 120 patients with NERD were studied. ERD patients were characterized by higher prevalence of hiatal hernia (P = 0.001) and smoking (P = 0.047). The prevalence of GERD was greater in the age group between 41 and 60 years regardless of endoscopic finding. There was no difference in the prevalence of atypical symptoms or histological esophagitis between NERD and ERD. In all subjects, heartburn was associated with dysphagia (r = 0.16, P = 0.01), dyspepsia (r = 0.22, P = 0.008) and hiccup (r = 0.19, P = 0.003), whereas acid regurgitation was associated with dyspepsia (r = 0.21, P = 0.014), belching (r = 0.15, P = 0.018) and hiccup (r = 0.19, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Atypical symptoms did not correlate with the presence of histological esophagitis. Atypical symptoms were equally prevalent in patients with NERD and ERD. The existence of atypical symptoms appears to be associated with the presence of typical reflux symptoms irrespective of endoscopic and histological reflux esophagitis.