Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 143: 107605, 2024 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866095

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimizing the use of blood component can reduce known and unknown blood transfusion risks, preserve blood bank resources, and decrease healthcare costs. Red Blood Cell (RBC) transfusion is common after cardiac surgery and associated with adverse perioperative outcomes, including mortality. Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) may reduce bleeding and the need for blood product transfusion after cardiac surgery. However, its blood-saving effect and impact on major outcomes remain uncertain. METHODS: This is a single-blinded, multinational, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio conducted in Tertiary and University hospitals. The study is designed to enroll patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery with planned cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients are randomized to receive ANH before CPB or the best available treatment without ANH. We identified an ANH volume of at least 650 ml as the critical threshold for clinically relevant benefits. Larger ANH volumes, however, are allowed and tailored to the patient's characteristics and clinical conditions. RESULTS: The primary outcome is the percentage of patients receiving RBCs transfusion from randomization until hospital discharge, which we hypothesize will be reduced from 35% to 28% with ANH. Secondary outcomes are all-cause 30-day mortality, acute kidney injury, bleeding complications, and ischemic complications. CONCLUSION: The trial is designed to determine whether ANH can safely reduce RBC transfusion after elective cardiac surgery with CPB. STUDY REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in April 2019 with the trial identification number NCT03913481.

2.
N Engl J Med ; 2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865168

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious and common complication of cardiac surgery, for which reduced kidney perfusion is a key contributing factor. Intravenous amino acids increase kidney perfusion and recruit renal functional reserve. However, the efficacy of amino acids in reducing the occurrence of AKI after cardiac surgery is uncertain. METHODS: In a multinational, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adult patients who were scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass to receive an intravenous infusion of either a balanced mixture of amino acids, at a dose of 2 g per kilogram of ideal body weight per day, or placebo (Ringer's solution) for up to 3 days. The primary outcome was the occurrence of AKI, defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes creatinine criteria. Secondary outcomes included the severity of AKI, the use and duration of kidney-replacement therapy, and all-cause 30-day mortality. RESULTS: We recruited 3511 patients at 22 centers in three countries and assigned 1759 patients to the amino acid group and 1752 to the placebo group. AKI occurred in 474 patients (26.9%) in the amino acid group and in 555 (31.7%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.94; P = 0.002). Stage 3 AKI occurred in 29 patients (1.6%) and 52 patients (3.0%), respectively (relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.87). Kidney-replacement therapy was used in 24 patients (1.4%) in the amino acid group and in 33 patients (1.9%) in the placebo group. There were no substantial differences between the two groups in other secondary outcomes or in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery, infusion of amino acids reduced the occurrence of AKI. (Funded by the Italian Ministry of Health; PROTECTION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03709264.).

3.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 33(10): 2685-2694, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31064730

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Reducing mortality is a key target in critical care and perioperative medicine. The authors aimed to identify all nonsurgical interventions (drugs, techniques, strategies) shown by randomized trials to increase mortality in these clinical settings. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature followed by a consensus-based voting process. SETTING: A web-based international consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-one physicians from 46 countries. INTERVENTIONS: The authors performed a systematic literature search and identified all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing a significant increase in unadjusted landmark mortality among surgical or critically ill patients. The authors reviewed such studies during a meeting by a core group of experts. Studies selected after such review advanced to web-based voting by clinicians in relation to agreement, clinical practice, and willingness to include each intervention in international guidelines. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors selected 12 RCTs dealing with 12 interventions increasing mortality: diaspirin-crosslinked hemoglobin (92% of agreement among web voters), overfeeding, nitric oxide synthase inhibitor in septic shock, human growth hormone, thyroxin in acute kidney injury, intravenous salbutamol in acute respiratory distress syndrome, plasma-derived protein C concentrate, aprotinin in high-risk cardiac surgery, cysteine prodrug, hypothermia in meningitis, methylprednisolone in traumatic brain injury, and albumin in traumatic brain injury (72% of agreement). Overall, a high consistency (ranging from 80% to 90%) between agreement and clinical practice was observed. CONCLUSION: The authors identified 12 clinical interventions showing increased mortality supported by randomized controlled trials with nonconflicting evidence, and wide agreement upon clinicians on a global scale.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Médicos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Humanos , Internet , Mortalidad/tendencias
4.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 32(1): 225-235, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29122431

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A careful choice of perioperative care strategies is pivotal to improve survival in cardiac surgery. However, there is no general agreement or particular attention to which nonsurgical interventions can reduce mortality in this setting. The authors sought to address this issue with a consensus-based approach. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature followed by a consensus-based voting process. SETTING: A web-based international consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS: More than 400 physicians from 52 countries participated in this web-based consensus conference. INTERVENTIONS: The authors identified all studies published in peer-reviewed journals that reported on interventions with a statistically significant effect on mortality in the setting of cardiac surgery through a systematic Medline/PubMed search and contacts with experts. These studies were discussed during a consensus meeting and those considered eligible for inclusion in this study were voted on by clinicians worldwide. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eleven interventions finally were selected: 10 were shown to reduce mortality (aspirin, glycemic control, high-volume surgeons, prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump, levosimendan, leuko-depleted red blood cells transfusion, noninvasive ventilation, tranexamic acid, vacuum-assisted closure, and volatile agents), whereas 1 (aprotinin) increased mortality. A significant difference in the percentages of agreement among different countries and a variable gap between agreement and clinical practice were found for most of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This updated consensus process identified 11 nonsurgical interventions with possible survival implications for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This list of interventions may help cardiac anesthesiologists and intensivists worldwide in their daily clinical practice and can contribute to direct future research in the field.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/tendencias , Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Congresos como Asunto/tendencias , Consenso , Humanos , Internet/tendencias , Mortalidad/tendencias , Atención Perioperativa/tendencias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos
5.
N Engl J Med ; 376(21): 2021-2031, 2017 05 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28320259

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute left ventricular dysfunction is a major complication of cardiac surgery and is associated with increased mortality. Meta-analyses of small trials suggest that levosimendan may result in a higher rate of survival among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving patients in whom perioperative hemodynamic support was indicated after cardiac surgery, according to prespecified criteria. Patients were randomly assigned to receive levosimendan (in a continuous infusion at a dose of 0.025 to 0.2 µg per kilogram of body weight per minute) or placebo, for up to 48 hours or until discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), in addition to standard care. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The trial was stopped for futility after 506 patients were enrolled. A total of 248 patients were assigned to receive levosimendan and 258 to receive placebo. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the levosimendan group and the placebo group (32 patients [12.9%] and 33 patients [12.8%], respectively; absolute risk difference, 0.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.7 to 5.9; P=0.97). There were no significant differences between the levosimendan group and the placebo group in the durations of mechanical ventilation (median, 19 hours and 21 hours, respectively; median difference, -2 hours; 95% CI, -5 to 1; P=0.48), ICU stay (median, 72 hours and 84 hours, respectively; median difference, -12 hours; 95% CI, -21 to 2; P=0.09), and hospital stay (median, 14 days and 14 days, respectively; median difference, 0 days; 95% CI, -1 to 2; P=0.39). There was no significant difference between the levosimendan group and the placebo group in rates of hypotension or cardiac arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who required perioperative hemodynamic support after cardiac surgery, low-dose levosimendan in addition to standard care did not result in lower 30-day mortality than placebo. (Funded by the Italian Ministry of Health; CHEETAH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00994825 .).


Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco Bajo/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiotónicos/uso terapéutico , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Hidrazonas/uso terapéutico , Mortalidad , Piridazinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Cardiotónicos/administración & dosificación , Cardiotónicos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrazonas/administración & dosificación , Hidrazonas/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Perioperatorio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridazinas/administración & dosificación , Piridazinas/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial , Simendán , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
6.
Am Heart J ; 177: 66-73, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27297851

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are at risk of perioperative low cardiac output syndrome due to postoperative myocardial dysfunction. Myocardial dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is a potential indication for the use of levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer with 3 beneficial cardiovascular effects (inotropic, vasodilatory, and anti-inflammatory), which appears effective in improving clinically relevant outcomes. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter randomized trial. SETTING: Tertiary care hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: Cardiac surgery patients (n = 1,000) with postoperative myocardial dysfunction (defined as patients with intraaortic balloon pump and/or high-dose standard inotropic support) will be randomized to receive a continuous infusion of either levosimendan (0.05-0.2 µg/[kg min]) or placebo for 24-48 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point will be 30-day mortality. Secondary end points will be mortality at 1 year, time on mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, decision to stop the study drug due to adverse events or to start open-label levosimendan, and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay. We will test the hypothesis that levosimendan reduces 30-day mortality in cardiac surgery patients with postoperative myocardial dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: This trial is planned to determine whether levosimendan could improve survival in patients with postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. The results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial may provide important insights into the management of low cardiac output in cardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco Bajo/terapia , Cardiotónicos/uso terapéutico , Hidrazonas/uso terapéutico , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Piridazinas/uso terapéutico , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Gasto Cardíaco Bajo/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Respiración Artificial , Simendán
7.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 27(6): 1384-98, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24103711

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify all interventions that increase or reduce mortality in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and to establish the agreement between stated beliefs and actual practice in this setting. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic literature review and international web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: More than 300 physicians from 62 countries. INTERVENTIONS: Several databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, were searched with no time limits (updated February 14, 2012) to identify all the drugs/techniques/strategies that fulfilled all the following criteria: (a) published in a peer-reviewed journal, (b) dealing with critically ill adult patients with or at risk for acute kidney injury, and (c) reporting a statistically significant reduction or increase in mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 18 identified interventions, 15 reduced mortality and 3 increased mortality. Perioperative hemodynamic optimization, albumin in cirrhotic patients, terlipressin for hepatorenal syndrome type 1, human immunoglobulin, peri-angiography hemofiltration, fenoldopam, plasma exchange in multiple-myeloma-associated AKI, increased intensity of renal replacement therapy (RRT), CVVH in severely burned patients, vasopressin in septic shock, furosemide by continuous infusion, citrate in continuous RRT, N-acetylcysteine, continuous and early RRT might reduce mortality in critically ill patients with or at risk for AKI; positive fluid balance, hydroxyethyl starch and loop diuretics might increase mortality in critically ill patients with or at risk for AKI. Web-based opinion differed from consensus opinion for 30% of interventions and self-reported practice for 3 interventions. CONCLUSION: The authors identified all interventions with at least 1 study suggesting a significant effect on mortality in patients with or at risk of AKI and found that there is discordance between participant stated beliefs and actual practice regarding these topics.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/prevención & control , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Comorbilidad , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Internet , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Atención Perioperativa
8.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 22(1): 23-6, 2008 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18249326

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a continuous 48-hour infusion of fenoldopam, 0.1 mug/kg/min, reduced the need for renal replacement therapy in patients with acute renal injury after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Case-matched study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-two patients. INTERVENTIONS: Patients who developed acute renal injury (defined as serum creatinine doubling or oliguria) after cardiac surgery received a continuous infusion of fenoldopam, 0.1 mug/kg/min, (46 patients) for 48 hours. They were case matched with 46 patients who developed acute renal injury, had similar baseline characteristics, and received standard treatment (hemodynamic support to obtain a mean arterial pressure >60 mmHg, fluid administration to increase central venous pressure >10 mmHg, and loop diuretics to maintain a urine output >0.5 mL/kg/h). Renal replacement therapy was started when acute renal injury became oligoanuric, when serum creatinine increased >4 mg/dL or 3 times basal value, or in the presence of severe hyperkalemia (K >6.5 mmol/L) or severe acidemia (pH < 7). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients in the fenoldopam group had a reduced need for renal replacement therapy (8 patients, 17%) with respect to case-matched controls (18 patients, 39%; p = 0.037). The length of intensive care unit stay (median [interquartile range]) was similar in the 2 groups: fenoldopam group, 5 days (3-9 days), and control group, 10 days (3-16 days, p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Given the limitations of case-matched studies, fenoldopam may be useful in avoiding renal replacement therapy in patients who develop acute renal injury after cardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Dopamina/administración & dosificación , Fenoldopam/administración & dosificación , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Creatinina/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA