Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Epilepsy Behav ; 112: 107355, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32745960

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In cases undergoing epilepsy surgery, postoperative psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) may be underdiagnosed complicating the assessment of postsurgical seizures' outcome and the clinical management. We conducted a survey to investigate the current practices in the European epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) and the data that EMUs could provide to retrospectively detect cases with postoperative PNES and to assess the feasibility of a subsequent postoperative PNES research project for cases with postoperative PNES. METHODS: We developed and distributed a questionnaire survey to 57 EMUs. Questions addressed the number of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery, the performance of systematic preoperative and postoperative psychiatric evaluation, the recording of sexual or other abuse, the follow-up period of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery, the performance of video-electroencephalogram (EEG) and postoperative psychiatric assessment in suspected postoperative cases with PNES, the existence of electronic databases to allow extraction of cases with postoperative PNES, the data that these bases could provide, and EMUs' interest to participate in a retrospective postoperative PNES project. RESULTS: Twenty EMUs completed the questionnaire sheet. The number of patients operated every year/per center is 26.7 ( ±â€¯19.1), and systematic preoperative and postoperative psychiatric evaluation is performed in 75% and 50% of the EMUs accordingly. Sexual or other abuse is systematically recorded in one-third of the centers, and the mean follow-up period after epilepsy surgery is 10.5 ±â€¯7.5 years. In suspected postoperative PNES, video-EEG is performed in 85% and psychiatric assessment in 95% of the centers. An electronic database to allow extraction of patients with PNES after epilepsy surgery is used in 75% of the EMUs, and all EMUs that sent the sheet completed expressed their interest to participate in a retrospective postoperative PNES project. CONCLUSION: Postoperative PNES is an underestimated and not well-studied entity. This is a European survey to assess the type of data that the EMUs surgical cohorts could provide to retrospectively detect postoperative PNES. In cases with suspected PNES, most EMUs perform video-EEG and psychiatric assessment, and most EMUs use an electronic database to allow extraction of patients developing PNES.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Convulsiones , Electroencefalografía , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Epilepsia ; 58(3): 343-355, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28067423

RESUMEN

We explored the current practice with respect to the neuropsychological assessment of surgical epilepsy patients in European epilepsy centers, with the aim of harmonizing and establishing common standards. Twenty-six epilepsy centers and members of "E-PILEPSY" (a European pilot network of reference centers in refractory epilepsy and epilepsy surgery), were asked to report the status of neuropsychological assessment in adults and children via two different surveys. There was a consensus among these centers regarding the role of neuropsychology in the presurgical workup. Strong agreement was found on indications (localization, epileptic dysfunctions, adverse drugs effects, and postoperative monitoring) and the domains to be evaluated (memory, attention, executive functions, language, visuospatial skills, intelligence, depression, anxiety, and quality of life). Although 186 different tests are in use throughout these European centers, a core group of tests reflecting a moderate level of agreement could be discerned. Variability exists with regard to indications, protocols, and paradigms for the assessment of hemispheric language dominance. For the tests in use, little published evidence of clinical validity in epilepsy was provided. Participants in the survey reported a need for improvement concerning the validity of the tests, tools for the assessment of everyday functioning and accelerated forgetting, national norms, and test co-normalization. Based on the present survey, we documented a consensus regarding the indications and principles of neuropsychological testing. Despite the variety of tests in use, the survey indicated that there may be a core set of tests chosen based on experience, as well as on published evidence. By combining these findings with the results of an ongoing systematic literature review, we aim for a battery that can be recommended for the use across epilepsy surgical centers in Europe.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento , Epilepsia/cirugía , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/normas , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Neuroimagen
3.
Seizure ; 38: 38-45, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27104922

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The European Union-funded E-PILEPSY network aims to improve awareness of, and accessibility to, epilepsy surgery across Europe. In this study we assessed current clinical practices in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) in the participating centers. METHOD: A 60-item web-based survey was distributed to 25 centers (27 EMUs) of the E-PILEPSY network across 22 European countries. The questionnaire was designed to evaluate the characteristics of EMUs, including organizational aspects, admission, and observation of patients, procedures performed, safety issues, cost, and reimbursement. RESULTS: Complete responses were received from all (100%) EMUs surveyed. Continuous observation of patients was performed in 22 (81%) EMUs during regular working hours, and in 17 EMUs (63%) outside of regular working hours. Fifteen (56%) EMUs requested a signed informed consent before admission. All EMUs performed tapering/withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs, 14 (52%) prior to admission to an EMU. Specific protocols on antiepileptic drugs (AED) tapering were available in four (15%) EMUs. Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) for the treatment of seizure clusters and status epilepticus were available in 16 (59%). Safety measures implemented by EMUs were: alarm seizure buttons in 21 (78%), restricted patient's ambulation in 19 (70%), guard rails in 16 (59%), and specially designated bathrooms in 7 (26%). Average costs for one inpatient day in EMU ranged between 100 and 2200 Euros. CONCLUSION: This study shows a considerable diversity in the organization and practice patterns across European epilepsy monitoring units. The collected data may contribute to the development and implementation of evidence-based recommended practices in LTM services across Europe.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria/diagnóstico , Electroencefalografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Adulto Joven
4.
Seizure ; 28: 81-4, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25794467

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim was to investigate the prevalence of eating disorders and its relation to pregnancy and delivery complications in childbearing women with epilepsy (WWE). METHOD: This study is based on The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) linked to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Epilepsy was reported in 706 pregnancies. The remaining cohort (n=106,511) served as the reference group. Eating disorders were diagnosed using DSM-IV criteria adjusted for pregnancy. The risk of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, diabetes and weight gain during pregnancy as well as delivery outcome (small for gestational age, large for gestational age, ponderal index, low APGAR score, small head circumference) were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for maternal age, smoking, parity and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: Pregnant WWE were significantly more likely to have binge eating disorder (6.5% vs. 4.7%, p<0.05). WWE and comorbid eating disorders had significantly more preeclampsia (7.9% vs. 3.7%, p<0.05), peripartum depression and/or anxiety (40.4% vs. 17.8%, p<0.001) and operative delivery (38.2% vs. 23.5%, p<0.001) than the reference group without epilepsy or eating disorders. After adjustment for confounders, a significantly increased risk of operative delivery (OR 1.96, CI 1.26-3.05) and peripartum depression and/or anxiety (OR 2.17, CI 1.40-3.36) was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Eating disorders in WWE contribute to the increased risk of pregnancy and delivery complications. Health personnel should be aware of eating disorders in WWE and refer them for treatment before pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Epilepsia , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/complicaciones , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Noruega , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA