Evaluation of Absolute Neutrophil, Lymphocyte and Platelet Count and Their Ratios as Predictors of Thrombotic Risk in Patients with Prefibrotic and Overt Myelofibrosis.

AIM: To investigate the prognostic contribution of absolute neutrophil (ANC), lymphocyte (ALC), platelet count and their ratios, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), to thrombotic risk in patients with prefibrotic and overt fibrotic myelofibrosis (MF). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 256 patients with prefibrotic (85 patients) and overt fibrotic MF (171 patients) treated in six Croatian hematological centers. RESULTS: Prefibrotic compared to overt fibrotic MF patients presented with significantly higher ALC, platelet count and PLR, and experienced longer time to thrombosis (TTT). Among prefibrotic patients, ANC > 8.33 × 109/L (HR 13.08, p = 0.036), ALC > 2.58 × 109/L (HR 20.63, p = 0.049) and platelet count > 752 × 109/L (HR 10.5, p = 0.043) remained independently associated with shorter TTT. Among overt fibrotic patients, ANC > 8.8 × 109/L (HR 4.49, p = 0.004), ALC ≤ 1.43 × 109/L (HR 4.15, p = 0.003), platelet count ≤ 385 × 109/L (HR 4.68, p = 0.004) and chronic kidney disease (HR 9.07, p < 0.001) remained independently associated with shorter TTT. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic properties of ANC, ALC and platelet count are mutually independent and exceed those of NLR and PLR regarding thrombotic risk stratification. ALC and platelet count associate in opposite directions with thrombotic risk in prefibrotic and overt fibrotic MF patients.

Specific adverse outcomes associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors use in COVID-19 patients might be potentiated by remdesivir use.

BACKGROUND: Due to non-consistent reports in the literature, there are uncertainties about the potential benefits and harms of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). AIM: To investigate associations of SSRIs with clinical characteristics and unwanted outcomes among real-life severe and critical COVID-19 patients and their relationship with remdesivir (RDV) use. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated a total of 1558 COVID-19 patients of the white race treated in a tertiary center institution, among them 779 patients treated with RDV and 779 1:1 case-matched patients. RESULTS: A total of 78 (5%) patients were exposed to SSRIs during hospitalization, similarly distributed among patients treated with RDV and matched patients (5.1 and 4.9%). No significant associations of SSRI use with age, sex, comorbidity burden, and COVID-19 severity were present in either of the two cohorts (p > 0.05 for all analyses). In multivariate analyses adjusted for clinically meaningful variables, SSRI use was significantly associated with higher mortality among RDV (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.0, p = 0.049) and matched patients (aOR 2.22, p = 0.044) and with higher risk for mechanical-ventilation (aOR 2.57, p = 0.006), venous-thromboembolism (aOR 3.69, p = 0.007), and bacteremia (aOR 2.22, p = 0.049) among RDV treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse outcomes associated with SSRI use in COVID-19 patients might be potentiated by RDV use, and clinically significant interactions between these two drug classes might exist. Although our findings raise important considerations for clinical practice, they are limited by retrospective nature of the study, lack of ethnic diversity, and the potential for unmeasured confounding factors. Future studies exploring underlying biological mechanisms are needed.

Patterns of corticosteroid use among remdesivir and matched patients and associated clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to investigate patterns of corticosteroid use and their relationship with remdesivir use and clinical outcomes in a large real-life cohort of COVID-19 patients treated in a tertiary-level institution. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 1558 severe and critical COVID-19 patients, including 779 patients treated with remdesivir and 779 matched control patients. RESULTS: A total of 167 (10.7%) patients received none, 710 (45.6%) low, 539 (34.6%) high, and 142 (9.1%) very high corticosteroid doses. Patients treated with remdesivir had significantly longer exposure to corticosteroids, received higher average and maximal daily doses, and cumulative corticosteroid doses. In the multivariate analysis remdesivir use, lower cumulative comorbidity burden, higher severity of COVID-19 symptoms, and mechanical ventilation were recognized as mutually independent predictors of the use of higher corticosteroid doses. Higher corticosteroid doses were associated with significantly increased mortality.Among non-remdesivir treated patients, there was a U-shaped relationship between maximal daily corticosteroid dose and mortality. Among remdesivir treated patients gradual increase in mortality with increasing corticosteroid doses was observed. CONCLUSION: Patterns of corticosteroid use differ regarding the use of remdesivir and may moderate its association with survival among severe and critical COVID-19 patients.

Secondary polycythemia in acutely ill COVID-19 patients is associated with higher mortality but not markedly higher thrombotic risk.

Secondary polycythemia is commonly observed among patients with chronic pulmonary diseases. However, its significance in the context of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated a total of 5872 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with mostly severe and critical symptoms, and without prior or subsequently diagnosed myeloproliferative neoplasm. Patients were stratified based on admission hemoglobin into four subgroups: anemia (hemoglobin <120 g/L for females and 130 g/L for males), normal hemoglobin, mild (hemoglobin 160-165 g/L for females and 165-185 g/L for males) and severe polycythemia (hemoglobin >165 g/L for females and >185 g/L for males). Among 5872 patients, a total of 158 (2.7%) had mild and 25 (0.4%) severe polycythemia. Polycythemia was significantly associated with higher respiratory and functional impairment, reduced plasma volume, higher serum osmolarity and comorbidity burden specific to the degree of polycythemia. Patients presenting with mild (odds ratio (OR) = 1.63, p = .003) and severe polycythemia (OR = 4.98, p < .001) had increased risk of death in comparison to patients with normal hemoglobin, whereas no significant associations with venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis nor major bleeding were observed. Anemia was associated with higher risk of death (OR = 1.42, p < .001), venous thromboembolism (OR = 1.34, p < .006) and major bleeding (OR = 2.27, p < .001) in comparison to normal hemoglobin. Associations of polycythemia and anemia with mortality diminished, and anemia with venous thromboembolism and major bleeding persisted, after multivariate adjustments for age, sex, comorbidities, COVID-19 severity and functional status. Secondary polycythemia in hospitalized COVID-19 patients without prior of subsequently diagnosed myeloproliferative neoplasm is rare and is associated with high mortality, increasing with degree of polycythemia, but not markedly higher thrombotic risk.

Prolonged Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Thrombohemorrhagic Risk in Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera Patients Treated with Long-Term Aspirin: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to decrease the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential pharmacodynamic interactions of PPIs and antiplatelet drugs with respect to cardiovascular risk. Patients with BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and polycythemia vera (PV) often suffer from peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and frequently receive low-dose aspirin due to an intrinsically high thrombotic risk. METHOD: This retrospective multicenter study from a community setting investigated whether continuous PPI use may affect thrombohemorrhagic risk in ET and PV patients treated with long-term aspirin. RESULTS: Ninety-four aspirin-treated MPN patients (ET = 36, PV = 58) were included; median age was 69.5 years (range 21-92) and 40 (42.6%) were males. Nineteen (20.2%) patients continuously received PPIs and pantoprazole (n = 15, 78.9%) was the most frequently received PPI. PV phenotype (p = 0.085), male sex (p = 0.011), and prior thrombosis (p = 0.005) were associated with PPI use, whereas no correlations were found with respect to age, disease risk, splenomegaly, mutational status, constitutional symptoms, cardiovascular risk factors, cytoreductive treatment, or any of the blood cell counts (p > 0.050 for all analyses). The median follow-up time was 55.5 months; 19 (20.2%) thrombotic and 13 (13.8%) bleeding events occurred during this time. The use of PPIs was not associated with an increased risk of thrombosis (p = 0.158) or overall bleeding (p = 0.229) and none of the patients treated with PPIs experienced GI bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that Helicobacter pylori infection and PUD are quite frequent in ET and PV patients, these preliminary results may provide some reassurance to physicians regarding the absence of thrombohemorrhagic risk associated with prolonged PPI use in MPN patients treated with long-term aspirin. Our observations may be even more important in the light of recent evidence suggesting suboptimal platelet inhibition in ET with once-daily when compared to twice- or triple-daily aspirin which may also cause more abdominal discomfort. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design, limited number of patients included, and the lack of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessments.

Optimization of cardiovascular risk factor management in patients with BCR::ABL1 negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms, current knowledge, and perspectives.

The exact prognostic role of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in patients with BCR::ABL1 negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) remains unknown as it is often masked by other MPN-related features that bear strong prognostic impact on thrombotic risk. Therefore, current MPN treatment is not primarily guided by presence of CV risk factors. Treatment of CV risk factors in MPN patients usually mirrors that from the general population, despite the fact that CV risk factors in MPNs have their own specificities. Moreover, the optimal target levels for different metabolic deflections in MPNs (i.e., low-density lipoprotein, serum uric acid, or glycated hemoglobin levels) have not been defined. In the current review, we separately discuss the most important aspects of every individual CV risk factor (arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, and obesity and cachexia) in MPNs, summarize recent advances in the field, and propose future directions and research areas which may be needed to appropriately manage CV risk factors in MPNs.

Reappraisal of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Cardiovascular (CV) risk factors are important contributors to thrombotic risk in the general population and in patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). However, the role of CV risk factors is often masked by other disease features that have a strong prognostic impact regarding thrombotic risk in MPN patients. This review summarizes the contemporary knowledge and aspects that have not been addressed or lack consensus in the medical community. We propose multidisciplinary care for MPN patients with CV comorbidities and provide future directions that may be needed to appropriately manage CV risk factors in MPNs.

Hypoosmolar and hyperosmolar COVID-19 patients are predisposed to dismal clinical outcomes.

We aimed to investigate the associations of hypo- and hyperosmolarity at hospital admission with clinical characteristics and outcomes in 5645 consecutive hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated at a tertiary-level institution. Serum osmolarity was calculated as 2x Na (mmol/L) + urea (mmol/L) + glucose (mmol/L), with normal range from 275 to 295 mOsm/L. Median serum osmolarity was 292.9 mOsm/L with 51.8% normoosmolar, 5.3% hypoosmolar and 42.9% hyperosmolar patients present at the time of hospital admission. Hypoosmolarity was driven by hyponatremia, and was associated with the presence of chronic liver disease, liver cirrhosis, active malignancy and epilepsy. Hyperosmolarity was driven by an increase in urea and glucose and was associated with the presence of chronic metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities. Both hypo- and hyperosmolar patients presented with more severe COVID-19 symptoms, higher inflammatory status, and experienced higher mortality in comparison to normoosmolar patients. In multivariate analysis, hypoosmolarity (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.39, p = 0.024) and hyperosmolarity (aOR = 1.9, p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with higher mortality independently of older age, male sex, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and more severe COVID-19. Disruptions in serum osmolarity are frequent in COVID-19 patients, may be easy to detect and target therapeutically, and thus potentially moderate associateds poor prognosis.

Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive degenerative disease with an inflammatory background. Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal hematopoietic disorders characterized by chronic inflammation and a tendency for connective tissue remodeling. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated risk factors of symptomatic OA (sOA) in MPN patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive MPN (39 essential-thrombocythemia, 34 polycythemia-vera, 27 myelofibrosis) patients treated in two community hematologic centers were cross-sectionally evaluated. Patients were required to have both symptoms attributable to hip and/or knee OA and radiographic confirmation to be considered as having sOA. RESULTS: The prevalence of hip and/or knee sOA was significantly higher among MPN patients than the previously reported prevalence in the general population of similar age (61% vs. 22%, p < 0.001). Hip sOA was present in 50%, knee sOA in 51% and sOA of both localizations in 41% of patients. A high proportion of MPN patients had radiographic signs of hip OA (94%) and knee OA (98%) in the presence of attributable symptoms. Among the other factors, sOA was univariately associated with the presence of JAK2 mutation, myelofibrosis phenotype, older age, higher body weight, and higher MPN-SAF score (p < 0.050 for all analyses). In the multivariate analysis, older age (odds ratio = 1.19, 95% confidence interval-CI 1.06-1.33) and higher body weight (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.25) were recognized as independent risk factors for sOA. On the other hand, cytoreductive treatment was a protective factor for sOA (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.006-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of sOA in MPN patients was higher than that in the general population and seems to correlate with older age, increased myeloproliferation and a higher inflammatory state. Whether cytoreductive treatment may postpone OA development in MPN patients warrants additional confirmation.