Impact of cancer on the mortality of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies by flexible parametric multistate modelling.

BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) have an increased risk of cancer, but their cancer-related disease burden remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To explore how cancer might impact the mortality of patients with IIM and examine the associated prognostic factors for cancer and death. METHODS: We identified patients with IIM diagnosed between 1998 and 2020 and ascertained their cancer and death records via linkage to the Swedish healthcare and population registers. Transition hazards from IIM diagnosis to cancer and death were estimated in multistate models using flexible parametric methods. We then predicted the probability of having cancer or death, and the duration of staying alive at a given time from IIM and cancer diagnoses from a crude model. We also explored prognostic factors for progression to cancer and death in a multivariable model. RESULTS: Of 1826 IIM patients, 310 (17%) were diagnosed with cancer before and 306 (17%) after IIM diagnosis. In patients diagnosed with cancer after IIM, the 5-year probability of death from cancer and from other causes was 31% and 18%, respectively, compared to 7% and 15% in patients without cancer after IIM. We reported several factors associated with risk of progression to cancer and death. Specifically, patients with first cancer after IIM who were older at IIM diagnosis, had cancer history, dermatomyositis and a cancer diagnosis within 1 year following IIM faced a greater cancer-specific mortality. CONCLUSION: We observed a substantial increase in mortality from cancer, compared to before, rather than other causes after a cancer diagnosis following IIM, suggesting an unmet medical need for effective cancer management in IIM patients. This finding, along with the identified prognostic factors, provides useful insight into future research directions for improving cancer management in IIM patients.

Effect modification of cancer on the association between dysphagia and mortality in early idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVE: The interplay between dysphagia, cancer, and mortality in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) has not been carefully studied. The aim of this study was to investigate possible effect modification of cancer on the association between dysphagia and mortality in early IIM. METHODS: A multi-center cohort of 230 adult IIM patients with dysphagia assessment within 6 months of disease onset was assembled. Crude mortality rates in IIM patients exposed or not to dysphagia were estimated for the 5-year period following cohort entry. To explore possible effect modification of cancer on the association between dysphagia and mortality, adjusted Cox models stratified on cancer status were performed as well as an interaction model. RESULTS: Mortality rates per 100 person-years for IIM patients exposed to dysphagia were 2.3 (95 %CI 1.0 to 4.5) in those without cancer compared to 33.3 (95 %CI 16.6 to 59.5) in those with cancer. In stratified Cox models, the main effect of dysphagia was HR 0.5 (95 %CI 0.2 to 1.5) in non-cancer and 3.1 (95 %CI 1.0 to 10.2) in cancer patients. In the interaction model, the combination of dysphagia and cancer yielded a HR of 6.4 (1.2 to 35.1). CONCLUSION: In this IIM cohort, dysphagia in non-cancer patients was not associated with increased mortality, while it was in presence of cancer, supporting effect modification of cancer on the association between dysphagia and mortality. This suggests that IIM patients with and without cancer differ and separate analyses for the two groups should be conducted when the outcome of interest is mortality.

Detection of Myositis Autoantibodies by Multi-Analytic Immunoassays in a Large Multicenter Cohort of Patients with Definite Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) for the assessment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) is acknowledged, but laboratory standardization remains a challenge. We detected MSAs/MAAs by multi-analytic line immunoassay (LIA) and particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) in a multicenter cohort of patients with IIMs. METHODS: We tested the sera from 411 patients affected with definite IIM, including 142 polymyositis (PM), 147 dermatomyositis (DM), 19 cancer-associated myositis, and 103 overlap myositis syndrome (OM), and from 269 controls. MSAs/MAAs were determined by 16Ags LIA in all sera, and anti-HMGCR by ELISA in 157/411 IIM sera and 91/269 control sera. The analytical specificity of LIA/HMGCR ELISA was compared with that of PMAT in 89 MSA+ IIM sera. RESULTS: MSAs/MAAs were positive in 307/411 (75%) IIM patients and 65/269 (24%) controls by LIA (Odds Ratio 9.26, 95% CI 6.43-13.13, p < 0.0001). The sensitivity/specificity of individual MSAs/MAAs were: 20%/100% (Jo-1), 3%/99.3% (PL-7), 4%/98.8% (PL-12), 1%/100% (EJ), 0.7%/100% (OJ), 9%/98% (SRP), 5.6%/99.6% (TIF1γ), 4.6%/99.6% (MDA5), 8%/96% (Mi-2), 1.5%/98% (NXP2), 1.7%/100% (SAE1), 4%/92% (Ku), 8.5%/99% (PM/Scl-100), 8%/96% (PM/Scl-75), and 25.5%/79% (Ro52). Anti-HMGCR was found in 8/157 (5%) IIM patients and 0/176 (0%) controls by ELISA (p = 0.007). Concordance between LIA/HMGCR ELISA and PMAT was found in 78/89 (88%) samples. Individual MSAs detected by LIA were associated with IIM subsets: Jo-1 with PM and OM, PL-12 with OM, Mi-2, TIF1γ, and MDA5 with DM, SRP with PM, and PM/Scl-75/100 with OM (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Since MSAs are mostly mutually exclusive, multi-specific antibody profiling seems effective for a targeted clinical-serologic approach to the diagnosis of IIMs.

Comparison of clinical features between patients with anti-synthetase syndrome and dermatomyositis: Results from the MYONET registry.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical characteristics, including the frequency of cutaneous, extramuscular manifestations, and malignancy, between adults with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) and dermatomyositis (DM). METHODS: Using data regarding adults from the MYONET registry, a cohort of DM patients with anti-Mi2/-TIF1É£/-NXP2/-SAE/-MDA5 autoantibodies, and a cohort of ASyS patients with anti-tRNA synthetase autoantibodies (anti-Jo1/-PL7/-PL12/-OJ/-EJ/-Zo/-KS) were identified. Patients with DM sine dermatitis or with discordant dual autoantibody specificities were excluded. Sub-cohorts of patients with ASyS with or without skin involvement were defined based on presence of DM-type rashes (heliotrope rash, Gottron's papules/sign, violaceous rash, shawl sign, V sign, erythroderma, and/or periorbital rash). RESULTS: In total 1,054 patients were included (DM, n = 405; ASyS, n = 649). In ASyS cohort, 31% (n = 203) had DM-type skin involvement (ASyS-DMskin). A higher frequency of extramuscular manifestations, including Mechanic's hands, Raynaud's phenomenon, arthritis, interstitial lung disease, and cardiac involvement differentiated ASyS-DMskin from DM (all p< 0.001), whereas higher frequency of any of four DM-type rashes: heliotrope rash (n = 248, 61% vs n = 90, 44%), violaceous rash (n = 166, 41% vs n = 57, 9%), V sign (n = 124, 31% vs n = 28, 4%), and shawl sign (n = 133, 33% vs n = 18, 3%) differentiated DM from ASyS-DMskin (all p< 0.005). Cancer-associated myositis (CAM) was more frequent in DM (n = 67, 17%) compared with ASyS (n = 21, 3%) and ASyS-DMskin (n = 7, 3%) cohorts (both p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: DM-type rashes are frequent in patients with ASyS; however, distinct clinical manifestations differentiate these patients from classical DM. Skin involvement in ASyS does not necessitate increased malignancy surveillance. These findings will inform future ASyS classification criteria and patient management.

Autoantibodies against the melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 in patients with dermatomyositis target the helicase domains.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical observations in patients with dermatomyositis (DM) and autoantibodies against the melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) suggest that the autoantibodies contribute to the pathogenesis of MDA5(+) DM. To gain insight into the role of the anti-MDA5 autoantibodies, we aimed to identify their binding sites on the different domains of the MDA5 protein. METHODS: We developed an in-house ELISA to assess the reactivity against the MDA5 domains (conformational epitopes) in plasma (n = 8) and serum (n = 24) samples from MDA5(+) patients with varying clinical manifestations and disease outcomes. The reactivities were also assessed using Western Blot (linearized epitopes). An ELISA-based depletion assay was developed to assess cross-reactivity among the different MDA5 domains. RESULTS: All eight plasma samples consistently showed reactivity towards conformational and linearized epitopes on the helicase domains of the MDA5 protein. The ELISA-based depletion assay suggests that anti-MDA5 autoantibodies specifically target each of the three helicase domains. Twenty-two of the 24 serum samples showed reactivity in the in-house ELISA and all 22 displayed reactivity towards the helicase domains of the MDA5 protein. CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that the main immunogenic targets of anti-MDA5 autoantibodies from MDA5(+) patients are the helicase domains. Considering that the helicase domains are responsible for the enzymatic activity and subsequent triggering of an inflammatory response, our findings suggest that binding of anti-MDA5 autoantibodies could alter the canonical activity of the MDA5 protein and potentially affect the downstream induction of a pro-inflammatory cascade.

Familial Co-Aggregation of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies and Cancer: A Swedish Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine if idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) share familial susceptibility with cancer, we estimated the familial co-aggregation of these diseases. METHODS: This Swedish population-based family study with data from national registers included 8,460 first-degree relatives of patients with IIM and 41,127 relatives of matched individuals without IIM. We modeled the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of familial co-aggregation of IIM and cancer using conditional logistic regressions and adjusted for sex and birth year of index individuals and their first-degree relatives. We examined the associations for cancer overall and stratified by several factors of interest. We also performed exploratory analyses for specific cancer types. RESULTS: We observed no statistically significant familial associations between IIM and cancer overall. However, there was a familial association in male relative pairs of patients with dermatomyositis (adjusted OR for familial association 1.39 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15-1.68]). The association remained statistically significant after controlling for multiple testing. Moreover, this finding was consistent between kinships. Familial co-aggregation of IIM and cancer diagnosed before 50 years of age was only observed in offspring. In exploratory analyses, only the familial associations for myeloid malignancies (adjusted OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.43-3.60]) and liver cancer (adjusted OR 2.01 [95% CI 1.21-3.33]) in male relative pairs remained significant after controlling for multiple testing. CONCLUSION: We found little evidence of shared familial susceptibility as a major pathologic mechanism contributing to the co-occurrence of IIM and cancer overall. There could be subsets of patients and cancer types for which familial factors including genetics and shared environments are of more importance, but these findings need replication.

Genetic Influences in Cancer-Associated Myositis.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) comprise a heterogeneous group of rare immune-mediated disorders that primarily affect muscles but also lead to dysfunction in other organs. Five different clinical subphenotypes of IIM have been distinguished: dermatomyositis, polymyositis, inclusion body myositis, antisynthetase syndrome, and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy. Excess mortality and morbidity associated with IIM are largely attributed to comorbidities, particularly cancer. The risk of malignancy is not equally distributed among IIM groups and is particularly high among patients with dermatomyositis. The cancer risk peaks around 3 years on either side of the IIM diagnosis and remains elevated even 10 years after the onset of the disease. Lung, colorectal, and ovarian neoplasms typically arise before the onset of IIM, whereas melanoma, cervical, oropharyngeal, and nonmelanoma skin cancers usually develop after IIM diagnosis. Given the close temporal proximity between IIM diagnosis and the emergence of malignancy, it has been proposed that IIM could be a consequence rather than a cause of cancer, a process known as a paramalignant phenomenon. Thus, a separate group of IIMs related to paramalignant phenomenon has been distinguished, known as cancer-associated myositis (CAM). Although the relationship between IIM and cancer is widely recognized, the pathophysiology of CAM remains elusive. Given that genetic factors play a role in the development of IIM, dissection of the molecular mechanisms shared between IIM and cancer presents an opportunity to examine the role of autoimmunity in cancer development and progression. In this review, the evidence supporting the contribution of genetics to CAM will be discussed.

Autoantigenic properties of the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase family in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVES: Autoantibodies are thought to play a key role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). However, up to 40% of IIM patients, even those with clinical manifestations of anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD), test seronegative to known myositis-specific autoantibodies. We hypothesized the existence of new potential autoantigens among human cytoplasmic aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (aaRS) in patients with IIM. METHODS: Plasma samples from 217 patients with IIM according to 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria, including 50 patients with ASSD, 165 without, and two with unknown ASSD status were identified retrospectively, as well as age and gender-matched sera from 156 population controls, and 219 disease controls. Patients with previously documented ASSD had to test positive for at least one of the five most common anti-aaRS autoantibodies (anti-Jo1, -PL7, -PL12, -EJ, and -OJ) and present with one or more of the following clinical manifestations: interstitial lung disease, myositis, arthritis, Raynaud's phenomenon, fever, or mechanic's hands. Demographics, laboratory, and clinical data of the IIM cohort (ASSD and non-ASSD) were compared. Samples were screened using a multiplex bead array assay for presence of autoantibodies against a panel of 117 recombinant protein variants, representing 33 myositis-related proteins, including all nineteen cytoplasmic aaRS. Prospectively collected clinical data for the IIM cohort were retrieved and compared between groups within the IIM cohort and correlated with the results of the autoantibody screening. Principal component analysis was used to analyze clinical manifestations between ASSD, non-ASSD groups, and individuals with novel anti-aaRS autoantibodies. RESULTS: We identified reactivity towards 16 aaRS in 72 of the 217 IIM patients. Twelve patients displayed reactivity against nine novel aaRS. The novel autoantibody specificities were detected in four previously seronegative patients for myositis-specific autoantibodies and eight with previously detected myositis-specific autoantibodies. IIM individuals with novel anti-aaRS autoantibodies (n = 12) all had signs of myositis, and they had either muscle weakness and/or muscle enzyme elevation, 2/12 had mechanic's hands, 3/12 had interstitial lung disease, and 2/12 had arthritis. The individuals with novel anti-aaRS and a pathological muscle biopsy all presented widespread up-regulation of major histocompatibility complex class I. The reactivities against novel aaRS could be confirmed in ELISA and western blot. Using the multiplex bead array assay, we could confirm previously known reactivities to four of the most common aaRS (Jo1, PL12, PL7, and EJ (n = 45)) and identified patients positive for anti-Zo, -KS, and -HA (n = 10) that were not previously tested. A low frequency of anti-aaRS autoantibodies was also detected in controls. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that most, if not all, cytoplasmic aaRS may become autoantigenic. Autoantibodies against new aaRS may be found in plasma of patients previously classified as seronegative with potential high clinical relevance.

Environmental Risks for Inflammatory Myopathies.

This is an up-to-date review on external environmental factors for adult-onset idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Environmental factors with suggestive evidence including ultraviolet radiation, smoking, infectious agents (viruses in particular), pollutants, medications (ie, statin) and vitamin D deficiency are discussed. We also discuss the potential implications of environmental factors in IIM development, identify current challenges, and provide insight into future investigations.

ELISA, protein immunoprecipitation and line blot assays for anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibody detection in cancer-associated dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibodies can be detected with immunoprecipitation (IP), line blot (LB) and ELISA. We compared assay performance in patients with DM and the potential of these assays to detect anti-TIF1-gamma positive cancer-associated DM (CADM). METHODS: We included sera from 131 patients with DM followed at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden and 82 healthy controls. Serum samples taken at DM diagnosis were tested for anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibodies with IP, two ELISAs (in-house and commercial) and LB. Cancer diagnosis and dates were obtained from the Swedish national cancer register. CADM was defined as a malignancy that developed within 3 years of DM diagnosis. RESULTS: Anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibodies were detected in 19/101 (18.8%), 15/113 (13.2%), 34/131 (26%) and 45/131 (34.4%) of the patients with IP, LB, in-house and commercial ELISA, respectively. The anti-TIF1-gamma results from the in-house ELISA were confirmed with IP in 93 of 101 (92%) cases, κ = 0.76, with a commercial ELISA in 110 of 131 (84%) cases, κ = 0.63, and with LB in 101 of 113 (89.3%) cases, κ = 0.67. Anti-TIF1-gamma results with IP were confirmed with LB in 85 of 92 (92.4%) cases, κ = 0.73. For detecting CADM, the anti-TIF1-gamma in-house ELISA had a sensitivity of 58% and specificity of 86%, the commercial ELISA had a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 82%, IP had a sensitivity of 52% and specificity of 92%, LB had a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 96%. CONCLUSION: The two anti-TIF1-gamma ELISA assays had advantages both for autoantibody detection and to identify anti-TIF1-gamma-positive CADM.

An update on polymyalgia rheumatica.

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is the most common inflammatory rheumatic disease affecting people older than 50 years and is 2-3 times more common in women. The most common symptoms are pain and morning stiffness in the shoulder and pelvic girdle and the onset may be acute or develop over a few days to weeks. General symptoms such as fatigue, fever and weight loss may occur, likely driven by systemic IL-6 signalling. The pathology includes synovial and periarticular inflammation and muscular vasculopathy. A new observation is that PMR may appear as a side effect of cancer treatment with checkpoint inhibitors. The diagnosis of PMR relies mainly on symptoms and signs combined with laboratory markers of inflammation. Imaging modalities including ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with computed tomography are promising new tools in the investigation of suspected PMR. However, they are still limited by availability, high cost and unclear performance in the diagnostic workup. Glucocorticoid (GC) therapy is effective in PMR, with most patients responding promptly to 15-25 mg prednisolone per day. There are challenges in the management of patients with PMR as relapses do occur and patients with PMR may need to stay on GC for extended periods. This is associated with high rates of GC-related comorbidities, such as diabetes and osteoporosis, and there are limited data on the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologics as GC sparing agents. Finally, PMR is associated with giant cell arteritis that may complicate the disease course and require more intense and prolonged treatment.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases: On Anti-Synthetase Syndrome and Beyond.

Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of autoantibodies targeting one of several aminoacyl t-RNA synthetases (aaRSs) along with clinical features including interstitial lung disease, myositis, Raynaud's phenomenon, arthritis, mechanic's hands, and fever. The family of aaRSs consists of highly conserved cytoplasmic and mitochondrial enzymes, one for each amino acid, which are essential for the RNA translation machinery and protein synthesis. Along with their main functions, aaRSs are involved in the development of immune responses, regulation of transcription, and gene-specific silencing of translation. During the last decade, these proteins have been associated with cancer, neurological disorders, infectious responses, and autoimmune diseases including ASSD. To date, several aaRSs have been described to be possible autoantigens in different diseases. The most commonly described are histidyl (HisRS), threonyl (ThrRS), alanyl (AlaRS), glycyl (GlyRS), isoleucyl (IleRS), asparaginyl (AsnRS), phenylalanyl (PheRS), tyrosyl (TyrRS), lysyl (LysRS), glutaminyl (GlnRS), tryptophanyl (TrpRS), and seryl (SerRS) tRNA synthetases. Autoantibodies against the first eight autoantigens listed above have been associated with ASSD while the rest have been associated with other diseases. This review will address what is known about the function of the aaRSs with a focus on their autoantigenic properties. We will also describe the anti-aaRSs autoantibodies and their association to specific clinical manifestations, and discuss their potential contribution to the pathogenesis of ASSD.

Defining anti-synthetase syndrome: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterised by multi-system involvement with a wide variety of manifestations. Validated classification criteria are necessary to improve recognition and prevent misclassification, especially given the lack of reliable and standardised autoantibody testing. We systematically reviewed the literature to analyse proposed ASSD criteria, characteristics, and diagnostic performance. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase databases (01/01/1984 to 06/11/2018) and the ACR and EULAR meeting abstracts (2017-2018). Sensitivities, specificities, positive, negative likelihood ratios and risk of bias were calculated for ASSD criteria and key variables reported in the literature. We performed meta-analysis when appropriate. RESULTS: We retrieved 4,358 studies. We found 85 proposed ASSD criteria from a total of 82 studies. All but one study included anti-synthetase autoantibody (ARS) positivity in the ASSD criteria. Most studies required only one ASSD feature plus anti-ARS to define ASSD (n=64, 78%), whereas 16 studies required more than one ASSD variable plus anti-ARS. The only criteria not including anti-ARS positivity required 5 ASSD clinical features. We found limited data and wide variability in the diagnostic performance of each variable and definition proposed in the literature. Given these limitations we only meta-analysed the performance of individual muscle biopsy and clinical variables in diagnosing ASSD, which performed poorly. CONCLUSIONS: The current ASSD criteria include a variety of serological, clinical, and histological features with wide variability amongst proposed definitions and the performance of these definitions has not been tested. This systematic literature review suggests the need for additional data and consensus-driven classification criteria for ASSD.

Distribution and trajectory of direct and indirect costs of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the annual direct and indirect costs associated with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM) over time, including the pre-diagnostic period. METHODS: A cohort of incident adult IIM patients (n = 673) was identified from the Swedish National Patient Register from 2010 to 2016 and matched with general population comparators (n = 3343). Follow-up started at IIM diagnosis and corresponding date in the general population. International Classification of Diseases codes (ICD-10) were used for IIM case definition. Costs were calculated using national register data. RESULTS: The costs related to IIM started to increase 2 years before diagnosis. In the year following diagnosis, the mean annual IIM cost was €21 639 compared to €4816 in the general population. Five years after diagnosis, the mean annual cost in the IIM cohort was €12 796. Outpatient visits, hospitalizations and productivity loss were the components driving the increment in overall annual disease-related expenditures. Indirect costs accounted for a significant portion of IIM long-term societal costs. The highest costs were found in individuals of working age with cancer-associated IIM. CONCLUSIONS: The mean annual costs in IIM were 3 to 5 times higher than in the general population in the 5-year period following diagnosis. These costs started to increase long before diagnosis, were at their peak in the year post-diagnosis and remained elevated thereafter. Indirect costs contributed to a substantial portion of this increment. Early in the IIM disease course, clinicians and allied health professionals should aim to improve function, reduce damage and address barriers to return-to-work to mitigate these costs.

Proteome study of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and dermatomyositis skin lesions reveals IL-16 is differentially upregulated in CLE.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to explore the disease pathways activated in the inflammatory foci of skin lesions in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and dermatomyositis (DM). METHODS: Skin biopsies acquired from active CLE and DM lesions, patient (PC), and also healthy controls (HC) were investigated. Biopsy sections were examined by a pathologist, inflammatory foci were laser micro-dissected and captured, and proteins within captured tissue were detected in an unbiased manner by mass spectrometry. Protein pathway analysis was performed by the string-db.org platform. Findings of interest were confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: Proteome investigation identified abundant expression of interferon-regulated proteins (IRP) as a common feature of CLE and DM. Interleukin (IL)-16 was the only abundant cytokine differentially expressed in CLE compared to DM. Caspase-3, an enzyme that cleaves IL-16 into its active form, was detected in low levels. Significantly higher proportion of IL-16- and caspase-3-positive cells was identified in CLE lesions in comparison with DM, PC, and HC. Proteomic results indicate more abundant complement deposition in CLE skin lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Using unbiased mass spectrometry investigation of CLE and DM inflammatory infiltrates, we confirmed that high IRP expression is a common feature of both CLE and DM, while IL-16 is the only differentially expressed cytokine in CLE. IHC confirmed high expression of IL-16 and caspase-3 in CLE. Our novel molecular findings indicate that IL-16 detection could be useful in differential diagnostics between the two conditions that can display similar histopathological appearance. IL-16 could be of interest as a future therapeutic target for CLE.

Clinical characteristics of Vietnamese patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and autoantibodies to aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetases.

OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical phenotypes of anti-aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetases (aaRS) autoantibodies in Vietnamese patients of Kinh ethnicity with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). METHODS: In a cross-sectional study 23 patients with anti-aaRS autoantibodies were compared to 36 patients with other myositis-specific antibodies and to 69 seronegative patients with IIM. Assessments included muscle performance, extra-muscular involvement, and disease activity according to the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS). Sera were tested by a line immunoassay (Euroline Myositis Profile 4). RESULTS: The frequency of anti-Jo-1 antibodies was 56.5%, anti-EJ antibodies 26.1%, and anti-PL-7 antibodies 17.4%, while anti-PL-12 and anti-OJ antibodies were not present in any case. All patients with anti-aaRS autoantibodies had signs of myositis. At time of investigation 22/23 patients had muscle weakness, 52.2% arthritis, 34.8% Raynaud's phenomenon, 73.9% fever, 14.3% mechanic's hands and 56.5% dysphagia. Interstitial lung disease was present in 52.2%, and pulmonary hypertension in 56.5%. The anti-aaRS autoantibody positive group had higher disease activity in the domains of skin and pulmonary disease compared to the seronegative group and had lower disease activity in skeletal disease compared to the anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5-positive patients. The clinical presentation of antisynthetase syndrome was similar between the aaRS autoantibody specificities with the exception of more frequent pulmonary hypertension in anti-Jo-1 positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Different aaRS autoantibody specificities may vary between different ethnic populations for reasons that still need to be clarified. Furthermore, the high frequency of pulmonary hypertension is noteworthy but otherwise clinical manifestations associated with aaRS autoantibodies did not differ from other ethnic populations.

Overall and site-specific cancer before and after diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A nationwide study 2002-2016.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and cancer before and after IIM diagnosis. METHODS: We used prospectively collected nationwide register data to design a case-control study to investigate the occurrence of cancer before IIM, and a cohort study to investigate the occurrence of cancer after IIM. Patients diagnosed with IIM between 2002 and 2016 in Sweden, were compared to the general population. The association between cancer and IIM was estimated before and after IIM diagnosis via logistic regression and Cox regression models, respectively. RESULTS: We included 1419 patients with IIM and 7045 individuals from the general population. The overall odds of cancer before IIM diagnosis were increased in IIM compared to the general population, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-1.8. This association was also noted after IIM diagnosis, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.7 (95% CI 1.4-2.0), or one additional cancer in every 125 IIM patients per year. Colorectal (AOR 2.1), lung (AOR 5.4) and ovarian (AOR 7.0) cancers were associated with IIM before diagnosis. Oropharyngeal (AHR 9.1) and cervical (AHR 3.8) cancers, malignant melanoma (AHR 3.2) and non-melanoma skin cancer (AHR 3.1) were associated with IIM after diagnosis. Adenocarcinomas were associated with dermatomyositis before diagnosis and squamous cell cancers after IIM diagnosis. Lymphatic hematopoietic cancers were associated with IIM both before and after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The cancer types that occur before IIM diagnosis differ from the ones that occur after diagnosis. This may have an impact on screening decisions for IIM.

Features of repeated muscle biopsies and phenotypes of monocytes in paired blood samples and clinical long-term response to treatment in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: In a pilot study we aimed to identify biomarkers in repeated muscle biopsies and paired blood samples, taken before and after conventional immunosuppressive therapy, in order to predict long-term therapeutic response in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). METHODS: Muscle biopsies were selected from 13 new onset patients, six responders and seven non-responders. Repeated muscle biopsies after a median of 11 months follow-up were available from 9 patients and paired peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 5 patients. Treatment response after 3 years was defined by MMT-8 measuring muscle strength and the ACR/EULAR 2016 improvement criteria. Frozen biopsy sections were immunohistochemically stained for expression of CD3, CD66b, IL-15, CD68, CD163 and myosin heavy chain neonatal (MHCn). PBMCs were analysed by flow cytometry for monocyte phenotypes (CD14, CD16, CD68, CX3CR1, and CCR2). RESULTS: Before treatment there were no significant differences in any clinical or muscle biopsy variables or monocyte subsets between responders and non-responders. MMT-8 was significantly higher compared to baseline in the responders at 3-year follow-up. In responders the expression of CD68 in the repeated biopsies was significantly lower compared to non-responders (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline biopsy, monocyte profile or clinical data did not predict long-term treatment response, but in the repeated biopsy within 1 year of immunosuppressive treatment, the lower number of macrophages (CD68+) seemed to predict a more favourable long-term clinical response with regard to improved muscle strength.

Proinflammatory Histidyl-Transfer RNA Synthetase-Specific CD4+ T Cells in the Blood and Lungs of Patients With Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies.

OBJECTIVE: Autoantibodies targeting histidyl-transfer RNA synthetase (HisRS; anti-Jo-1) are common in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and antisynthetase syndrome. This study was undertaken to investigate immunity against HisRS in the blood and lungs of patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome. METHODS: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, BAL fluid cells, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome (n = 24) were stimulated with full-length HisRS protein or a HisRS-derived peptide (HisRS11-23 ). BAL fluid and PBMCs from patients with sarcoidosis (n = 7) and healthy subjects (n = 12) were included as controls. The CD4+ T cell response was determined according to levels of CD40L up-regulation and cytokine expression using flow cytometry. Anti-Jo-1 autoantibody responses in the serum and BAL fluid were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Lung biopsy samples from patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome (n = 14) were investigated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In BAL fluid, CD4+ T cells from 3 of 4 patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome responded to stimulation with HisRS protein, as measured by the median fold change in CD40L expresssion in stimulated cells compared to unstimulated cells (median fold change 3.6, interquartile range [IQR] 2.7-14.7), and 2 of 3 patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome had the highest responses to HisRS11-23 (median fold change 88, IQR 27-149). In PBMCs, CD4+ T cells from 14 of 18 patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome responded to HisRS protein (median fold change 7.38, IQR 2.69-31.86; P < 0.001), whereas a HisRS11-23 response was present in 11 of 14 patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome (median fold change 3.4, IQR 1.87-10.9; P < 0.001). In the control group, there was a HisRS11-23 response in 3 of 7 patients with sarcoidosis (median fold change 2.09, IQR 1.45-3.29) and in 5 of 12 healthy controls (median fold change 2, IQR 1.89-2.42). CD4+ T cells from patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome displayed a pronounced Th1 phenotype in the BAL fluid when compared to the PBMCs (P < 0.001), producing high amounts of interferon-γ and interleukin-2 following stimulation. Anti-Jo-1 autoantibodies were detected in BAL fluid and germinal center (GC)-like structures were seen in the lung biopsy samples from patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate a pronounced presence of HisRS-reactive CD4+ T cells in PBMCs and BAL fluid cells from patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome as compared to patients with sarcoidosis and healthy controls. These findings, combined with the presence of anti-Jo-1 autoantibodies in BAL fluid and GC-like structures in the lungs, suggest that immune activation against HisRS might take place within the lungs of patients with IIM/antisynthetase syndrome.