Ocular lichen planus as a cause of recurrent restrictive strabismus.

We report the case of an 80-year-old man with restrictive strabismus in lateral gaze following multiple oculoplastic procedures for idiopathic epiphora. Despite excellent initial response to nasal conjunctival recession with lysis of adhesions and a miminal recession of the medial rectus muscle, the patient suffered recurrence of diplopia associated with limitation of abduction due to aggressive, deep, subconjunctival scarring. Given the history of oral lichen planus (LP), the patient was diagnosed with ocular involvement of LP. He underwent a second conjunctival recession, this time accompanied by an intensive LP treatment regimen. Nine months after surgery, he remained diplopia free and orthophoric in primary gaze. Surgeons treating restrictive strabismus in patients with LP should consider implementing systemic and topical immunosuppressive treatment simultaneously with surgical management.

Immunomodulator use, risk factors and management of flares, and mortality for patients with pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis after immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate immunomodulator use, risk factors and management for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) flares, and mortality for patients with pre-existing RA initiating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with RA meeting 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria that initiated ICI for cancer at Mass General Brigham or Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, MA (2011-2022). We described immunomodulator use and changes at baseline of ICI initiation. We identified RA flares after baseline, categorized the severity, and described the management. Baseline factors were examined for RA flare risk using Fine and Gray competing risk models. We performed a landmark analysis to limit the potential for immortal time bias, where the analysis started 3 months after ICI initiation. Among those who survived at least 3 months, we examined whether RA flare within 3 months after ICI initiation was associated with mortality using Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 11,901 patients who initiated ICI for cancer treatment, we analyzed 100 pre-existing RA patients (mean age 70.3 years, 63 % female, 89 % on PD-1 monotherapy, 50 % lung cancer). At ICI initiation, 71 % were seropositive, 82 % had remission/low RA disease activity, 24 % were on glucocorticoids, 35 % were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and 10 % were on biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs. None discontinued glucocorticoids and 3/35 (9 %) discontinued DMARDs in anticipation of starting ICI. RA flares occurred in 46 % (incidence rate 1.84 per 1000 person-months, 95 % CI 1.30, 2.37); 31/100 flared within 3 months of baseline. RA flares were grade 1 in 16/46 (35 %), grade 2 in 25/46 (54 %), and grade 3 in 5/46 (11 %); 2/46 (4 %) required hospitalization for RA flare. Concomitant immune-related adverse events occurred in 15/46 (33 %) that flared. A total of 72/100 died during follow-up; 21 died within 3 months of baseline. Seropositivity had an age-adjusted sdHR of 1.95 (95 % CI 1.02, 3.71) for RA flare compared to seronegativity, accounting for competing risk of death. Otherwise, no baseline factors were associated with RA flare, including cancer type, disease activity, RA duration, and deformities. 9/46 (20 %) patients had their ICI discontinued/paused due to RA flares. In the landmark analysis among 79 patients who survived at least 3 months, RA flare in the first 3 months was not associated with lower mortality (adjusted HR 1.24, 95 % CI 0.71, 2.16) compared to no RA flare. CONCLUSION: Among patients with pre-existing RA, few changed immunomodulator medications in anticipation of starting ICI, but RA flares occurred in nearly half. RA flares were mostly mild and treated with typical therapies. Seropositivity was associated with RA flare risk. A minority had severe RA flares requiring disruption of ICI, and RA flares were not associated with mortality.

Mortality and immune-related adverse events after immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation for cancer among patients with pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective, comparative, cohort study.

Background: Patients with pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis initiating immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer might be at risk of increased mortality, rheumatoid arthritis flares, and other immune-related adverse events (AEs). We aimed to determine whether pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis was associated with higher mortality and immune-related AE risk in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: This retrospective, comparative cohort study was conducted at the Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston (MA, USA). We searched data repositories to identify all individuals who initiated immune checkpoint inhibitors from April 1, 2011, to April 21, 2021. Patients with pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis had to meet the 2010 American College of Rheumatology-European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR-EULAR) criteria. For each pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis case, we matched up to three non-rheumatoid arthritis comparators at the index date of immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation by sex (recorded as male or female), calendar year, immune checkpoint inhibitor target, and cancer type and stage. The coprimary outcomes were time from index date to death and time to the first immune-related AE, measured using an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Deaths were identified by medical record and obituary review. Rheumatoid arthritis flares and immune-related AE presence, type, and severity were determined by medical record review. Findings: We identified 11 901 patients who initiated immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment between April 1, 2011, and April 21, 2021; of those, 101 met the 2010 ACR-EULAR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. We successfully matched 87 patients with pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis to 203 non-rheumatoid arthritis comparators. The median age was 71·2 years (IQR 63·2-77·1). 178 (61%) of 290 participants were female, 112 (39%) were male and 268 (92%) participants were White. PD-1 was the most common immune checkpoint inhibitor target (80 [92%] of 87 patients with rheumatoid arthritis vs 188 [93%] of 203 comparators). Lung cancer was the most common cancer type (43 [49%] vs 114 [56%]), followed by melanoma (21 [24%] vs 50 [25%]). 60 (69%) patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus 127 (63%) comparators died (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] of 1·16 [95% CI 0·86-1·57]; p=0·34). 53 (61%) patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus 99 (49%) comparators had any all-grade immune-related AE (adjusted HR 1·72 [95% CI 1·20-2·47]; p=0·0032). There were two (1%) grade 5 immune-related AEs (deaths) due to myocarditis, both in the comparator group. Rheumatoid arthritis flares occurred in 42 (48%) patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory arthritis occurred in 14 (7%) comparators (p<0·0001). Those with rheumatoid arthritis were less likely to have rash or dermatitis (five [6%] vs 28 [14%]; p=0·048), endocrinopathy (two [2%] vs 22 [11%]; p=0·0078), colitis or enteritis (six [7%] vs 28 [14%] comparators; p=0·094), and hepatitis (three [3%] vs 19 [9%]; p=0·043). Interpretation: Patients with pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis initiating immune checkpoint inhibitors had similar risk of mortality and severe immune-related AEs as matched comparators. Although patients with pre-existing rheumatoid arthritis were more likely to have immune-related AEs, this finding was mostly due to mild rheumatoid arthritis flares. These results suggest that this patient population can safely receive immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment. Funding: None.

Clonally expanded CD38hi cytotoxic CD8 T cells define the T cell infiltrate in checkpoint inhibitor-associated arthritis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies used to treat cancer, such as anti-PD-1 antibodies, can induce autoimmune conditions in some individuals. The T cell mechanisms mediating such iatrogenic autoimmunity and their overlap with spontaneous autoimmune diseases remain unclear. Here, we compared T cells from the joints of 20 patients with an inflammatory arthritis induced by ICI therapy (ICI-arthritis) with two archetypal autoimmune arthritides, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Single-cell transcriptomic and antigen receptor repertoire analyses highlighted clonal expansion of an activated effector CD8 T cell population in the joints and blood of patients with ICI-arthritis. These cells were identified as CD38hiCD127- CD8 T cells and were uniquely enriched in ICI-arthritis joints compared with RA and PsA and also displayed an elevated interferon signature. In vitro, type I interferon induced CD8 T cells to acquire the ICI-associated CD38hi phenotype and enhanced cytotoxic function. In a cohort of patients with advanced melanoma, ICI therapy markedly expanded circulating CD38hiCD127- T cells, which were frequently bound by the therapeutic anti-PD-1 drug. In patients with ICI-arthritis, drug-bound CD8 T cells in circulation showed marked clonal overlap with drug-bound CD8 T cells from synovial fluid. These results suggest that ICI therapy directly targets CD8 T cells in patients who develop ICI-arthritis and induces an autoimmune pathology that is distinct from prototypical spontaneous autoimmune arthritides.

Comparative safety and effectiveness of TNF inhibitors, IL6 inhibitors and methotrexate for the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and effectiveness of biologic and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA). METHODS: The retrospective multicentre observational study included patients with a diagnosis of ICI-IA treated with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL6Ri) and/or methotrexate (MTX); patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease were excluded. The primary outcome was time to cancer progression from ICI initiation; the secondary outcome was time to arthritis control from DMARD initiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare medication groups, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: 147 patients were included (mean age 60.3 (SD 11.9) years, 66 (45%) women). ICI-IA treatment was TNFi in 33 (22%), IL6Ri 42 (29%) and MTX 72 (49%). After adjustment for time from ICI initiation to DMARD initiation, time to cancer progression was significantly shorter for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 3.27 (95% CI 1.21 to 8.84, p=0.019)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 2.37 (95% CI 0.94 to 5.98, p=0.055). Time to arthritis control was faster for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 1.91 (95% CI 1.06 to 3.45, p=0.032)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 1.66 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.97, p=0.089). A subset analysis in patients with melanoma gave similar results for both cancer progression and arthritis control. CONCLUSION: The treatment of ICI-IA with a biologic DMARD is associated with more rapid arthritis control than with MTX, but may be associated with a shorter time to cancer progression.

Patient Perspectives Surrounding Intraarticular Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: Intraarticular (IA) injections are used frequently for knee osteoarthritis (OA), but little is known about patients' attitudes toward these therapies. We aimed to better understand patients' perceptions of the facilitators of and barriers to IA injections for knee OA. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative, descriptive, exploratory study and held focus groups and individual interviews with participants with knee OA, including some who had and some who had not received IA injections. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify themes describing the factors that participants found influential when deciding whether to try an IA injection. RESULTS: We held 3 focus groups with 12 participants and conducted 3 individual interviews (15 participants total). We identified the following 4 themes that shaped participants' decisions to receive a specific injection: 1) the impact of OA on participants' lives; 2) participants' attitudes and concerns, including desire to avoid surgery, willingness to accept uncertain outcomes, and concerns about side effects and dependence; 3) the way participants gathered and processed information from physicians, peers, and the internet; and 4) the availability of injectable products. Participants weighed the desire to regain function and delay surgery with concerns about side effects, uncertain efficacy, and costs. CONCLUSION: Participants were concerned about the effectiveness, toxicity, availability, and cost of injectable products. They balanced disparate sources of information, uncertain outcomes, limited product availability, and other injection-related concerns with a desire to decrease pain. These findings can provide clinicians, investigators, and public health professionals with insights into challenges that patients face when making injection decisions.

Association Between Baseline Meniscal Symptoms and Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Meniscal Tear in Patients With Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with meniscal tears reporting meniscal symptoms such as catching or locking have traditionally undergone arthroscopy. The present study was undertaken to investigate whether patients with meniscal tears who report meniscal symptoms have greater improvement with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) than physical therapy (PT). METHODS: We used data from the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial, which randomized participants with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and meniscal tear to APM or PT. The frequency of each meniscal symptom (clicking, catching, popping, intermittent locking, giving way, swelling) was measured at baseline and 6 months. We used linear regression models to determine whether the difference in improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain score at 6 months between patients treated with APM versus PT was modified by the presence of each meniscal symptom. We also determined the percentage of participants with resolution of meniscal symptoms by treatment group. RESULTS: We included 287 participants. The presence (versus absence) of any of the meniscal symptoms did not modify the improvement in KOOS pain score between APM versus PT by >0.5 SD (all P interaction >0.05). APM led to greater resolution of intermittent locking and clicking than PT (locking 70% versus 46%, clicking 41% versus 25%). No difference in resolution of the other meniscal symptoms was observed. CONCLUSION: Meniscal symptoms were not associated with improved pain relief. Although symptoms of clicking and intermittent locking had a greater reduction in the APM group, the presence of meniscal symptoms in isolation should not inform clinical decisions surrounding APM versus PT in patients with meniscal tear and knee OA.

Predictors of Rheumatic Immune-Related Adverse Events and De Novo Inflammatory Arthritis After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for cancer. METHODS: We performed a case-control study to predict the occurrence of rheumatic irAEs in cancer patients who initiated ICI treatment at Mass General Brigham and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2011 and 2020. We screened for the presence of rheumatic irAEs by reviewing the medical records of patients evaluated by rheumatologists or those prescribed nonglucocorticoid immunomodulatory drugs after the time of ICI initiation (baseline). Review of medical records confirmed the presence of rheumatic irAEs and the indications necessitating immunomodulatory drug treatment. Controls were defined as patients who did not experience rheumatic irAEs, did not have preexisting rheumatic disease, did not have a clinical evaluation by a rheumatologist after ICI treatment, did not receive an immunomodulatory drug after ICI, did not receive systemic glucocorticoids after ICI, and survived at least 6 months after the initial ICI treatment. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) (with 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) for the risk of a rheumatic irAE in the presence of various baseline predictors. RESULTS: A total of 8,028 ICI recipients were identified (mean age 65.5 years, 43.1% female, 31.8% with lung cancer). After ICI initiation, 404 patients (5.0%) were evaluated by rheumatologists, and 475 patients (5.9%) received an immunomodulatory drug to treat any irAEs. There were 226 confirmed rheumatic irAE cases (2.8%) and 118 de novo inflammatory arthritis cases (1.5%). Rheumatic diseases (either preexisting rheumatic diseases or rheumatic irAEs) were a common indication for immunomodulatory drug use (27.9%). Baseline predictors of rheumatic irAEs included melanoma (multivariable OR 4.06 [95% CI 2.54-6.51]) and genitourinary (GU) cancer (OR 2.22 [95% CI 1.39-3.54]), both relative to patients with lung cancer; combination ICI treatment (OR 2.35 [95% CI 1.48-3.74]), relative to patients receiving programmed death 1 inhibitor monotherapy; autoimmune disease (OR 2.04 [95% CI 1.45-2.85]) and recent glucocorticoid use (OR 2.13 [95% CI 1.51-2.98]), relative to patients not receiving a glucocorticoid, compared to the 2,312 controls without rheumatic irAEs. Predictors of de novo inflammatory arthritis were similar to those of rheumatic irAEs. CONCLUSION: We identified novel predictors of rheumatic irAE development in cancer patients, including baseline presence of melanoma, baseline presence of GU tract cancer, preexisting autoimmune disease, receiving or having received combination ICI treatment, and receiving or having received glucocorticoids. The proportion of cancer patients experiencing rheumatic irAEs may be even higher than was reported in the present study, since we used stringent criteria to identify cases of rheumatic irAEs. Our findings could be used to identify cancer patients at risk of developing rheumatic irAEs and de novo inflammatory arthritis and may help further elucidate the pathogenesis of rheumatic irAEs in patients with cancer who are receiving ICI treatment.

Effects of One Year of Vitamin D and Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation in Older US Adults.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest vitamin D and marine ω-3 fatty acid (n-3 FA) supplements are associated with lower systemic inflammation. However, past trials have been inconsistent. METHODS: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) tested vitamin D (2000 IU/day) and/or n-3 FA (1 g/day) supplementation in a 2 × 2 factorial design among women ≥55 and men ≥50 years of age. We assessed changes in interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentrations from baseline to 1 year among participants randomized to vitamin D + n-3 FA (392), vitamin D (392), n-3 FA (392), or placebo only (385). Geometric means and percent changes were compared, adjusting for baseline factors. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced. In the active arms, 25-OH vitamin D rose 39% and n-3 FA rose 55% vs minimal change in placebo arms. Neither supplement reduced biomarkers at 1 year. Vitamin D resulted in 8.2% higher IL-6 (95% CI, 1.5%-15.3%; adjusted P = 0.02), but TNFR2 and hsCRP did not. Among 784 receiving vitamin D, hsCRP increased 35.7% (7.8%-70.9%) in those with low (<20 ng/mL) but not with higher baseline serum 25(OH) vitamin D [0.45% (-8.9% to 10.8%); P interaction = 0.02]. Among 777 randomized to n-3 FA, hsCRP declined [-10.5% (-20.4% to 0.8%)] in those with baseline low (<1.5 servings/week), but not with higher fish intake [6.4% (95% CI, -7.11% to 21.8%); P interaction = 0.06]. CONCLUSIONS: In this large sample from a population-based randomized controlled trial, neither vitamin D nor n-3 FA supplementation over 1 year decreased these biomarkers of inflammation. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01169259; NCT01351805.

Influence of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Outcome of Arthroscopic Meniscectomy and Physical Therapy Treatment of Meniscal Tears in Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is used to treat meniscal tears, although its efficacy is controversial. PURPOSE: This study used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine characteristics that lead to greater benefit from APM and physical therapy (PT) than from PT alone among patients with meniscal tear and knee osteoarthritis. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Using data from the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial, the authors first assessed whether the effect of treatment on pain scores at 6 months differed according to baseline MRI features (bone marrow lesions, cartilage and meniscal damage). Second, the authors summed MRI features associated with differential pain relief between APM and PT to create a "damage score," which included bone marrow lesion number and cartilage damage size with possible values of 0 (least damage), 1 (moderate), and 2 (greatest). The authors used linear models to determine whether the association between damage score and pain relief at 6 months differed for APM versus PT. RESULTS: The study included 220 participants: 13%, had the least damage; 52%, moderate; and 34%, greatest. Although treatment type did not significantly modify the association of damage score and change in pain ( P interaction = .13), those with the least damage and moderate damage had greater improvement with APM than with PT in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain subscale-by 15 and 7 points, respectively. Those with the greatest damage had a similar improvement with APM and PT. CONCLUSION: Among patients with osteoarthritis and meniscal tear, those with less intra-articular damage on MRI may have greater improvement in pain with APM and PT than with PT alone. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously owing to the limited sample size.

Association of Changes in Effusion-Synovitis With Progression of Cartilage Damage Over Eighteen Months in Patients With Osteoarthritis and Meniscal Tear.

OBJECTIVE: Synovitis is a feature of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and meniscal tear and has been associated with articular cartilage damage. This study was undertaken to examine the associations of baseline effusion-synovitis and changes in effusion-synovitis with changes in cartilage damage in a cohort with OA and meniscal tear. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial of surgery versus physical therapy for treatment of meniscal tear. We performed semiquantitative grading of effusion-synovitis and cartilage damage on magnetic resonance imaging, and dichotomized effusion-synovitis as none/small (minimal) and medium/large (extensive). We assessed the association of baseline effusion-synovitis and changes in effusion-synovitis with changes in cartilage damage size and depth over 18 months, using Poisson regression models. Analyses were adjusted for patient demographic characteristics, treatment, and baseline cartilage damage. RESULTS: We analyzed 221 participants. Over 18 months, effusion-synovitis was persistently minimal in 45.3% and persistently extensive in 21.3% of the patients. The remaining 33.5% of the patients had minimal synovitis on one occasion and extensive synovitis on the other. In adjusted analyses, patients with extensive effusion-synovitis at baseline had a relative risk (RR) of progression of cartilage damage depth of 1.7 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.0-2.7). Compared to those with persistently minimal effusion-synovitis, those with persistently extensive effusion-synovitis had a significantly increased risk of progression of cartilage damage depth (RR 2.0 [95% CI 1.1-3.4]). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the presence of extensive effusion-synovitis is associated with subsequent progression of cartilage damage over 18 months. The persistence of extensive effusion-synovitis over time is associated with the greatest risk of concurrent cartilage damage progression.

Rheumatologic symptoms in oncologic patients on PD-1 inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective cancer therapies that have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Recent reports of irAEs describe symptoms resembling classic rheumatologic syndromes, most notably associated with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor blockade. Though cases have been described, there are fewer reports of rheumatologic disease associated with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. Here, we describe a series of four patients presenting to the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) Arthritis Center with de novo polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR)-type conditions and/or peripheral synovitis after treatment with PD-1/PD-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway inhibitors. METHODS: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibitors and subsequently developed complaints of new joint pain were referred to the BWH Arthritis Center as part of routine care and identified retrospectively. The electronic medical record was reviewed for cancer history and treatment, rheumatologic symptoms, physical exam, laboratory testing, and clinical course. RESULTS: All four patients developed irAEs consistent with a PMR-type syndrome and/or peripheral synovitis. Symptoms persisted despite discontinuation of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibitors; however, three of the patients responded well to oral glucocorticoids alone while one patient required the addition of oral methotrexate. All patients had an eventual decline in inflammatory markers. CONCLUSION: These cases highlight the need for both oncologists and rheumatologists to recognize the development of rheumatologic disease during treatment with immune checkpoint blockade. Further investigation is needed to optimize the management of irAEs, particularly considering the increasing use of checkpoint inhibitors to treat malignancies.

Cystatin C deficiency promotes inflammation in angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurisms in atherosclerotic mice.

An imbalance between cysteinyl cathepsins and their principal endogenous inhibitor cystatin C (CystC) may favor proteolysis in the pathogenesis of human abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), yet a direct role of CystC in AAA remains unproven. This study used CystC and apolipoprotein E (ApoE) compound mutant (CystC(-/-)ApoE(-/-)) mice to examine directly the role of cysteine protease/protease inhibitor imbalance in AAA formation in angiotensin II-induced AAA. CystC-deficiency increased lumenal diameter and lesion size compared with control mice. CystC(-/-) ApoE(-/-) lesions also demonstrated enhanced inflammatory cell accumulation, more severe elastin fragmentation, and fewer smooth muscle cells in the tunica media. Macrophage content, measured as percent positive area (23.2 +/- 1.4% versus 11.2 +/- 1.4%; P = 0.0003) and number of the CD4(+) T cells (ninefold; P = 0.048), increased significantly in CystC(-/-)ApoE(-/-) lesions. CystC deficiency increased cathepsin activity (5.5 fold; P = 0.001) in AAA, yielding greater elastin degradation and proangiogenic laminin-5 gamma2 peptide production, which may account for increased microvascularization in CystC(-/-)ApoE(-/-) compared with ApoE(-/-) lesions. Increased leukocyte adhesion molecule VCAM-1 expression and leukocyte proliferation might also promote inflammation in CystC-deficient AAA. These data indicate that CystC contributes to experimental AAA pathogenesis and that enhanced cysteine protease activity, due to the lack of CystC, favors inflammation in AAA lesions induced in atherosclerotic mice by promoting microvascularization and smooth muscle cell apoptosis as well as leukocytes adhesion and proliferation.

Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) deficiency attenuates atherosclerosis in mice by impairing monocyte recruitment to the vessel wall.

BACKGROUND: Members of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, potently promote atherogenesis in mice and humans. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs) are cytoplasmic adaptor proteins for this group of cytokines. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study tested the hypothesis that TRAF1 modulates atherogenesis in vivo. TRAF1(-/-)/LDLR(-/-) mice that consumed a high-cholesterol diet for 18 weeks developed significantly smaller atherosclerotic lesions than LDLR(-/-) (LDL receptor-deficient) control animals. As the most prominent change in histological composition, plaques of TRAF1-deficient animals contained significantly fewer macrophages. Bone marrow transplantations revealed that TRAF1 deficiency in both hematopoietic and vascular resident cells contributed to the reduction in atherogenesis observed. Mechanistic studies showed that deficiency of TRAF1 in endothelial cells and monocytes reduced adhesion of inflammatory cells to the endothelium in static and dynamic assays. Impaired adhesion coincided with reduced cell spreading, actin polymerization, and CD29 expression in macrophages, as well as decreased expression of the adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in endothelial cells. Small interfering RNA studies in human cells verified these findings. Furthermore, TRAF1 messenger RNA levels were significantly elevated in the blood of patients with acute coronary syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: TRAF1 deficiency attenuates atherogenesis in mice, most likely owing to impaired monocyte recruitment to the vessel wall. These data identify TRAF1 as a potential treatment target for atherosclerosis.

Mast cells modulate the pathogenesis of elastase-induced abdominal aortic aneurysms in mice.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), an inflammatory disease, involves leukocyte recruitment, immune responses, inflammatory cytokine production, vascular remodeling, neovascularization, and vascular cell apoptosis, all of which contribute to aortic dilatation. This study demonstrates that mast cells, key participants in human allergic immunity, participate in AAA pathogenesis in mice. Mast cells were found to accumulate in murine AAA lesions. Mast cell-deficient KitW-sh/KitW-sh mice failed to develop AAA elicited by elastase perfusion or periaortic chemical injury. KitW-sh/KitW-sh mice had reduced aortic expansion and internal elastic lamina degradation; decreased numbers of macrophages, CD3+ T lymphocytes, SMCs, apoptotic cells, and CD31+ microvessels; and decreased levels of aortic tissue IL-6 and IFN-gamma. Activation of mast cells in WT mice via C48/80 injection resulted in enhanced AAA growth while mast cell stabilization with disodium cromoglycate diminished AAA formation. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that mast cells participated in angiogenesis, aortic SMC apoptosis, and matrix-degrading protease expression. Reconstitution of KitW-sh/KitW-sh mice with bone marrow-derived mast cells from WT or TNF-alpha-/- mice, but not from IL-6-/- or IFN-gamma-/- mice, caused susceptibility to AAA formation to be regained. These results demonstrate that mast cells participate in AAA pathogenesis in mice by releasing proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IFN-gamma, which may induce aortic SMC apoptosis, matrix-degrading protease expression, and vascular wall remodeling, important hallmarks of arterial aneurysms.

Mast cells promote atherosclerosis by releasing proinflammatory cytokines.

Mast cells contribute importantly to allergic and innate immune responses by releasing various preformed and newly synthesized mediators. Previous studies have shown mast cell accumulation in human atherosclerotic lesions. This report establishes the direct participation of mast cells in atherogenesis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient (Ldlr(-/-)) mice. Atheromata from compound mutant Ldlr(-/-) Kit(W-sh)(/W-sh) mice showed decreased lesion size, lipid deposition, T-cell and macrophage numbers, cell proliferation and apoptosis, but increased collagen content and fibrous cap development. In vivo, adoptive transfer of syngeneic wild-type or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha-deficient mast cells restored atherogenesis to Ldlr(-/-)Kit(W-sh/W-sh) mice. Notably, neither interleukin (IL)-6- nor interferon (IFN)-gamma-deficient mast cells did so, indicating that the inhibition of atherogenesis in Ldlr(-/-)Kit(W-sh/W-sh) mice resulted from the absence of mast cells and mast cell-derived IL-6 and IFN-gamma. Compared with wild-type or TNF-alpha-deficient mast cells, those lacking IL-6 or IFN-gamma did not induce expression of proatherogenic cysteine proteinase cathepsins from vascular cells in vitro or affect cathepsin and matrix metalloproteinase activities in atherosclerotic lesions, implying that mast cell-derived IL-6 and IFN-gamma promote atherogenesis by augmenting the expression of matrix-degrading proteases. These observations establish direct participation of mast cells and mast cell-derived IL-6 and IFN-gamma in mouse atherogenesis and provide new mechanistic insight into the pathogenesis of this common disease.